On Thursday 24 March 2011 22:07:28 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Thursday 24 March 2011 12:08:02 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 March 2011 12:19:39 Dale wrote:
> > > I have never used LVM but when it messes up after a upgrade, as has
> > > happened to many others, see if you say the sam
On Thursday 24 March 2011 12:19:39 Dale wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Thu, March 24, 2011 12:30 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> >> On Thursday 24 March 2011 08:49:52 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >>> On Wed, March 23, 2011 5:43 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> md raid devices can do barriers.
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:09:27 +0100, Jarry wrote:
I know, there is "qfile" with "-o" option, but its syntax is
not clear to me. I tried "qfile -o *" but that is apparently
not the correct syntax, as all I got were a few top-level
subdirectories and nothing more...
On 2011-03-24 22:37, Sebastian Günther wrote:
> just to warn everyone of you readers, who use ~ARCH:
> firefox 4.0 arrived with a dep to gconf.
>
> A big show stopper for the all who do not want to have any gnome
> dependencies, but want to have the new Firefox.
>
> You have been warned
Mostly
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Dale wrote:
> And if we should set python to 2.7, should we remove python-2.6? I don't
> think we want to break something, portage in particular. ;-)
I have no trace of python-2.6 on my system at this point and I'm
getting along just fine with 2.7 as my active
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 07:28:35PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
> > One of my machines just saw a python-2.7 update and the ebuild was
> > good enough to remind me to run python-updater, but it didn't suggest
> > that I run eselect python and set the active version to 2.7.
> >
> > Should
Mark Knecht wrote:
One of my machines just saw a python-2.7 update and the ebuild was
good enough to remind me to run python-updater, but it didn't suggest
that I run eselect python and set the active version to 2.7.
Should this new version python be selected first as the active python
2 version
One of my machines just saw a python-2.7 update and the ebuild was
good enough to remind me to run python-updater, but it didn't suggest
that I run eselect python and set the active version to 2.7.
Should this new version python be selected first as the active python
2 version and then run python-
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:09:27 +0100, Jarry wrote:
> I know, there is "qfile" with "-o" option, but its syntax is
> not clear to me. I tried "qfile -o *" but that is apparently
> not the correct syntax, as all I got were a few top-level
> subdirectories and nothing more...
qfile operates on the fil
Hi,
just to warn everyone of you readers, who use ~ARCH:
firefox 4.0 arrived with a dep to gconf.
A big show stopper for the all who do not want to have any gnome
dependencies, but want to have the new Firefox.
You have been warned
Sebastian
--
" Religion ist das Opium des Volkes. " | _
Bill Longman wrote:
On 03/24/2011 11:17 AM, Dale wrote:
kashani wrote:
On 3/24/2011 10:19 AM, Dale wrote:
I have never used LVM but when it messes up after a upgrade, as has
happened to many others, see if you say the same thing. I hope your
backups are good and they can rest
Hi,
is there any way to find completely all "orphaned" files on my
system (recursivelly from /)? I mean all files (and directories)
which do not belong to any ebuild installed...
I know, there is "qfile" with "-o" option, but its syntax is
not clear to me. I tried "qfile -o *" but that is appare
On Thursday 24 March 2011 12:08:02 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thursday 24 March 2011 12:19:39 Dale wrote:
> > I have never used LVM but when it messes up after a upgrade, as has
> > happened to many others, see if you say the same thing. I hope your
> > backups are good and they can restore.
>
> W
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:19:39 -0500, Dale wrote:
> I have never used LVM but when it messes up after a upgrade, as has
> happened to many others, see if you say the same thing. I hope your
> backups are good and they can restore.
I must be one of the luckiest people around. LVM messes up for ma
On Thursday 24 March 2011 15:38:02 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thu, March 24, 2011 12:30 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 March 2011 08:49:52 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >> On Wed, March 23, 2011 5:43 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> >> > md raid devices can do barriers. Don't know about
On Thursday 24 March 2011 12:19:39 Dale wrote:
> I have never used LVM but when it messes up after a upgrade, as has
> happened to many others, see if you say the same thing. I hope your
> backups are good and they can restore.
What is this "mess up after an upgrade" of which you speak?
I've us
On 03/24/2011 11:17 AM, Dale wrote:
> kashani wrote:
>> On 3/24/2011 10:19 AM, Dale wrote:
>>>
>>> I have never used LVM but when it messes up after a upgrade, as has
>>> happened to many others, see if you say the same thing. I hope your
>>> backups are good and they can restore.
>>>
>>> Dale
>>
>
kashani wrote:
On 3/24/2011 10:19 AM, Dale wrote:
I have never used LVM but when it messes up after a upgrade, as has
happened to many others, see if you say the same thing. I hope your
backups are good and they can restore.
Dale
Meh, boot a liveCD and fix it which took all of 15 minutes
On 3/24/2011 10:19 AM, Dale wrote:
I have never used LVM but when it messes up after a upgrade, as has
happened to many others, see if you say the same thing. I hope your
backups are good and they can restore.
Dale
Meh, boot a liveCD and fix it which took all of 15 minutes. I don't see
that
J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Thu, March 24, 2011 12:30 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Thursday 24 March 2011 08:49:52 J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Wed, March 23, 2011 5:43 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
md raid devices can do barriers. Don't know about lvm. But lvm is such
On Thu, March 24, 2011 12:30 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Thursday 24 March 2011 08:49:52 J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Wed, March 23, 2011 5:43 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> > md raid devices can do barriers. Don't know about lvm. But lvm is such
>> a
>> > can
>> > of worms I am surprised
On Thu, March 24, 2011 2:10 pm, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 19:57, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Thu, March 24, 2011 1:19 pm, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 18:21, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Thu, March 24, 2011 10:36 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 20
Hi,
I want to rsync all the directories and files that contain the date
"2011.03.03".
Everything else should not be copied.
I did a lot of experiments and read web pages, but can't solve this
conundrum.
kfir@goofy /tmp/rsync.test $ find
.
./b
./a
./a/aaa
./a/aaa/2011.03.03
./a/2011.03.04
./a/2011.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 19:57, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thu, March 24, 2011 1:19 pm, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 18:21, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>> On Thu, March 24, 2011 10:36 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 15:32, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>
>> -- snip --
>>
On Thu, March 24, 2011 1:57 pm, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thu, March 24, 2011 1:19 pm, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>
>> -- snip --
>>
Can't hurt to try, now that I've gotten a bootable kernel. Can always
fallback to the previous one.
>>>
>>> Let me know how that goes.
>>>
>>
>> Compiling all the
On Thu, March 24, 2011 1:19 pm, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 18:21, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Thu, March 24, 2011 10:36 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 15:32, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> -- snip --
>
Hmm... I don't use kernel-modules in my Xen domu's (All are
Hello,
Few month ago I played with that. My experience was that I need to use
hardened gentoo for distcc to work correctrly.
So I tried the virtualbox setup.
HTH
Best Regards.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Coert Waagmeester <
lgro...@waagmeester.co.za> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
> Only just
El 24/03/11 11:13, Coert Waagmeester escribió:
> Hello all,
>
>
> Only just started playing with hardened gentoo.
>
> I have a few normal gentoo amd64 machines already running.
> Can I add those to the distcc config for the hardened box?
No
> Or are there indeed special things with the compiler on
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 18:21, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thu, March 24, 2011 10:36 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 15:32, J. Roeleveld wrote:
-- snip --
>>> Hmm... I don't use kernel-modules in my Xen domu's (All are PV). I
>>> wonder
>>> if compiling them into the kernel migh
On Thursday 24 March 2011 08:49:52 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Wed, March 23, 2011 5:43 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 23 March 2011 14:04:23 Mr. Jarry wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> > And if you don't care about barriers, j
On Thu, March 24, 2011 10:36 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 15:32, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>> Hmmm... currently I set xencons=hvc0 (also in /etc/inittab,
>>> s/tty0/hvc0/)
>>>
>>> I'll see what happens if I return them to tty0.
>>
>> Good luck there :)
>
> No joy. Changing xencons
Hello all,
Only just started playing with hardened gentoo.
I have a few normal gentoo amd64 machines already running.
Can I add those to the distcc config for the hardened box?
Or are there indeed special things with the compiler on hardened gentoo?
Regards,
Coert
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 15:32, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thu, March 24, 2011 9:20 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 14:47, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>> On Thu, March 24, 2011 7:37 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:30, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 201
On Thu, March 24, 2011 9:20 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 14:47, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Thu, March 24, 2011 7:37 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:30, Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 00:03, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> More up
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 14:47, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thu, March 24, 2011 7:37 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:30, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 00:03, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> More update on my odyssey.
>>
>> I went back to HVM and reboot using
On Wed, March 23, 2011 5:43 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 March 2011 14:04:23 Mr. Jarry wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
>>
>> wrote:
>> > And if you don't care about barriers, jfs might be a good choice.
>>
>> Knowing nothing about "barriers" I
On Thu, March 24, 2011 7:37 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:30, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 00:03, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
> More update on my odyssey.
>
> I went back to HVM and reboot using the Install CD. I did a 'chroot'
> followed by 'rc-update add ss
37 matches
Mail list logo
