On 3/16/22 18:01, Jakov Smolić wrote:
# Jakov Smolić (2022-03-16)
# -only ebuilds, various other QA issues (no python
# 3.10, using deprecated EAPI, ...)
# Removal on 2022-04-15.
net-libs/libmirisdr
media-sound/deinvert
net-wireless/gr-m2k
adding net-wireless/libm2k as well. This package
This speeds up initial emerge run on my livecd by eight minutes. Please
accept.
Thanks,
Zero
On 10/27/2015 09:52 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> X-Gentoo-Bug: 564222
> X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=564222
> ---
> pym/portage/dbapi/vartree.py | 6 +-
> 1 file changed, 5
On 03/06/15 08:53, Mark Kubacki wrote:
2015-03-06 1:56 GMT+01:00 Rick Zero_Chaos Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org:
tl;dr webrsync-gpg is a built in feature of the package manager which
OPTIONALLY adds a significant amount of security against the attacks
described on your website
On 03/05/15 14:14, Patrick Schleizer wrote:
I used the footnote numbers to reference the attacks.
I am afraid, this might cause some confusion. The numbers you have used
won't stay stable. Those were autogenerated numbers of footnotes. As
footnotes change, these numbers change. To keep your
On 03/05/15 09:49, Patrick Schleizer wrote:
Hi,
I am currently working on a comparison of package managers in which
Portage is part of.
https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Comparison_Of_Package_Managers
Would you be interested to check if the current assessments are correct
and/or to fill the
On 02/19/15 06:38, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:34:28 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thursday 19 February 2015 12:31:27 Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:48:27 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dnia 2015-02-18, o godz. 16:11:53
Mike
On 01/18/2015 11:58 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 11:38:38 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Default MAKEOPTS job number to (number of CPUs + 1) when it is not
provided in the ebuild environment.
Suggested-By: Daniel Robbins drobb...@funtoo.org
---
On 12/23/14 20:51, Zac Medico wrote:
Hi,
As discussed in bug 150031 [1], it would be useful if PKGDIR could
accommodate multiple binary packages built from the same source ebuild.
Use cases for preserving multiple builds typically involve supporting
multiple clients (with partially
On 11/04/2014 08:16 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
When I was taking my ebuild quizzes, I asked for someone to clarify the
implicit system dependency that we have enshrined in the devmanual:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485356
There is... some agreement, but also special cases
On 11/01/2014 03:36 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 01:52:57PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
Michał Górny told me on IRC that I might be approaching this incorrectly (or
at least, inefficiently). I was working on the massive bug-spree (right now
stopped around 22% of the
On 10/12/2014 02:03 PM, Dan Douglas wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org
wrote:
--- toolchain-funcs.eclass.orig2014-10-12 11:23:41.585182742 -0400
+++ toolchain-funcs.eclass2014-10-12 11:31:57.170205300 -0400
@@ -610,6 +610,12 @@
On 10/05/2014 06:44 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
Hey all, I'm stepping down as GCC maintainer. I haven't been reading
toolchain
bugmail since June, and keep telling myself I'll tackle it next weekend, which
never happens. To be frank, I'm kinda sick of Gentoo. I'm hoping it's
temporary but we'll
On 09/17/2014 09:58 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
There was a thread a while back about mix-in support and I think there
was genuine interest. For the most part we just need to do the work,
and the first step is identifying blockers. If some end up involving
PMS/etc then we may need to get the
On 09/07/2014 09:03 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
Right now the general policy is that we don't allow unmasked (hard or
via keywords) ebuilds in the tree if they use an scm to fetch their
sources. There are a bunch of reasons for this, and for the most part
they make sense.
Hard masking is a relic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/26/2014 06:23 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 08/26/14 17:00, Alexander Tsoy wrote:
On Tue Aug 26 22:27:36 2014 Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I plan to update the pax-utils.eclass because of bug #520198. Can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/27/2014 09:55 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Today some user on IRC noted that there were some doubts about if
developers are allowed to stabilize packages they maintain when they are
able to test on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/21/2014 06:52 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
I'm picking a random msg to reply to.
My concern about doing a revbump just because the deps change is that
the new revision has to be committed in ~arch, so we then have to hit
the arch teams, which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/08/2014 09:48 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
arm has a historical problem with stabilization, while keywording
doesn't require access to all arm sub-arches the problem with the
stabilization slowness causes running a full ~arm to become hard. By
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/04/2014 12:25 PM, dREPLACEeLETTEReEjBYeLETTEReAatGMA ILcom wrote:
It is incredibly hard to seriously review anything with this from email
address.
- -Zero
Hello to all,
Summary: I have made many mods to sys-app/portage (2013 version).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/02/2014 02:10 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't feel like we ought to vote on something like this without
understanding most of the current profiles. And I'm afraid there are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/02/2014 03:07 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 07/02/14 14:41, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/02/2014 02:10 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Michał Górny mgo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/07/2014 04:59 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
Related to this, I'd like to take care of sys-apps/gentoo-functions in
WilliamH's absence. There's a couple of items to fix and I'd like to
get them done. Any objections?
Knowing WilliamH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/30/2014 11:10 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings,
... to genkernel repository for:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828
I'll p.mask it on amd64 profiles if noone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/30/2014 01:39 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
configs should have never gotten into genkernel in the first place.
it's each kernel pkg (or even version) that owns a valid config of
itself.
I am part of genkernel@ but I have no will nor time to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/23/2014 03:42 PM, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Le vendredi 23 mai 2014 à 22:57 +0700, gro...@gentoo.org a écrit :
# Google closed free usage of the translate api
# Masked for removal in 30 days
app-text/qgoogletranslator
# openmcl has been renamed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/11/2014 05:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Hi, everyone.
Almost 9 months ago I've committed three new FEATURES for portage:
cgroup, ipc-sandbox and network-sandbox. Today I'd like to propose
enabling at least the latter two by default.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/12/2014 01:08 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-05-12, o godz. 12:07:11
Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
What about talking to local network resources? In my metasploit ebuild
it has tests available which talk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/14/2014 04:35 AM, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
There are a list of packages up for grabs. I cannnot test anymore some of
them, or i stopped use them.
app-text/fbreader
dev-libs/liblinebreak
net-wireless/madwimax
net-wireless/wimax-tools
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I forgot to send this out when I originally masked the package so the 30
days will start now.
# Rick Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org (22 Mar 2014)
# Upstream has replaced dev-util/dissy with dev-util/emilpro
# Please switch to emilpro or report issues in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/08/2014 02:40 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
Gentoo typically tries to keep patching to a minimum in general. To be
enabling something like this by default seems bad, the fact that it is
openssh compounds that. +1 for removing the + and leaving this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/02/2014 02:22 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
The 30 days maintainer time out stabilization policy isn't working
when package has multiple SLOTs, because
the bugs are filed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/01/2014 11:55 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 01/04/14 18:28, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Tue, 01 Apr 2014 12:23:43 +
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
And this is going to get worse if people don't trust them. Currently
it looks more like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/01/2014 02:41 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 01/04/14 21:33, Tom Wijsman wrote:
Okay, but this isn't what happened yet; because your plan was to send
out a mail after stabilization for everyone to adapt the reverse
dependencies, and I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/02/2014 02:00 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/04/14 05:02, Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Projects like the Council, ComRel and QA are there to protect Gentoo;
and yes, people are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/24/2014 12:32 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
If it's okay, I'd want to post this fast, before adding KEYWORDS to
sys-fs/udev-209's ebuild
Should means required now? Man if I only knew that last week...
- -Zero
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/10/2014 07:29 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Picking a random mail in the thread.
Making udev dependency always on is a deliberate choice here, as noted
by Alexandre, the library will be most likely useless without it and we
simply don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/31/2014 01:50 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 30/03/14 23:45, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
Your input will be considered here with all the weight it deserves. My
mask was to force this discussion on the list and it has done it's job
well
/03/14 23:48, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
Recently, without discussion as suggested by the dev manual, new
virtuals were added for libudev and libgudev.
These virtuals are different than any virtuals use in gentoo in the
past, and due to this, I fell the discussion step is critical
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Recently, without discussion as suggested by the dev manual, new
virtuals were added for libudev and libgudev.
These virtuals are different than any virtuals use in gentoo in the
past, and due to this, I fell the discussion step is critical. As such,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/31/2013 06:43 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Dienstag, 31. Dezember 2013, 23:30:14 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
I have noticed that the arch profile directories (profiles/arch/$ARCH)
are not EAPI 5 capable. These profiles are inherited by both the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/07/2014 06:00 PM, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. TL;DR, this is basically just a THANK YOU to the Gentoo devs
This is totally unacceptable. I demand you take your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/05/2014 04:48 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 10:07:22 -0600
Steev Klimaszewski st...@gentoo.org wrote:
Against my better judgment...
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 05:55 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 21:15:47 -0600
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/05/2014 07:48 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 17:05:08 -0500
Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
Yes, making the newest versions never available because the old
versions sink all your time really stops progress
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/01/2014 01:42 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
I see exactly zero downside to doing this, so if whoever is going to
actually do the editing of the profiles would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/01/2014 10:06 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Dear all,
in its last session the Gentoo council decided that 30 days from now the
entire profile tree will be updated to require EAPI=5 support.
For all non-deprecated profiles this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/10/2014 10:50 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 01:35:09 -0500
Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
More to the point, this specific use flag appears to have no purpose
what-so-ever. If a user can do exactly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2014 03:58 PM, Magnus Granberg wrote:
Hi
Some time ago we discussed that we should enable stack smashing
(-fstack-protector) by default. So we opened a bug to track this [1].
The affected Gcc version will be 4.8.2 and newer. Only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2014 05:21 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-01-09, o godz. 17:06:52
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 01/09/2014 04:57 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
What are the advantages of disabling SSP to deserve that special
handling
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2014 06:01 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 01/09/2014 05:21 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-01-09, o godz. 17:06:52
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 01/09/2014 04:57 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
What are the advantages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2014 06:09 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 01/09/2014 05:29 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2014 05:21 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-01-09, o godz. 17:06:52
Anthony G. Basile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2014 07:12 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 17:41:08 -0600
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:30:04AM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2014, 00:26:03 schrieb Ryan Hill:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2014 07:17 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 17:30:46 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 17:29:26 -0500 Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/08/2014 03:27 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 09:14:43PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Comments:
-
In bug #4411, comment 43, vapier noted:
any package that does dlopen(libfoo.so) without the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/01/2014 05:28 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
Hi, According to GLEP 23 [1], the LICENSE variable regulates the
software that is installed on a system. There is however some
ambiguity in this: should it cover the actual files installed on
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/01/2014 08:51 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 01/01/2014 05:28 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
Hi,
According to GLEP 23 [1], the LICENSE variable regulates the software
that is installed on a system. There is however some ambiguity in
this: should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/01/2014 09:40 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 01/01/2014 09:13 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
What use case is there for having the LICENSE apply to anything else?
Some of us do redistribute the entire source package, so it does matter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/30/2013 03:48 PM, Emery Hemingway wrote:
I really like working with Go, and would like to see a means of merging
Go packages with Portage. In short I am asking if anyone else is
interested in a Go project.
For those who aren't familiar
Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
What if he wants to
put a stage3 on a disk for his amd64 box from his arm box? I'd love to
see him emulate an amd64 from his arm to install dhcpcd.
...
I really don't like the idea of having no networking in the stage3 by
default, however, I'm becoming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/14/2013 04:57 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 08:47:01PM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
OK, I see what you mean.
To be clear, I'm not ready to have a stage3 without netifrc. If / when we
update catalyst so that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/15/2013 07:20 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Montag, 16. Dezember 2013, 00:34:13 schrieb Matt Turner:
3dnow: Use the 3DNow! instruction set
3dnowext: Use the Enhanced 3DNow! instruction set
mmx: Use the MMX instruction set
mmxext: Use the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/14/2013 07:59 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
You make some good points. I'll answer your questions as best as I can,
but we can consider this thread closed. I will not try to put the
virtual in, but I will come back to the list soon and start
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/08/2013 05:25 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 12:52:08AM -0500, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
1.) If we are going to stuff this into @system then we probably want a
USE=nonet flag to allow users to not pull anything
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/09/2013 10:28 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
I can honestly say most of the time when setup my arm systems I'm
unpacking the arm stage3 on an amd64 and then booting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/07/2013 07:42 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
Honestly, I'm not really sure why anyone would want to make stage3 less
functional than it already is but honestly net isn't something I'm ready
to give up just yet.
It isn't about making the stage3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/2013 04:11 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
I would like to add a virtual/network-manager package to @system which
has the following rdepend settings:
RDEPEND= || (
net-misc/netifrc
=sys-apps/openrc-0.12[newnet]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/02/2013 03:28 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 11:20:15AM +0100, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
*snip*
The other two cases need a clarification:
3) -netifrc -newnet: no network stack?!?
That's correct, you do not need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/24/2013 12:28 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'd like to bounce a question of the community regarding the order of
profile stackings. We have a suggestion in hardened to re-introduce the
hardened desktop profile. This was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/16/2013 10:28 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 11/16/2013 04:11 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013, Robin H Johnson wrote:
Add this line to the dev-lang/python-exec ebuilds:
PDEPEND==dev-python/python-exec-1:$SLOT
This looks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/13/2013 01:58 PM, Francesco R. wrote:
long story short having a portage-20130126.tar.bz2 snapshot
(before the EAPI 5 switch) greatly simplified the upgrade of an old
server on a client.
Why not keep a copy on the servers? I mean
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2013 11:03 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-11-02, o godz. 14:51:26
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 09:16:45 -0400
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
This is a followup to a discussion on IRC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2013 04:35 PM, yac wrote:
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 15:20:41 -0400
Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2013 11:03 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-11-02, o godz. 14
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2013 06:09 PM, yac wrote:
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 16:57:07 -0400
Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2013 04:35 PM, yac wrote:
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 15:20:41 -0400
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
net-analyzer/sslsniff #zerochaos seems to have this as well, I can
co-maintain :D
be my guest
- -Zero
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/15/2013 07:29 PM, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote:
Can't the users download and install those tables manually from the
official ophcrack website/server? If so, maybe adding the instructions
in the pkg_postinst() phase of app-crypt/ophcrack ebuild
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/11/2013 11:42 AM, hasufell wrote:
On 01/30/2013 05:28 AM, Richard Farina (zerochaos) wrote:
zerochaos13/01/30 04:28:06
[...]
LICENSE=GPL-2 -SLOT=0 +SLOT=0/${PV} KEYWORDS=~alpha ~amd64
~arm ~hppa ~ia64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sparc ~x86 ~x86-fbsd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/11/2013 12:07 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 18:00:33 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
I c. Woukd there be a way to change the plugin dir, so it is not
version specific anymore?
Yes, we could call wireshark's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/28/2013 03:00 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, heroxbd wrote:
I am revisiting this topic based on previous discussions[1,2,3].
There seems to be a constant need for toolchain with a new EAPI. The
only block is how can we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/28/2013 10:12 PM, hero...@gentoo.org wrote:
Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org writes:
On 09/28/2013 03:00 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, heroxbd wrote:
I am revisiting this topic based on previous discussions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/23/2013 04:41 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 09/23/2013 09:31 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 22:03:49 +0200
Agostino Sarubbo a...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello,
the council has decided[1] to drop m68k, sh, s390 to unstable. If
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/2013 08:44 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 21-09-2013 a las 14:42 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
I don't have time for it for a long time (since I switched to official
suspend time ago and moved back to gentoo-sources then), updated patches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/07/2013 01:25 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Thu, 05 Sep 2013 12:13:28 +0200
Agostino Sarubbo a...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello,
during an irc debate, me and other people just noticed that the default
profile could use more flags to enhance the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/07/2013 05:11 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sat, 7 Sep 2013 18:10:42 + (UTC)
Martin Vaeth va...@mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de wrote:
Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
* -fstack-protector{-all}
No thank you. -fstack-protector has very
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/05/2013 07:06 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 05 September 2013 06:13:28 Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
during an irc debate, me and other people just noticed that the default
profile could use more flags to enhance the security.
An hint is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ozzie src # emerge -vp ruby
These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
emerge: there are no ebuilds built with USE flags to satisfy
=dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6[ruby_targets_ruby20]. !!! One
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/21/2013 05:13 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:32:35 +0400
Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org wrote:
21.08.2013 12:13, Tom Wijsman пишет:
Recruiting shows to be a hard task; so, the suggestions I am doing
are assuming that that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/31/2013 01:29 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 12:37:58 -0400
Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
I know we are a little OT here but the fifth type of recruit is
Yes.
someone who is very excited, very
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/31/2013 03:57 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 20:45:00 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El sáb, 31-08-2013 a las 12:37 -0400, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
escribió: [...]
I know we are a little OT here but the fifth type
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/22/2013 07:24 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 22 August 2013 11:01, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think the result of a policy like this would be that stable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The new eclass is supposedly used by 732 in-tree packages [1],
and possibly a few dozens out-of-the-tree. Some parts of the eclass API
are barely used. I would really prefer to avoid yet another eclass
migration.
that's a shame, I don't think it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/30/2013 07:37 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, all.
After a few days of thinking, discovering and working, here it is.
The first working draft of new git eclass codenamed 'git-r3'.
First of all, the name is not final. I'm open to ideas.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/20/2013 06:26 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, fellow developers.
I've added a few new fancy features for Gentoo developers to portage
git. Sadly, since Zac isn't planning another release until 2.2.0 goes
stable, you need to switch to -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/18/2013 12:39 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
Hi all,
For EAPI 6, introduction of a patch applying function to the package
manager itself is being discussed. This would serve two purposes:
- support for PATCHES variable in a default src_install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/11/2013 04:30 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-08-11, o godz. 20:59:01
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 13:29:16 -0500
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
I am splitting this to a separate thread,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/13/2013 01:21 AM, heroxbd wrote:
Dear Fellows,
Canonical is raising money by pushing their concept of Ubuntu for
Android[1][2]. The idea is to put GNU environment (esp. Ubuntu userland)
in parallel to Android to drive the external HDMI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/27/2013 12:08 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
(I sent this to gentoo-releng@. Resending to gentoo-dev@ for a wider audience)
Can we make autobuilds go to /experimental and then only move them to
/releases when someone actually tests them?
Looking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Shall we revisit that, and try to make portage behave more correctly,
even if it means more revbumps / rebuilding?
Just set EMERGE_DEFAULT_DEPS=--dynamic-deps=n in make.conf if you'd
like to test it.
What (if anything) does that break or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/25/2013 01:28 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 07/25/2013 08:29 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
Shall we revisit that, and try to make portage behave more correctly,
even if it means more revbumps / rebuilding?
Just set EMERGE_DEFAULT_DEPS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/24/2013 03:18 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 21:17:26 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Other thing is that Portage explicitly ignores PMS in this matter
and uses dependencies from ebuilds rather than recorded ones.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/23/2013 03:37 PM, Roy Bamford wrote:
On 2013.07.23 01:57, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
[snip]
I think the real difference [between the foundation and council] is
that most of the devs don't care what the
foundation does as long
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/22/2013 05:51 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Roy Bamford neddyseag...@gentoo.org wrote:
- vote for holding meetings every 2nd Tuesday of the month at 2000
UTC
(or
1900 UTC depending on daylight savings)
In any
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
