On 10 May 2012 06:05, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
> wrote:
>> In reviewing the Amabari report, I have a couple of notes/concerns:
>>
>> * The community IMHO is in serious risk of failure to launch. A recent
>> code change has sparked project inte
On 11 May 2012 16:29, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> I've created a 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with the following artifacts up
> for a vote:
>
> SVN source tag ( r1335495):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/syncope/tags/syncope-1.0.0-RC1-incubating/
If this is the second attempt, w
On 12 May 2012 23:59, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 5/12/12 1:42 AM, sebb a écrit :
>
>> On 11 May 2012 16:29, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
>>>
>>> I've created a 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with the following artifacts
>>> up
>>> for a vo
On 14 May 2012 08:47, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> On 14/05/2012 01:03, sebb wrote:
>> On 12 May 2012 23:59, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>>> Le 5/12/12 1:42 AM, sebb a écrit :
>>>
>>>> On 11 May 2012 16:29, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
>>>>
On 14 May 2012 19:45, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
> wrote:
>> Le 5/14/12 6:42 PM, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
>>
>>> Can you please let me know which license XPP uses? I could not find
>>> informatino in NOTICE and did not find a website whic
On 19 May 2012 10:39, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i wanted to add:
> RedirectMatch Permanent ^/zetacomponents(.*)
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/zetacomponents.html
>
> to the incubators htaccess file, but i have no permission to do so.
> Can somebody help?
You cannot edit the li
On 26 May 2012 03:54, Sam Ruby wrote:
> https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq
>
> Nothing fancy: simple data gathering. Output will be validated and
> placed into svn as input to another tool down the chain.
>
> The topic I would like to discuss is what additional input validation
> should be don
On 31 May 2012 13:58, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Sweet.
>
> It would be really helpful for the pmc field to be a select list of existing
> TLPs / podlings.
Not sure that will always be possible; often the mailing lists are
being created as part of TLP/podling creation.
Even for existing TLPs/podling
On 6 June 2012 05:05, David Crossley wrote:
> Sam Ruby wrote:
>> V3 of the interface:
>>
>> https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq
>> https://whimsy.apache.org/infra/mlreq/incubator
>>
>> Key changes:
>>
>> 1) initially start out with two moderator input fields, both marked as
>> required.
>>
>> 2
On 7 June 2012 02:39, David Crossley wrote:
> Sam Ruby wrote:
>> David Crossley wrote:
>> >
>> > There was an old conversation about this around 2011-10-10, e.g.
>> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.general/31601/focus=31662
>> > suggesting an optional "resourceAlias" attribute
As the subject says: is there any need for a separate
ReportingSchedule page now that we have podlings.xml?
The CMS bookmark allows direct edit via the copy at
http://incubator.apache.org/podlings.xml
So is the Wiki page still necessary?
Thoughts?
---
On 9 June 2012 02:38, David Crossley wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>> As the subject says: is there any need for a separate
>> ReportingSchedule page now that we have podlings.xml?
>
> Some things to take care with, when we modify Clutch:
>
> Clutch based everything on the pr
On 9 June 2012 00:55, wrote:
> Author: crossley
> Date: Fri Jun 8 23:55:11 2012
> New Revision: 1348282
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1348282&view=rev
> Log:
> flume started to graduate.
> oozie updated status page.
> oozie news about 2 new committers.
>
> Modified:
> incubator/pu
On 9 June 2012 15:36, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> The Apache Oozie team is pleased to announce the release of Oozie
> 3.2.0 from the Apache Incubator.
Please include a brief synopsis (1 or 2 sentences) of what Oozie is in
all announcements sent outside the Oozie mailing lists.
The Oozie develope
On 11 June 2012 04:50, David Crossley wrote:
> The RAT status page is giving a 404 Not Found
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/rat.html
>
> The source is still there in SVN at content/projects/rat.xml
> but the generated html is gone on the server.
>
> Perhaps Robert deleted it by accident wh
On 11 June 2012 11:52, sebb wrote:
> On 11 June 2012 04:50, David Crossley wrote:
>> The RAT status page is giving a 404 Not Found
>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/rat.html
>>
>> The source is still there in SVN at content/projects/rat.xml
>> but the gen
Do we still need the following external on
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk ?
svn:external rat -r679965
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat/main/trunk/scan/src/main
Those RAT files have not been updated since 2008.
On 11 June 2012 21:18, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On 06/11/12 15:17, sebb wrote:
>>
>> Do we still need the following external on
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk ?
>>
>> svn:external rat -r679965
>> http://svn.apache.org/repo
On 9 June 2012 05:54, David Crossley wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>> > Author: crossley
>> > Date: Fri Jun 8 23:55:11 2012
>> > New Revision: 1348282
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1348282&view=rev
>> > Log:
>> > flum
On 9 June 2012 02:46, sebb wrote:
> On 9 June 2012 02:38, David Crossley wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>>> As the subject says: is there any need for a separate
>>> ReportingSchedule page now that we have podlings.xml?
>>
>> Some things to take care with, wh
just
>>> > adding (at line 96?)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/site/doap/doap-jspwiki.rdf
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > to
>>> >
>>> https://svn.ap
On 12 June 2012 19:16, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> @sebb: yes, the asfext:pmc entry is corrected
Could you change the name entry as follows please:
Apache JSPWiki (incubating)
I know SIS and Stanbol don't do this currently, but those ought to be fixed too.
&
OK, added to files.xml
On 12 June 2012 19:32, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
wrote:
> done, thanks!
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:26 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 12 June 2012 19:16, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > @sebb: yes
On 14 June 2012 17:34, Joe Stein wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is the first candidate for the second incubator release for
> Apache Kafka, version 0.7.1-incubating.
>
> This release fixes the following issues
> http://people.apache.org/~joestein/kafka-0.7.1-incubating-candidate-1/RELEASE-NOTES.html
>
>
On 22 June 2012 01:29, Jun Rao wrote:
> Kevan,
>
> I agree that to the benefit of users, it would be reasonable for Apache
> projects to include license/notice for all dependant jars (directly or
> indirectly) in a release. However, this has to be done automatically by
> tools, not manually by hum
On 24 June 2012 14:11, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 6/24/12 10:46 AM, Chris Douglas a écrit :
>>
>> Kevan-
>
>
> Hi, jumping on this thread, because we have had similar discussions on
> another incubating project I'm mentoring...
>
>>
>> This argument is logical, but that doesn't make it legal an
On 24 June 2012 17:30, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:32 AM, sebb wrote:
>> The N&L files only apply to what is included in the release archive itself.
>
> +1
>
>> If there are other dependencies, these can be listed in a
>> DEPENDENCI
On 26 June 2012 10:55, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was voted
> negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came that far)
>
> There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list.
> Results:
> PPMC:
> aaf +1
On 26 June 2012 12:43, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
> @Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates?
bcprov
commons-beanutils
commons-codec
commons-collections
ehcache-core
httpclient
httpcore
etc.
Not as many as I thought at first glance, but still quite a lot.
> About Lice
gt; Do we need to write "activation-jar-1.1.jar" instead of "activation.jar"
> ?
Yes, because licenses may change between versions.
> or Line 327 instead of "For SLF4J:" "slf4j-api-1.6.4.jar"
>
> Thanks,
> Sebastian
>
> 2012/6/26 sebb
On 26 June 2012 14:46, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jun 26, 2012, at 9:40 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 26 June 2012 13:28, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Thanks for the feedback and review so far!
>>>
>>> About correct attribution of ASF JARs
>>>
On 26 June 2012 16:26, Fabian Christ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please vote for releasing Apache Stanbol 0.10.0-incubating (RC3).
>
> This release has already passed the PPMC vote [1] with
>
> +1 : 4 votes (including 3 PPMC votes and 1 IPMC vote)
> 0 : 0 votes
> -1 : 0 votes
>
> So, we need at least 2 more
On 28 June 2012 13:12, wrote:
> Author: twilliams
> Date: Thu Jun 28 12:12:43 2012
> New Revision: 1354971
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1354971&view=rev
> Log:
> typo
>
> Modified:
> incubator/public/trunk/content/guides/graduation.xml
>
> Modified: incubator/public/trunk/content/
Or just do it every time the Incubator site is built.
There are likely to be enough changes to ensure it runs once a month.
On 29 June 2012 08:57, Upayavira wrote:
> Ask infra to add it as a cron task.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012, at 09:29 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
>> On 29/06
On 29 June 2012 08:14, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> On 29/06/2012 01:04, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò
>> wrote:
>>> I've drafted a couple of XSLTs for this need:
>> Great!
>>
>>> 2. podlings-report-per-month-exslt.xsl
>>> this will d
On 2 July 2012 09:11, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> We'd like to release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
> on Apache land !)
>
> The vote has already passed on direct memory dev@.
> Vote thread: http://markmail.org/message/a3yczwysqognrtg4
> Vote result:
> +1 (binding): Ant Elder,
On 2 July 2012 14:42, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/7/2 sebb :
>> On 2 July 2012 09:11, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> We'd like to release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
>>> on Apache land !)
>>>
>>> The vote has
On 3 July 2012 19:02, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
> Dear Incubator Members,
>
> this is the 3th Release Candidate (the second Candidate was voted negative
> by the IPMC because of missing exact JAR filenames in LICENSE file and
> missing sources as ZIP not only as .tar.gz)
>
> There was already a
On 5 July 2012 20:45, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like we release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
> on Apache land !)
>
> We solved 54 issues (see http://s.apache.org/DIRECTMEMORY-0.1-incubating)
> See release notes:
> http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/releases/release
nf/access.properties
conf/build_standalone.properties
> Sebastian
>
> 2012/7/3 seba.wag...@gmail.com
>
>> is this the only concern or are there any other objections that will only
>> be checked in the next round?
>>
>> Sebastian
>>
>>
>> 2012/7/
On 6 July 2012 22:35, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/7/6 sebb :
>> On 5 July 2012 20:45, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I'd like we release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
>>> on Apache land !)
>>>
>>> We solved 54
On 7 July 2012 07:48, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/7/7 sebb :
>> On 6 July 2012 22:35, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> 2012/7/6 sebb :
>>>> On 5 July 2012 20:45, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> I'd like we release Apach
On 11 July 2012 22:26, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
wrote:
> Oh, my misunderstanding then. If that's the case, then there is one
> technicality of the apache release process blocking the release
> (distributing dependencies alongside source), although not a tough one.
> I'll file a Jira and reflect
On 27 July 2012 08:22, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> On 27/07/2012 08:13, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>>
>> Le 7/27/12 1:02 AM, Joe Schaefer a écrit :
>>>
>>> I believe Bill is complaining not about the venue,
>>> but the choice of referring to this package as
>>> a "release candidate" instead of s
podi/
>>http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>>http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>>http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>>On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I wish the proposal made my Jukka includes t
On 11 August 2012 00:12, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> This is a call for vote to graduate Oozie podling from Apache Incubator.
>
> Oozie entered the Incubator in July of 2011. Since then it has added
> two new committers and made two significant releases following the ASF
> policies and guidelines.
On 7 August 2012 14:42, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> I'm not sure the vote passed. According to Patrick Hunt's message, we need 3
> +1 IPMC votes, and we only have 2 +1 IPMC votes. The confusing perhaps comes
> from this sentence in the podling release management manual:
>
> "The vote passes if the
On 13 August 2012 03:07, wrote:
> Author: crossley
> Date: Mon Aug 13 02:07:22 2012
> New Revision: 1372240
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1372240&view=rev
> Log:
> AWF is retiring.
>
> Modified:
> incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml
>
> Modified: incubator/public/trunk/con
On 12 August 2012 11:20, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>
> On Aug 12, 2012, at 12:09 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 7 August 2012 14:42, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>>> I'm not sure the vote passed. According to Patrick Hunt's message, we need
>>> 3 +1 IPMC votes, and
On 11 August 2012 00:12, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> This is a call for vote to graduate Oozie podling from Apache Incubator.
>
> Oozie entered the Incubator in July of 2011. Since then it has added
> two new committers and made two significant releases following the ASF
> policies and guidelines.
On 14 August 2012 02:40, David Crossley wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>> > Author: crossley
>> > Date: Mon Aug 13 02:07:22 2012
>> > New Revision: 1372240
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1372240&view=rev
>> > Log:
>> >
On 14 August 2012 03:55, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> Alan, thanks for updating Oozie status page.
>
> Sebb, Bertrand, does the updated status page address your concerns?
Yes, thanks.
> Regarding Bertrand suggestion about leaving an Apache member on the
> PMC, We was no
On 16 August 2012 14:41, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> We have already called and completed a community VOTE with the Any23
> community and the Tika PMC and they have positively recommended Any23's
> graduation from the Incubator.
According to the Incubator status page, the name
On 16 August 2012 17:42, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
> On Aug 16, 2012, at 9:32 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 16 August 2012 14:41, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> We have already called and completed a commu
On 16 August 2012 18:55, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hey Sebb,
>
> On Aug 16, 2012, at 10:47 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>>>>> X. Establish the Apache Any23 Project
>>>>>
>>>>> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
Please note that manually updated directories and files under
dist/incubator (and site files) should always have group = incubator
and should be group-writable.
[If the podling is using svnpubsub then the rules are different; owner
= group = svnwc and it does not have to be group writable]
Otherw
> related to automatic crawling, parsing, analyzing, producing, and converting
> *of* RDF data
> ]]
Suffers from the same problem that I mentioned before:
There's only one object - RDF data - for all the verbs.
However crawling, parsing and analysing don't apply to RDF data (at
On 17 August 2012 10:29, sebb wrote:
> Please note that manually updated directories and files under
> dist/incubator (and site files) should always have group = incubator
> and should be group-writable.
>
> [If the podling is using svnpubsub then the rules are different; owner
&g
On 18 August 2012 18:20, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I don't have karma to mess with svn. Can someone who does please set
> Kato's SVN to Read-Only? I've done the necessary research into the IP
> situation.
Done.
> -
> To unsubscr
The Wiki proposal mentions that Composer has an optional dependency on
the Apache project "BSH".
I could not find an Apache project called BSH.
Is is then BeanShell (which is not an Apache project) or should it be
"BSF" (which is Apache)?
Or perhaps something else entirely?
S
On 22/10/2007, Jas
RATify?
Or rat as in the verb - to rat on something ;-)
On 25/10/2007, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > RAT is a good name and popular but i'm still a little concerned that
> > there are existing open source projects named RAT as well as
> > commercial software containing RAT in t
On 29/10/2007, Erik Abele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 29.10.2007, at 03:13, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 28 October 2007 23:15, Erik Abele wrote:
> >> As BenL always says: "I don't give a shit about some random document,
> >> that could be faked anyway. All I care about is the email ad
On 29/10/2007, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Even if you can't establish a trust path, the PGP signature gives a
> > bit more assurance than a hash. The K
On 10/11/2007, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a new patch
> release of Apache CXF.This release is mostly a patch release to fix
> problems and issues (82 JIRA items resolved) that users have encountered
> in the 2.0.2-incubator
> releas
Does this help?
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html
On 13/11/2007, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the web site archived somewhere, should I just edit the web page under
> /www/incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html
> or is there a better way to do that ?
>
> --
>
RAT should not expect MANIFEST.MF to include a licence.
Would it be useful if it insisted on certain other contents of the
manifest file instead?
e.g.
Implementation-Title:
Implementation-Vendor:
Implementation-Vendor-Id:
Implementation-Version:
Specification-Title:
Specification-Vendor:
Specif
[Eventually found the KEYS file in SVN, but it might be helpful to
provide a pointer in the vote mails]
The NOTICE file in uimaj-2.2.1-incubating-bin.zip refers to the
contributions from IBM:
"Software Grant License Agreement", informally known as the
"IBM UIMA License Agreement".
however, that
On 15/12/2007, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > [Eventually found the KEYS file in SVN, but it might be helpful to
> > provide a pointer in the vote mails]
> >
> >
> yeah, I went to their website and followed the link from there
On 17/12/2007, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 15/12/2007, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> sebb wrote:
> >>> [Eventually found the KEYS file in SVN, but it might be helpful to
> >>> provide a point
On 17/12/2007, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > [Eventually found the KEYS file in SVN, but it might be helpful to
> > provide a pointer in the vote mails]
>
> Good point, will do next time.
>
> [...]
> >
> > There are some prob
On 17/12/2007, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevan Miller wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 17, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote:
> >
> >> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >>> Marshall Schor wrote:
> We've put the LICENSE, NOTICES, and DISCLAIMERs into the top directory
> of the source (an
On 17/12/2007, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2007 5:49 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Your interpretation works if your subversion repository is not a
> > "distribution". IMO, it is and should contain appropriate license/
> > notice/disclaimer.
> >
I
ll do this for the next release.
> (I already opened a JIRA issue for that). It is just open what we have
> to do for the current release.
I've created reformatted versions for the src and bin archives in:
http://people.apache.org/~sebb/UIMA/
in case that helps.
I've not fixed the
On 18/12/2007, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 18/12/2007, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Leo Simons wrote:
> >>> On Dec 18, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> >>>> On D
The NOTICE files need to be updated for 2008, i.e. replace 2007 with
2007-2008 on line 3.
The hash files use a format which is difficult to use, as the hashes
may be split over two lines.
The common MD5 format is either
hex{32}
(i.e. no spaces between hex digits)
or
hex{32}(|*)filename
Simila
On 14/01/2008, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Jan 14, 2008 12:58 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The NOTICE files need to be updated for 2008, i.e. replace 2007 with
> > 2007-2008 on line 3.
>
> The release was rolled on Jan
On 14/01/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14/01/2008, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Jan 14, 2008 12:58 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The NOTICE files need to be updated for 2008, i.e. replace
On 14/01/2008, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 14, 2008, at 2:58 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> > The NOTICE files need to be updated for 2008, i.e. replace 2007 with
> > 2007-2008 on line 3.
>
> Not a blocker for me.
> >
> > The hash files u
On 22/01/2008, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 21, 2008 6:00 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Matthieu Riou wrote:
> >
> > > in committee but not in authorization:
> > > ["dashorst", "ekoneil", "gianugo", "henning", "jgenender", "kevan",
> > "matt",
> > > "mvd
On 22/01/2008, J Aaron Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Just wondering whether Labs would be a suitable place to collaborate
> > on scripts for cross-checking/reformatting the meta data? Also to
> > document the
Some of the NOTICE files start with the text:
${pom.name}
e.g.
tools/wsdl2java
and
modules/policy
This does not seem right.
The top-level NOTICE and LICENSE files in demos/mortgage-loanapproval
are the standard ASF ones - however NOTICE and LICENSE.txt in the
demos/mortgage-loanapproval/src/ma
ncubating-src\modules\implementation-openjpa\test\log
There are also 3 db.lck files.
Are these really needed for the source archive?
> +1 to release.
>
>...ant
>
> On Jan 23, 2008 10:55 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Some of the NOTICE files start with
On 24/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi sebb
>
> Thank you for the detailed review.
>
> Can you tell me what you mean by
>
> On Jan 24, 2008 4:57 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 24/01/2008, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
no Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you please try to build itest/osgi-implementation with a "mvn -U
> clean install" and see if you still have issues. I just tried and it
> completed successfully even with all felix artifacts removed from my
> local maven r
I got a couple of failures when trying to build the Tuscany 1.1 source.
The first time, I got an out of memory error from Java.
I'm assuming this was due to the hundreds of jar and digest files that
were downloaded (at least 760 jar+digest), as the error did not occur
the second time. Possibly th
On 25/01/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got a couple of failures when trying to build the Tuscany 1.1 source.
>
> The first time, I got an out of memory error from Java.
>
> I'm assuming this was due to the hundreds of jar and digest files that
> were downlo
On 25/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2008 8:59 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 24, 2008 9:39 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On 24/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote
There are several problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.
The NOTICE file should only pertain to artefacts actually included in
distribution; it should not have any details of transitive
dependencies. So the "/uses" text should be removed.
The line
This product includes/uses software(s) deve
The CXF build fails several tests.
Environment:
Maven version: 2.0.8
Java version: 1.5.0_13
OS name: "windows xp" version: "5.1" arch: "x86" Family: "windows"
Log file:
http://people.apache.org/~sebb/CXF
On 30/01/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 18/02/2008, Shane Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the NMaven dev list, we have passed a vote for our first release. We
> request approval of the release by the IPMC. The 0.15-incubating version
> supports:
>
> 1) Compiling C# projects (2.0 framework)
> 2) Strong Naming
> 3) Generation of
On 18/02/2008, Shane Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
> Thanks for checking over the staging release. The only missing license
> headers that I could find are in the unit test and integration test source
> files. Do test class files also need the license heade
[Apologies to incubator readers if you get this twice]
On 20/02/2008, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> El mar, 19-02-2008 a las 23:06 -0500, Noel J. Bergman escribió:
> > Endre Stølsvik wrote:
> >
> > > I find the decision to use one single SVN repo for the entire
> > > organization's
On 20/02/2008, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> El mar, 19-02-2008 a las 23:06 -0500, Noel J. Bergman escribió:
> > Endre Stølsvik wrote:
> >
> > > I find the decision to use one single SVN repo for the entire
> > > organization's source pretty strange. I'd believe that one repo
> > > f
On 29/02/2008, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Comments on last version ..
>
> - It looks like you are using a non-applicable template for the board
> resolution. Take a look at other incubator graduation resolutions.
> - Specifically, the paragraph on establishing bylaws isn't applica
On 02/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Audit Report: 2008-01-29 -> 2008-03-02
> ==
>
> * 18 files were added
> * 2 files were modified
> * 0 files were deleted
>
> For details
On 04/03/2008, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 29/02/2008, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Craig L Russell wrote:
> >> Comments on last version ..
> >>
> >> - It looks like you are us
On 05/03/2008, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marnie McCormack wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Several of our project (Qpid) memebers are legally in a difficult position
> > disclosing their employer in Apache world.
>
>
> Does that mean they are contributing in their private time rather
>
On 10/03/2008, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Tuscany community had a vote to release SDO Java 1.1-incubating release
> candidate 2 [1] which was passed with 7+1s and no -1s.
>
> Please vote to approve this release.
>
> The distribution files are at [2]
> Maven artifacts for th
On 10/03/2008, Bob Buffone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Incubator PM,
>
> The XAP team has put together a new release of the project (0.5.0) and
> it has been approved by the xap-dev list with 8 (+1s) and 0 (others). We
It would be helpful to have a link to the vote thread.
> are now asking th
On 11/03/2008, Bob Buffone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 9:23 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release
>
801 - 900 of 1583 matches
Mail list logo
