Hello,
I'm no longer interested in maintaining x11-libs/libaosd. It has no
open bugs, no in-tree consumers and -- as far as I'm aware -- no new
commits for 2 years. It was requested in bug 351741 [1].
I believe that our users mostly use the command-line interface. Some
grepping of the net shows
On 2012.12.15 03:52, Richard Yao wrote:
Dear Everyone,
I am pleased to announce the Gentoo eudev project.
[snip]
Yours truly,
Richard Yao
[snip]
I welcome the choice that this new project brings, that's what Gentoo
is about - choice.
I wish eudev both good luck and success.
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
I, on the other hand, hope that this isn't an indication of Gentoo not being
interested in systemd. I'm eagerly awaiting the moment where I can emerge
systemd and just have it working.
Gentoo is a community - of
Roy Bamford wrote:
On 2012.12.15 03:52, Richard Yao wrote:
Dear Everyone,
I am pleased to announce the Gentoo eudev project.
[snip]
Yours truly,
Richard Yao
[snip]
I welcome the choice that this new project brings, that's what Gentoo
is about - choice.
I wish eudev both good
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org wrote:
The systemd developers were in the middle of a transition to the LGPL
from the GPL when we forked. We inherited the code in the middle of that
transition and we see no reason to pursue a different course. Therefore,
Rich Freeman posted on Sat, 15 Dec 2012 07:48:29 -0500 as excerpted:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org wrote:
The systemd developers were in the middle of a transition to
the LGPL
from the GPL when we forked. We inherited the code in the middle of
On 12/15/2012 01:33 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 05:16:48AM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote
I hope that eudev wants to do the respectable thing for any fork, ie.
work hard to minimize the amount of wasted effort in both projects by
sharing much code and bugfixes.
That would be
On 12/15/2012 01:48 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org wrote:
The systemd developers were in the middle of a transition to the LGPL
from the GPL when we forked. We inherited the code in the middle of that
transition and we see no
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org wrote:
eudev is a Gentoo project is not Gentoo. Same could be said for OpenRC.
OpenRC isn't a Gentoo project, at least, it wasn't in the past.
The social contract defines Gentoo as a collection of free knowledge,
which
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 07:21:21AM +, Duncan wrote
Walter Dnes posted on Sat, 15 Dec 2012 01:33:04 -0500 as excerpted:
[Udev-systemd has] essentially announced ahead of time that most bugs
from non-systemd users would be closed with WONTFIX.
Agreed, to this point.
Actually, for
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 12:53:41 -0500
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 07:21:21AM +, Duncan wrote
Walter Dnes posted on Sat, 15 Dec 2012 01:33:04 -0500 as excerpted:
[Udev-systemd has] essentially announced ahead of time that most bugs
from non-systemd
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 07:07:09PM +0100, Micha?? G??rny wrote
Waaait, what? Did something change lately or are you just repeating
the same bullshit for months?
Older systemd boots OK with a separate /usr and eudev. But somehow,
somewhere along the line, as part of the merge, the udev
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 13:58:43 -0500
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 07:07:09PM +0100, Micha?? G??rny wrote
Waaait, what? Did something change lately or are you just repeating
the same bullshit for months?
Older systemd boots OK with a separate /usr and
On 12/15/2012 02:33 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 13:58:43 -0500
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 07:07:09PM +0100, Micha?? G??rny wrote
Waaait, what? Did something change lately or are you just repeating
the same bullshit for months?
Older
On 12/15/2012 05:20 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org wrote:
eudev is a Gentoo project is not Gentoo. Same could be said for OpenRC.
OpenRC isn't a Gentoo project, at least, it wasn't in the past.
The social contract defines Gentoo
On 12/14/2012 11:16 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
Richard Yao wrote:
Where is development now?
We have rewritten the build system and restored support for older
kernels and verified compatibility as far back as Linux 2.6.31. We have
tagged 1_beta1 and eudev is in the portage tree. A few
On 12/15/2012 11:20 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
Gentoo isn't GitHub. When people donate money to Gentoo they're not
donating so that a club of elite coders can use the infrastructure to
host just anything that suits their fancy. The reason that we let any
Gentoo developer just start a project is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please, you have your own mailing list. Use it.
- -ZC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQzOm7AAoJEKXdFCfdEflKZ9YP/iwUIKYhpE6b7+3Jp0m4s76/
On 12/15/2012 04:20 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
Please, you have your own mailing list. Use it.
-ZC
I am under the impression that project announcements must be sent to
gentoo-dev-announce@ and set Reply-To: gentoo-dev@.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
All,
what are the specific choices I made in udev that are distro choices vs
upstream choices. People have said to me a couple of times that there
were choices I made that are not upstream choices. If there is something
I can undo in udev to make it easier for us I will do that; I'm just not
On 16/12/12 01:02, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
what are the specific choices I made in udev that are distro choices vs
upstream choices. People have said to me a couple of times that there
were choices I made that are not upstream choices. If there is something
I can undo in udev to make it
Walter Dnes posted on Sat, 15 Dec 2012 12:53:41 -0500 as excerpted:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 07:21:21AM +, Duncan wrote
Walter Dnes posted on Sat, 15 Dec 2012 01:33:04 -0500 as excerpted:
Actually, for political reasons, I hope that eudev does submit a
bunch bugs+patches, and gets them
On 12/15/2012 06:02 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
what are the specific choices I made in udev that are distro choices vs
upstream choices. People have said to me a couple of times that there
were choices I made that are not upstream choices. If there is something
I can undo in udev to make
Richard Yao posted on Sat, 15 Dec 2012 19:10:22 -0500 as excerpted:
On 12/15/2012 06:02 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
what are the specific choices I made in udev that are distro choices vs
upstream choices. People have said to me a couple of times that there
were choices I made that are
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 07:10:22PM -0500, Richard Yao wrote:
On 12/15/2012 06:02 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
what are the specific choices I made in udev that are distro choices vs
upstream choices. People have said to me a couple of times that there
were choices I made that are not
On 12/15/2012 10:03 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 07:10:22PM -0500, Richard Yao wrote:
On 12/15/2012 06:02 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
what are the specific choices I made in udev that are distro choices vs
upstream choices. People have said to me a couple of times that
Currently, the orc local USE flag is used by 11 packages, 9 of them
with identical descriptions. I think it's time to make it a global flag.
I would suggest the following description:
Use dev-lang/orc for just-in-time optimization of array operations
Current flag users:
On 12/16/12 5:28 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
Currently, the orc local USE flag is used by 11 packages, 9 of them
with identical descriptions. I think it's time to make it a global flag.
I would suggest the following description:
Use dev-lang/orc for just-in-time optimization of array
28 matches
Mail list logo
