ting
Patrick, I think it's time you put up or shut up. Bringing up
shortcomings or other things that need attention is useful, but your
near constant bitching is quite tiresome. You could start by fixing
your own gpg key situation. If you don't find adequate documentation
to do it, then create a some that does meets your satisfaction.
--
Brian Dolbec
pgpZWBsy9zasU.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 11:47:35 -0500
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Brian Dolbec
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:02:15 +0100
> > Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:53:17 +1100
> >> Michael Palima
..) much easier to understand for the
> occasional user of cmake-utils.eclass.
>
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I thought EAPI 6 specifications were
finalized.
Doesn't that mean this will have to wait for EAPI 7?
--
Brian Dolbec
m there so that it is easier for users to drop back
> from ~arch to stable without downgrading.
>
Rich, please re-read your above statements until you see the total
failure in your logic.
--
Brian Dolbec
ot finding that bug this morning. If it is to be dropped
completely, that can be done. As I recall it was you that wanted to
keep it, at least for an interim period for some other infra use in the
rsync tree generation. I don't recall the exact reason.
Most certainly patches are welcome.
--
Brian Dolbec
d still need to follow a number of the
dependency specification rules so that it would not break them while
doing it's sorting.
Still if someone is somewhat a glutton for punishment. They can take
on the task ;)
--
Brian Dolbec
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 10:43:29 -0700
Alec Warner wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Brian Dolbec
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 14:24:28 +0200
> > Fabian Groffen wrote:
> >
> > > On 10-10-2015 14:19:44 +0200, hasufell wrote:
> > > >
Fabian
>
>
Please NO, repoman's code is still a mess, the last thing it needs is
adding a bunch of code messing with ebuilds directly. Reporting is one
thing, modifying ebuilds quite another.
--
Brian Dolbec
pgpF5jgV7PyUk.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
robably ignore the rest again.
So, to that end, I fully support Rich's idea of a top-5 issues of the
week/month/... It would be something I would read and not simply
ignore like most of the current emails of this type. And no, I don't
have any filters set up in m
it works. Which parts in
> particular need the most attention? I'd be willing to help out if it's
> anything I have a shot at understanding. :)
> - --
> Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer
Then go to the link and fill in your available times, we'll try our
best to get as many as possible in a time that we pick for it.
--
Brian Dolbec
be created that
returns the results to the pages as proper python data or
json converted data rather than parsing stdout which can be
buggy and need constant updates if the format changes.
Thank you :)
--
Brian Dolbec
I think the new bugzie version allows multiple aliases on a
> >bug, so can we automomatically assign them github-pr-123 and
> >github-issue-234
> >etc?
>
> Sounds good.
>
> >
> >> What are your thoughts? Any other proposals?
> >
> >Overall I like the idea. I think the quoting and other issues can be
> >fixed in an acceptable way.
> >
> >-- Jason
>
>
--
Brian Dolbec
the rest of the tree.
>
to hell with stable, IMHO gtk3 is just crap and nearly destroys all
usability, I have mostly gtk2, with some gtk3, and I'd love to nuke
the rest of the gtk3 ones... So, if chromium goes gtk3, I'll be
looking for a new browser. and if gentoo drops gtk2,
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:25:51 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Brian Dolbec
> wrote:
> >
> > It does not other the the metadata.dtd file it checks for updates
> > and updates itself with. But that is very likely to change with the
> &
se from the main portage package.
Most users don't ever use repoman. Plus once the plugin system and
checks data downloads are in place, there will be far less need for
updates and releases. I would still keep it part of the portage
repository due to it's ties to the codebase. Just release it as a
separate installable package.
--
Brian Dolbec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:16:19 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 12/08/15 09:27 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > 2) There is another alternate location that you can define f
confusion between portage the package manager
and portage the "gentoo" ebuild tree. So to follow the overlay naming
rules for inclusion in the repositories.xml file, the directory name
must be the same as the repo name.
2) There is another alternate location that you can define files to
ignore locally without having to commit them to .gitignore.
Consider .gitignore a global setting. There is another setting
inside .git/info/exclude which is a local config file that will persist
and not be affected by pulls.
So please use that for local exclusions you want to add and not try to
force them into a global .gitignore which is part of the repo.
Something that seems to be hotly debated. ;)
--
Brian Dolbec
rences in formatting, but the data should be the same.
Thank you...
--
Brian Dolbec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 00:47:24 -0700
Brian Dolbec wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 00:22:42 -0700
> "Daniel Campbell (zlg)" wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm having
vercome shortcomings/limitations in the fstab, netmount,
localmount designs.
Net result should be better configurability, proper error reporting,
proper service order startup,...
Downside, it will likely mean a little migration/transistion.
I'm in favour of the change. Good work William.
-
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:50:43 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Rich Freeman
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Brian Dolbec
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't know tbh, most are already signed, with the git migrat
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:36:25 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Brian Dolbec
> wrote:
> >
> > I don't know tbh, most are already signed, with the git migration,
> > the strongly recommended commit signing will become MANDATORY.
> >
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 23:06:03 -0400
NP-Hardass wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 07/16/2015 09:25 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:13:09 -0400 NP-Hardass
> > wrote:
> &g
son that the person pushing).
For the regular rsync tree, Full manifests will be regenerated as
needed and signed by a common infra supplied gpg key. So for general
users, it will be easy to verify without having all gentoo devs gpg
keys. That will be different for
hen
merge from there into master with one merge commit.
Any other small branches could live in developer space if they needed
to share them with one or two others. With git it is easy to add other
remotes to pull and checkout from. So, no need to clutter up the main
git repo with small experiment
enko
Newer version(s) of git do have git push --sign capability. Sorry, I
don't know the versions that it applies to. It was recently added as a
feature. It also makes the push sig and data readily available for hook
use.
--
Brian Dolbec
s-deprecated" to "eapis-banned". This would
> have the consequence that repoman would refuse to commit packages
> containing such ebuilds. AFAICS there would be no impact on users.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Ulrich
DDOO IIITTTTT ;)
+
--
Brian Dolbec
was synced to and the path to the repo.
Using that information you could easily add a postsync hook there
looking for the gentoo repo argument. And if not exit. If it is the
gentoo repo, call your squashmount script to remount it your way.
See the example script in that directory.
--
Brian Dolbec
ser@g.o too!
>
>
But it will have to wait. There is a few bugs in the commit made to
portage for the release. It doesn't run. It is fixed in portage-
though.
We'll see if we can get it gpg verifying with gkeys for another release.
--
Brian Dolbec
But I think what happened for some, was, the urls had not yet been
updated or updated correctly in repositories.xml. That resulted in
failures to update to a new valid url.
--
Brian Dolbec
bove the
> median (58) and the mean value (113) of packages in a category.
>
> Ulrich
>
> [1]
> https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/4cfd11c209754be96ffa417cb4d40b9f
yes, +1
--
Brian Dolbec
pgpJhxXd2_SPR.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
subdirectory for on disk use as
the main tree.
be it gentoo-ebuilds, ebuilds/gentoo, trees/gentoo, repos/gentoo,...
The directory name it is installed to MUST be the same as it's
repo_name.
$ git clone git://anongit.gentoo.org/gentoo-tree.git gentoo
The rsync tree generated from the git
d into master finally.
I'll begin some testing again soon to make sure it works properly with
the "gentoo" repo relocated. It shouldn't be long to have a new
release based on the 3.0 re-write making stages for release.
--
Brian Dolbec
e gotten caught up in too
many projects at the moment.
> misc other python coding.. etc
> --
> If we fail to find an interested and qualified candidate I'll probably
> post bounties
>
> Please reply offlist
>
> Christopher
>
> codestr0m on irc freenode
>
--
Brian Dolbec
hile I can agree to the principal of this, Unfortunately I maintain
several pkgs that I would love to clean out old versions of
that trigger several of these, but can't. (But I am getting closer to
being able to clean them)
If I recall correctly they are:
"ebuild.minorsyn",
"ebuild.badheader",
plus a couple other odd ones
Portage ebuild triggers minorsyn due to a false positive quoting issue.
--
Brian Dolbec
; > understand the issue.
>
> I can give you an accout here; system is Opteron 2000 (i.e., ancient)
> but it is arm64.
>
Isn't an opteron processor an amd64, not arm64. The arm64 is a very new
processor in the arm family, just in the last year or so.
--
Brian Dolbec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 13:25:39 -0500
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Brian Dolbec
> wrote:
> >
> > You can't fix crap code to both keep the old crap handling while
> > still giving you new decent
On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 20:52:27 +0300
Diamond wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 08:36:54 -0800
> Brian Dolbec wrote:
>
> > > 1. Why autosync is disabled by default? This broke current
> > > default for emerge --sync. And if users added overlays, they
> > > most
and of migrating from
make.conf style to repos.conf style with only a few steps on the users
part. See the wiki page [1] for more detailed migration instructions.
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Portage/Sync
--
Brian Dolbec
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 17:37:49 +0300
Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:54:37 -0800 Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > Attached is an updated news item.
> [...]
>
> > Changes: /etc/portage/repos.conf/*
> > New for all repository types (needed):
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:54:37 -0800
Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > On 02.02.2015 22:58, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > >
> > > sys-apps/portage-2.2.16 is ready for release and is just waiting
> > > for the news announcement
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 23:21:53 +0100
Manuel Rüger wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 02.02.2015 22:58, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> >
> > sys-apps/portage-2.2.16 is ready for release and is just
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 19:24:38 -0500
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Brian Dolbec
> wrote:
> >
> > sys-apps/portage-2.2.16 is ready for release and is just waiting
> > for the news announcement about the new plug-in sync system being
> > used and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
sys-apps/portage-2.2.16 is ready for release and is just waiting for the
news announcement about the new plug-in sync system being used and the
changes in it's operation.
Attached is the news announcement for review.
- --
Brian D
colorize("GOOD", "eselect news") + "
> to read news items.")
> + print("Use " + colorize("GOOD", "eselect news read")
> + " to view new items.") print()
Wrong list. Plus it's already applied and in git.
--
Brian Dolbec
recent etc-proposals bump and re-Stabilization request for the
EAPI/distutils-r1 change. Is that one you prefer we just handle and
not add to your list?
I wouldn't have for just the berlios url changes.
--
Brian Dolbec
utomatically look for a matching *.sig to use to
verify with against the installed gpg keys. It can even save and use
timestamps to prevent unneeded downloads for unchanged data in a local
cache.
But, for gkeys to become commonplace in usage, it also requires devs to
fix their current keys and LDAP data, or generate new GLEP 63 compliant
keys. But that is an off topic discussion
--
Brian Dolbec
the new key provided it belongs to
the same primary key. Updates like that will be taken care of whenever
a "gpg --refresh-key ..." or "gkeys-refresh-key -C gentoo-devs"
operation is done on the keyring.
--
Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 11 Jan 2015 20:55:29 -0500
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Brian Dolbec
> wrote:
> > I added a little more info to the First-Use wiki page, I included a
> > link to a great webpage about setting up gpg keys.
> >
> > https://alexcaba
On Sun, 11 Jan 2015 12:06:18 -0500
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Brian Dolbec
> wrote:
> > Of the remaining devs, only 16 keys total pass the GLEP 63
> > requirements. More info can be found in the First-Use wiki page
> > [4]
>
> If
/gkey-logs/
[2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/
[3] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Gentoo-keys
[4] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Gentoo-keys/Fisrt-Use
--
Brian Dolbec
manage.com/profile?u=d5cf526b4ceea238da3512fb3&id=2be821d83b&e=c6ace56087)
--
Brian Dolbec
Title: FOSSASIA 2015,
;
einfo ""
einfo "Currently installed sync-type modules include:"
einfo "rsync, git, cvs, svn, websync"
einfo "the websync module currently runs emerge-webrsync for you"
einfo ""
einfo "For sync module specifications:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Portage/Sync";
einfo ""
}
--
Brian Dolbec
hich has me wondering if anything out there except human eyes every
> reads .
>
>
> jer
>
Porthole displays the long description when it exists and has always
done so.
--
Brian Dolbec
portage's master branch
before enabling it to be installed. It will also allow for third party
sync modules to be created and easily installed. So a squashfs sync
type could be created and installed for those repos where that a
squashfs tree is offered.
--
Brian Dolbec
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
/proj/elfix as a concrete
> example, but the site is still down. This usefulness suggests that
> it should be standardize and documented so that VDB information can
> be read correctly by non-PM tools.
>
+1
The new python based revdep-rebuild also uses scanelf and subsequently
the NEEDED.ELF.2 files. And there are other tools that make use of vdb
info.
It is past due to have a minimum set of defined info to be recorded in
the vdb.
--
Brian Dolbec
re
> it is used in a few places. As we discussed today during the
> Hardened meeting, we'll ewarn if we get here.
>
>
scanelf is also used in the new python based revdep-rebuild. So,
changing it will cause issues there too.
--
Brian Dolbec
where cvs/git/git.overlays was hosted
turned off the old servers, earlier than I expected.
So, I'm sure there would have been an announcement again before the
final switch. Had the actual date been known in advance.
--
Brian Dolbec
existence. I haven't kept track, but they may have finally done away
with it.
There are many other problems with using that syntax, namely most other
tools are not compatible with it, so more than just portage needs to be
modified. Adding that syntax to ebuilds will cause disruptions and bugs
for years to come.
So, please, forget about this syntax as a viable solution.
--
Brian Dolbec
..@lists.gentoo.org, but it never
> appeared. I'm subscribed to gentoo-dev-announce; don't know what's
> the matter.
>
> Andrey
>
You probably did not set the replyto header to the gentoo-dev list
--
Brian Dolbec
app-crypt category as it is middleware for interacting
> with the card. However, unlike the middleware, the viewer doesn't
> seem to perform anything cryptographic-related.
>
> So - is app-misc ok?
>
> Wkr,
> Sven Vermeulen
>
app-misc is not full, it only has
ocally), so the changes themselves are
> good by me.
>
+1
There wasn't enough time left for people to respond. There is
Scale going on this weekend also, not that 70% of the gentoo devs were
attending... Still, 1 week is not too long to wait.
--
Brian Dolbec
r done as
an emaint module. Especially for the original topic, since it is a
user initiated maintenance item. Provided of course that it is
determined to be done by portage code in the first place. As for the
existing --config whatevers, the emaint module could probably be
extended to add a list function.
--
Brian Dolbec
s to
portage that will help keep it working in the future. I started
development of a public_api branch long ago just for having a stable
API for apps to use. Perhaps some of what you need can be integrated
there.
--
Brian Dolbec
rt of the
> specified dependencies and @system.
>
>
There was a gentoo gsoc project a few years ago that did exactly this
for doing dep checks on ebuilds. There was also one for determining
deps automatically.
Is this the project mentioned? ^^^
--
Brian Dolbec
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:57:36 -0800
"W. Trevor King" wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 04:21:39PM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
> wrote:
> > +If you need to track the stable branch, please use the catalyst
> > +2.0. ebuild that tracks the 2.X branch.
>
> How about “If you want to track the
find their way in pkgcores code. That is when pkgcore will make more
headway at becoming portage's replacement. But some new fires keep
popping up.
Long story in a nutshell, gentoo could use more GOOD firefighters.
Sorry for the long speech ;)
your friendly gentoo python firefighter
--
Brian Dolbec
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2014-01-12 at 19:07 -0800, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> Our team is now, I think quite well rounded, with interests in different
> areas of portage and it's utilities.
>
> We have also converted most of the old www.gentoo.org project pages to
> the wiki [1], still a few
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 21:33 -0800, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> This is a general call for developers to join the portage development
> team.
>
> aka: Recruiting Drive
>
> If you have some "Good" python and/or bash skills and want/need to or
> already know portage'
elp radhermit out as yet, I have been trying to
get some other project cleaned up before delving deeper into pkgcore
code. I have just recently taken over lead of portage (an interim
position) due to Zac stepping down and away. So I have that added to my
todo list at the moment too.
--
Brian Dolbec
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 08:53 +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > We have several non-developer contributors helping out, but it will be
> > very hard to match the productivity Zac has made over these past years.
>
> I must
Once we get an indication that new volunteers are no longer coming
forward to join. We will elect a new lead.
Those interested in joining, please subscribe to the gentoo-portage-dev
list and send an email stating what you can offer and any ideas you have
to improve portage's code base.
--
B
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 17:08 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Sergey Popov wrote:
> > >>> Last time I checked, vixie-cron upstream was died
> > >>
> > >> If vixie-cron upstream is dead as you say
> > >
> > > Define dead?
> >
> > Bugs are not fixed for a very long time, no answers on private
> > e-mails
On Sun, 2013-11-10 at 17:45 -0800, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 00:01 +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > Gentoo LDAP:
> >
> > All developers must list the complete GPG fingerprint for their root
> > keys in the "gpgfingerprint" LDAP
/05/10/creating-new-gpgkey/)
> .. [#DEBIANGPG] Debian GPG documentation
>(https://wiki.debian.org/Keysigning)
> .. [#RISEUP] RiseUp.net OpenPGP best practices
>(https://we.riseup.net/riseuplabs+paow/openpgp-best-practices)
> .. [#DEVMANUAL-MANIFEST] Gentoo Development Guide: Manifest
>(http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/manifest/index.html)
> .. [#GNUPG-USER] GnuPG Gentoo User Guide
>(http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gnupg-user.xml)
>
--
Brian Dolbec
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
to eclean to get remote pkg
lists from machines for consideration doing distfiles and binpkg
cleaning.
C'mon, there has to be more people interested in this...
--
Brian Dolbec
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 11:45 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> For EAPI 6, introduction of a patch applying function to the package
> manager itself is being discussed. This would serve two purposes:
> - support for PATCHES variable in a default src
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 16:09 -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 18:13 +0200, Alex Legler wrote:
> > The overlays configuration file repositories.xml is the first file that
> > is now being served via api.gentoo.org.
> >
> > New public URL: http
On Sun, 2013-08-04 at 15:37 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> Doug and Brian, I'm going to reply in a little more detail.
>
> On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 07:38:04PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 21:03 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2
cause all interesting features are
> gone and it'll just become an inferior init system that needs to be
> replaced.
>
++
--
Brian Dolbec
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 16:44 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> one thing that is going to be different about OpenRc-0.12 is the oldnet
> scripts (net.* and /lib*/rc/net/*) are going to be split out into their
> own package, gentoo-oldnet-0.1. This will be brought in by a pdepend
> initially to
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 18:13 +0200, Alex Legler wrote:
> The overlays configuration file repositories.xml is the first file that
> is now being served via api.gentoo.org.
>
> New public URL: https://api.gentoo.org/overlays/repositories.xml
> Git repository: git+ssh://g...@git.gentoo.org/proj/api.gi
On Sun, 2013-07-28 at 13:33 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Leho Kraav wrote:
> > Wondering if there's any plan for proper convergence at some point?
>
> I'd guess that the value of further convergence is so small that it
> will not be a priority for any of the t
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 00:35 +0200, hasufell wrote:
> On 07/22/2013 12:33 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Dnia 2013-07-22, o godz. 00:16:31 hasufell
> > napisał(a):
> >
> >> On 07/22/2013 12:07 AM, Duncan wrote:
> >>> hasufell posted on Sun, 21 Jul 2013 17:22:24 +0200 as
> >>> excerpted:
> >>>
>
On Sat, 2013-07-06 at 09:36 -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > Yes, it does need to be rebuilt if key deps are updated. The gcc
> > produced in the stage1 is broken, so won't run to rebuild itself during
> > the stage2
n to rebuild itself during
the stage2 run.
Also the "--rebuild-if-new-ver gcc" only rebuilds gcc if it's deps are
updated to new versions (likely breaking lib linkage), it is not
unconditional. It is not as accurate as subslots, so may rebuild more
often than possibly needed. But it is better than having unreliable
stage builds, not knowing when they may break.
--
Brian Dolbec
On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 22:18 -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
> On 07/05/2013 09:41 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 15:47:08 -0400
> > "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" wrote:
> >
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >>> Paweł was nice enough to write a patc
ssenger. I
> shouldn't be getting the credit for them at all.
>
>
> Regards,
> jer
>
Thank you for the extra effort. I appreciate it, although for the one I
had recently, it made it harder. I had just migrated the ebuild to the
new python eclasses. So the diff included the reversal of those changes
too.
--
Brian Dolbec
git repo in my dev space. It is in the
compress branch. Note there is no master branch there, so a basic clone
will error when it tries to checkout a master working copy on completion
of the clone. Just "git checkout compress" after.
http://dev.gentoo.org/~dolsen/catalyst/
I've atta
On Sun, 2013-06-16 at 19:21 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El dom, 16-06-2013 a las 10:09 -0700, Brian Dolbec escribió:
> [...]
> > Thank you for considering helping. I have stayed away form the
> > intricate details of package management in the past, but I also do not
> >
On Sun, 2013-06-16 at 16:44 +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 06:55:23 -0700
> Brian Dolbec wrote:
>
> > I'll take pkgcore (if somehow we can get eapi 5 finished.)
>
> Here's the catch: it's not only about finishing EAPI 5, but also about
> i
On Sun, 2013-06-16 at 14:48 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Due ferringb retirement the following packages are up for grabs:
> > dev-python/snakeoil
> > sys-apps/pkgcore (likely to be treecleaned as it's no longer maintained
> > and neither
On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 15:05 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2013-06-15, o godz. 15:56:53
> "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" napisał(a):
>
> > And, moreover, I guess, SRC_URI can even be used for VCS:
> >
> > SRC_URI="
> > git+ssh://github.com/lol/moo.git
> > hg+ssh://bitbucket.org/lol/moo
>
On Mon, 2013-03-25 at 06:40 +, Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
> On 2013-03-25, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Markos Chandras
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> # Markos Chandras (22 Mar 2013)
> >> # Fails with automake-1.12 (#424289)
> >> # Problems with the alsa p
On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 14:22 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Nuno Silva wrote:
> > mplayer *can* play it, but tuning is a different story.
>
> mplayer is not really an alternative. tvtime looks and feels
> significantly better.
>
> A lot like saying that Fiat is an alternative to Ferrari.
>
> I'm als
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:10 +0100, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> ... if it is used in the ebuild?
>
> It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere?
>
> Cheers,
> Thomas
>
Only if the pkg is also a system package. I recently ran into a problem
running a catalyst build because portage-util
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 04:09 +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 04:36:08PM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
> > It may be advantageous to have a gentoo wrapper script that calls GPG
> > with recommended settings to make some tasks easier,
> > > gentoo-gpg-create --recommended
> > >
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 20:46 +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 13.02.2013 20:19, schrieb Michael Sterrett:
> > # Michael Sterrett (13 Feb 2013)
> > # No longer licensed for sale upstream.
> > # Masked for removal on 20130315.
> > games-strategy/x2
> > games-strategy/x2-demo
> >
>
> Sure, I canno
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 09:03 +0200, Kfir Lavi wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm the author of bashlibs - general library framework and libraries
> for bash programing.
> I have created new overlay for bash libraries.
> https://github.com/kfirlavi/bashlibs/tree/master/gentoo/portage
>
> How do I publish it via l
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 01:15 -0200, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 14:44 +0100, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Petteri Räty
> >> wrote:
> >> &g
101 - 200 of 253 matches
Mail list logo
