Re: [incubator] branch master updated: Add titles to columns; repeat at end of table

Well, I like the idea, but now the table is broken and coloring is lost. > On Mar 21, 2019, at 9:59 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > OK. Thanks! > >> On Mar 21, 2019, at 9:55 AM, s...@apache.org wrote: >> >> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-231) Cleanup Git-generated Incubator website

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16798281#comment-16798281 ] Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-231: --- Projects page has been updated. Slight mis-sorting

Re: [incubator] branch master updated: Add titles to columns; repeat at end of table

OK. Thanks! > On Mar 21, 2019, at 9:55 AM, s...@apache.org wrote: > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > sebb pushed a commit to branch master > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator.git > > > The following commit(s) were added to

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-199) Extend podlings.xml to include old names and TLP parent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16798258#comment-16798258 ] Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-199: --- As I rebuilt the project page to use git and jbake's

Re: Learning to edit the incubator website

Hi - Thanks Myrle! I’m new to AsciiDoctor too. Every build includes the clutch analysis and takes about 3 minutes once Jenkins starts. Yesterday I had one build that waited about 10 minutes in queue. If you subscribe to c...@incubator.apache.org you’ll see when the build completes as well.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache ECharts (incubating) 4.2.1

Hi Craig, > On Mar 20, 2019, at 6:25 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > > > >> On Mar 20, 2019, at 5:43 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi - >> >> Also you can look at the sparkling new >> https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/echarts.html >> &l

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache ECharts (incubating) 4.2.1

Hi - Also you can look at the sparkling new https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/echarts.html under releases for compliant links. Regards, Dave > On Mar 20, 2019, at 5:23 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > > Hi Su Shuang, > > You will need to

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-231) Cleanup Git-generated Incubator website

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16797692#comment-16797692 ] Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-231: --- I pretty much have the projects index page done, but I

[Annoucement] Updated Clutch 2 Report with Individual Podling Pages is Now Available

I’ve spent the past few weeks updating the clutch analysis process which had been neglected for many years. This is now in production and on the Incubator website at https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/ It is my hope that every podling will be much better

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Hi - > On Mar 19, 2019, at 8:36 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > On 3/19/2019 8:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> What is somewhat funny is that the "SkyWalking" podling is on the cusp of >> graduation. :) > > I would say that's irrelevant. Skywalking is a term that is from the > iron workers

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

>>> All, the results are in, from VP Legal: >>>> I am happy to approve the name in isolation. Specifically, the >> community must refrain from linking the project to any Star Wars >> references. The view of the community is that the community is likely to >>

Re: [EXTERNAL] Graduated from the Incubator but Releases remain in Incubator Dist SVN

i, Mar 15, 2019 at 3:15 AM Gelinas, Derek >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Dave, >>>> >>>> I have removed the releases. Thank you! >>>> >>>> Derek >>>> >>>> On 3/14/19, 2:01 PM, "Dave Fisher&

Re: [VOTE] Accept DataSketches into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Mar 14, 2019, at 2:23 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > > Hi all, > > We've discussed the proposal for the DataSketches project in [1] and [2]. > The > proposal itself has been put on the wiki [3]. > > Per incubator rules [4] I'd like to call a vote to accept the new >

Re: Releases Require KEYS Files

> On Mar 14, 2019, at 5:11 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > > > >> On 14 Mar 2019, at 17:49, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi - >> >> I’ve been reviewing releases and you are missing your KEYS file from >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incu

Re: Releases Require KEYS Files

Hi - > On Mar 14, 2019, at 3:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > But this was there right? [1] No. $ svn log https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/myriad/KEYS r32935 | javiroman | 2019-03-14 12:10:14

Re: Releases Require KEYS Files

Hi Justin, SVN shows it was fixed after I sent the email: $ svn log https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/myriad r32935 | javiroman | 2019-03-14 12:10:14 -0700 (Thu, 14 Mar 2019) | 1 line Apache Myriad KEYS

Re: [EXTERNAL] Graduated from the Incubator but Releases remain in Incubator Dist SVN

Hi Derek, Confirmed. Thank you, Dave > On Mar 14, 2019, at 11:14 AM, Gelinas, Derek > wrote: > > Dave, > > I have removed the releases. Thank you! > > Derek > > On 3/14/19, 2:01 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote: > >Hi - > >Yo

[RDF] Graduated from the Incubator but Releases remain in Incubator Dist SVN

Hi - You still have Commons RDF releases in the Incubator’s area of SVN - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/ Please plan to move or remove these soon. Thank you! Regards, Dave

Graduated from the Incubator but Releases remain in Incubator Dist SVN

Hi - You still have releases in the Incubator’s area of SVN - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/ Please plan to move or remove these soon. Thank you! Regards, Dave

Releases Require KEYS File

Hi - I’ve been reviewing releases and you are missing your KEYS file from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/samoa/ Your site should refer users to the KEYS file at https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/samoa/KEYS

Releases Require KEYS Files

Hi - I’ve been reviewing releases and you are missing your KEYS file from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/myriad/ Your site should refer users to the KEYS file at

Re: Mentors and Voting on Podling Releases

Hi Julian - Thanks for bringing this discussion to general@. I think that there are two calls to action here: (1) How can Mentors service the Podlings they have volunteered to help by VOTING on releases? For me the issues can be any of: - The Release was not discussed on the dev@ list until

Re: [DISCUSS] Include Incubator as part of Community Track at Apachecon NA?

Hi Sharan, I’m thinking about submitting an Incubator focused talk for Apachecon NA Regards, Dave > On Mar 7, 2019, at 11:48 AM, Sharan Foga wrote: > > Hi All > > I’m helping to manage the Community track for ApacheCon NA in Las Vegas > http://www.apachecon.com/acna19/index.html > > and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ECharts (incubating) 4.2.1 (release candidate 3)

Hi - +1 (binding) I checked: Signature. Hash. RAT Check DISCLAIMER LICENSE NOTICE Once the VOTE passes we need to discuss the download page setup for the ECharts.apache.org website. Regards, Dave > On Mar 5, 2019, at 10:58 PM, SHUANG SU wrote: > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for

Re: workflow surrounding podling LDAP creation

Thanks Chris, It would be great to have a whimsy page that allows an IPMC member to properly automate the creation of a podling. Other incubator podling startup steps that could be improved beyond LDAP would be: - Add the podling to podlings.xml - Create the podling status file and yml file. -

Re: [PATCH] clutch: Fix broken links in the hasStatusEntry column

Hi Daniel, Thanks. FYI I am in the middle of a massive update to clutch.py. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 9, 2019, at 8:16 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > The links in the 'F' column are broken. Patch: > > Index: clutch.py >

Re: svn commit: r1855068 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml

It’s actually a 1. No worries. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 8, 2019, at 3:00 PM, sebb AT ASF wrote: > > I 'fixed' the file because it was causing Whimsy errors. > > I may have got the group wrong, but I'm sure it's only supposed to be > a single digit. > > On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 22:57,

Re: A smaller IPMC

Hi - > IPMC membership has nothing to do with mentor engagement. > > If you are trying to diagnose mentorship, then you need to start over with > a mentorship discussion. If mentors participating at the IPMC don't > correlate to their mentor engagement with their podlings, that's something >

Re: A smaller IPMC

Hi - I lean heavily towards #4. > On Mar 7, 2019, at 3:33 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > It’s been suggested that the IPMC is too large, what do other IPMC members > think might be a way to address this? > > Please discuss and indicate +1 what you would think would help, you can vote

Re: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates

Hi Myrle, Yes, we should start recommending your approach. I am actually for this as normal course and instituting the “pTLP” as the new normal as it is actually makes the PPMC more like a TLP from the start. Given our current interpretation of rules that An Official Apache Release requires 3

Re: [website] Do we still need the Clutch report?

Hi Justin - > >> Do others have an opinion on the clutch report? Does anyone look at it? > > I use when generating the board report and when codlings are graduating and > find it useful. On the clutch pages which columns do you find helpful? > > As already noted, take some care as it’s (or

Re: [DISCUSS] Responsibilities and Improvements (was: Re: Whimsy general@ subs check

Hi - Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 6, 2019, at 1:18 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> 1) Removal question and its allowance in general: this question asked >> during every talk I gave related to ASF. My fellows ask me if someone can >> remove Committer or PMCs. Some folks think it is

Re: [website] Do we still need the Clutch report?

Hi - > On Mar 6, 2019, at 1:58 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 7:20 PM Dave Fisher wrote: >> ...The clutch.py program is large. It already writes out a pickle file with >> the status of every podling. >> So, it is n

Re: [DISCUSS] Responsibilities and Improvements (was: Re: Whimsy general@ subs check

> On Mar 6, 2019, at 7:59 AM, sebb wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 15:53, Myrle Krantz wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 4:49 PM Daniel Gruno wrote: >> >>> Or put differently; why would we care that someone is inactive on the >>> IPMC? Are we short on bytes on the LDAP server and need

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache SkyWalking (incubating) as a TLP(take2)

Hi - > On Mar 5, 2019, at 3:55 PM, 吴晟 Sheng Wu wrote: > > Hi Roman > > > In the discussion, I started about inviting committers to PMC when > graduation, shows the most PPMC members support this. We will wait another 2 > days, in case someone may say others. > > > In case PPMC agree, I

Re: [website] Do we still need the Clutch report?

Hi Bertrand, One more point here and we can continue to discuss in INCUBATOR-231. > On Mar 5, 2019, at 4:13 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 12:36 AM Dave Fisher wrote: >> ...Clutch must be run. A lot depends on it. Particul

Re: [DISCUSS] Responsibilities and Improvements (was: Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: .... introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling ... release candidates))

Hi - Jumping in here although some points may be repetitive. (This turned into quite a diatribe, apologies.) TL/DR - I believe we need to revamp our workflows and record keeping to better serve podlings and we need to teardown much of our website content as it is duplicative of the

Re: Withdraw from Incubator or TLP status?

Hi - Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 4, 2019, at 10:38 PM, Danny Angus wrote: > > I think we have had projects "leave", back in the day, before we were > structured like this. But thinking about a example, maybe they were > sub-projects. > > It's worth noting that anyone is free to fork an

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache SkyWalking (incubating) as a TLP(take2)

Hi - Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 4, 2019, at 7:52 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > HI, > >> Removing those two initial PPMC that have since been quiet has not been >> done, I'm waiting on confirmation on whether that is needed/requested. > > The PPMC should be able to discuss that and work

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache SkyWalking (incubating) as a TLP(take2)

Wonderful! > On Mar 4, 2019, at 3:56 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > >> May I see a link to the planned Graduation Resolution? > > > The planned graduation resolution is in this DISCUSS thread above, > specifically here: >

Re: [website] Do we still need the Clutch report?

Hi Bertrand - > On Mar 4, 2019, at 11:21 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi Bertrand, > >> On Mar 4, 2019, at 8:20 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I was looking at streamlining the incubator.a.o website generation, >> curr

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Hi - > On Mar 4, 2019, at 2:10 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > > >> On Mar 4, 2019, at 2:00 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi - >> >> I went to look at the Trademark name search and something is either messed >> up or autocorrected. >> &

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Hi - I went to look at the Trademark name search and something is either messed up or autocorrected. PODLINGNAMESEARCH-165 Establish whether "Apache Obiwarn" is a Suitable Name Isn’t the name supposed to be Obiwan and not Obiwarn?

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache SkyWalking (incubating) as a TLP(take2)

Hi - It is down to four people missing from the PPMC list. I don’t view this as a problem. Clearly there are small operational issues. (Mick - SHOULD is used as specifications and really means MUST. They really MUST because if not that means that these PMC members can’t see discussion and

Re: [website] Do we still need the Clutch report?

Hi Bertrand, > On Mar 4, 2019, at 8:20 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > Hi, > > I was looking at streamlining the incubator.a.o website generation, > currently the build script at [1] calls "python3 clutch.py" to build > the http://incubator.apache.org/clutch/ page. > > Is that

[DISCUSS] Responsibilities and Improvements (was: Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: .... introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling ... release candidates))

Hi - > On Mar 1, 2019, at 7:23 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > On 3/1/2019 5:12 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: >>> The Board isn't gonna worry about something like that. >> I wasn’t expecting the board to say anything re that, but the IPMC could of. Many PMCs contain what could be called inactive

Changes to Website and Marking As Obsolete SVN Version of Incubator Website

Hi - I’ve been reviewing the incubator’s svn repository. In order to avoid confusion I am going to add README.txt files to directories (eg. [1]) which are now obsolete, but not obviously so. I’ve been doing so since there is no documentation on maintaining the content/podling/${podling}.yml

Re: Podlings Which Need Mentors

Hi Matt, I’ve gone ahead and added you as a Mentor to OpenWhisk. Thanks, Dave > On Feb 26, 2019, at 1:37 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > I'd be interested in helping mentor OpenWhisk. I've reviewed some of > their releases a while ago, so it's the project I'm most familiar with > from that list.

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Hi - JAL is built for programming PIC micro controllers and I think that the field of use may be different enough. But the question is one for the VP, Brand. http://justanotherlanguage.org Regards, Dave > On Feb 26, 2019, at 2:33 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > Thanks Antoine, > > I am

Re: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates

The IPMC could consider some changes to the Incubator rules. (As proposed mostly by Roy on private lists.) Allow the VOTE thread to be only on the dev@ list with 0 or 1 mentor vote required. As long as the DISCLAIMER exists then the pooling release is good. Once completed the podling sends the

Re: Podlings Which Need Mentors

Myrle, > On Feb 26, 2019, at 12:57 PM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > > This is a helpful collection Dave, > > So one way to put these facts next to each other: That’s one way to do it. I found other interesting bits and was going to present other issues separately. > * We have 1 podling that has

Re: Podlings Which Need Mentors

> On Feb 26, 2019, at 12:32 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Tamaya should likely be on that list as well. > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019, 15:26 Dave Fisher wrote: > >> Hi - >> >> I did a review of all 51 podlings via Whimsy and the most recent visible >>

Podlings Which Need Mentors

Hi - I did a review of all 51 podlings via Whimsy and the most recent visible Report. One result was identifying several podlings that need/want additional mentors. This email will serve two purposes. (1) Confirm whether the list is accurate. (2) Seek volunteers from the current IPMC. If this

Re: March 2019 Incubator report timeline

Hi Makoto, I don’t think that Justin has generated the reminders for March. You are certainly welcome to add a report without a reminder. Regards, Dave > On Feb 26, 2019, at 9:35 AM, Makoto Yui wrote: > > Justin, > > We (dev@hivemall.i.a.o) did not receive Incubator report notification >

Welcome Wagon

Hi - There has been mentions about lack of documentation, not being able to find documentation, not being responsible for a policy, and not including the rationale for a policy. This morning I remembered something that happened some 49 years ago when I was a child and we moved to the suburbs

Re: Starting at the incubator and releases

Hi - I agree with what Myrle wrote I wanted to focus on this paragraph which I think describes one of the major issues with the IPMC. > On Feb 25, 2019, at 3:03 AM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > > Also, our mentors were not always the most active, so it would have been > impossible for us to get a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

Hi Craig, Sent from my iPhone On Feb 22, 2019, at 4:12 PM, Craig Russell wrote: >> On Feb 19, 2019, at 1:18 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi - >> >> (1) To be fixed on the next release: >>(a) Please do not include the KEYS file in the source r

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Looking forward to this podling! Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 20, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > we've discussed the proposal for the Cava project in [1] and [2]. The > proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3]. > > We discussed

Re: Starting at the incubator and releases

> On Feb 19, 2019, at 3:10 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > On 2/19/2019 6:07 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> (5) Go and develop in The Apache Way! >> >> Only once these four things happen can we start any timer on the first >> Apache Release. > > Four, no

Re: Starting at the incubator and releases

We have to make sure that the steps that occur before work can proceed are addressed. (1) Mentor or champion bootstraps the podling files and mailing lists then starts: (2) Onboard the individuals to join the mailing lists, file ICLAs and get their apache ids. (3) SGA must be filed. (Or it is

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search

Jim, The potential conflict is a small San Francisco blockchain software comp[any called kava.io . Regards, Dave > On Feb 19, 2019, at 5:50 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > +1 keeping as-is. > >> On Feb 18, 2019, at 1:28 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: >> >> First, a heartfelt

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

Hi - (1) To be fixed on the next release: (a) Please do not include the KEYS file in the source release zip. Refer the users back to the location: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/daffodil/KEYS

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

Hi - Note below. > On Feb 19, 2019, at 5:21 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > > Hi all, > > The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed > release of Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1. > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this > incubator

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin Brave Karaf (Incubating) version 0.1.2

Hi Adrian, (NOTE - cross posted to private lists. Take care with replies.) Thanks for your patience regarding the branding issue I mentioned. > On Feb 14, 2019, at 4:29 AM, Adrian Cole wrote: > Finally, there was an unresolved question about branding of the repo. I > dont think we should

Re: the case of the maven wrapper

Please see my response in the other thread. I didn’t see this rethreading. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 13, 2019, at 9:29 PM, Adrian Cole wrote: > > To help others participate, here is the original thread: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin Brave Karaf (Incubating) version 0.1.2

Hi Adrian/Justin, We are discussing the wrong points. The clear question is what is MavenWrapperDownloader.java and why does it need to be in source release? It doesn’t. The Zipkin build instruction should include the installation instructions for MavenWrapper. [3] Adrian will that work for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin Brave Karaf (Incubating) version 0.1.2

Hi Adrian, Simple question inline. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 13, 2019, at 8:33 PM, Adrian Cole wrote: >> See [1][2] on policy and many many projects do it except those that were >> developed solely at the ASF. > In practice, you can find many, many that have stock files and were > not

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin Brave Karaf (Incubating) version 0.1.2

The product name is a problem. Please explain how this release relates to Apache Karaf? We can give you branding guidance once you do. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 13, 2019, at 6:07 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry but it’s -1 (binding) as it contains compiled code

Re: Apache ManifoldCF: Get a history report for a repository connection over REST API

Redirecting your query to d...@manifoldcf.apache.org Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 12, 2019, at 8:38 AM, Marta Gołąbek wrote: > > Dear Sir or Madam, > > I'm trying to get a history report for a repository connection over > ManifoldCF REST API. According to the documentation: > >

Re: [RESTARTING][VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

Hi - Third party vendor considerations do not matter. Are you voting +1 with your Apache hat on or your Amazon hat? Regards, Dave > On Feb 11, 2019, at 10:16 PM, Lin Yuan wrote: > > +1 binding > Horovod is going to release it's 0.16.0 in the coming week with MXNet > integration. We need to

Re: Permission to print a PLC4X stand for being displayed at conferences?

Hi Chris - The Branding advice/requirements you would get does not differ between TLP and Podling other than places where an Incubating disclaimer should exist. Regarding contacting press@apache about any incubator limitations, Sally is pretty quick and my experience is that it is mostly about

Re: Podlings not following ASF release policy

Hi Julian, A perfect example! I think we should add a checkbox to the podling report where the podling indicates when they are fully in compliance with release policy. Until that is done we don’t worry. Additionally, Infra could tag and “release” with appropriate description when they move a

Re: Renaming repos and security concerns

> On Feb 8, 2019, at 1:36 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > HI, > > In the thread on guidelines for distributions I suggested some common naming > to help with trademarks, branding and be in line with release policy. > > There's a possible security issue here, as people could (in theory) take

Re: Tying Dockerhub into development and release management

Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 7, 2019, at 7:51 PM, Chris Lambertus wrote: > > > >> On Feb 7, 2019, at 6:47 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>> Infra does not police what projects deploy on their dockerhub repos. Do we >>> need to? >> >> Well from a casual glance I can see several

Re: Draft incubator report

Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 7, 2019, at 6:51 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Give the response from intro on use of docker. it would seem that this is not > actually allowed. > >> Nightly builds for project-internal use clearly marked as "snapshot" or >> "prerelease" (or similar)

Re: Draft incubator report

Hi - > On Feb 7, 2019, at 3:41 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> I respectfully request that you edit the following to make it less alarming >> and remove any implication that the IPMC cannot handle our duties. > > I don’t read that implication there, this is quite factual all of the

Re: Draft incubator report

ort >> Date: 6 February 2019 at 8:48:46 am AEDT >> To: Dave Fisher >> >> Hi, >> >>> Yes, that is better, but here is the next challenge. For distribution >>> channels like Maven, NPM, etc which some projects use to stage prospective >>>

Re: Unapproved Sharding Sphere releases

> On Feb 7, 2019, at 1:55 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> Do we recommend that the Title be changed to add “Non-Apache release from >> prior to Incubation” or would it be sufficient for that text to be added to >> the Description? > > IMO however the PPMC want to handle it as long

Re: Unapproved Sharding Sphere releases

> On Feb 7, 2019, at 1:44 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > >> On Feb 7, 2019, at 11:02 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/INFRA/issues/INFRA-17289 >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/INFRA/issues/INFRA-1728

Re: Unapproved Sharding Sphere releases

> On Feb 7, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> Prior “Non-Apache Releases” are attached to the repository and come along. >> What to do? I think we have to accept these, but mark them appropriately as >> deleting them would be for the project community during transition. >

Re: Unapproved Sharding Sphere releases

> On Feb 7, 2019, at 10:46 AM, Craig Russell wrote: > > Hi Dave, > >> On Feb 7, 2019, at 9:12 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Feb 7, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Craig Russell wrote: >>> >>> >>> >

Re: Unapproved Sharding Sphere releases

> On Feb 7, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Craig Russell wrote: > > > >> On Feb 6, 2019, at 10:31 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: >> >> HI, >> >>> This was done. The issue is that the "3.0.0 outside Apache" release should >>> not be associated with Apache but with the previous project. >> >> They also

Re: Tying Dockerhub into development and release management

Hey - not everyone agrees with Justin’s and Henry’s conclusions. I don’t have time to argue every point. AFAIK everyone releasing binary convenience to dockerhub believed they were authorized. Pulsar had ONE release that was current for a short time that mistakenly kept an RC in the name. It

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 6, 2019, at 6:16 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:06 PM Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hey just because there is a restaurant chain called Cava does not mean >> that a software project called Cava is not suitab

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

ke you >> don't need anymore mentors so I can volunteer in any capacity you need. >> >> I think you are going to have trouble with the name though as >> https://cava.com/ is a great restaurant. >> >> Mike >> >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:36 PM Dave

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

Hi - I would also be happy to volunteer as a Mentor to this podling. Regards, Dave > On Feb 5, 2019, at 3:28 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > > +1 > > I would like to volunteer as an additional mentor. > > Kenn > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:57 PM Justin Mclean > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Nice

Re: Missing podling reports (due Wednesday 6th)

Hi - Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 5, 2019, at 1:07 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > There’s less than a day to get you podling report in. Currently these > podlings have failed to report: > - BRPC > - Iceberg > - Ratis > - SDAP > > Any podling that fails to report by the deadline will

Re: Draft incubator report

> On Feb 5, 2019, at 10:27 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > On 2/5/2019 6:27 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: >> Hi, >> As long as these are not available to the general public all is fine. [1] >>> s/available/advertised/ >> Thanks that’s a better way of putting it. Obviously any published

Re: Apache ODF Toolkit (retired) migration to TDF

Hi - > On Feb 4, 2019, at 8:49 AM, Thorsten Behrens > wrote: > > Dear people, > > one of your committers (Michael Stahl, in Cc) last year asked to > migrate the retired ODF Toolkit project over to the Document > Foundation, which TDF would be happy to accept. > > Volunteers from various

Re: Chinese site echarts.baidu.com Was:: [VOTE] Release Apache ECharts 4.2.1 (release candidate 1)

Yes, essentially a similar discussion is in progress on dev@echarts. We’ll need to review stuff in ecomfe and the initial SGA to know what more may be needed. No need to discuss more here on general@ at this time.. Thanks, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 30, 2019, at 7:55 PM, Justin Mclean

Chinese site echarts.baidu.com Was:: [VOTE] Release Apache ECharts 4.2.1 (release candidate 1)

Hi Justin, You are looking at the Chinese version of this: https://echarts.apache.org I think that a reasonable solution for the pooling may be to put this website up on https://echarts.apache.org/zh/ and then redirect. That would

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Unomi to TLP

Hi - > On Jan 21, 2019, at 4:37 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 3:21 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > >> -0 (binding) - This podling has never completed a suitable podling name >> search. It seems that people no longer consider that relevant as it is not

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Unomi to TLP

-0 (binding) - This podling has never completed a suitable podling name search. It seems that people no longer consider that relevant as it is not in the Maturity model and I’m not sure why. It could be because that is ComDev and not the IPMC. Regards, Dave > On Jan 21, 2019, at 2:24 AM,

Re: Discussion board vs. user mailing list in incubating project

Great. It will be up to the Community and the Mentors to determine if any migrations make sense in order to protect the project’s valuable user discussions. Regards, Dave > On Jan 17, 2019, at 7:10 PM, Sebastian wrote: > > The question was only about the user discussions (e.g. to replace the

Re: Discussion board vs. user mailing list in incubating project

Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 13, 2019, at 10:09 PM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > > How’s their discussion board archived? Yes, archival is the question. One approach we took with OpenOffice was to move the phpBB for the forums onto PMC managed VMs using Apache Infra provided MySQL. Regards, Dave

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.9.0-incubating-rc01

Moving this to the Doris dev list - general@incubator is BCC’d. Regards, Dave > On Jan 10, 2019, at 10:23 AM, Makoto Yui wrote: > > Reed, > > Why not cancel rc1 and create rc2 fixing license header issue that Willem > pointed? > It seems it's better to be fixed. > > It also seems that no one

Re: Feedback requested: New committer invitation template

Hi Craig, This is the perfect new guidance. (1) I think that similar process needs to be used by Incubator Mentors for Initial PPMC Members. (2) I assume you will send to pmcs@ once the new guidance is confirmed. I don’t have specific edits in mind, but others no doubt may. (I wonder if

Re: December report - Mentor sign off due end of today

Hi - My mistake as I took Gosling Von and fengji...@gmail.com as separate people. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 10, 2018, at 10:07 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> It looks like we will have 4 mentors for BRPC which is great. > > Who is the 4th there is only 3 on the

Re: December report - Mentor sign off due end of today

I am the Champion. I went and JFDI the next step of the startup. It looks like we will have 4 mentors for BRPC which is great. Regards Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 10, 2018, at 7:24 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> I wrote the short report already. > > Yes Dave you did, but

Re: Trouble Reaching mentors?

Hi - Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 10, 2018, at 7:47 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > Zhongyi, I just signed off on the BRPC report. Nicely done. > > However, I saw a note you were having trouble getting responses from > mentors. My apologies! I don't think I'm getting the emails. Can you >

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >