Hello,
Instead of the floating patches and p-d-ng modifications I sent
earlier, here are the two complete (so far, well, initial :P) eclasses
for review.
They are designed as 'mostly' drop-in python-distutils-ng replacement.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
# Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation
Hello,
Following the late discussion, I have updated GLEP-62. It no longer is
designed to be 'backwards compatible' and instead it was suited for
addition in a new EAPI.
Thus, IUSE_RUNTIME is now independent of IUSE, and runtime dependencies
can be expressed in SDEPEND only.
There's still a
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 03:29:17 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:02:44AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:54:39 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 08:58:07PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On
2012/9/29 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org:
Hello,
Instead of the floating patches and p-d-ng modifications I sent
earlier, here are the two complete (so far, well, initial :P) eclasses
for review.
They are designed as 'mostly' drop-in python-distutils-ng replacement.
Hi,
the eclasses look
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/29/2012 09:53 AM, Micha? Górny wrote:
Hello,
Instead of the floating patches and p-d-ng modifications I sent
earlier, here are the two complete (so far, well, initial :P)
eclasses for review.
They are designed as 'mostly' drop-in
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:00:18 +0200
Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/9/29 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org:
Hello,
Instead of the floating patches and p-d-ng modifications I sent
earlier, here are the two complete (so far, well, initial :P) eclasses
for review.
They
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:00:18 +0200
Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/9/29 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org:
Hello,
Instead of the floating patches and p-d-ng modifications I sent
earlier, here are the two complete (so far, well, initial :P) eclasses
for review.
They
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:20:31 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/29/2012 09:53 AM, Micha? Górny wrote:
Hello,
Instead of the floating patches and p-d-ng modifications I sent
earlier, here are the two complete (so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/29/2012 12:49 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:20:31 +0100 Markos Chandras
hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
On 09/29/2012 09:53 AM, Micha? Górny wrote:
Hello,
Instead of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 29/09/12 09:49 AM, hasufell wrote:
On 09/29/2012 12:49 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:20:31 +0100 Markos Chandras
hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
On 09/29/2012 09:53 AM, Micha?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/29/2012 04:19 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 29/09/12 09:49 AM, hasufell wrote:
On 09/29/2012 12:49 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:20:31 +0100 Markos Chandras
hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 4:26 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
That still does not explain the reasons why this work was initiated.
If there is any way to fix the current eclass, that should be preferred.
I tend to agree. Michał, let me first say I value the time you have
invested to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 29/09/12 10:26 AM, hasufell wrote:
On 09/29/2012 04:19 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 29/09/12 09:49 AM, hasufell wrote:
On 09/29/2012 12:49 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:20:31 +0100 Markos Chandras
hwoar...@gentoo.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/29/2012 05:37 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
There isn't so much a problem with the current python-distutils-ng
eclass but rather it's to expand it to a more comprehensive
replacement for both distutils and python eclasses. In order to
do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/29/2012 05:37 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
There isn't so much a problem with the current python-distutils-ng
eclass but rather it's to expand it to a more comprehensive
replacement for both distutils and python eclasses. In order to
do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 29/09/12 11:45 AM, hasufell wrote:
On 09/29/2012 05:37 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
There isn't so much a problem with the current
python-distutils-ng eclass but rather it's to expand it to a more
comprehensive replacement for both distutils
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/29/2012 05:50 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 29/09/12 11:45 AM, hasufell wrote:
On 09/29/2012 05:37 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
There isn't so much a problem with the current
python-distutils-ng eclass but rather it's to expand it to a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:45:07 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
In that case we are missing 95% of the features of python.eclass.
You say that like it's a bad thing...
Seriously, most of the problem with python.eclass (and several other
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:23:50 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
Something like this would work with current versions of portage:
if ! declare -F usex /dev/null ; then
usex() { use $1 echo ${2-yes}$4 || echo ${3-no}$5 ; }
fi
However, it's probably not a good idea to assume
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:46:14 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Fun fact; peoples usage of labels in exherbo is thus:
build+run:
set of deps
run:
set of deps/conditionals/etc
That's largely because there are a lot of former Gentoo developers
there who all said oh, yeah, I
On 09/29/2012 02:42 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
Following the late discussion, I have updated GLEP-62. It no longer is
designed to be 'backwards compatible' and instead it was suited for
addition in a new EAPI.
Thus, IUSE_RUNTIME is now independent of IUSE, and runtime dependencies
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:42:19 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Following the late discussion, I have updated GLEP-62. It no longer is
designed to be 'backwards compatible' and instead it was suited for
addition in a new EAPI.
You've still not addressed the UI side of it in any way.
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 15:49:32 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/29/2012 12:49 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:20:31 +0100 Markos Chandras
hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:37:15 +0200
Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 4:26 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
That still does not explain the reasons why this work was initiated.
If there is any way to fix the current eclass, that should be preferred.
I
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:45:07 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/29/2012 05:37 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
There isn't so much a problem with the current python-distutils-ng
eclass but rather it's to expand it to a more
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:12:38 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 09/29/2012 02:42 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
Following the late discussion, I have updated GLEP-62. It no longer is
designed to be 'backwards compatible' and instead it was suited for
addition in a new EAPI.
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:13:14 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:42:19 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Following the late discussion, I have updated GLEP-62. It no longer is
designed to be 'backwards compatible' and instead it was
El sáb, 29-09-2012 a las 20:40 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:45:07 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/29/2012 05:37 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
There isn't so much a problem with the current
Ulrich Mueller schrieb:
I've created licenses/HPND [1] now, and added it to the @OSI-APPROVED
group. So packages whose license matches this template can be changed
from as-is to HPND. (And please, _only_ OSD-compliant packages.
We don't want the same mess again, as we have with as-is.)
I have
Ulrich Mueller schrieb:
Why not directly use the FSF freedoms:
The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0).
The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does
your computing as you wish (freedom 1).
The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your
On 09/29/2012 12:45 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:00:18 +0200
Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/9/29 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org:
Hello,
Instead of the floating patches and p-d-ng modifications I sent
earlier, here are the two complete (so far, well,
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 21:20:00 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El sáb, 29-09-2012 a las 20:40 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:45:07 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/29/2012 05:37 PM, Ian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/29/2012 08:39 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:37:15 +0200 Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 4:26 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
wrote:
That still does not explain the reasons why this work was
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
I have one question: The license can be GPL-compatible but the
software itself non-free. So binary-only packages distributed under
e.g. BSD license should remain BSD or not?
Yes, if it's BSD licensed then it should have LICENSE=BSD.
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
If we start to measure the software freedom of the code inside the
package, then maybe LICENSE is the wrong variable to express this.
I'm aware that we can't
I just added gcc-4.7.2 to the tree, and I'd like to unmask it in a couple
weeks. I don't see anything I'd consider a blocker on the tracker*, but
95 open bugs is still a lot. If you have a bug blocking the tracker please
take a look at it soon. Many of these are trivial and could make good
On 29 September 2012 18:20, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/29/2012 09:53 AM, Micha? Górny wrote:
Hello,
Instead of the floating patches and p-d-ng modifications I sent
earlier, here are the two complete (so far, well,
37 matches
Mail list logo
