+1
2012/1/8 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
Dear IPMC, dear Community!
The Apache Bean-Validation project provides an ALv2 licensed implementation
of the JSR-303 Bean Validation Specification and would like to start a VOTE
on graduating as a TLP.
The podling is in the incubator since
+1
Regards
JB
On 01/09/2012 09:04 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
+1
2012/1/8 Mark Strubergstrub...@yahoo.de:
Dear IPMC, dear Community!
The Apache Bean-Validation project provides an ALv2 licensed implementation of
the JSR-303 Bean Validation Specification and would like to start a VOTE on
Etch is a cross-platform, language- and transport-independent
framework for building and consuming network services. The Etch
toolset includes a network service description language, a compiler,
and binding libraries for a variety of programming languages. It
currently supports C, C# and Java.
Just as an aside: I intend on staying with the PMC to provide
oversight as a Member (and being a familiar Mentor), provided the Etch
community wants me to tag along.
Martijn
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
Etch is a cross-platform, language-
Benson,
I dint have time for a full response. However, I have a couple podlings
that are in a similar position to Isis. That is, reasonably healthy, but
small community.
The ASF is about communities, if there is no community there is no TLP.
Without having a concrete proposal from you regardunf
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sam,
Rather than argue about the existence and interpretation of
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:11 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 January 2012 21:04, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Dear IPMC, dear Community!
The Apache Bean-Validation project provides an ALv2 licensed implementation
of the JSR-303 Bean Validation Specification and would like to
Hi,
+1 to graduate, with the following note:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
Committee
Just an FYI: I have posted a status update on Etch on general@, hoping
it doesn't fall on deaf ears with all the discussions going on:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201201.mbox/%3ccab63y-dsjkbkeljkhuvkbdlmsjwvfvixo0fnxexofhq1v4m...@mail.gmail.com%3e
Martijn
On Sun,
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
Etch is a cross-platform, language- and transport-independent
framework for building and consuming network services. The Etch
toolset includes a network service description language, a compiler,
and binding
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:28 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
On 9 January 2012 04:41, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
This has been the subject of prior conversations, but I'm opening a
thread in some hope of reaching a definitive resolution.
Some of our
On 9 January 2012 12:46, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:28 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I don't know about the more autonomy proposal but I had a quick look
at Isis. If they've never added any new committers thats a worry but
other than
Does my answer below suffice? It would be nice to close this vote out one way
or another
-Original Message-
From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfrank...@mitre.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 12:19 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Sam,
I started this separate thread because I view this situation as
distinctive from the problem you are referring to here. I take that
situation just as seriously as you do, I think. If you'd prefer that I
drop
On 9 January 2012 13:09, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
Does my answer below suffice? It would be nice to close this vote out one
way or another
The answer describes what happened.
However, it does not fix the problem, which is that the end-user sees
a file with
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 8:21 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
On 9 January 2012 13:09, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
Does my answer below suffice?
I'm actively mentoring Isis.
With having bval out of incubation I will also find a bit more time to review
the bits and pieces a bit better.
Isis really has a pretty active community and we have quite some users coming
along.
It would maybe make sense to shift direction a bit from a pure
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
+1 to graduate, with the following note:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and
Hey Board@,
Ferdy Galema accepted our invite for the Gora PPMC + committership so I just
updated
the Gora resolution in r32841 to include his name.
Cheers,
Chris
On Jan 3, 2012, at 7:40 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Okey dok, I added it in r32707 now that Doug created the agenda.
Since this thread has come back to life, I read through it and have
one comment to add:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 20:27, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I can see two problems with this view to begin with. One is IP
management. The more people participate in a project and the
Regarding attrition of mentors, it was discussed having mentors 'sign'
the board report for their podling. Could that be encouraged, and used
as a sign of minimum 'activity' for a mentor?
Upayavira
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012, at 08:10 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Benson
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
On Jan 7, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Jan 7, 2012 4:24 PM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
...
The original developers are not ambivalent to this fork.
Untrue. Christian and Remy are, and always
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
Regarding attrition of mentors, it was discussed having mentors 'sign'
the board report for their podling. Could that be encouraged, and used
as a sign of minimum 'activity' for a mentor?
I feel that what I am learning here is
On 1/9/2012 7:04 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
I don't think Wookie should graduate, but it certainly shouldn't be
kicked out (and I don't think it will be). However, as I not above
incubation may be holding it back. The question for me is, can we do
more for projects that are in this position?
On 1/9/2012 11:40 AM, Upayavira wrote:
Regarding attrition of mentors, it was discussed having mentors 'sign'
the board report for their podling. Could that be encouraged, and used
as a sign of minimum 'activity' for a mentor?
How about simply sign off on podling-dev@? Even if it is Thanks
Lame. I would actually like to see mentors WRITING the reports
at least for the first 6 months to a year, then going to sign-off
on the wiki.
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk
Sent:
Frankly, I don't see that much use.
Of course reports are very important, but they most of the times are just
copied over from the previous month + a few adoptions.
And most of the times it's fine.
What I really expect from a mentor is to look at the code a bit, check if the
code style is
On 1/9/2012 12:27 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Lame. I would actually like to see mentors WRITING the reports
at least for the first 6 months to a year, then going to sign-off
on the wiki.
My point was, all mentors need to reply to the draft. -One- of them,
or a leader in the community would
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Hyrum K Wright
hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote:
I think the Trac community sees this as a zero-sum game: if people are
contributing to Bloodhound, they *aren't* contributing to Trac.
Instead, we should try to convince the Bloodhound people that our
philosophy is
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:04 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
There are quite a few files without any licenses at all, e.g.
conf/aggregator.sql
conf/database_create_tables.sql
src/main/web/hicc/css/default.css
The NOTICE file should only contain *required* notices.
In particular, the
Hi all,
Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
release for Chukwa.
The source tarball artifact is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
Documents are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
The SVN tag to be
I was even thinking something like 'miss two reports, you're no longer a
mentor', but that might be a bit draconian :-)
I know I would fail according to the above criteria. But I suspect a
clear minimum would help keep me at least minimally connected.
Upayavira
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012, at 10:27 AM,
I would like to see the Incubator someday reach the point where
we could DISTRIBUTE our oversight across the podling lists, where
graduation votes are largely ceremonial other than vetting the
language, where release votes happen solely on dev lists, etc.
But we will NEVER get there and still do
It's my understanding that the group and artifact id do not include the token
incubating or incubator but that -incubating is suffixed to the version
number.
Do I understand the requirements correctly?
Regards,
Alan
-
To
-Original Message-
From: Alan D.Cabrera [mailto:l...@toolazydogs.com]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 3:47 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Maven coordinate for incubating podlings
It's my understanding that the group and artifact id do not include the token
incubating or
Hi Jukka!
Thanks for this very constructive post!
I'm not a native english speaker, but even I understand the point with not
using JSR-330 but a more 'descriptive' wording :)
What about the following?
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation
On Jan 9, 2012, at 10:27 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Lame. I would actually like to see mentors WRITING the reports
at least for the first 6 months to a year, then going to sign-off
on the wiki.
+1 on the mentors WRITING the reports part. I always try to do that
until my podlings beat me to it
+1, I couldn't have said it any better myself, Joe.
Cheers,
Chris
On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
I would like to see the Incubator someday reach the point where
we could DISTRIBUTE our oversight across the podling lists, where
graduation votes are largely ceremonial other
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alan D.Cabrera [mailto:l...@toolazydogs.com]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 3:47 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Maven coordinate for incubating podlings
It's my
On 9 January 2012 19:40, Eric Yang eric...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
release for Chukwa.
The source tarball artifact is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
Documents are available at:
Hi,
[to: general@, cc: callback-dev@]
As discussed during the Callback proposal phase [1], the podling
community wasn't too certain about the Callback name and thus after
some discussion they recently voted [2] on adopting the new name
Apache Cordova. The vote and its result was mentioned in the
On 10 January 2012 02:29, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
[to: general@, cc: callback-dev@]
As discussed during the Callback proposal phase [1], the podling
community wasn't too certain about the Callback name and thus after
some discussion they recently voted [2] on
On Jan 9, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
On Jan 7, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Jan 7, 2012 4:24 PM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
...
The original developers are not ambivalent to this
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
I don't follow that. Is Edgewall still a formal organization capable
of owning copyright? If not, who owns the copyright? Have Christian
and Remy stopped all work on Trac, or are they just busy with their $jobs?
On Jan 9, 2012 10:03 PM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
...
And, no, the discussion has not been with the Trac community -- it was
in private with a few individuals; as far as Apache is concerned,
it never happened.
And Oracle's private conversations, and their decisions regarding
Thank you for the multiple examples. I think I finally understand
what you are saying, and
the information on LEGAL-59, and LEGAL-62. I will re-spin rc3 with a
new svn tag with required changes in NOTICE file. Thanks
regards,
Eric
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:33 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
release for Chukwa.
The source tarball artifact is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
Documents are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
The SVN tag to be
48 matches
Mail list logo
