Hi folks,
I have to retire as a mentor of the PhotArk podling.
It hasn't been much work so far, but my availability
is too infrequent and irregular to be relied upon.
The podling has two other mentors, and one future
IPMC member is active as a committer. But it would
be better if we had a third m
Torsten Curdt wrote:
>
> One of the original authors is also working on Thrift ...which is
> currently in the incubator. Maybe we could create a dialog through
> him?
+1
cheers,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
Hello Ian,
> I'd like to propose a fork of the cassandra project. Since it was
> initially released by FaceBook, It hasn't really grown an active
> community around it.
> [...]
> Several people who plan to use the project in their companies have
> banded together and want to fork the project so th
ant elder wrote:
> The Kato proposal has been out for discussion for a few weeks now,
> please vote on accepting the Kato project for incubation.
>
> [...]
> = Kato - Post-mortem JVM Diagnostics API and RI/TCK for JSR 326 =
> [...]
>
> Nominated Mentors
> Geir has volunteered to be a mentor.
> An
+1 (binding)
David Crossley wrote:
> See patch at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-93
> to clarify the acceptance phase of new podlings
> because the process depends on who is Sponsor.
>
> The gist of it is:
> -
> In Incubation_Policy.xml ...
> * Add sentence to distingui
>
> Binding votes were:
>
> Alan Cabrera
> Bertrand Delacretaz
> Matt Hogstrom
> Kevan Miller
> Matthieu Riou
> Craig Russell
> Henning Schmiedehausen
>
> Emmanuel Lecharny
> Roland Weber
>
> Can the PMC ACK
+1
Craig L Russell wrote:
Please vote on accepting Olio into incubation.
The proposal can be found at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OlioProposal
[This proposal was formerly known as Web20Kit]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [
Allahbaksh Asadullah wrote:
Hi All,
I am on shared IP of service provider. I am not able to access any
code base from Apache Website through my service provider. But when I
try to access the same svn through office it work fine.
You should report your problem to infrastructure(at)apache.org
and
+1 (binding)
cheers,
Roland
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
This item has been out for discussion for a few weeks. Please indicate
your preference for accepting VCL to the Incubator. Proposal is
included below for posterity. We're looking for a few more mentors. If
there is discussion please creat
+1 (binding)
They are releases, they are meant to go out to users, so
let them get out. If podlings feel too comfortable in the
Incubator, then take the direct approach: go to those
podlings and make them feel uncomfortable. Block them
from making any more incubating releases at all if you
want t
+1 (binding)
cheers,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Serge,
thanks for the detailed reply.
We have started a discussion with Davanum Shrinivas from the Apache WS
community. [...] I have posted the proposal in the Savan list as well.
Good. If discussion there moves forward, you could occasionally
send a summary here for those that don't f
Hello Serge,
have you contacted the WebServices PMC about sponsoring
this proposal? [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be a good place to
pitch it and see how it fits into the existing web services
projects at Apache.
http://ws.apache.org/mail.html
The "Mentors" section is somewhat irritating, as the
In
Hello all,
with twelve +1 (11 binding) and one -0 (binding), the
renamed project PhotArk is accepted into the Incubator.
Jukka's -0 was based on the originally proposed name
PicaGalley, we hope that his concerns are addressed
by the new name.
cheers,
Roland
* = binding vote
+1:
Roland
Hi all,
the discussions on projects@ lead to the new name
PhotArk
as a play on "photo archive". If anybody wants to
change their vote one way or another based on the
name, please do so until Mon 2008-08-18 15:00 GMT.
cheers,
Roland
-
We're still discussing naming options, including
the option to stick with PicaGalley, on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll keep this vote open until we settle on a name,
and a few days longer if that is not PicaGalley.
cheers,
Roland
-
T
Jukka Zitting wrote:
I also think the names are too similar
I have re-opened the naming discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should we keep this vote running, or should we start a
new one after we settle for a different name?
cheers,
Roland
--
Hello Will,
Will Glass-Husain wrote:
Is there a potential trademark issue with Google? I worry about the
similarity in name to Picasa, especially given they both are web-based photo
galleries.
I wasn't aware of that. We came to the name of
PicaGalley from "Piccadilly". A Google search
didn't
+1 of course
When this came in as Caitrin, it was a proposal
for a codebase with no community. Since then, it
has changed into a little community without a
specific codebase, but several codebases to draw
from or use as a starting base. I find this a
much more convincing proposition. Convincing
e
cymbalak AT nechtan DOT org) (cla submitted)
Luciano Resende (lresende AT apache DOT org)
== Affiliations ==
None.
== Sponsors ==
=== Champion ===
Noel Bergman
=== Nominated Mentors ===
Carsten Ziegeler
Martin Cooper
Roland Weber
== Sponsoring Entity ==
We kindl
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I don't believe that this requires a vote,
and can be addressed by lazy consensus.
I thought about that myself. But given the choice
between starting a discussion about whether a vote
is required, or turning this into a simple testcase
for me calling votes in the Incubat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-80?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Roland Weber closed INCUBATOR-80.
-
Resolution: Fixed
The vote has passed and I committed the patch. I couldn't update the
This vote passes with eight +1, all of them binding,
and no other votes cast. I'll apply the patch.
+1:
Niclas Hedhman
Davanum Srinivas
Ant Elder
Martijn Dashorst
Roland Weber
Robert Burrell Donkin
Craig L. Russell
Noel J. Bergman
cheers,
Roland
Roland Weber wrote:
As explain
Hi Craig,
You have lost me here. Are you saying that the supposed license
contradicts the patent grants in the Apache license, which are
explicitly mentioned by the required notices?
Has this ever happened, or are we in hypothetical-land?
Alan asked a what-if question, so we are safely with
[X] +1 apply the patch
cheers,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As explained in INCUBATOR-80, the Table of Contents
of the policy document is inconsistent and contains
broken links.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-80
Please vote on applying the patch provided there.
Votes of IPMC members are binding. The vote passes
with at least three bindin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-80?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Roland Weber updated INCUBATOR-80:
--
Attachment: 2k8-07-28-policy-toc.txt
The attached patch makes the following modifications to
ToC of the policy is inconsistent
-
Key: INCUBATOR-80
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-80
Project: Incubator
Issue Type: Bug
Components: policy
Reporter: Roland Weber
Hi Craig,
Craig L Russell wrote:
[craig] I think I got the attribution correct in this. Please correct if
I got it wrong.
You got it right (I think :-).
[roland]Yes, and why shouldn't it be? Anybody can pull Apache sources
from
our public SVN repo and make releases with or without modificat
Hi Alan,
see my 0.02€ below...
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 25, 2008, at 8:50 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 25, 2008, at 7:38 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Jul 25, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Some things to consider in this discussi
Am I missing some context here? Why does adding a project
to the status files require new (and unrelated) files to
be added?
sitemap.xml is in directory site-author, yet has a
"DO NOT EDIT - THIS IS GENERATED" disclaimer.
The PDF seems to be ancient history, Geronimo is a TLP.
cheers,
Roland
David S (or rather Ed) wrote:
Community
One of the next objectives is to continue growing an active community of
users and contributors. It is expected that community will continue to grow.
So you already have an active community of users and contributors?
Any public record of that? Names and
Roland Weber wrote:
I'm still wondering where the discrepancy comes
from in the first place.
It was there from the start of the documents [1],
in revision 46392 (October 2003) when Champion
and Sponsor were still called "Sponsor" and
"Sponsoring Entity". Which also ex
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
the guide sounds like it's an improvement
Or one might argue that it tells some complicated
things to cover a case without real significance.
I've found [1] in the archives, which indicates
that the policy used to allow officers originally.
The guide says that an of
Hi all,
the "Roles and Responsibilities" document [1] says
in the section on Champions:
A candidate project shall be sponsored by
an Officer or Member of the Foundation.
Where the Champion is not a Member of the Foundation
(i.e. is an Officer only), the Champion shall be a
member of the PMC o
a cursory assessment...
License currently is LGPL.
CVS history goes back to August 2006.
All commits by "wwwfswcom".
Not a single message on the dev list.
Not a single posting in the forum.
Looks like a case of open source, closed development.
On the plus side, changing the license shouldn't be
Hello,
the website is not in XML, it is _generated_from_ XML.
SVN contains both, the XML source and the HTML result.
You "upload" the HTML part by running "svn update" on
the server. The general procedure for updating such
websites generated from XML, at the Incubator or elsewhere,
is as follows:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12610747#action_12610747
]
Roland Weber commented on INCUBATOR-78:
---
Projects could use svn:externals to
sebb wrote:
BiblioPic?
Biblimage already seems to be used for similar software.
BiblioImage seems to be a name for an international festival.
PicAndMix ;-)
PhoGal
PhoGa
Foga
SnapLib
SnapStore
PicStore
SnapShow
PicShow
You missed "PicLib" :-)
cheers,
Roland
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On May 17, 2008, at 10:33 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm beginning to regret not slogging through all those threads about
the IP
checks in relation to security. Ok, I'm actually glad that
Hi Angela,
Angela Cymbalak wrote:
There is an extremely large learning curve but everyone starts somewhere
right? If you have people willing to show you the ropes (mentors) and
someone who believes in the project (a champion) and the drive to see
through your project, then that learning curve
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On 5/6/08, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the Roller option makes more sense. I doubt that
a podling without three committers would even be accepted.
Not true, it is even one of the options on the table when starting a
new project. Start witho
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Hi Dims,
This looks good, so let me comment specifically on things that IMO need
clarification.
On May 5, 2008, at 11:29 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
#2: Create and maintain a charter that governs the PMC/project(s)
That's probably obsolete. I recall seeing some TLP's
Hi Angie,
Should I continue down the road of writing the proposal, knowing I have
no community to offer, just code or should I join the Roller community,
contribute the code there and then try to spin off a larger project
later?
I think the Roller option makes more sense. I doubt that
a podl
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
source distributions should be identical to the contents of version control
when the release is cut. if the KEYs file is present in the source that's
cut, it should be left.
I believe Maven interprets some sort of assembly descriptor that
defines the subset of the
Marnie McCormack wrote:
All,
Several of our project (Qpid) memebers are legally in a difficult position
disclosing their employer in Apache world.
Does that mean they are contributing in their private time rather
than as part of their jobs? If so, they should be considered as
independents. If
Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Monday 18 February 2008, Paul Querna wrote:
in a private list does not accord with *our way of
working*, I think. And I don't think there is any need to use a
private, unarchived list for discussions on infrastructure
improvements.
infrastructure is open to all committers.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> Perhaps we should force all initial committers to divulge if they
> are strictly involved in the effort as a work assignment, or if they
> have a broader interest in the new podling?
+1
> That said, we never "judge" people per-say [...]
I know. Just couldn't resi
Bill Stoddard wrote:
> Disclosure... I work for IBM.
So do I.
> IBM'ers participate on projects as individuals and it's the actions of
> individuals that should be judged.
I think that is a bit oversimplified. IBM has strict rules about
open source participation. It is either "on private time",
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> 1) http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#template-affiliations
> Replace the last paragraph "Only the affiliations...bootstrap has been
> completed" with this:
>
> ***
> As a general rule, podling committers and mentors are requested to
> disclose their comp
Hi Matt,
> I'm looking for general feedback about the group's
> perception of incubated projects and the number of
> roles that may be assumed by a foundation member in
> one. Can I view RAT as an example that it would be
> considered kosher for a member to be both champion of
> and an initial co
Hello Mathieu,
> How do you usually proceed on an unknown codebase? Checkout the code, see if
> it works, how it works and what is broken. Try to fix what's broken and
> improve the stuff to fix your needs.
The order is correct. But I'd say that there is a long way to go from
"checkout the code"
Matthieu Riou wrote:
>
> Couldn't we setup a "retired projects" Jira project? Or a specific module in
> the Incubator project? If people have some interest on a retired podling,
> this would allow them to start posting patches. People with Incubator karma
> could apply the patches (I certainly wou
Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> 2008/1/26, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Friday 25 January 2008 03:56, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>>> Champion
>> You have several ASF Members listed as initial committers. Howcome none has
>> stepped up as Champion and Mentors?
>
> The list contains *a
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>> Normally, I would suggest that if we have people wanting to work on a
>>> project, that we bring it back to life here.
>
> +1
>
> perhaps a little more structured would be good, maybe something as
> simple as a sign up sheet on the wiki.
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> Normally, I would suggest that if we have people wanting to work on a
> project, that we bring it back to life here.
I'm curious how this is supposed to happen? We recently had
two independent inquiries [1,2] of people wanting to work on
a failed incubator project calle
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> i've added something along these lines to
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/index.html. i've also added a note
> explaining that questions on deviations may be expected.
Looks good to me.
cheers,
Roland
Hi Robert,
changes are good, both for the directory stuff
and the dealing with a defect section.
cheers,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> i've taken a stab at a first draft of documenting release distribution
> (http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#release-distribution)
I was just wondering about the write permissions for
all files. Surely the release artifacts should never
be modi
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> recent experience suggests that the incubator documentation does a
> poor job of helping podlings understand the difference between guides
> and policy
>
> the first section in http://incubator.apache.org/guides/index.html is
> terse and obtuse. one possibility would
Hello Vinay,
> I am interested in working on the Lucene4c project. Please let me know
> how I can get started.
we had another inquiry about that in November [1].
I suggest you contact that person, maybe the two of
you can find a few more interested people and get
the project going again. See [2]
Hello Kaushik,
kaushik sarkar wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I worked for Kazeon Search Engine. Where it uses Java Lucene Library.
> I am interested to work for it's c counter part. Please provide me necessary
> information and pointer to start from.
I take it you are referring to this retired podling:
Hi Robert,
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On Nov 22, 2007 5:54 PM, kaushik sarkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I worked for Kazeon Search Engine. Where it uses Java Lucene Library.
>> I am interested to work for it's c counter part. Please provide me necessary
>> information and pointer to sta
Hello Janne,
> One of my contributors is asking if either the CLA or the Software Grant
> are available in other languages than English (French, Dutch or German
> preferred).
That kind of question would better be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I cannot imagine that you will find any authoritative tra
Hello,
thank you for your interest in Apache Geronimo. However, you've
sent your message to the Apache Incubator mailing list. You will
find the Apache Geronimo mailing lists here:
http://geronimo.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
Information on contributing to Apache projects in general and to
Apac
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> To expose committers affiliations before graduation, I suggest the
> following questions:
>
> a) What are your company affiliations?
Add "with respect to this project", to make sure that only those
affiliations are asked for.
> b) Does your activity in the project d
Hi Steve, Niclas,
>>> Any Java stack that does SOAP or REST should be using
>>> HttpClient
>>
>> That seems to indicate that it should be a TLP in its own right.
>
> you want that, you get my support.
Thanks for your encouragement. I'm currently drowned in work,
but I intend to kick off the (hop
Erik Abele wrote:
> Sure, am happy to help (as a satisfied user of both, HttpComponents and
> JMeter); just let me know where you'd like to see me subscribed... (I
> assume [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED])
That's great! Yes, those will be the interesting lists in terms
of future directions
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> I don't know what to suggest, but perhaps recruiting one or more veteran
> ASFer, either just off the member's list or some experienced Incubator
> mentor, feeling this being important could just join the PMC and at least
> ensure process with 3 pairs of eye balls.
Yeah,
Hello Jeremy,
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> The recent Tuscany distribution contains XSDs licensed under the OSOA
> license[1] which contains the following:
> "Permission to copy, make derivative works of, and distribute the
> Service Component Architecture
> JavaDoc, Interface Definition Files and XSD f
Hello Niclas,
>> Staying at Jakarta will buy some time, but won't last forever.
>> >
>> > If you have ideas on what to do with these small but active
>> > projects, please come over to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and share your
>> > thoughts.
>
> Can't Jakarta just be revitalized as a home for small, but m
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> Theres more of an issue IMO with projects that don't come thru the
> incubator, since they don't have to meet the Incubator's stringent
> graduation requirement. As an example - Tapestry was pushed out to a
> TLP from Jakarta,[...]
Jakarta is disintegrating. All big projec
> From:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new
>
> "you should append their license(s) to the LICENSE file at the top of the
> distribution, or at least put a pointer in the LICENSE file to the
> third-party license"
You didn't quote the beginning of the paragraph:
> If the distrib
> "Following general@" isn't a great effort. The last 2 weeks we are looking at
> ~10-12 messages a day on average. And if one is really short on time, which
> happens to all of us, it is fairly easy to skip a couple of threads...
I found that subscribing to a digest instead of the list itself
m
74 matches
Mail list logo
