On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 20:29, Matthew Sacks matt...@matthewsacks.comwrote:
...
*Mailing Lists*
kitty-dev
kitty-commits
kitty-user
Is there a large user community already? If not, then splitting the
community across
Isis mentors:
Given we're in the same situation and are still being bootstrapped,
should we follow this advice, ie start off with a combined mailing list
for -dev and -user?
Dan
On 08/09/2010 08:10, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Greg Steingst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com wrote:
Isis mentors:
Given we're in the same situation and are still being bootstrapped, should
we follow this advice, ie start off with a combined mailing list for -dev
and -user? ...
Like Martijn and Greg I think that's a
+1
I barely see the users list used in OWB and even in MyFaces ;)
I'd say an isis-...@incubator.a.o + isis-comm...@i.a.o list would do fine for
now.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 9/8/10, Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: No dev-, user-
+1 especially since incubation is about establishing a developers community
-M
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
+1
I barely see the users list used in OWB and even in MyFaces ;)
I'd say an isis-...@incubator.a.o + isis-comm...@i.a.o list would do fine
The private, dev and commits list is all that has been asked for.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2971
so your fine.
gav...
-Original Message-
From: mwessend...@gmail.com [mailto:mwessend...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Matthias Wessendorf
Sent: Wednesday, 8 September
My bad for possibly confusing things, then. Benson got it right when he
raised that ticket in the first place.
Dan
On 8 September 2010 10:33, Gav... ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
The private, dev and commits list is all that has been asked for.
See
Well, we could neglect to tell anyone about the user list until we need it.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com wrote:
Isis mentors:
Given we're in the same situation and are still being bootstrapped, should
we follow this advice, ie start off with a combined
Isn't Isis a different bird though? It has been around for a long time and
is likely to actually have existing users
On Sep 8, 2010 7:04 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, we could neglect to tell anyone about the user list until we need
it.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:16
One point against this is that we have had a long-standing user list,
and it is the developer list that is new and growing. People are use to
the user list already. If we are going to combine the two then I
suggest we have a -user list now and let the developers grow out of
that.
Rob
On Wed,
On 8 September 2010 12:16, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
Isn't Isis a different bird though? It has been around for a long time and
is likely to actually have existing users
It has some, but not enough to be sustainable. Hence entry into
the incubator to build both its user
On 8 September 2010 12:19, Robert Matthews rmatth...@nakedobjects.orgwrote:
One point against this is that we have had a long-standing user list, ...
... People are used to
the user list already.
We do, but it's going to change anyway when we make the apache mailing list
available.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:39 AM, dan haywood
d...@haywood-associates.co.uk wrote:
For the moment at least the dev community is more active (or at least more
vocal), so their mailing list should be the main focal point. As I said in
the other email, when we have more user traffic than dev
On 8 September 2010 12:39, dan haywood d...@haywood-associates.co.uk wrote:
snip/
And another benefit of putting user traffic on the dev list is that
it'll give the devs exposure to any probs that regular users are having with
actually using the framework (ie so we can mature its
Hi,
After much debate both here and on the connectors mailing list, the LCF
community has voted (see
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-connectors-dev/201008.mbox/browser)
and would like to officially change our name to be the Apache Connectors
Framework. We would like the
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
After much debate both here and on the connectors mailing list, the LCF
community has voted (see
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-connectors-dev/201008.mbox/browser)
and would like to
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
After much debate both here and on the connectors mailing list, the LCF
community has voted (see
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-connectors-dev/201008.mbox/browser)
and would like to
What is the view of having a project in Apache that pulls substantial
components
that are licensed under ASL as dependencies into the code base. I.e. not
coping the
code, but using components that have been built and maintained elsewhere
under ASL
but used as dependencies for running.
I
On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:13, Carl Trieloff wrote:
What is the view of having a project in Apache that pulls substantial
components
that are licensed under ASL as dependencies into the code base. I.e. not
coping the
code, but using components that have been built and maintained elsewhere
On 09/08/2010 10:29 AM, Scott Wilson wrote:
On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:13, Carl Trieloff wrote:
What is the view of having a project in Apache that pulls substantial components
that are licensed under ASL as dependencies into the code base. I.e. not coping
the
code, but using components that
+1 (Notbinding)
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 20:29, Matthew Sacks matt...@matthewsacks.comwrote:
...
*Mailing Lists*
kitty-dev
kitty-commits
kitty-user
Is there a large user community already? If not, then splitting the
On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:40, Carl Trieloff wrote:
On 09/08/2010 10:29 AM, Scott Wilson wrote:
On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:13, Carl Trieloff wrote:
What is the view of having a project in Apache that pulls substantial
components
that are licensed under ASL as dependencies into the code base.
On Sep 8, 2010, at 1:22 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 20:29, Matthew Sacks matt...@matthewsacks.comwrote:
...
*Mailing Lists*
kitty-dev
kitty-commits
kitty-user
Is there a large user community already? If not, then splitting the
community across dev/user does not
On 09/08/2010 11:06 AM, Scott Wilson wrote:
On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:40, Carl Trieloff wrote:
On 09/08/2010 10:29 AM, Scott Wilson wrote:
On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:13, Carl Trieloff wrote:
What is the view of having a project in Apache that pulls substantial
components
-0.5 (non-binding), I find the proposed name rather confusing
Kalle
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
After much debate both here and on the connectors mailing list, the LCF
community has voted (see
Hi,
[x] +1 Change the Lucene Connector Framework to the Apache Connector Framework
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
[x] +1 Change the Lucene Connector Framework to the Apache Connector Framework.
Mike
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
[x] +1 Change the Lucene Connector Framework to the Apache Connector Framework
BR,
Jukka Zitting
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Kalle Korhonen
kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
-0.5 (non-binding), I find the proposed name rather confusing
-1.
I should probably have listened in (and participated) on the previous
discussion, but I agree with Kalle. Connector is such a wide term,
that I
On 9/8/2010 8:44 AM, ant elder wrote:
-0
I agree with the comments from David and others such as [1] and the
suggestion at [2] to call it something more abstract like Apache
Connecto.
Thats IMHO anyway, I'm not sure that the IPMC should be the ones with
binding votes on this but it would
-Original Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, 8 September 2010 10:18 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Change name of Lucene Connectors Framework to Apache
Connectors Framework
Hi,
After much debate both here and on
30 matches
Mail list logo
