Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Gobblin (Incubating) as a TLP

Talking to Justin, although you removed the non-Apache logos from the Gobblin home page, he would still like you to start a discussion with trademarks to clarify what would be required to use them. That way, we'll know the rules going forward. Thanks, Owen On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 10:30 PM

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Gobblin (Incubating) as a TLP

he Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Gobblin > > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the > > projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Gobblin > > Project; and be it further > > > > RESOLVED, that the persons liste

Re: [VOTE] Recommend Apache Iceberg graduation to top-level project resolution to the board

of the Apache Iceberg > Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Iceberg Project: > > * Anton Okolnychyi > * Carl Steinbach > * Daniel C. Weeks >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate to a top-level project

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:44 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > I notice a few minor things that may need to be sorted out/dicussed: - You have only made two releases and the last one had some issue around > licensing and NOTICE files > Obviously the first release at Apache takes the longest as the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.8.0-incubating RC2

+1 (binding) On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 8:56 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > Thanks, Justin. Can you be more specific about what you think isn't correct > in the NOTICE file? Our practice is to copy the entire notice of > third-party projects, if they exist. We don't do this for the boiler-plate > ASF

Re: [VOTE] Accept the Iceberg project for incubation

+1 (binding) On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:12 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > On Nov 13, 2018, at 9:10 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > > > +1 binding > > > > On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 11:09, Ryan Blue wrote: > > > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 9:06 AM Ryan Blue wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

I can represent ORC within the group. .. Owen > On Oct 19, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote: > > Hi all, > > We can expect more and more projects will take the huge potential > advantages of storage-class memory for data processing and analytics > because silicon

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Ranger Project from the Incubator - Resending with additional mail distro

+1 (binding) On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Balaji Ganesan wrote: > +1 Great to see the progress from the Ranger community. > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > > > +1 binding > > > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Ramesh

[VOTE] release of Metron_0.1BETA_rc7

+1 on the release. I tested: * The SHA and MD5 checksums are correct. * The GPG signature is correct. * The metron-streaming module builds and the unit tests pass. * The LICENSE and NOTICE file look correct. Things that should be improved before the next release: * The top level

Re: svn commit: r1718228 - in /incubator/public/trunk/content: podlings.xml projects/metron.xml

> + > sponsor="Incubator" startdate="2015-12-06"> > > +Metron is a project dedicated to providing an > > extensible and scalable advanced network security analytics tool. It has > > strong foundations in the Apache Hadoop ecosystem. > &

[RESULT][VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

With 10 binding +1's and 10 non-binding +1's and no -1's, the vote to accept Metron in the Apache Incubator passes. Thank you everyone. Binding +1's: Owen O'Malley Chris Nauroth Chris Mattmann Seetharan Venkatesh P. Taylor Goetz Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli Brock Noland Billie Rinaldi

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

; > > From: Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> > > > Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org > > > > > Date: Tuesday, December 1, 2015 at 2:02 AM > > > To: Incubator General <general@incubator.apache.org>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: > The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on > whether Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is > pasted below and is available on t

[VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

The [DISCUSS] thread has would down, so I'd like to start a VOTE on whether Apache Incubator should accept Metron as a podling. The proposal is pasted below and is available on the wiki as well. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetronProposal We've added a paragraph in the background section

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote: > Would like to know who in Cisco was asked actually. I am from Cisco and > can help. Debo, If you can help get an SGA signed that would be great. I don't have any contacts in Cisco, so I didn't have anywhere to

Re: [VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I think that there was a still pending question of why not ask Cisco for an > SGA for cleanliness. The answer that I gave you on board@apache was that large corporations don't sign legal documents unless they perceive

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

Not that it changes the result, but I also voted +1. https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg52096.html .. Owen On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > This vote is now closed and passes with 17 binding +1 votes, 7 non-binding > +1 votes

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

Thanks for the good suggestion, Bertrand. I've included your paragraph in the background section of the proposal. .. Owen On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apach

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

in attacks. > > I for one would be interested in lending a hand as a contributor or > > committer - if that would be welcomed. > > > > > >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, >

Re: [DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Owen, > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: > > ...The > > condensed version is that the original code base (OpenSOC) was created &g

[DISCUSS] Metron incubator proposal

Hi all, We'd like to start a discussion proposing creating Metron as an incubator podling. The proposal is on the wiki here: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetronProposal I would call your attention to the background section in particular. The condensed version is that the original code base

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 11/23/15, 8:23 AM, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" > > wrote: > > > > >Alex, > > > > > >Please re-read my email. As I

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > -1 (binding) > I’d like to see the project start with CTR and use RTC only for specific > cases (like where tests must be modified, over X (1000 lines?) of code > added, etc. > > I must say I do find

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > -1 (binding) > I’d like to see the project start with CTR and use RTC only for specific > cases (like where tests must be modified, over X (1000 lines?) of code > added, etc. > > Ralph > > > > On Nov

Resigning as HAWQ mentor

All, I'd like to resign as a HAWQ mentor. HAWQ will still have 5 mentors, so it should still be in good shape. Thanks, Owen

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 (binding) On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:42 AM, wp chun wrote: > +1 > wp_c...@hotmail.com > > > > On 10/23/15, 11:26 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz" wrote: > > > > >+1 (binding) > > > > > >-Taylor > > > > > >> On Oct 23, 2015, at 10:11 AM, Manoharan, Arun

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

> >>open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the > > > >>public, relative to distributed and scalable OLAP engine > > > >> > > > >>NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > > > >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Eagle incubator proposal

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would suggest that Owen O'Malley has not had enough time to be a viable > mentor recently and should not be on the list of mentors. > I have been helping Kylin out and it is graduating, so I'm down to

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Calcite from the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Sep 14, 2015, at 22:56, Balaji Ganesan wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Chris Nauroth

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin-0.7.2-incubating

* Checked GPG signature and hashes. * Built and ran unit tests. * Checked that all java files had Apache headers. * All of the java files are in org.apache.kylin package. Only exceptions were in the atopcalcite module: * net.hydromatic.optiq.runtime * org.eigenbase.sql2rel Are those

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin-0.7.2-incubating

On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: (NOTE next time probably use sha512) I'd like to second the request for using sha512 and not including md5.

Re: [VOTE] Accept REEF into the Apache Incubator

* Brian Cho * Byung-Gon Chun # Sponsors ## Champions Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org ## Nominated Mentors * Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org * Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org * Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org ## Sponsoring Entity The Apache Incubator

Re: [VOTE] Argus as a new incubator project

With 10 binding +1's and 5 non-binding +1's and no -1's, the vote passes. Thanks everyone, Owen On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:34 PM, j...@nanthrax.net wrote: +1 (binding) Regards JB On 2014-07-23 22:32, Arun Murthy wrote: +1 (binding) Arun On Jul 21, 2014, at 9:03 AM, Owen

[VOTE] Argus as a new incubator project

Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Argus as a new Incubator project. The proposal draft is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ArgusProposal, and is also included below. Vote is open for 72h and closes at 24 July 2014 at 10am PST. [ ] +1 accept Argus

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: when all PPMCs including mentors and committers are from same organizations Argus *does* have an external mentor. Jakob Homan is working at LinkedIn and has never worked at Hortonworks. I've been looking for a

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

Sorry that should be but I have not found one yet. On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: when all PPMCs including mentors and committers are from same organizations Argus

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

Thanks, Daniel. I'll add you to the proposal. .. Owen On Jul 18, 2014, at 12:36, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote: On 07/18/2014 09:33 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: Sorry that should be but I have not found one yet. On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote: Establishing trust and a track record of inclusion and openness will be essential for Argus to achieve your objectives, if I understand them correctly. I encourage you to address concerns raised on this thread about

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: HI, Just curious if you could give reference to Apache encourages disjoint teams to form independent projects, even when those projects overlap in scope statement ? Henry, It generally comes from the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

with the same lack of PMC/committer diversity with which it entered, this is in effect Apache-washing, in my opinion. A stacked PMC is no more open a community then one controlled by a BDFL and hosted on GitHub. On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Owen O'Malley omal

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote: Have you considered reaching out to the Sentry community to see if they would be interested in bringing Argus existing code base into Sentry? We did consider it, but decided that the challenge of integrating the two

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe we should start asking incubator project to try to build some kind of momentum or community before going to ASF incubator. Apache incubator is a great place for new projects to grow their community and

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Argus Proposal

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Sean Owen sro...@apache.org wrote: The proposal just says it overlaps, and that it might be good have a different group of people reimplement some of the same things. Is there a real gap that people want to build to plug here with overlap at the edges, or is

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratosphere into the incubator

( ga...@apache.org ) === Nominated Mentors === * Sean Owen ( sro...@apache.org ) (Note: Sean is an Apache member but not currently on the IPC, he will need to request IPMC membership) * Ted Dunning ( tdunn...@apache.org ) * Owen O'Malley ( omal...@apache.org ) * Henry Saputra

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox-0.3.1-incubating RC3

+1 on the RC. I checked the signatures, looked for license headers, built, and ran unit tests. For the next release, please add a license header to gateway-shell/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/gateway/shell/BasicResponse.java. On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Devaraj Das d...@hortonworks.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox-0.3.1-incubating RC3

On further inspection, I see the header is there, but not at the top of the file. Please move it in a future release. -- Owen On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote: +1 on the RC. I checked the signatures, looked for license headers, built, and ran unit tests

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Ambari from Apache Incubator

+1 for graduation (binding) On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Arun C. Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote: [ ] +1 Graduate Ambari from Incubator +1 for graduation (binding) thanks, Arun On Nov 15, 2013, at 9:12 AM, Yusaku Sako yus...@hortonworks.com wrote: This is a call for vote

Re: [VOTE] Accept Falcon into the Apache Incubator (was originally named Ivory)

+1 (binding) On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Leif Hedstrom zw...@apache.org wrote: On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:54 PM, Srikanth Sundarrajan wrote: [ ] +1 Accept Apache Falcon into the Incubator [ ] +0 Don't care. [ ] -1 Don't accept Apache Falcon into the Incubator because... +1. Binding.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: At least in Hadoop ecosystem I know of no other project that provides a combined bundle for the checksums. Have you looked at the Hadoop releases? http://www.us.apache.org/dist/hadoop/common/hadoop-1.1.2/ -- Owen

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be separate files for each hash type. Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided. In what way are they wrong? It is a perfectly well defined output format that is the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tajo into the Apache Incubator

With 11 binding +1's and 5 non-binding +1's the vote passes. Jakob, can you start the process for setting up the project? Thanks, all. -- Owen On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 3:48 AM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tajo into the Apache Incubator

) * Sangwook Kim (Inervit) * Yi A Liu (Intel) The nominated mentors are employees of NASA JPL, LinkedIn, and Hortonworks. * Chris Mattmann - NASA JPL * Jakob Homan - LinkedIn * Owen O'Malley - Hortonworks = Sponsors = == Champion == * Jakob Homan ghoman AT apache

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tez into Incubator

at microsoft dot com * Namit Jain namit at apache dot org * Nathan Roberts nroberts at yahoo dash inc dot com * Owen O'Malley omalley at apache dot org * Robert Evans bobby at apache dot org * Siddharth Seth sseth at apache dot org * Tom White tomwhite at apache dot org * Thomas Graves tgraves

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Apache Open Climate Workbench into the Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Hi Everyone, This VOTE has passed with the following tallies: +1 Chris Mattmann* Andrew Hart* Daniel Gruno Paul Ramirez* Gary Martin Ross Gardler* Ted Dunning* Alexei

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Knox Hadoop Gateway Project into the Incubator

McCay (Hortonworks) John Speidel (Hortonworks) Tom Beerbower (Hortonworks) Sumit Mohanty (Hortonworks) Venkatesh Seetharm (Hortonworks) Owen O'Malley (Hortonworks) Mahadev Konar (Hortonworks) Alan Gates (Hortonworks) Devaraj Das (Hortwonrks) Chris Douglas (Microsoft) Chris Mattmann (NASA

Re: [VOTE] Graduate HCatalog from the incubator and become part of Hive

+1 (binding) On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Binding. On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Alexander Alten-Lorenz wget.n...@gmail.comwrote: +1, non-binding - Alex On Feb 5, 2013, at 10:06 AM, Sushanth Sowmyan khorg...@gmail.com wrote: And

Re: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.2-incubating (Candidate 5)

On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Joe Stein crypt...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to keep the vote open for another few days to give the IPMC members time to review and vote, thanks. Joe, Could you update your gpg key: * set it in id.apache.org * get someone who knows you to sign it.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HCatalog 0.4.0-incubating

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Alan Gates ga...@hortonworks.com wrote: Hi, Please vote for releasing Apache HCatalog 0.4.0-incubating. rc6 for this release has passed a PPMC vote and is now advancing to an IPMC vote. +1 (binding) verified sigs, checked rat, and compiled.

Re: Ambari Status

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote: Also, I noticed that ddas signed off on it as a mentor.  I don't see him listed as an Apache member or IPMC member. He was added to the IPMC. The message from Noel was dated 6 Oct 2011. Note: he is currently

Re: Ambari Status

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote: In reviewing the Amabari report, I have a couple of notes/concerns:  * The community IMHO is in serious risk of failure to launch.  A recent code change has sparked project interest, but list activity was non

Re: Ambari Status

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Sounds like the project community still needs to learn how to develop code out in the open. The massive revision 1335750 [1] seems to have been based on no open discussion on the mailing list or the issue tracker.

Re: [DISCUSS] BOM and supported platforms for Bigtop 0.4.0

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Bruno Mahé bm...@apache.org wrote: ... It seems that we're talking about this location:  http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/bigtop/bigtop-0.3.0-incubating/ Again, we don't distribute

Re: [DISCUSS] BOM and supported platforms for Bigtop 0.4.0

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote: They are proposing adding Hue, which is a Apache licensed project on Github. Does Hue match the guidelines in http://www.apache.org/legal

Re: [DISCUSS] BOM and supported platforms for Bigtop 0.4.0

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: I don't understand the BigTop use cases Perhaps this preso can help a bit:    http://people.apache.org/~rvs/apache-bigtop2.pdf Notes from this presentation: * 100% Apache Bigdata management distribution * Bigtop is a

Re: [DISCUSS] BOM and supported platforms for Bigtop 0.4.0

On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Now (again IIUC) the interesting bit is whether it's better for BigTop to be repackaging and -distributing upstream components by itself, or if it would in fact be better for BigTop to simply provide something like

Re: [DISCUSS] BOM and supported platforms for Bigtop 0.4.0

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: I don't understand the BigTop use cases Perhaps this preso can help a bit

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Giraph to a TLP

With 4 binding +1's from the IPMC, I'll add the resolution to the board agenda. -- Owen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] BOM and supported platforms for Bigtop 0.4.0

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: It's not the job of the incubator to create new rules, but rather to help podlings to graduation while following existing Apache guidelines. We aren't making new rules. We are trying to help the Bigtop project understand the

Re: [DISCUSS] BOM and supported platforms for Bigtop 0.4.0

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler eri...@hortonworks.com wrote: So you are suggesting expanding the charter to include projects not hosted at Apache? I don't think this is what Bruno suggested.

Re: [DISCUSS] BOM and supported platforms for Bigtop 0.4.0

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Bruno Mahé bm...@apache.org wrote: As a mentor of the Bigtop project, I don't see it as acceptable for an Apache project to distribute binaries of non-Apache software. If the owners of the Hue project decide to donate it to Apache and it had been released by

Re: Giraph status (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of April2012 by OwenOmalley)

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Thanks for the report, Giraph! On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote: + Next steps: + * Another incubator release + * Adding new committers Looking at the report and recent

Re: Other mentors for accumulo?

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Bernd Fondermann bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote: I've signed up myself, too. I'll sign up too. -- Owen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo to join the Incubator

Vines, National Security Agency  * Chris Waring, National Security Agency == Sponsors ==  * Champion: Doug Cutting == Nominated Mentors ==  * Benson Margulies  * Alan Cabrera  * Bernd Fondermann  * Owen O'Malley == Sponsoring Entity ==  * Apache Incubator

Re: [VOTE] Change the name of the HMS podling to Ambari.

With 8 +1's and no -1's, the name change passes. -- Owen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo for the Apache Incubator

Is the NSA going to file a code grant for the project? How deeply embedded are the LGPL dependencies? Are they optional components or mandatory? Thanks, Owen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accumulo for the Apache Incubator

On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Adam P Fuchs adam.p.fu...@ugov.gov wrote: The project looks interesting. I believe the answer is yes regarding the code grant, and I am currently confirming that with our lawyers. We'll get you an official answer early next week. Great. I know that the US

[VOTE] Change the name of the HMS podling to Ambari.

When I was doing the initial trademark search for HMS, I found that there are a lot of projects (including software) named HMS. It also has the problem of being very bad to search for (42.7m hits on google). Before I go through and create the infrastructure for Apache incubator, I wanted to

Re: [VOTE] Accept HMS as an incubator project

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Devaraj Das d...@hortonworks.com wrote: Hello everyone, This is a vote proposing that HMS be accepted as a project in the Apache Incubator. HMS is monitoring, administration and lifecycle management project for Apache Hadoop clusters. The latest proposal is

Re: [VOTE] Giraph to join the incubator

+1 (binding)

Re: [VOTE] Release HCatalog 0.1-incubating (RC1)

Ok, I've verified the key, signature and md5. All of the unit tests passed. +1

Re: [PROPOSAL] Proposing Giraph for the Apache Incubator

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Avery Ching ach...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: Hi, I would like to propose Giraph as an Apache Incubator project. Obviously, I'm +1 for this. *smile* -- Owen

Re: [PROPOSAL] Bigtop for the Apache Incubator

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Tom White tomwh...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I would like to propose Bigtop to be an Apache Incubator project. Bigtop is a project for the development of packaging and tests of the Hadoop ecosystem. The goal is to do testing at various levels (packaging,

Re: Hadoop related Incubator projects

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote: There are some which indicate that their sole impediment to graduation is community size. Has there been any consideration of the Hadoop TLP picking them up as sub-projects? Wow, the wheels turn. The Hadoop PMC was

Basing Apache releases on releases from incubating projects

In http://bit.ly/fhCxIt , Steve argued that it isn't permitted for non- podling releases to depend on the artifacts that come out of podlings. I believe that to be false, but I can't find a relevant statement in the FAQ. Can I get clarification? Thanks, Owen

Re: Basing Apache releases on releases from incubating projects

On Dec 1, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: It is common for podlings to import their code here and only then start cleaning up dependencies that do not comply with ASF requirements. So if another project release contains unreleased code from a podling, it might not be clean. In

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gora into the Apache Incubator

+1 binding - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Thrift 0.3.0 RC6

On Jul 28, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Bryan Duxbury wrote: The GPG signature can be found at http://people.apache.org/~bryanduxbury/thrift-0.3.0-rc6.tar.gz.aschttp://people.apache.org/%7Ebryanduxbury/thrift-0.3.0-rc6.tar.gz.asc Shouldn't you make a KEYS file in subversion somewhere so that people

Re: Thrift 0.3.0 RC6

On Aug 2, 2010, at 11:37 AM, Bryan Duxbury wrote: Owen - I'm not sure I understand what you mean, particularly because your link doesn't work. *Sigh* You'd think that the 5 billion times that I'd typed the Hadoop subversion URL that I wouldn't mess it up any more.

Re: [Result][Vote] Move Chukwa to incubator

, Chris Douglas, Greg Reddin Option 3) Bernd Fondermann Owen O'Malley +1 on proposal Sorry, I meant to vote for option 2. I think that it would be good to have more visibility in before they become a TLP. They also need to figure out how to add new committers to their project. -- Owen

Re: [VOTE] Move Chukwa to incubator

On Jun 21, 2010, at 10:29 AM, Eric Yang wrote: Please vote as to whether you think Chukwa should move to Apache incubator. The proposal is posted at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChukwaProposal +1 - To unsubscribe,

Re: [VOTE] Should we accept Pig as a Hadoop subproject?

Owen O'Malley wrote: Should we accept Pig as a subproject? With six +1's from the Hadoop PMC, the vote passes. Hadoop will have a new subproject. *smile* -- Owen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional