Jan Kundrát wrote:
>Alin Nastac wrote:
>
>
>>this has been discussed before.
>>summary: tarballs could be used by more than one package. this way
>>you'll manage to increase the disk space demands for our mirrors.
>>
>>
>
>This one is about sorting by first letter of filename. It won't solve
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 19:54:28 + "Stuart Herbert"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On 3/6/06, Alin Nastac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > this has been discussed before.
| > summary: tarballs could be used by more than one package. this way
| > you'll manage to increase the disk space demands for our m
On Monday 06 March 2006 18:05, Kito wrote:
> On Mar 6, 2006, at 1:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > Alfredo has joined the Gentoo team to help with the games herd. I'm
> > sure
> > he'll have a fun time "testing" all those games :)
> >
> > Alfredo writes about himself:
> > "I live
Kito wrote:
>
> On Mar 6, 2006, at 1:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Hi all.
>>
>> Alfredo has joined the Gentoo team to help with the games herd. I'm sure
>> he'll have a fun time "testing" all those games :)
>>
>> Alfredo writes about himself:
>> "I live in Rome, Italy.
>
>
> Italians, I
On Mar 6, 2006, at 1:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
Alfredo has joined the Gentoo team to help with the games herd. I'm
sure
he'll have a fun time "testing" all those games :)
Alfredo writes about himself:
"I live in Rome, Italy.
Italians, Italians, everywhere Italians!
echo "
On Monday 06 March 2006 17:39, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
I guess some advanced /etc/portage/bashrc magic isn't enough for you?
There are some neat tricks you can play with that.
While magic is great, it is also not for all end users. bashrc magic is
not officially supported by the Portage t
On Monday 06 March 2006 17:49, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> Documentation is uncountable. So no singular or plural ;-)
Uh, that was meant ironic, considering Ciaran's remarks to others, that they
should know about this or that, leading to the one or the other inflaming
thread. But thanks for the expl
On Monday 06 March 2006 17:39, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> I guess some advanced /etc/portage/bashrc magic isn't enough for you?
> There are some neat tricks you can play with that.
I consider this sort of ugly hack. And I don't see the point why everyone
should do this, while a maintainer, even when
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Welcome to the team Emanuele :)
Welcome!
__
Sandro Bonazzola (Sanchan)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Michael Renner wrote:
> Introducing an additional directory hierarchy should fix this, and is
> the common solution for this problem for various projects, be it debian
> [1], cpan [2], slackware [3], etc.
>
>
> One migration scenario for a better future:
>
> Create subdirectories named after th
On Monday 06 March 2006 20:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Alfredo has joined the Gentoo team to help with the games herd. I'm sure
> he'll have a fun time "testing" all those games :)
Welcome!
We're really going to form a conspiracy now :P
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~fl
On Monday 06 March 2006 20:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Emanuele is a 23 year old student in computer science at the university
> of Catania, in Italy. Besides spending time on Gentoo he's fond of
> manga/anime, listening/playing music, poetry and mysticism.
Welcome :)
This is going to help our
wt! =)
On Mar 6, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Grobian wrote:
At last... :)
Welcome Emanuele!
On 06-03-2006 20:41:28 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
Slightly late but never the less I'd like to introduce Emanuele
Giaquinta (exg) who joined the team a few weeks ago. Emanuele will be
working o
On Sunday 05 March 2006 19:29, Marcelo Góes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am basically mailing this new draft on behalf of Ciaran, I just ok'd it
> :-). Please read and comment.
>
I'm really sorry that I didn't act upon a previous proposal in this area. I'm
still putting the finishing touches on my Ph.D.
On Monday 06 March 2006 18:11, MIkey wrote:
> Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > Take a look at the options offered by a custom /etc/portage/bashrc. One
> > can do almost anything there. You can have it read in configuration files
> > and whatever. The documentation is kindof lacking, but most portage
> > f
On 3/6/06, Alin Nastac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this has been discussed before.
> summary: tarballs could be used by more than one package. this way
> you'll manage to increase the disk space demands for our mirrors.
And you can't hard-link the files into multiple directories because ...?
Bes
Alin Nastac wrote:
> this has been discussed before.
> summary: tarballs could be used by more than one package. this way
> you'll manage to increase the disk space demands for our mirrors.
This one is about sorting by first letter of filename. It won't solve
multiple different files with same fil
At last... :)
Welcome Emanuele!
On 06-03-2006 20:41:28 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Slightly late but never the less I'd like to introduce Emanuele
> Giaquinta (exg) who joined the team a few weeks ago. Emanuele will be
> working on Gentoo/OSX and ppc stuff when he's not making u
Stuart Herbert wrote:
>Why not have the directory structure follow the package category
>structure? E.g. the distfiles for package foo/bar goes into the
>directory ${MIRROR_ROOT}/foo/bar?
>
>This should be easy enough to support in Portage, and if applied to
>the /usr/portage/distfiles directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Alfredo writes about himself:
> "I live in Rome, Italy. Well, I used to live there. Now I'm some
> kilometers away. I own a club, not alone, that is about open source,
> digital freedom mixed with entertainment. you can see that at
> http://linux-club.org. Have to spend
Hi all.
Slightly late but never the less I'd like to introduce Emanuele
Giaquinta (exg) who joined the team a few weeks ago. Emanuele will be
working on Gentoo/OSX and ppc stuff when he's not making up weird
potions :)
Before joining Gentoo Emanuele has contributed to gentoo, rxvt-unicode
and oth
Hi all.
Alfredo has joined the Gentoo team to help with the games herd. I'm sure
he'll have a fun time "testing" all those games :)
Alfredo writes about himself:
"I live in Rome, Italy. Well, I used to live there. Now I'm some
kilometers away. I own a club, not alone, that is about open source,
Hi,
On 3/6/06, Michael Renner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as suggested by Mike in http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123335,
> here's my proposal for changing the layout of the distfiles tree:
> Introducing an additional directory hierarchy should fix this, and is
> the common solutio
Simon Stelling wrote:
Daniel Ostrow wrote:
Hrm, /me thinks you are missing something there, almost the entire
tree doesn't explicitly state the mirror://gentoo SRC_URI, portage
handles that automatically. That being the case portage would have
change so that the automatic lookup was mirror:
On Monday 06 March 2006 13:18, Simon Stelling wrote:
> Daniel Ostrow wrote:
> > Hrm, /me thinks you are missing something there, almost the entire tree
> > doesn't explicitly state the mirror://gentoo SRC_URI, portage handles
> > that automatically. That being the case portage would have change so
Simon Stelling wrote:
> Alec Warner wrote:
>
>> Taking the earlier comment ( changing files only on the mirrors )
>> there are no portage changes that are technically required. However,
>> you'd need to change about 1 ( random number I pulled out of my
>> ass, but there are many affected ) SR
Daniel Ostrow wrote:
Hrm, /me thinks you are missing something there, almost the entire tree
doesn't explicitly state the mirror://gentoo SRC_URI, portage handles that
automatically. That being the case portage would have change so that the
automatic lookup was mirror://gentoo/${firstchar}/. So
On Monday 06 March 2006 12:36, Alec Warner wrote:
> Michael Renner wrote:
> > Kurt Lieber wrote:
> >> If we can come up with a seamless, painless transition process, great,
> >> let's make it happen.
> >
> > From the _MIRROR_-side using hardlinks should be fine enough, we'd just
> > have to ensure
Alec Warner wrote:
Taking the earlier comment ( changing files only on the mirrors ) there
are no portage changes that are technically required. However, you'd
need to change about 1 ( random number I pulled out of my ass, but
there are many affected ) SRC_URI's to point to the new format,
Michael Renner wrote:
Kurt Lieber wrote:
If we can come up with a seamless, painless transition process, great,
let's make it happen.
From the _MIRROR_-side using hardlinks should be fine enough, we'd just
have to ensure that every mirror uses -H (preserve hardlinks). And for
the mirror
Kurt Lieber wrote:
If we can come up with a seamless, painless transition process, great,
let's make it happen.
From the _MIRROR_-side using hardlinks should be fine enough, we'd just
have to ensure that every mirror uses -H (preserve hardlinks). And for
the mirrors not using -H this will ju
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> Take a look at the options offered by a custom /etc/portage/bashrc. One
> can do almost anything there. You can have it read in configuration files
> and whatever. The documentation is kindof lacking, but most portage
> features could actually be removed in favour of a cust
Alec Warner wrote:
Is this plan for server side only distfiles, or do you want
/usr/portage/distfiles/{a-z}/ on the local system as well.
Changing the layout on the server suffices, no need to fiddle around
with more scripts than necessary ;).
Is there any needed performance benefit out of
On Saturday 04 March 2006 17:02, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> On Saturday 04 March 2006 02:04, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > This is undocumented and unofficial, so feel free to utterly ignore
> > it and commit whatever the heck you want.
> >
> > The 'doc' and 'examples' (yay for consistency!)
>
> Don't no
On Sunday 05 March 2006 23:38, MIkey wrote:
>
> That is of course always an option.
>
> But, I have a dream... That some day, some way, I will be able to
> control _everything_ I need relating to building and installing via USE
> flags and package.use.
>
> I don't think using _anything_ in the env
On Saturday 04 March 2006 17:00, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> On Saturday 04 March 2006 16:43, Dan Armak wrote:
> > If you're concerned about diskspace you can filter out /usr/share/doc
> > entirely, so users do have the choice. The problem here is that the
> > docs USE flag is off by default. Making mo
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 07:59:14AM -0500 or thereabouts, Alec Warner wrote:
> I believe the Infrastructure team also doesn't want to change the
> layout, but I'll leave it up to them to comment on their own policy ;)
We'd love to change the layout to something similar to what Michael
proposed. It
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Saturday 04 March 2006 15:45, Danny van Dyk wrote:
Just to throw in my 2 cents into this discussion: I'm all against
die-ing during the update process. However, i think that stopping
before the update process would be the best solution at hand. I'd like
to propose the
On Saturday 04 March 2006 15:45, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> Just to throw in my 2 cents into this discussion: I'm all against
> die-ing during the update process. However, i think that stopping
> before the update process would be the best solution at hand. I'd like
> to propose the addition of a dedic
Michael Renner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as suggested by Mike in http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123335,
> here's my proposal for changing the layout of the distfiles tree:
> Introducing an additional directory hierarchy should fix this, and is
> the common solution for this problem for various pro
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:37:09 +0100 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| On Monday 06 March 2006 01:19, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > That's exactly it. It requires a client to look at and be able to
| > handle all other news items just to read a single item.
|
| Who says that the client should
On Monday 06 March 2006 01:19, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
> That's exactly it. It requires a client to look at and be able to
> handle all other news items just to read a single item.
Who says that the client should do this? In my opinion doing so is an
improvement of the user experience, but not r
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:23:21AM +0100, Jose Alberto Suarez Lopez <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that it's a nice idea.
> Maybe 2 versions: with X and w/o X just to reduce the space needed.
How would shipping twice the number of images save space? However, at
the last count there was 1.8G
Hi,
as suggested by Mike in http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123335,
here's my proposal for changing the layout of the distfiles tree:
This is the current state:
mirror:/storage/gentoo/data/source/distfiles# ls | wc -l
22543
mirror:/storage/gentoo/data/source/distfiles# ls -l ../ | gre
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14535 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
45 matches
Mail list logo
