Re: Looking for Champion

de54f182e ... in which a GPL license copyright by Oracle was "fixed" to be an Apache license copyright Baidu. So if this project does enter incubation I think we should be extra careful to audit the origins of all of the source code. -Todd > On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 9:12 A

Re: Looking for Champion

to be set up when entering incubation: > >> > >> > >>priv...@palo.incubator.apache.org<mailto:private@ > palo.incubator.apache.or > >>g> > >> d...@palo.incubator.apache.org<mailto:d...@palo.incubator.apache.org> > >> > >>comm...@palo.incubator.apache.org<mailto:commits@ > palo.incubator.apache.or > >>g> > >> > >> ###Subversion Directory > >> > >> Upon entering incubation: https://github.com/baidu/palo. > >> After incubation, we want to move the existing repo from > >>https://github.com/baidu/palo to Apache infrastructure. > >> > >> ###Issue Tracking > >> > >> Palo currently uses GitHub to track issues. Would like to continue to > >>do so while we discuss migration possibilities with the ASF Infra > >>committee. > >> > >> ###Other Resources > >> > >> The existing code already has unit tests so we will make use of > >>existing Apache continuous testing infrastructure. The resulting load > >>should not be very large. > >> > >> ##Initial Committers > >> > >> * Ruyue Ma (https://github.com/maruyue, > >>maru...@baidu.com<mailto:maru...@baidu.com>) > >> * Chun Zhao (https://github.com/imay, > >>buaa.zh...@gmail.com<mailto:buaa.zh...@gmail.com>) > >> * Mingyu Chen (https://github.com/morningman,chenmin...@baidu.com) > >> * De Li（https://github.com/lide-reed, > >>mailtol...@sina.com）<mailto:mailtol...@sina.com%EF%BC%89> > >> * Hao Chen (https://github.com/chenhao7253886, > >>chenha...@baidu.com<mailto:chenha...@baidu.com>) > >> * Chaoyong Li (https://github.com/cyongli, > >>lichaoy...@baidu.com<mailto:lichaoy...@baidu.com>) > >> * Bin Lin (https://github.com/lingbin, > >>lingbi...@gmail.com<mailto:lingbi...@gmail.com>) > >> > >> ##Affiliations > >> > >> The initial committers are employees of Baidu Inc.. The nominated > >>mentors are employees of TODO. > >> > >> ##Sponsors > >> > >> ###Champion > >> > >> TODO > >> > >> ###Nominated Mentors > >> > >> * sijie guo, guosi...@gmail.com<mailto:guosi...@gmail.com> > >> * Luke Han, luke...@apache.org<mailto:luke...@apache.org> > >> * Zheng Shao, zs...@apache.org<mailto:zs...@apache.org> > >> > >> ###Sponsoring Entity > >> > >> We are requesting the Incubator to sponsor this project. > >> > > > >- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: [VOTE] Resolution to graduate Apache Impala to TLP

Behm > * Bharath Vissapragada > * Brock Noland > * Carl Steinbach > * Casey Ching > * Daniel Hecht > * Dimitris Tsirogiannis > * Henry Robinson > * Ishaan Joshi > * Jim Apple > * John Russell > * Juan Yu > * Lars Volker > * Lenni Kuff > * Mar

Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution to graduate Apache Impala to TLP

Hey John, I'm not sure if Jim (proposed PMC chair) has surveyed all the PMC members recently but I'm in touch with a good number of the PMC so I think I have a good sense, and I'll take a whack at answering this: It looks like of the proposed 24 PMC members, 15 work at Cloudera, the original orga

Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution to graduate Apache Impala to TLP

appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Impala Project: > >> > >> * Alex Behm > >> * Bharath Vissapragada > >> * Brock Noland > >> * Carl Steinbach > >> * Casey Ching > >> * Daniel Hecht > >> * Dimitris

Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.9.0 release candidate 1

lt;https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ > impala/KEYS> > > >. > > > > To run RAT, follow the instructions in bin/check-rat-report.py. To > > build, follow the instructions in bin/bootstrap_build.sh. > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours, or until the necessary > > number of votes (3 +1) is reached. > > > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

TSU/ECCN notification for Impala podling

Hey folks, I'm helping out the Impala podling with their ECCN (crypto export) notice. I added them to the page at http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ (well, really I just committed a patch provided by Sailesh Mukil). The next step is to send the TSU NOTIFICATION email to the various US Governm

Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

urs, or until the necessary > > number of votes (3 +1) is reached. > > > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > > > Thanks, > > Jim > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: [VOTE] Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator

t; * Vartika Singh > * Nathanael Smith > * Carlos Villavicencio > > == Affiliations == > > * Grant Babb: Jask > * Ricardo Barona : Intel > * Cesar Berho: Intel > * Jarek Jarcec Cecho: StreamSets > * Michael Czerny: Cybraics > * Nick Gamb: Centrify >

Re: [NOTICE] Community vote to graduate Apache Kudu

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:22 AM, John D. Ament > > wrote: > > > >> Is the status page accurate? Only one added committer and no releases

Re: [NOTICE] Community vote to graduate Apache Kudu

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:22 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Is the status page accurate? Only one added committer and no releases while > under incubation? > Yes, just one added committer so far. We've had five releases during incubation (3 minor releases with new features, and two bug-fix releases

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 released

The Apache Kudu (incubating) team is happy to announce the release of Kudu 0.9.1! Kudu is an open source storage engine for structured data which supports low-latency random access together with efficient analytical access patterns. It is designed within the context of the Apache Hadoop ecosystem

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > > > * Although redirections are correctly handled, I'd remove all getkudu.io > links in the documentation to use the new canonical domain kudu.apache.org > > * I noticed you incubating releases are not clearly marked (version suffix) > at

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

72 hours have passed, so this vote is now closed. We had 6 binding +1s. Thanks for voting! -Todd On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi, > > The PPMC vote to release Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1 passed and > I'm now submitting this to the IPMC

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > But would be good clarify licenses of patches and fix up the slightly > confusing section in LICENSE. > > Thanks for your thorough check as always. Notes below: > I checked: > - incubating in name > - signature and

Re: [VOTE] $podling.apache.org is the same as $podling.incubator.apache.org

> > [+1] I want the two URLs to both work the same. > > [+/- 0] Don't care > > [-1] I want the $podling.incubator.apache.org URL to be the one that > > works, > > including emails. > > > > John > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < > chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > >> Hi Todd, >> >> If the release managers log in to id.apache.org and put their >> keys in their

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hi Todd, > > If the release managers log in to id.apache.org and put their > keys in their profile the kudu.asc will get generated automatically. > Hrm, when I log in, it shows: OpenPGP Public Ke

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hi All, > > minor nit first: > > there are no KEYS present in: > > > > And, the Git WP repo doesn’t have a KEYS file. > > Can someone point me to the

[VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

Hi, The PPMC vote to release Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1 passed and I'm now submitting this to the IPMC. Vote thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-kudu-dev/201606.mbox/%3CCADY20s6%3D%2BnKNgvx%3DG_pKupQGiH%2B9ToS53LqExBwWM6vLp-ns9A%40mail.gmail.com%3E Result: http://m

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

;d like to call out two specific changes we made related to Justin > > McLean's feedback on 0.7.1's voting thread: > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-kudu.git;a=commit;h=51463bcf6cca7e99439bb796a35d43560bfc9bcc > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apac

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.8.0 RC1

- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: Podling Report Reminder - April 2016

ntors > --- > > Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on > the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are > following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms > for the Incubator PMC. > > Incubator PMC > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > The specific cases of BSD-licensed software here is FindProtobuf.cmake, > which > > is a build-time-only dependency and does not become part of the binary > > distribution. > > If there is a binary distribution why was it not voted

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2

Hi Justin, Thanks for voting (and for your +1 despite there being some questions). Responses inline: On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > I checked: > - signatures and hashes fine > - name contains incubating > - DISCLAIMER exists > - LICENSE and NOTICE

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

er > > gearpump-commits > > > > Git repository > > Git is the preferred source control system: git:// > git.apache.org/gearpump > > > > Documentation > > https://gearpump.incubator.apache.org/docs/ > > > > JIRA instance > > JIRA Gearpump (GEARPUMP) > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/gearpump > > > > === Initial Committers === > > * Xiang Zhong > > > > * Tianlun Zhang > > > > * Qian Xu > > > > * Huafeng Wang > > > > * Kam Kasravi > > > > * Weihua Jiang > > > > * Tomasz Targonski > > > > * Karol Brejna > > > > * Gang Wang > > > > * Mark Chmarny > > > > * Xinglang Wang > > > > * Lan Wang > > > > * Jianzhong Chen > > > > * Xuefu Zhang > > > > * Rui Li > > > > === Affiliations === > > * Xiang Zhong – Intel > > > > * Tianlun Zhang – Intel > > > > * Qian Xu – Intel > > > > * Huafeng Wang – Intel > > > > * Kam Kasravi – Intel > > > > * Weihua Jiang – Intel > > > > * Tomasz Targonski – Intel > > > > * Karol Brejna – Intel > > > > * Mark Chmarny – Intel > > > > * Gang Wang – Intel > > > > * Mark Chmarny – Intel > > > > * Xinglang Wang – Ebay > > > > * Lan Wang – Huawei > > > > * Jianzhong Chen – Cloudera > > > > * Xuefu Zhang – Cloudera > > > > * Rui Li – Intel > > > > === Sponsors === > > > > Champion > > Andrew Purtell > > > > Nominated Mentors > > * Andrew Purtell > > > > * Jarek Jarcec Cecho > > > > * Todd Lipcon > > > > * Xuefu Zhang > > > > * Reynold Xin > > > > Sponsoring Entity > > Apache Incubator PMC​ > > > > ​ > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 RC3

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > OK. In the case that we've incorporated code, we could switch to doing: > > > > """ > > src/kudu/gutil/valgrind.h: Hybrid BSD (half BSD, half zlib) > > src/kudu/util (some portions): 3-clause BSD license > > src/kudu/util (HdrHistog

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 RC3

nses, please refer to the license headers at the top of the respective files. """ ...and then make sure that those files contain the full text of the license, instead of copy-pasting the text into LICENSE.txt. Does that sound like the best path forward? -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 RC3

Hi Justin, I'm working on making the changes you suggested below. A few follow-up questions: On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Hmm, I'm not seeing this -- got a line number? Line 614 in LICENSE.txt > > says "StumbleUpon”. > > Sorry it was WebRTC line 360 and also

Re: Project Kudu. .NET edition

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> To be slightly more specific, we cleared it with the _legal team_ for >> the .NET foundation (who runs the project that Roman spotted), not >> just some enginee

Re: Project Kudu. .NET edition

b 26, 2016 5:33 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > >> To be slightly more specific, we cleared it with the _legal team_ for >> the .NET foundation (who runs the project that Roman spotted), not >> just some engineers. >> >> -Todd >> >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2

Re: Project Kudu. .NET edition

To be slightly more specific, we cleared it with the _legal team_ for the .NET foundation (who runs the project that Roman spotted), not just some engineers. -Todd On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi Roman, > > Before we first publicly used the name, we were in t

Re: Project Kudu. .NET edition

ditional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 RC3

r. > > Probably best to double check on legal discuss re this if your not already > done so. > > Thanks, > Justin > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org &

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 RC3

m4 > /bin/sh: aclocal-1.14: command not found > make: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 127 Interesting. I run on Ubuntu but hopefully another Kudu developer will pipe up and might know what's going on here - probably missing some 'brew install ' in the docs. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0 RC3

Porting over my +1 from the podling vote. Not sure if it's binding in the IPMC context if I already voted as PPMC. Todd On Feb 22, 2016 7:10 AM, "Jean-Daniel Cryans" wrote: > Hi, > > The PPMC vote to release Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0's RC3 passed and > I'm now submitting this to the IPMC. >

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

of > the work. > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > For the sake of all of these discussions, are "bundled dependencies" and > > "work derived from other projects source code" 100% equivalent? In many > > cases

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

yright standpoint. My assumption is that there's no difference between that and "bundling" in which you are typically taking a release artifact as-is from another project. -Todd On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Todd L

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

ral-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

424 [3] https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-kudu.git;a=blob;f=LICENSE.txt;h=347de4f88b5e6240f6e560b2b1208364d6042c55;hb=HEAD#l553 -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: File headers for third party utility code

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > > One thing to try here is contribute all changes back to the original > author(s), at least as patch submissions, so giving them the option to > incorporate it. > > Sure, I agree that makes sense in the case that you're borrowing someone el

Re: File headers for third party utility code

es, we've done trivial edits like putting things in a "kudu" namespace or removing some portability code. In other cases, we've made more substantial alterations to fit our codebase (eg https://github.com/cloudera/kudu/commit/0ee3218b9edcd7e5e9d450307bc22d0eadfb53be ) but still kept the overall API/design. At what point do we go ahead and add the Apache License header? -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

File headers for third party utility code

Hi all, I'm working on verifying licenses and copyrights, etc, in Apache Kudu (incubating). There is one area I wanted to confirm the right way to document in our LICENSE/NOTICE files: Kudu makes use of a lot of open source utility code borrowed from (or adapted from) other open source projects.

Re: Karma for Kudu podling committers

Original Message- > From: Marvin Humphrey > Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" > Date: Monday, December 21, 2015 at 11:49 AM > To: "general@incubator.apache.org" > Cc: "d...@kudu.incubator.apache.org" > Subject: Re: Karma for Kudu p

Karma for Kudu podling committers

Hi all, I'm trying to follow the mentor guide to ensure that all of the initial committers for the new Kudu podling have the correct karma. The guide seems to be only half-updated for git, so having a bit of confusion here. My understanding from the guide is that for git, the asf-authorization-te

Re: Moving Kudu and Impala to reporting group 2

Thanks, Marvin, that works well for us from the Kudu perspective. (Too late for the December report anyway IIRC) -Todd On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greets, > > We still have an imbalance for podlings in various reporting groups: > not enough in group 2 (February, M

Modifications to SGA

Hi all, I'm working on completing the SGA for the contribution of Kudu. Our legal counsel has requested a few small changes to the text (just clarifications, nothing substantial). Can I submit the amended SGA, or do I need to have the changes signed off on the ASF side by some representative? Like

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache incubator

number of people who didn't specify). The -1 votes were related to code review policy which was discussed thoroughly in a separate thread. As this is a majority vote, the vote passes. Thanks for voting! -Todd +1 (binding) -- Todd Lipcon Reynold Xin Jarek Jarcec Cecho Ja

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > Much as I don’t care to participate in GPL projects I also don’t care to > participate in pure RTC projects as both restrict me in ways I very much > dislike, > > You're entitled to that opinion. I personally don't care to participate in CTR

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > 1. What makes you think all bugs are caught during code reviews (they > aren’t)? > They aren't. But some are. And catching them in code review is cheaper than catching them when a user hits them. Additionally, plenty of other things are caug

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > Hi - > > The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's > been sufficient opportunity for discussion around our proposal to bring > Impala to the ASF Incubator. > > I'd like to call a VOTE on that proposal, which is

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi all, > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like > to call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal > is pasted below and also available on the wiki at: >

[VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

ubator.apache.org (JIRA issue feed) * d...@kudu.incubator.apache.org (Gerrit code reviews plus dev discussion) * u...@kudu.incubator.apache.org (User questions) === Repository === * git://git.apache.org/kudu === Gerrit === We hope to continue using Gerrit for our code review and commit

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > Basing the "diversity" on affiliaiton (or any other arbitrary property) is > quite bogus - I am with you and Roy on this. All I want to make sure that > people who contributed code and, perhaps, became inactive for a period of > time

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > > > > The question is not to decide if C-T-R is The Apache Way over R-T-C. > The > > > question is wether a project entering incubation with a selected R-T-C > > > mode is likely to exit incubation for the simple reason it will be v

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > Todd: as Ross notes, your three points about code reviews in a CTR project > are quite valid, and match accepted engineering practices. > > What I haven't seen is an explanation why a committer must be treated the > same as a drive-by. Both are

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

Amusingly enough, the RTC communities I'm a part of do the opposite: you can make a branch which operates under CTR, so long as it's reviewed sufficiently prior to its merge into trunk. This is great for rapid development and prototyping when a small number of contributors are working together on a new project. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:07 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >... > > > I think it's a _plus_ that contributors and committers contribute code in > > the same way -- it's more of a level playing field for new peop

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > >> > > Except that there seems to be great disagreement among the Members as to > > whether RTC is somehow anti-Apache-Way. > > > > If you want to try to create an ASF-wide resolution that RTC doesn't > follow > > the Apache Way, and g

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

usted to > > both do the correct action and be willing to listen objectively to > > criticism. In an CTR project it is clear to me that the point where a > > project grants Committership should be the point where the PMC wants to > > treat an individual's contribution as CTR rather than RTC. How does an > RTC > > project make THAT important decision? > > > > Regards, > > Dave > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera >

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

or via their employers). That said, if we need to track people down to get more explicit consent to contribute code to Apache, I'm sure folks should be fine with it. I'll await further instruction from the IPMC on this one. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Luke Han wrote: > In "community" section of this proposal, there are many companies > have been mentioned including Xiaomi, Dropbox, Intel and Dremio, > and said there are contributions from them. > > I think their engineers are more interesting and be involved >

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:53PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Konstantin Boudnik > wrote: > > > > > So, you're saying that people were chosen to be listed or not as the > > > contributors merely by the am

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > On the contrary... The business of the Incubator and IPMC is to help > podlings > and their communities to grok and follow the Apache Way. Trust is a > foundation > principal of a healthy community. Hence, this whole discussion has qu

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > > For now, I think "meritocracy" should be followed -- when contributors > > demonstrate sufficient merit, we can add them as committers. Note that > > there are plenty of my coworkers who have made small contributions in the > > past

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 08:53AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Ted Dunning > wrote: > > > ...RTC can be framed as "I don't trust you to do things right"... > > > > Or also "I don't trust myself 100% to

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

quot; should be followed -- when contributors demonstrate sufficient merit, we can add them as committers. Note that there are plenty of my coworkers who have made small contributions in the past, and they aren't listed as contributors either. Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Atri Sharma wrote: > Sounds great. > > I would love to be an help as a committer, if possible. This seems to be > fantastic in line with my focus areas and can help existing big data > projects to accelerate so Kudu's growth is something I would care about. > Hi

[DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

u.incubator.apache.org (git push emails) * iss...@kudu.incubator.apache.org (JIRA issue feed) * d...@kudu.incubator.apache.org (Gerrit code reviews plus dev discussion) * u...@kudu.incubator.apache.org (User questions) === Repository === * git://git.apache.org/kudu === Gerrit === We h

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

ibutors to rebase, etc. On other projects that use gerrit, I rarely see a mergeable trivial patch last longer than a couple hours before someone clicks the necessary buttons to merge it. This may all seem orthogonal to RTC vs CTR, but I think my point is this: the actual review workflow strongly affects the rate of progress in RTC projects. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >... > > > 1) You're right, I don't trust anybody to make code changes to a complex > > project with zero oversight. I currently work on a project that

RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

[editing subject since the discussion has veered away from Sentry] On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > And I have to disagree with you Joe. To me, a mandatory RTC policy says > “we don’t trust anybody”. Sure, it doesn’t discriminate, but it is also a > PITA. One project I mento

Re: Releases during incubation?

Thanks, Joe! -Todd On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Subversion cut a release while in incubation on their old system. > Shouldn't pose a problem for others. > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > Hey folks, > > >

IP clearance for properly licensed code

Hi all, Another hopefully simple question: The Mentor guide contains the following text: > > Existing codebases need to be imported through the standard IP clearance > process. This means that a Software Grant Agreement (SGA > ) or Contributor License > Ag

Releases during incubation?

Hey folks, Hopefully quick policy question here: Once a project is under proposal for incubation, what is the foundation policy on that project making releases outside of Apache from its current home? For example, suppose there's an open source project FooBar, with a public release FooBar 1.0.0

Re: [VOTE] Accept HTrace into the Apache Incubator

ay, 9th November 2014, 23:59:00 UTC > > > > [ X] +1 accept HTrace in the Incubator > > [ ] ±0 > > [ ] -1 because... > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: [VOTE] Accept Parquet into the incubator

ng that > time, we have curated an open-source community successfully, attracting > over 40 contributors (see > https://github.com/Parquet/parquet-mr/graphs/contributors) from a diverse > group of companies. > Several of the core contributors to the project are deeply fam

Re: [PROPOSAL] Parquet

has existed as a healthy open source for one year. During that > time, we have curated an open-source community successfully, attracting > over 40 contributors (see > https://github.com/Parquet/parquet-mr/graphs/contributors) from a diverse > group of companies. > Several of the core contributor

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo for the Apache Incubator

pache license. Good engineers should always be evaluating the tradeoffs between staying with mainline and having to maintain a fork of a particular piece of code. Sometimes the latter makes sense, even within two closely-related projects. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera -

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo for the Apache Incubator

(billie.j.rinaldi at ugov dot gov) >  * Keith Turner (keith.turner at ptech-llc dot com) >  * John Vines (john.w.vines at ugov dot gov) >  * Chris Waring (christopher.a.waring at ugov dot gov) > > == Affiliations == >  * Aaron Cordova, The Interllective >  * Adam Fuchs, National Se

Re: [VOTE] Release Thrift 0.2.0

c 10, 2009, at 9:17 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> Hi Kevan, >> >> Responses below: >> >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: >>> >>> What's the license for the file: doc/thrift.tex? >>> >> >> This was cont

Re: [VOTE] Release Thrift 0.2.0

. ;-) > > Assuming I understand the license that applies to doc/thrift.tex (and why it > doesn't contain a source license header), looks like I'd be +1. > > --kevan > > On Dec 10, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Joe has p

Re: [VOTE] Release Thrift 0.2.0

all md5sum: 9958c57c402c02171ba0bcc96183505c Thanks in advance for voting! -Todd On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > The Thrift community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Thrift > 0.2.0. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy, we would > now like to reques

[VOTE] Release Thrift 0.2.0

The Thrift community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Thrift 0.2.0. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy, we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the tarball on the Thrift Download page. Please vote by 6 PM PST, Fri 12/11. Vo