[OT] Subproject Proposal - crossdb

> It is a problem people can understand and is easy to become > fascinated with. > > Similar to they way everyone in the world has created their > own text editor. Pah! Text Editors are for weenies. Real developers write their own window manager :) -- NOTICE This e-mail and any attachm

AW: AW: Subproject Proposal - crossdb

-Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. April 2002 23:55 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: Subproject Proposal - crossdb On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 16:01, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > > Yuck. Why do people feel the need to inve

RE: Subproject Proposal - crossdb

Hi Kevin, > Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If anything, crossdb is something that is a few generations > behind Torque in > > terms of functionality and design. > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/torque/ > > Yeah... I was going to point this out. > > > Funny h

AW: Subproject Proposal - crossdb

>Torque is nice, but you have to specify the database first in the XML. >Usually, I prefer to code Java instead of XML. If it was the other way i solved this by writing a little tools that analyzes the database and generates the xml for me. but this is for my own tool not for torque ;) it also r

RE: Subproject Proposal - crossdb

Hi Amarendran, If you analyse the database, then you have to define it first using an SQL script, or something. We felt the need for a tool that, taking a set of classes, created the tables for us and filled them with the objects. For example, if we have public class Nested { private in

RE: Subproject Proposal - crossdb

Check out jdocentral.org, vendors implementing the Java Data Object (JSR-12 jcp.org) specification do that stuff. I personally like Zodo JDO (http://www.solarmetric.com/). It is pretty slick, it does exactly what you want to do. Given a class that you build in Java it can generate tables and m

AW: Subproject Proposal - crossdb

Hi Alex, >If you analyse the database, then you have to define it first using an SQL >script, or something. We felt the need for a tool that, taking a set of ok i see, i normally use ER-Tools to create the database using a GUI which is really good for the overview and documentation purposes. So

Re: Subproject Proposal - crossdb

Fernandez Martinez, Alejandro wrote: > > I can imagine why people do their OR tool: because existing ones do not > fulfill their necessities. In fact, that's what happened to me recently. Exactly. I haven't seen a decent one so far (except for NeXT/Apple WebObjects). So if you want to compar

RE: Subproject Proposal - crossdb

Now I wonder if using crossdb for Torque would be a good idea. Reason being is that you wouldn't have to rebuild all your classes and scripts like you would using Torque now if you wanted to use a different database. Or even modifying the database, you wouldn't have to rebuild everything, jus

Re: Subproject Proposal - crossdb

on 4/24/02 8:13 AM, "Bala Kamallakharan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I personally like Zodo JDO > (http://www.solarmetric.com/). It is pretty slick, it > does exactly what you want to do. Given a class that > you build in Java it can generate tables and make the > classes Persistence Capable. >

[OT] OR mapping tools as a commodity

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: >on 4/24/02 8:13 AM, "Bala Kamallakharan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > > > >>I personally like Zodo JDO >>(http://www.solarmetric.com/). It is pretty slick, it >>does exactly what you want to do. Given a class that >>you build in Java it can generate tables and make th

[OT] RE: Subproject Proposal - crossdb

Thanks for the plug. Whenever I need a commercial product, I will certainly use Zodo JDO. For now, I will stick to free software. Un saludo, Alex. > -Mensaje original- > De: Bala Kamallakharan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: miércoles 24 de abril de 2002 17:13 > Para: Jakarta G

Re: AW: Subproject Proposal - crossdb

Amarendran Subramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>Torque is nice, but you have to specify the database first in the XML. >>Usually, I prefer to code Java instead of XML. If it was the other way > > i solved this by writing a little tools that analyzes the database > and generates the xml for

RE: Subproject Proposal - crossdb

At 9:30 AM -0600 4/24/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Now I wonder if using crossdb for Torque would be a good idea. >Reason being is that you wouldn't have to rebuild all your classes >and scripts like you would using Torque now if you wanted to use a >different database. Or even modifying the

Re: Subproject Proposal - crossdb

Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 9:30 AM -0600 4/24/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Now I wonder if using crossdb for Torque would be a good >> idea. Reason being is that you wouldn't have to rebuild all your >> classes and scripts like you would using Torque now if you wanted to >>

RE: Subproject Proposal - crossdb

> From: Jon Scott Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > on 4/22/02 12:19 AM, "Leo Simons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > While these may not be accurate summaries, I hope you now do see that > > CrossDB and Torque are not, in the majority of use cases, alternatives > > to one another. > > I'

Re: Subproject Proposal - crossdb

> > > Only >$3000 to deploy it! > > Bah. This stuff should be free. > Maybe this is a project for Jakarta :-) I am interested in an Open Source Alternative, I am sure a lot of folks are JDO spec came out a couple of months back...I am

New Subproject proposal Config4J

Hi. I would like to propose a new subproject called Config4J. The aim of this project is to provide developers with a generic framework to help with setting up application level configuration in Java applications, in a manner similar to what Log4J does for logging. I have a first cut of the cod

Re: New Subproject proposal Config4J

on 4/24/02 4:50 PM, "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > > I would like to propose a new subproject called Config4J. > > The aim of this project is to provide developers with a generic > framework to help with setting up application level configuration in > Java applications, in a manner si

Re: New Subproject proposal Config4J

I didnt realise that. Will check it out and send what I have to the folks who are managing that. Cheers /sam Daniel Rall wrote: > > Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > on 4/24/02 4:50 PM, "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Hi. > >> > >> I would like to propose a new

Re: New Subproject proposal Config4J

on 4/24/02 5:04 PM, "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I didnt realise that. > > Will check it out and send what I have to the folks who > are managing that. > > Cheers > /sam You may also want to pass this on: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/newproject.html One more thing, come up with a

Re: New Subproject proposal Config4J

Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > on 4/24/02 4:50 PM, "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> I would like to propose a new subproject called Config4J. >> >> The aim of this project is to provide developers with a generic >> framework to help with setting up application le

Re: New Subproject proposal Config4J

Dumb question. Where is this jakarta-commons-sandbox/configuration that you mentioned below. Its not listed anywhere on http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/components.html Thanks ./s Daniel Rall wrote: > > Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > on 4/24/02 4:50 PM, "Sam" <[EMAIL

Re: New Subproject proposal Config4J

The creativity went out the window, right after the dot Coms with their -creative- work enviornments :) ./s Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > > on 4/24/02 5:04 PM, "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I didnt realise that. > > > > Will check it out and send what I have to the folks who > > are ma

Re: New Subproject proposal Config4J

On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:50, Sam wrote: > Hi. > > I would like to propose a new subproject called Config4J. Theres a few of these around all solving similar things. Is there anything that distinguishes it from the Preferences API in JDK1.4? (Except that it would run on pre-jdk1.4 JVMs). The Prefe

RE: RE: Subproject Proposal - crossdb

So, I'm kind of curious what the general consensus is regarding this. Seems to be in various directions. Travis Original Message From: Jeff Schnitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 2002-04-24 To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Subproject Proposal - crossdb > From

Re: New Subproject proposal Config4J

On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Sam wrote: > Where is this jakarta-commons-sandbox/configuration that you mentioned > below. > > Its not listed anywhere on > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/components.html The component doesn't have a website yet. You can get to the files via viewcvs: http://cvs.apache

tomcat4 context problem

Hi everybody, I am using tomcat4-4.0-1 tomcat4-webapps-4.0-1 mod_webapp-1.0-1 rpms and I have set apache - tomcat connection successfully. So now I can access sample servlet as http://192.168.0.26:8180/examples/servlet/HelloWorldExample as well as http://192.168.0