on 05/12/2011 06:13 AM meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote the following:
Hi,
after upgradeing to openrc there still some issues...
1) After reboot eth1 (there was/is no eth0!) is up and
running (according to ifconfig) but
ping site
returns unknown host. After calling
meino.cra...@gmx.de:
this morning there was an update to nvidia-drivers-270.41.06.
I am back to 270.41.03 because dosemu caused a high load and games with
it acted poorly. Haven't investigated further.
Hartmut
--
Usenet-ABC-Wiki http://www.usenet-abc.de/wiki/
Von Usern fuer User :-)
Hartmut Figge:
I am back to 270.41.03 because dosemu caused a high load...
dosbox, not dosemu. ;)
Hartmut
--
Usenet-ABC-Wiki http://www.usenet-abc.de/wiki/
Von Usern fuer User :-)
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 07:27:32 Dale wrote:
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Dale.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 04:55:01PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Hi folks,
I was curious, what's the results of the openrc update for people that
have done theirs? Is it pretty simple and just works or are
2011/5/12 Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org:
on 05/12/2011 06:13 AM meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote the following:
Hi,
after upgradeing to openrc there still some issues...
1) After reboot eth1 (there was/is no eth0!) is up and
running (according to ifconfig) but
ping site
On 12 May 2011 09:27, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/5/12 Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org:
on 05/12/2011 06:13 AM meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote the following:
Hi,
after upgradeing to openrc there still some issues...
1) After reboot eth1 (there was/is no eth0!) is up and
On 11 May 2011 15:43, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:45 on Wednesday 11 May 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 05/11/2011 02:50 AM, Dale wrote:
[...]
What do you know, I upgraded and it worked. Now if I can just get
Mick wrote:
On 12 May 2011 09:27, Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
This will only work if the OP first reads the migration web page[1]
that the devs have kindly provided and included in the elog of KDE
4.6, which explicitly states that the net.eth0 - net.lo symlink may
need to be
On 12 May 2011 06:31, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 23:26:18 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 05/12/2011 12:28 AM, Mick wrote:
Having completed the upgrade I noticed that a few packages are being
called up
for removal:
sys-apps/dmidecode
selected:
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
this morning there was an update to nvidia-drivers-270.41.06.
After running dmesg I found this:
ioremap error for 0x9a000-0x9b000, requested 0x10, got 0x0
ioremap error for 0xcfe9-0xcfe91000, requested 0x10, got 0x0
I dont know, whether this is
个人经历，baselayout的更新其实都不怎么suffer,呵呵～
2011/5/12 刘勇泰 lyt...@gmail.com:
Hello everyone. I am going to build a new gentoo box. Will the next
auto-build stage tar ball (2011-5-12) for amd64 include the OpenRC update?
If so I will not suffer the baselayout updating.
Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 5/11/2011 6:51 PM, Dale wrote:
Does this look more better?
root@fireball / # locale
LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF8
LC_NAME=en_US.UTF8
LC_ADDRESS=en_US.UTF8
LC_TELEPHONE=en_US.UTF8
LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF8
LC_IDENTIFICATION=en_US.UTF8
LC_PAPER, is that like paper in my
Walter Dnes wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:56:05PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote
Possibly one more problem, rdate seems to have stopped working for me.
I've opened a separate thread on that.
Not really. It seems that rdate is being dprecated in favour of NTP.
I found an rdate
James Wall wrote:
On May 11, 2011 4:38 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com
mailto:w41...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/11/2011 03:10 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 04:55:46 -0500, Dale wrote:
I'll leave it like it is I guess. I like all the little green OK's
that scroll up anyway.
Joost Roeleveld wrote:
I actually did mine before noticing this thread and didn't actually pay much
attention to it all.
Not had any issues and didn't need to spend much time in fixing anything. The
only problem I had was that /etc/init.d/eth0 had dissapeared.
That was easily fixed.
--
Joost
Apparently, though unproven, at 02:40 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Walter Dnes did
opine thusly:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 05:45:07PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
KDE devs decided to take the risk and make the jump ahead of the curve.
Coca Cola went from Coke Classic to New Coke; at least they
Apparently, though unproven, at 04:13 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Kevin O'Gorman
did opine thusly:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently so. It seems like it ought to pay attention to eselect.
If I've explicitly configured my system to use
On Wed, 11 May 2011 20:40:02 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
KDE devs decided to take the risk and make the jump ahead of the
curve.
Coca Cola went from Coke Classic to New Coke; at least they had the
guts to admit that it was a bad idea, and reverse it.
IBM walked away from their
On 5/12/2011 5:21 AM, Dale wrote:
Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 5/11/2011 6:51 PM, Dale wrote:
Does this look more better?
root@fireball / # locale
LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF8
LC_NAME=en_US.UTF8
LC_ADDRESS=en_US.UTF8
LC_TELEPHONE=en_US.UTF8
LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF8
LC_IDENTIFICATION=en_US.UTF8
The
On Thursday 12 May 2011 17:12:30 dong l wrote:
个人经历，baselayout的更新其实都不怎么suffer,呵呵～
huh?
2011/5/12 刘勇泰 lyt...@gmail.com:
Hello everyone. I am going to build a new gentoo box. Will the next
auto-build stage tar ball (2011-5-12) for amd64 include the OpenRC
update? If so I will not suffer
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:00:01PM +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 20:40:02 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
KDE devs decided to take the risk and make the jump ahead of the
curve.
Coca Cola went from Coke Classic to New Coke; at least they had the
guts to admit that
On Thursday 12 May 2011 04:25:58 Dale wrote:
Joost Roeleveld wrote:
I actually did mine before noticing this thread and didn't actually pay
much attention to it all.
Not had any issues and didn't need to spend much time in fixing
anything. The only problem I had was that
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:40:02PM +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2011 17:12:30 dong l wrote:
个人经历，baselayout的更新其实都不怎么suffer,呵呵～
huh?
It surely does look cool though, wish I could read and write in such
a picturesque manner. :)
--
caveat utilitor
♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫
Neil Bothwick wrote:
The pattern I see is that of selecting only changes that failed and
implying they are the norm.
Why not add other improvements that were so bad, like the switch from
floppy disks to hard disks, or CDs to DVDs? Companies try to predict
where the market should go so they can
Mike Edenfield wrote:
They're already set, as your locale output showed :) The definitions
of those various formats are built into the locale definitions, so
they should have the same value as all your other LC_* variables.
You can see your locale's idea of what those things mean in the
Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2011 04:25:58 Dale wrote:
Joost Roeleveld wrote:
I actually did mine before noticing this thread and didn't actually pay
much attention to it all.
Not had any issues and didn't need to spend much time in fixing
anything. The only problem I
Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2011 17:12:30 dong l wrote:
个人经历，baselayout的更新其实都不怎么suffer,呵呵～
huh?
Remember the old saying, 'you can say that again'? Let's not. I didn't
understand it the first time and won't the next time either. lol
I got a friend that lived
Apparently, though unproven, at 14:54 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
The pattern I see is that of selecting only changes that failed and
implying they are the norm.
Why not add other improvements that were so bad, like the switch from
floppy
Hi,
I'm using nvidia-drivers-270.41.03 and got those too.
ioremap error for 0xbf7ef000-0xbf7f, requested 0x10, got 0x0
Regards
--
Xiangru Chen
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
this morning there was an update to
He said that, according to his experiences, updating baselayout isn't really
suffering.
Regards
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2011 17:12:30 dong l wrote:
个人经历，baselayout的更新其实都不怎么suffer,呵呵～
huh?
Remember
Alan McKinnon wrote:
They can do any damn thing they want to with their code. They also you owe
support for it in exactly the same amount you paid for it. Which is to say
nothing.
It's not a question of should, it's only a question of Dale would prefer it
if
So, you think most of the KDE
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 03:50:02PM +0200, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
They can do any damn thing they want to with their code. They also you owe
support for it in exactly the same amount you paid for it. Which is to say
nothing.
It's not a question of should, it's only a question
on 05/12/2011 03:43 PM Indi wrote the following:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:40:02PM +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2011 17:12:30 dong l wrote:
个人经历，baselayout的更新其实都不怎么suffer,呵呵～
huh?
It surely does look cool though, wish I could read and write in such
a picturesque
Up until a few weeks ago I have never used kde opting for xfce and openbox and
cannot make any comments about kde3 and upgrade. I always preferred the lighter
desktops. I really like 4.x, it has lots of features and seems to me at least,
very easy to use (intuitive). So perhaps the kde team
On Thu, 12 May 2011 08:46:32 -0500, Dale wrote:
So, you think most of the KDE users were happy to see support for KDE3
being dropped, especially considering KDE4 was much less than stable?
For me and a lot of others, it was worthless at first. It was good eye
candy but not functional
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:00 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
I had 8 users on kde before 3 was deprecated in 2009.
Now I have zero. It was a harrowing time, switching
everyone to gnome, finding that is not so hot, finally
putting them on xfce. If xfce gets a wild
Indi wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 03:50:02PM +0200, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
They can do any damn thing they want to with their code. They also you owe
support for it in exactly the same amount you paid for it. Which is to say
nothing.
It's not a question of should, it's
On Thu, 12 May 2011 07:54:13 -0500, Dale wrote:
I just hope they also learned from their mistakes. Dropping KDE3
support long before KDE4 was ready was a big one. That shouldn't be
repeated.
If it's as good as everyone says, what more support did it need? Did the
KDE guys come knocking on
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2011 08:46:32 -0500, Dale wrote:
So, you think most of the KDE users were happy to see support for KDE3
being dropped, especially considering KDE4 was much less than stable?
For me and a lot of others, it was worthless at first. It was good eye
candy
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 04:30:02PM +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2011 07:54:13 -0500, Dale wrote:
I just hope they also learned from their mistakes. Dropping KDE3
support long before KDE4 was ready was a big one. That shouldn't be
repeated.
If it's as good as everyone
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 04:40:02PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:00 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
I had 8 users on kde before 3 was deprecated in 2009.
Now I have zero. It was a harrowing time, switching
everyone to gnome, finding that
Indi wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 04:40:02PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:00 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
I had 8 users on kde before 3 was deprecated in 2009.
Now I have zero. It was a harrowing time, switching
everyone to
On 5/12/2011 9:25 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 14:54 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
The pattern I see is that of selecting only changes that failed and
implying they are the norm.
Why not add other improvements that were
On 12/5/2011, at 12:31am, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 22:14:55 Mike Edenfield wrote:
The only problem with LC_ALL is that it overrides all of the other LC_*
variables.
- which is precisely what most ordinary desktop users want.
No, I think they want all locale
Stroller wrote:
`date +%l:%M%P`
Here's mine:
root@fireball / # date +%l:%M%P
12:19pm
root@fireball / #
Dale
:-) :-)
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 23:26:28 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
kde-base/knetworkconf
selected: 4.4.5
protected: none
omitted: none
Is asking to be removed, but there isn't a 4.6 version. Has it been
replaced by
On Thursday 12 May 2011 18:06:27 Stroller wrote:
Could you possibly post the output of `date +%l:%M%P`?
In doing so you'd be doing me a favour.
$ date +%l:%M%P
8:39
That's the wall-clock time (p.m.) in my local time-zone. What Americans call
daylight savings time, though how they imagine
On Thursday 12 May 2011 10:23:42 Dale wrote:
If ntp gives you grief, try chrony. I use ntp on one machine where ntp
works well and chrony on my main rig since ntp sucks on it. Weird but
it works.
I've been using chrony for years. It's a nice piece of code: it keeps the clock
in sync,
On Thursday 12 May 2011 14:00:16 Dale wrote:
Hindsight. 20/20 as always. LOL I just wish my eyes was.
What? In the back of your head? :)
--
Rgds
Peter
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:00:02PM +0200, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2011 14:00:16 Dale wrote:
Hindsight. 20/20 as always. LOL I just wish my eyes was.
What? In the back of your head? :)
My hair hides the eyes in the back of my head (and hides my
horns, too).
--
Peter Humphrey pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org writes:
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 22:14:55 Mike Edenfield wrote:
The only problem with LC_ALL is that it overrides all of the other LC_*
variables.
- which is precisely what most ordinary desktop users want.
Most perhaps, but certainly not all. For me
On Thursday 12 May 2011 18:20:15 Dale wrote:
Stroller wrote:
`date +%l:%M%P`
Here's mine:
root@fireball / # date +%l:%M%P
12:19pm
root@fireball / #
Dale
$ date +%l:%M%P
9:23
$ locale
LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8
LC_NUMERIC=en_GB.UTF-8
LC_TIME=en_GB.UTF-8
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2011 14:00:16 Dale wrote:
Hindsight. 20/20 as always. LOL I just wish my eyes was.
What? In the back of your head? :)
You know, you do something then look back and wish you had done it
differently. Then again, I have arthritis in
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1chap=6 seems to
have a circular reference, that is, suggesting the use of the subject utility
prior to chrooting and having any such utility in $PATH. I've never installed
Gentoo before, so maybe I've missed something. Or maybe that
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1chap=6 seems
to have a circular reference, that is, suggesting the use of the subject
utility prior to chrooting and having any such utility in $PATH. I've
* Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net [110512 16:15]:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1chap=6 seems to
have a circular reference, that is, suggesting the use of the subject utility
prior to chrooting and having any such utility in $PATH. I've never installed
Gentoo
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:06 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 04:40:02PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:00 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Indi did
opine
thusly:
I had 8 users on kde before 3 was deprecated in
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:41 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Felix Miata did
opine thusly:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1chap=6 seems
to have a circular reference, that is, suggesting the use of the subject
utility prior to chrooting and having any such
Probably a dumb one, but...
I have /home, /usr and /var on separate partitions...
If I want to image my system prior to the update 'just in case'
something goes south, am I correct that all I need to worry about is /,
since /etc is located there?
In other words, is anything on /usr or /var
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:50:02PM +0200, Felix Miata wrote:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1chap=6 seems to
have a circular reference, that is, suggesting the use of the subject utility
prior to chrooting and having any such utility in $PATH. I've never installed
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:00 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Tanstaafl did
opine thusly:
Probably a dumb one, but...
I have /home, /usr and /var on separate partitions...
If I want to image my system prior to the update 'just in case'
something goes south, am I correct that all I need
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:38 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2011 08:46:32 -0500, Dale wrote:
So, you think most of the KDE users were happy to see support for KDE3
being dropped, especially considering KDE4 was much less than
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:10:03PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:06 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 04:40:02PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:00 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Indi did
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:19 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
You might be correct, but I very much doubt it.
I will say though that it's almost a certainty
the type of user who uses kde4 is probably
different from those who used kde3.
There you go again,
On 12/5/2011, at 6:20pm, Dale wrote:
Stroller wrote:
`date +%l:%M%P`
Here's mine:
root@fireball / # date +%l:%M%P
12:19pm
root@fireball / #
And what are your locale settings?
Stroller.
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:38 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2011 08:46:32 -0500, Dale wrote:
So, you think most of the KDE users were happy to see support for KDE3
being dropped, especially
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:00 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Tanstaafl did
opine thusly:
Probably a dumb one, but...
I have /home, /usr and /var on separate partitions...
If I want to image my system prior to the update 'just in case'
something goes south, am I
On 12/5/2011, at 8:41pm, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2011 18:06:27 Stroller wrote:
Could you possibly post the output of `date +%l:%M%P`?
In doing so you'd be doing me a favour.
$ date +%l:%M%P
8:39
That's the wall-clock time (p.m.) in my local time-zone. What
On 05/12/2011 07:00 AM, Indi wrote:
...It was a harrowing time, switching
everyone to gnome, finding that is not so hot...
Just curious: what sort of complaints did you get about gnome?
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:30:02PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:38 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2011 08:46:32 -0500, Dale wrote:
So, you think most of the KDE users were happy to see support for
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:50:02PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:19 on Thursday 12 May 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
You might be correct, but I very much doubt it.
I will say though that it's almost a certainty
the type of user who uses kde4 is probably
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:30:01AM +0200, walt wrote:
On 05/12/2011 07:00 AM, Indi wrote:
...It was a harrowing time, switching
everyone to gnome, finding that is not so hot...
Just curious: what sort of complaints did you get about gnome?
Oh to be honest I think most of the complaints
Stroller wrote:
On 12/5/2011, at 6:20pm, Dale wrote:
Stroller wrote:
`date +%l:%M%P`
Here's mine:
root@fireball / # date +%l:%M%P
12:19pm
root@fireball / #
And what are your locale settings?
Stroller.
root@fireball / # locale
LANG=en_US.UTF8
Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2011 17:12:30 dong l wrote:
?baselayout?suffer,???
huh?
Google Translate :
**Personal experience, baselayout how updates are in fact not suffer, Oh~
**
Xiangru Chen's translation is a bit better, I must admit.
On 2011/05/12 17:03 (GMT-0400) Indi composed:
On 2011/05/12 16:41 (GMT-0400) Felix Miata composed:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1chap=6 seems to
have a circular reference, that is, suggesting the use of the subject utility
prior to chrooting and having any
On 13/05/2011 5:00 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Probably a dumb one, but...
I have /home, /usr and /var on separate partitions...
If I want to image my system prior to the update 'just in case'
something goes south, am I correct that all I need to worry about is /,
since /etc is located there?
In
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
On 2011/05/12 17:03 (GMT-0400) Indi composed:
On 2011/05/12 16:41 (GMT-0400) Felix Miata composed:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1chap=6
seems to
have a circular reference, that is,
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 02:20:01AM +0200, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2011/05/12 17:03 (GMT-0400) Indi composed:
On 2011/05/12 16:41 (GMT-0400) Felix Miata composed:
Since I'm familiar and happy with mirrors.us.kernel.org performance, I might
rather use that, or rsync.us.gentoo.org (if that's
Apparently, though unproven, at 02:06 on Friday 13 May 2011, Felix Miata did
opine thusly:
I guess I missed the requirement to be running Gentoo to be able to
initiate an install of Gentoo.
This is not correct
I thought whatever Linux was already
installed would be good enough,
this is
2011/5/12 Indi thebeelzebubtrig...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:40:02PM +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2011 17:12:30 dong l wrote:
个人经历，baselayout的更新其实都不怎么suffer,呵呵～
huh?
It surely does look cool though, wish I could read and write in such
a picturesque
2011/5/12 Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org
on 05/12/2011 03:43 PM Indi wrote the following:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:40:02PM +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2011 17:12:30 dong l wrote:
个人经历，baselayout的更新其实都不怎么suffer,呵呵～
huh?
It surely does look cool though,
On 2011/05/13 02:37 (GMT+0200) Alan McKinnon composed:
That part of the doc assumes that the user is indeed running from the
LiveCD-like environment provided by the official installer. There are other
docs (far less verbose in their explanations) covering alternate install
sources.
My actual
On 5/12/2011 9:27 PM, 刘勇泰 wrote:
2011/5/12 Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org
mailto:thana...@asyr.hopto.org
on 05/12/2011 03:43 PM Indi wrote the following:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:40:02PM +0200, Joost
Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2011 17:12:30 dong l wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 03:40:01AM +0200, 刘勇泰 wrote:
2011/5/12 Thanasis [1]thana...@asyr.hopto.org
on 05/12/2011 03:43 PM Indi wrote the following:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:40:02PM +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2011 17:12:30 dong l wrote:
On 5/12/2011 8:06 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
In the pages preceding
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1chap=6
it seemed as though the process would be easy enough, having
built up some experience working in chroot lately to fix
fubar'd Fedora and Mandriva rpm database
Just ran into a gotcha with my main server upgrade to
openrc/baselayout2 - it appears that the old ifconfig network syntax
no longer works. I kept getting the message:
Error: either local is duplicate, or netmask is garbage
until I changed the syntax from
config_eth0=XX.YY.ZZ.WW broadcast
On 2011-05-12 23:44, Dale wrote:
Your questions don't disprove what me and others have posted. As I have
I think Alans point is that while the KDE developers (volunteers, or
paid for) have certain goals which may or may not be tangential to yours
(clearly, in the case of KDE3 vs KDE4 they are
87 matches
Mail list logo
