Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 01:03 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
>
>
>>On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 03:42:25AM -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hola all.
>>>
>>>Straight to the point, I'm proposing that the following files-
>>>arch.list
>>>categories
>>>use.desc
>>>use.local.d
On 08/30/05 Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 01:03 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 03:42:25AM -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> > > Hola all.
> > >
> > > Straight to the point, I'm proposing that the following files-
> > > arch.list
> > > categories
> > > use.d
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 01:03 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 03:42:25AM -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> > Hola all.
> >
> > Straight to the point, I'm proposing that the following files-
> > arch.list
> > categories
> > use.desc
> > use.local.desc
> > package.mask
> > updates
>
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 17:24 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> Aside from that, the parent implementation could stand a tweak or two.
> Further, assuming metapkg goes through, virtual is obsoleted. The
> inclusion of GRP_STAGE23_USE also bugs me a bit; yes it works right
> now, but what happens whe
On 08/29/05 Brian Harring wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 09:57:37AM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > On 08/29/05 Brian Harring wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 08:17:39AM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > > > Don't mind moving them, BUT
> > > > - metadata is a stupid location for them for
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 03:42:25AM -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> Hola all.
>
> Straight to the point, I'm proposing that the following files-
> arch.list
> categories
> use.desc
> use.local.desc
> package.mask
> updates
Addition to this list: thirdpartymirrors .
~harring
pgpvIGSGfwz7G.pgp
Desc
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 05:48:20PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> What other changes are you guys thinking of regarding profiles?
That would be Marius's department. I'm not willing (personally) to
look at revamping profiles till rewrite is finished.
At that point, new profile's should be able
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 15:36 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 01:27:34PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > This could still be done under profiles. Personally, I like the idea of
> > something more like this:
> >
> > project/os/arch/version for profiles
> >
> > This would gi
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 01:27:34PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> This could still be done under profiles. Personally, I like the idea of
> something more like this:
>
> project/os/arch/version for profiles
>
> This would give us something like this:
>
> default/linux/x86/2006.0
> default/fre
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 03:42 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> Further, while no one has yet proposed anything concrete, people have
> been after revamping the profile implementation. Quite likely if/when
> this occurs, it's going to require a seperate directory to avoid any
> issues with older port
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 09:57:37AM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On 08/29/05 Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 08:17:39AM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > > Don't mind moving them, BUT
> > > - metadata is a stupid location for them for several reasons
> > being?
> > metadata already
On 08/29/05 Brian Harring wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 08:17:39AM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > Don't mind moving them, BUT
> > - metadata is a stupid location for them for several reasons
> being?
> metadata already holds global repository information, time of
> repositories generation, pr
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 08:17:39AM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On 08/27/05 Brian Harring wrote:
> > Straight to the point, I'm proposing that the following files-
> > arch.list
> > categories
> > use.desc
> > use.local.desc
> > package.mask
> > updates
> >
> > be moved out of the profiles direct
On 08/27/05 Brian Harring wrote:
> Hola all.
>
> Straight to the point, I'm proposing that the following files-
> arch.list
> categories
> use.desc
> use.local.desc
> package.mask
> updates
>
> be moved out of the profiles directory in the tree, and into the
> existing metadata directory perso
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 03:29:32PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On 27/8/2005 13:34:15, Brian Harring ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > Rough filtering stack-
> > profiles/package.mask
> > /etc/make.profile/package.mask (incremental through subprofiles)
> > users package.mask, and users package.un
On 27/8/2005 13:34:15, Brian Harring ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Rough filtering stack-
> profiles/package.mask
> /etc/make.profile/package.mask (incremental through subprofiles)
> users package.mask, and users package.unmask
>
> Ordered it in that fashion to show that it's effectively repositor
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 06:38:36AM -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> You're masking occurs within the profile itself, not globally.
> Global masking usually is for introduction of new ebuilds that need
> testing and shouldn't be hit by normal arch testers (portage early
> release candidates for examp
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 01:32:33PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 01:17:50PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> > Not sure about package.mask. I thought that was part of the profile,
> > as different profiles might package.mask separately. I know I use it
> > in /etc/profi
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 01:17:50PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On 27/8/2005 10:42:25, Brian Harring ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Hola all.
> >
> > Straight to the point, I'm proposing that the following files-
> > arch.list
> > categories
> > use.desc
> > use.local.desc
> > package.mask
> > u
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 01:17:50PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On 27/8/2005 10:42:25, Brian Harring ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Hola all.
> >
> > Straight to the point, I'm proposing that the following files-
> > arch.list
> > categories
> > use.desc
> > use.local.desc
> > package.mask
> > u
On 27/8/2005 10:42:25, Brian Harring ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hola all.
>
> Straight to the point, I'm proposing that the following files-
> arch.list
> categories
> use.desc
> use.local.desc
> package.mask
> updates
>
> be moved out of the profiles directory in the tree
Not sure about packa
Hola all.
Straight to the point, I'm proposing that the following files-
arch.list
categories
use.desc
use.local.desc
package.mask
updates
be moved out of the profiles directory in the tree, and into the existing
metadata directory personally, due to the fact that the files above are
essentiall
22 matches
Mail list logo