Our 72 hour window has passed. So, I'm calling this IP CLEARANCE complete.
Thanks!
--kevan
On Nov 29, 2011, at 5:09 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> The Apache Geronimo project has received a contribution which updates a
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> The Apache Geronimo project has received a contribution which updates a
> number of Geronimo dependencies and associated code updates.
>
> The code contributions have been attached to
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows
The Apache Geronimo project has received a contribution which updates a number
of Geronimo dependencies and associated code updates.
The code contributions have been attached to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6217
I've committed the IP Clearance form to the Incubator we
On Sep 29, 2009, at 5:17 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Please note that the aries-private mailing list is subscription
moderated and currently restricted to mentors or ASF *members* until
the community is bootstrapped. So please do not subscribe unless you
fall into one of those two categories.
Please note that the aries-private mailing list is subscription
moderated and currently restricted to mentors or ASF *members* until
the community is bootstrapped. So please do not subscribe unless you
fall into one of those two categories.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 05:22, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>
On Sep 28, 2009, at 3:23 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Ok, let's put everything in standby until those lists are created.
OK, the mailing lists have been created. Thanks Brett Porter!
aries-dev-subscr...@incubator.apache.org
aries-user-subscr...@incubator.apache.org
aries-commits-subscr...@incu
> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Great - let me see if I can make it part of a larger Aries build with
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> shared parent pom, a pom in the root dir etc...
>>>>&g
laume Nodet wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 15:24, David Bosschaert
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Great - let me see if I can make it part of a larger Aries build with
>>>>>> a
>
larger Aries build
with a
shared parent pom, a pom in the root dir etc...
I'd also like to rename some things from Geronimo to Aries...
Sure.
I guess the first thing though is to decide on the svn layout.
I think we should aim for a single trunk/tags/branches for now.
This does no pre
eat - let me see if I can make it part of a larger Aries build with a
>>>> shared parent pom, a pom in the root dir etc...
>>>> I'd also like to rename some things from Geronimo to Aries...
>>>
>>> Sure.
>>> I guess the first thing though is to d
also like to rename some things from Geronimo to Aries...
Sure.
I guess the first thing though is to decide on the svn layout.
I think we should aim for a single trunk/tags/branches for now.
This does no preclude having blueprint released separatly if needed,
but this is another problem we can ad
On Sep 28, 2009, at 9:32 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 15:24, David Bosschaert
wrote:
Great - let me see if I can make it part of a larger Aries build
with a
shared parent pom, a pom in the root dir etc...
I'd also like to rename some things from Geronimo to
I have only set up svn write access to the four mentors. I was
planning on checking with the other ones the right wau to go forward.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 16:05, David Bosschaert
wrote:
> 2009/9/28 Guillaume Nodet
>
>>
>> Sounds good to me. We need to set up the trunk/tags/branches first I
>
2009/9/28 Guillaume Nodet
>
> Sounds good to me. We need to set up the trunk/tags/branches first I
> think.
>
I don't seem to have the permissions to create these. Could someone create
them or give me enough permissions so I could?
Cheers,
David
e root dir etc...
>> > I'd also like to rename some things from Geronimo to Aries...
>>
>> Sure.
>> I guess the first thing though is to decide on the svn layout.
>> I think we should aim for a single trunk/tags/branches for now.
>> This does no preclude
2009/9/28 Guillaume Nodet
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 15:24, David Bosschaert
> wrote:
> > Great - let me see if I can make it part of a larger Aries build with a
> > shared parent pom, a pom in the root dir etc...
> > I'd also like to rename some things from Geron
n
>
> > Cheers,
> >
> > David
> >
> > 2009/9/28 Guillaume Nodet
> >
> >> The Geronimo PMC has voted to donate the blueprint implementation to
> >> aries, so I've gone ahead and moved the code to:
> >> https://svn.apache.org/rep
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 15:24, David Bosschaert
wrote:
> Great - let me see if I can make it part of a larger Aries build with a
> shared parent pom, a pom in the root dir etc...
> I'd also like to rename some things from Geronimo to Aries...
Sure.
I guess the first thing though i
Great - let me see if I can make it part of a larger Aries build with a
shared parent pom, a pom in the root dir etc...
I'd also like to rename some things from Geronimo to Aries...
Finally, should we asking INFRA for a Hudson build? Or is this normally not
done for podlings?
Cheers,
The Geronimo PMC has voted to donate the blueprint implementation to
aries, so I've gone ahead and moved the code to:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/aries/blueprint/
I guess we need to discuss how we want to organized the svn tree /
build, and until the mailing lists are set u
to Geronimo so is this going to be a new
sub-project of Geronimo and if so then shouldn't this just be a simple
graduation as a sub-project vote?
...ant
I had sent a note to the Incubator PMC about the plan and hadn't
received this as an option. I spect this is basically what we&
t was discussed and brought forward by the
Yoko Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-
project of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings
to CXF. Please read the proposal below for all the detail.
This proposal was brought forward to the Apache Ger
My +1 ... sorry
On Dec 17, 2007, at 8:36 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 12, 2007, at 5:28 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 11:26, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
[x] +1 Approve the below proposal and code migration to
Apache Geronimo and CXF respectively
+1
On Dec 12, 2007, at 5:28 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 11:26, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
[x] +1 Approve the below proposal and code migration to
Apache Geronimo and CXF respectively
+1
-
To
+1
On 11/12/2007, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
> Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-project
> of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings to CXF.
&g
On Dec 11, 2007 2:15 PM, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 2007/12/11, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Just to make sure I understand what is happening here - Yoko is going
> > away/ending and getting
> > merged into Geronimo and CXF?
+1
Bill
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-project
of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings to CXF.
Please read the proposal below for all the detail
it was done. Since
Yoko will be moved to CXF and Geronimo, it is now the responsibility
PMCs of those two projects to make sure that it was done to their
satisfaction since responsibility has now shifted from the Incubator
PMC to CXF and Geronimo PMCs.
More specifically this should be t
y9
> > http://tinyurl.com/2ffkn2
> > http://tinyurl.com/2glch9
> > http://tinyurl.com/2d94hw
> > Geronimo Discussion: http://tinyurl.com/2zr2bh
> > Geronimo Vote: http://tinyurl.com/2c8yuo
> > CXF Discussion / Vote: http://tinyurl.com/yr6wet
to an existing project.
The way I see it theres two scenarios here:
1) CXF is incubating (i.e. no current PMC) and none of the Yoko
developers are interested in moving with the portion of code thats
going there. IMO its only going to get harder to complete this as time
goes by so better off gett
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 11:26, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
[x] +1 Approve the below proposal and code migration to
Apache Geronimo and CXF respectively
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here
+1
--kevan
On Dec 10, 2007, at 10:26 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the
Yoko Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-
project of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings
to CXF. Please read
+1
Craig
On Dec 10, 2007, at 7:26 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
[ ] +1 Approve the below proposal and code migration to Apache
Geronimo and CXF respectively
[ ] 0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not approve of the move (please provide rationale
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http
; http://tinyurl.com/2ffkn2
> http://tinyurl.com/2glch9
> http://tinyurl.com/2d94hw
> Geronimo Discussion: http://tinyurl.com/2zr2bh
> Geronimo Vote: http://tinyurl.com/2c8yuo
> CXF Discussion / Vote: http://tinyurl.com/yr6wet
>
> I guess the question
ds for anyone interested:
>
> Yoko Threads:
> http://tinyurl.com/2y4sy9
> http://tinyurl.com/2ffkn2
> http://tinyurl.com/2glch9
> http://tinyurl.com/2d94hw
> Geronimo Discussion: http://tinyurl.com/2zr2bh
> Geronimo Vote: http://tinyurl.com
Links to the various relevant threads for anyone interested:
Yoko Threads:
http://tinyurl.com/2y4sy9
http://tinyurl.com/2ffkn2
http://tinyurl.com/2glch9
http://tinyurl.com/2d94hw
Geronimo Discussion: http://tinyurl.com/2zr2bh
Geronimo Vote: http://tinyurl.com
2007/12/11, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Just to make sure I understand what is happening here - Yoko is going
> away/ending and getting
> merged into Geronimo and CXF?
Yes.
SY, Alexey
> Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > 2007/12/11, Matt Hogst
Just to make sure I understand what is happening here - Yoko is going
away/ending and getting
merged into Geronimo and CXF?
Carl.
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
+1
2007/12/11, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
Com
+1
2007/12/11, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
> Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-project
> of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings to CXF.
> Please
Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-project
of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings to CXF.
Please read the proposal below for all the detail.
This proposal was brought
Noel,
Thanks. We will review and provide signed documents ASAP.
-Ismael
On 2/15/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ismael needs to do a Software Grant (i think that's the doc) on
> > behalf of Intalio for OpenEJB.
>
> See: http://www.apache.org/licenses/#grants
>
> Ismael shoul
> Ismael needs to do a Software Grant (i think that's the doc) on
> behalf of Intalio for OpenEJB.
See: http://www.apache.org/licenses/#grants
Ismael should also submit a CCLA (see the same page) if one will be
necessary for Intalio employees to satisfy their obligations under the terms
of their
On Feb 14, 2006, at 7:35 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David,
The mentors should have karma to setup the status file. At least
one of
them has karma to the SVN access control lists. Do we have all of
the CLAs
and a Software Grant?
Noel or anyone,
Ismael needs to do a Software Grant (i th
On Feb 14, 2006, at 8:54 PM, David Crossley wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
Is it possible to do a
quick cross-check of our committers list and the CLAs on file? Keep
in mind I have no idea if what i'm asking is hard.
See the list at http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
The top table i
Do we have all of
> > >the CLAs
> > >and a Software Grant?
> >
> > Ok. I made nearly all the OpenEJB committers sign CLAs way back when
> > Geronimo started as a preventative measure. Is it possible to do a
> > quick cross-check of our committers list
e Grant?
>
> Ok. I made nearly all the OpenEJB committers sign CLAs way back when
> Geronimo started as a preventative measure. Is it possible to do a
> quick cross-check of our committers list and the CLAs on file? Keep
> in mind I have no idea if what i'm asking is hard.
S
way back when
Geronimo started as a preventative measure. Is it possible to do a
quick cross-check of our committers list and the CLAs on file? Keep
in mind I have no idea if what i'm asking is hard.
If so, *after* the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
has been created, we can impor
David,
The mentors should have karma to setup the status file. At least one of
them has karma to the SVN access control lists. Do we have all of the CLAs
and a Software Grant? If so, *after* the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
has been created, we can import the code under incubator/openejb.
So, it's been about two weeks. It seems like this is all the
discussion we are going to get.
What is the next step?
-David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4. Where's the summary of that vote?
> 5. Do we have a clear read on whether we want foreign code
>committed to ASF repositories before IP vettage? [Noel?]
My bad; I was confused and thinking XBean was coming in as
a podling and not as a direct import to Geronimo. So
my ob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> I have committed the ip-clearance for the XBean donation to Geronimo:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=377477&view=rev
>
> If there are no objections, I will commit the code with history on
&
I have committed the ip-clearance for the XBean donation to Geronimo:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=377477&view=rev
If there are no objections, I will commit the code with history on
Wednesday February 15th.
-
On Feb 4, 2006, at 9:42 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 03 February 2006 03:50, David Blevins wrote:
OpenEJB has been proposed as a subproject of Geronimo. See the
proposal here:
I think this is a good idea.
However, I would like to hear why OpenEJB was not part of Geronimo&#
On Friday 03 February 2006 03:50, David Blevins wrote:
> OpenEJB has been proposed as a subproject of Geronimo. See the
> proposal here:
I think this is a good idea.
However, I would like to hear why OpenEJB was not part of Geronimo's
incubation?? After all, it was one of the corn
to actually /do/ the
"code vetting" - the responsibility for actually doing that is pretty
much completely delegated to other PMCs, or to a PPMC (like geronimo
once had).
Note there is no "the" code I referred to. However, according to the
status files for the subprojects under
Hi all,
I'm afraid I don't have time for a drawn-out discussion about any of this,
especially
not a heated one, but a few people asked me to write this down anyway. This
message is
directed primarily at the Geronimo PMC.
I've just reviewed the traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [
Should have sent this email a much earlier as we voted quite some
time ago. Anyway,
OpenEJB has been proposed as a subproject of Geronimo. See the
proposal here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal
The Geronimo project has voted to be the sponsor of the OpenEJB.
The
On Feb 2, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
As you know, this is a project that I would like to see moving into
the ASF,
and Geronimo (in this case) is actually where it does belong, but ...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal
Would you PLEASE
David Blevins wrote:
As you know, this is a project that I would like to see moving into the ASF,
and Geronimo (in this case) is actually where it does belong, but ...
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal
Would you PLEASE revise whatever template you guys are copying from:
&g
Should have sent this email a much earlier as we voted quite some
time ago. Anyway,
OpenEJB has been proposed as a subproject of Geronimo. See the
proposal here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal
The Geronimo project has voted to be the sponsor of the OpenEJB.
The
The ActiveMQ, ServiceMix and WADI projects have been proposed as sub
projects of Geronimo. The proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ServiceMixProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WadiProposal
The Geronimo project has
The ActiveMQ, ServiceMix and WADI projects have been proposed as sub
projects of Geronimo. The proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ServiceMixProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WadiProposal
The Geronimo project has
On Nov 3, 2005, at 10:07 PM, David Crossley wrote:
While investigating something else, i noticed that the Geronimo
Status report in its "Project website" section refers to an
old site at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/geronimo/
I presume that this is a very old version of th
While investigating something else, i noticed that the Geronimo
Status report in its "Project website" section refers to an
old site at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/geronimo/
I presume that this is a very old version of the Geronimo
incubation. These days incubating projects
On Thursday 16 June 2005 09:43, David Blevins wrote:
> You should ask on the user@geronimo.apache.org list. I would have
> forwarded your message myself, but your confidentiality statement prevents
> me from legally doing so :)
Really? ;o) How about this message ??
Niclas
Confidentiality Statem
Hi Kumar,
You should ask on the user@geronimo.apache.org list. I would have forwarded
your message myself, but your confidentiality statement prevents me from
legally doing so :)
Cheers,
David
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 12:48:48PM +0530, NATARAJAN Sasi Kumar wrote:
> Hai All
>
>
>
>
Hai All
The following command is possible to deploy local. But I am
expecting remote deployment how can I do. Where can I mention the
Hostname and what is the argument. Option. Anyone has idea please advice
to me
Thanks in Advance
Kumar
>deployer.jar --user system --password
Geronimo successfully left the Incubator a long time ago.
Please visit this page:
http://geronimo.apache.org/
Cheers,
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: "Ashok Suresh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 5:14 AM
Subject: Pro
Andreas Hartmann wrote:
Dear Incubators,
just FYI, when you click on the Geronimo link on
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html,
the redirect is wrong (I wanted to add a bugzilla
entry, but I didn't find the Incubator product).
It rises the question about the pages created while Ger
Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> when you click on the Geronimo link on
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html,
> the redirect is wrong
Fixed. That should not have been effected by the redirect, but was.
Dear Incubators,
just FYI, when you click on the Geronimo link on
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html,
the redirect is wrong (I wanted to add a bugzilla
entry, but I didn't find the Incubator product).
-- Andreas
---
Bhanu,
The mailing lists can be found in
http://geronimo.apache.org/mail-lists.html
I'll fix the wiki.
Regards,
Alan
> -Original Message-
> From: Bhanu Vasireddy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 7:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Su
Hi,
I am not sure whether Geronimo J2EE project falls under incubator project. I tried to
subscribe Geronimo mailing list using following mail id's and I am getting failure
notice. is there any other mail address other then these 2 addresses
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROT
Hip, Hip, Hoay!!!
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 18:07, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> I'm happy to announce that the board today approved the proposal to
> make the Geronimo project a top-level Apache project.
>
> We'll be discussing the next steps later, but I wanted everyone to
I'm happy to announce that the board today approved the proposal to
make the Geronimo project a top-level Apache project.
We'll be discussing the next steps later, but I wanted everyone to hear
the good news here first.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr 203-
On May 20, 2004, at 7:57 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
[ ] +1 - The Geronimo project has met the requirements
for incubation and will be recommended to the
board for TLP status
+1
-aaron
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Cliff Schmidt
Leo Simons
Davanum Srinivas
James Strachan *
Dain Sundstrom
No objections have been expressed. The Geronimo PPMC should prepare and
present to the Board a request for TLP status.
--- Noel
* Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in th
+1
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 10:57:39PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
> The Geronimo project has been in Incubation for almost 10 months. In
> those 10 months, the Geronimo project has developed a community,
> developed a new codebase in an open and collaborative fashion,
[X] +1 - The Geronimo project has met the requirements
for incubation and will be recommended to the
board for TLP status
Jacek
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
+1. And very enthusiastic at that.
An absolutely heroic effort!
Cheers,
Berin
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
The Geronimo project has been in Incubation for almost 10 months. In
those 10 months, the Geronimo project has developed a community,
developed a new codebase in an open and
[ ] +1 - The Geronimo project has met the requirements
for incubation and will be recommended to the
board for TLP status
+1
Many thanks for all the assistance from the Apache veterans.
David Jencks
-
To
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks to Geronimo for the effort you all went through in applying
some of the new Incubator concepts, such as the PPMC. You helped
lead a path for the rest of us.
Cliff
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
[X] +1 - The Geronimo project has met the requirements
for incubation and will be recommended to the
board for TLP status
-dain
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
[X] +1 - The Geronimo project has met the requirements
for incubation and will be recommended to the
board for TLP status
[ ] -1 - The Geronimo project as not met the requirements
for incubation
--
|---|
| Magic by Merlin
On May 21, 2004, at 6:18 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
+1
Many thanks to Geronimo's resident nudniks Geir and Noel.
Nah. this is all possible and only possible because of the work and
dedication of the geronimo community.
geir
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
[X] +1 - The Geronimo project has met the requirements
for incubation and will be recommended to the
board for TLP status
Thanks to everyone who has helped us through incubation.
--
Jeremy
> > [X] +1 - The Geronimo project has met the requirements
> > for incubation and will be recommended to the
> > board for TLP status
> >
> > [ ] -1 - The Geronimo project as not met the requirements
>
+1 from me.
-- dims
On Thu, 20 May 2004 22:57:39 -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> The Geronimo project has been in Incubation for almost 10 months. In
> those 10 months, the Geronimo project has developed a community,
> developed a new co
+1
Many thanks to Geronimo's resident nudniks Geir and Noel.
> -Original Message-
> From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 9:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Geronimo from Inc
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
[ X ] +1 - The Geronimo project has met the requirements
for incubation and will be recommended to the
board for TLP status
it's about time :-D
- Leo Simons
-
To unsubscribe, e
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
...
please vote :
[ ] +1 - The Geronimo project has met the requirements
for incubation and will be recommended to the
board for TLP status
+1
I want to add that I've seen the Geronimo PPMC very responsive and
collaborative on issue managment, and
+1
Roy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On May 20, 2004, at 11:49 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir :
If this pleases the chair of the Incubator PMC
*I* know that you're just having fun, but that phrase really sets the
wrong
tone for an organization of peers, and I wouldn't want anyone to
perceive it
as having any relationship to realit
+ 1 (of course)
On May 20, 2004, at 10:57 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
The Geronimo project has been in Incubation for almost 10 months. In
those 10 months, the Geronimo project has developed a community,
developed a new codebase in an open and collaborative fashion,
weathered problems both
> I believe the Geronimo project has satisfied the requirements
> of the Apache Incubation process
That would also be my impression from active observation and discussion with
the project since its inception. I know that others have closely observed
Geronimo's progress, and we
The Geronimo project has been in Incubation for almost 10 months. In
those 10 months, the Geronimo project has developed a community,
developed a new codebase in an open and collaborative fashion,
weathered problems both internal and external, formed a functioning
group of committers to
All,
The Geronimo team will be working over the next week to try to become
an Apache top-level project. We would like all members of the
community, including all interested Incubator PMC members, to
participate in this process. We plan to do the following, in parallel:
1) Have a PPMC vote for
Status report from the Geronimo PPMC
* The project status file (/home/cvs/incubator-geronimo/STATUS)
is up to date.
* Geir Magnusson is preparing a response to the JBoss letter for
approval by the ASF Board. It concludes that there is no validity
to the
This one time, at band camp, Zhang, Larry (L.) said:
ZLL>Just wondering since we already have Tomcat why bother to develop Geronimo, what
is the difference between these two.
Tomcat only addresses Servlet and JSP specs which is only a subset
of the J2EE specs. Geronimo addresses the full set
Just wondering since we already have Tomcat why bother to develop Geronimo, what is
the difference between these two.
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 387 matches
Mail list logo
