Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -U or emerge -N

On Mon, 2023-04-10 at 10:44 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > Is it better to us emerge -U or emerge -N > > I've always done -N but it didn't go very smoothly it seems to me -U might be > better option but it takes longer. > Right now I'm doing -U and it is compiling 549-packages. > Since

[gentoo-user] emerge -U or emerge -N

Is it better to us emerge -U or emerge -N I've always done -N but it didn't go very smoothly it seems to me -U might be better option but it takes longer. Right now I'm doing -U and it is compiling 549-packages.

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge times blown out

> > Could it be that some kind of Spectre mitigation is active? I just read > about > some massive performance problems in Kernel 5.19+ on Skylake CPUs. Stable > gentoo kernel was upgraded to 6.1 recently, which could also be affected > by > this problem. > See https://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/k

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge times blown out

Am Samstag, 18. Februar 2023, 01:49:11 CET schrieb Adam Carter: > I have three systems (all ~arch) and the emerge times have blown out on all > of them across all packages. Worst example appears to be; > > Fri Dec 23 13:11:44 2022 >>> net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.3-r410 >merge time: 37 min

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge times blown out

Samstag, 18. Februar 2023 01:49:   > I have three systems (all ~arch) and the emerge times have blown out on all > of them across all packages. Worst example appears to be; >     Fri Dec 23 13:11:44 2022 >>> net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.3-r410 >        merge time: 37 minutes and 8 seconds. >      Fr

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge times blown out

Adam Carter writes: > My reason for asking is that i'm seeing this across multiple systems, 2 > AMD, 1 Intel, who's configuration hasn't really changed and while there is > some variance there has been a step change late December / early January. > Another example > > Sat Nov 26 14:34:50 2022

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge times blown out

Adam Carter wrote: > > Does that info help?  > > > My reason for asking is that i'm seeing this across multiple systems, > 2 AMD, 1 Intel, who's configuration hasn't really changed and while > there is some variance there has been a step change late December / > early January. Another example >

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge times blown out

> > Does that info help? > > My reason for asking is that i'm seeing this across multiple systems, 2 AMD, 1 Intel, who's configuration hasn't really changed and while there is some variance there has been a step change late December / early January. Another example Sat Nov 26 14:34:50 2022 >>>

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge times blown out

Adam Carter wrote: > I have three systems (all ~arch) and the emerge times have blown out > on all of them across all packages. Worst example appears to be; > >     Fri Dec 23 13:11:44 2022 >>> net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.3-r410 >        merge time: 37 minutes and 8 seconds. > >      Fri Dec 23 13:43:

[gentoo-user] emerge times blown out

I have three systems (all ~arch) and the emerge times have blown out on all of them across all packages. Worst example appears to be; Fri Dec 23 13:11:44 2022 >>> net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.3-r410 merge time: 37 minutes and 8 seconds. Fri Dec 23 13:43:08 2022 >>> net-libs/webkit-gtk

[gentoo-user] emerge 7-9% faster with python 3.11 beta 4

FYI, i've found 'emerge -pvuUD world' is 7-9% faster on my machines when I compare 3.10 to 3.11b4. To achieve this i've added '*/* PYTHON_TARGETS: -* python3_10 python3_11' to package.use on my ~arch systems, then run 'emerge -avuUD portage'. At the end of this python-exec.conf contains; python3.1

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge with another PATH

tastytea: > On 2022-05-20 17:22+0200 k...@aspodata.se wrote: > > > Neil Bothwick: > > > On Fri, 20 May 2022 15:55:22 +0200 (CEST), k...@aspodata.se wrote: > > > > How do I run emerge so that when buildin/emerging the package > > > > another PATH is used ? > > > > > > PATH is just an environme

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge with another PATH

k...@aspodata.se wrote: > Neil Bothwick: >> On Fri, 20 May 2022 15:55:22 +0200 (CEST), k...@aspodata.se wrote: >>> How do I run emerge so that when buildin/emerging the package another >>> PATH is used ? >> PATH is just an environment variable, so >> >> PATH="/path1:/path2" emerge blah >> >> should

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge with another PATH

On 2022-05-20 17:22+0200 k...@aspodata.se wrote: > Neil Bothwick: > > On Fri, 20 May 2022 15:55:22 +0200 (CEST), k...@aspodata.se wrote: > > > How do I run emerge so that when buildin/emerging the package > > > another PATH is used ? > > > > PATH is just an environment variable, so > > > > P

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge with another PATH

Neil Bothwick: > On Fri, 20 May 2022 15:55:22 +0200 (CEST), k...@aspodata.se wrote: > > How do I run emerge so that when buildin/emerging the package another > > PATH is used ? > > PATH is just an environment variable, so > > PATH="/path1:/path2" emerge blah > > should do that. Doesn't seems to

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge with another PATH

On Fri, 20 May 2022 15:55:22 +0200 (CEST), k...@aspodata.se wrote: > How do I run emerge so that when buildin/emerging the package another > PATH is used ? PATH is just an environment variable, so PATH="/path1:/path2" emerge blah should do that. Unless what you are really asking is how do you

[gentoo-user] emerge with another PATH

How do I run emerge so that when buildin/emerging the package another PATH is used ? Regards, /Karl Hammar

[gentoo-user] emerge not fetching anything

Hello, Starting last update emerge stopped downloading packages, but syncing works. For example: >>> Downloading 'http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/layout.conf' --2022-05-04 08:43:54-- http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/layout.conf Resolving distfiles.gentoo.org... !!! Couldn't download

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge-webrsync

I was doing the emerge-webrsync step in the install instructions for gentoo and that was to install a gentoo snapshot. On Fri, 15 Apr 2022, Arve Barsnes wrote: > On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 at 19:58, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > > Found no snapshots on rit.edu and went back from now to March 6, 2022. > > I

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge-webrsync

On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 at 19:58, Jude DaShiell wrote: > Found no snapshots on rit.edu and went back from now to March 6, 2022. > I'm using openrc now. Has gentoo got a site where it shows latest > available snapshot information for its snapshots? > What kind of information are you after? I looked

[gentoo-user] emerge-webrsync

Found no snapshots on rit.edu and went back from now to March 6, 2022. I'm using openrc now. Has gentoo got a site where it shows latest available snapshot information for its snapshots?

[gentoo-user] emerge is stumped

I can't emerge. I get these errors, like, 4 times: T/ask was destroyed but it is pending!// //task: wait_for=.() at /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/_emerge/AsynchronousTask.py:49, ()]> cb=[SpawnProcess._main_exit()]>// / // I had to abort an emerge yesterday, could it

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -DuN @system vs. emerge -DuN @world

On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 15:41:14 +0100, hitachi303 wrote: > >> as far as I understand updating @system first should be safer and > >> easier to perform than updating @world directly. It was mention that > >> especially after updating the software after a somewhat long period > >> this might solve conf

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -DuN @system vs. emerge -DuN @world

Am 21.03.22 um 13:34 schrieb Neil Bothwick: On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 10:43:30 +0100, hitachi303 wrote: as far as I understand updating @system first should be safer and easier to perform than updating @world directly. It was mention that especially after updating the software after a somewhat long

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -DuN @system vs. emerge -DuN @world

On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 10:43:30 +0100, hitachi303 wrote: > as far as I understand updating @system first should be safer and > easier to perform than updating @world directly. It was mention that > especially after updating the software after a somewhat long period > this might solve conflicts. I oft

[gentoo-user] emerge -DuN @system vs. emerge -DuN @world

Hi, as far as I understand updating @system first should be safer and easier to perform than updating @world directly. It was mention that especially after updating the software after a somewhat long period this might solve conflicts. I often do experience different and wonder what the reason

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge failes due to no valid source for pythonexec-2.2 when I have pythonexec-2.4 installed???

On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 at 03:42, Steven Lembark wrote: > # emerge --update --newuse --deep --with-bdeps=y @world > > emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy > ">=dev-lang/python-exec-2:2/2=[python_targets_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-)]". > (dependency required by "dev-py

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge failes due to no valid source for pythonexec-2.2 when I have pythonexec-2.4 installed???

On Sun, 06 Feb 2022 15:52:12 -0500, Steven Lembark wrote: > > # emerge --info > > > I spend more time maintaining a language I don't actually use > lately... > > Emerge fails becuase python-exec-2.2 doesn't have its expected > Pytnon version. Catch is that it app

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge failes due to no valid source for pythonexec-2.2 when I have pythonexec-2.4 installed???

On Sun, 6 Feb 2022 at 21:52, Steven Lembark wrote: > emerge: there are no ebuilds built with USE flags to satisfy > ">=dev-lang/python-exec-2:2/2=[python_targets_python3_6]". > !!! One of the following packages is required to complete your request: > - dev-lang/python-exec-2.4.8::gentoo (Missing

[gentoo-user] emerge failes due to no valid source for pythonexec-2.2 when I have pythonexec-2.4 installed???

# emerge --info I spend more time maintaining a language I don't actually use lately... Emerge fails becuase python-exec-2.2 doesn't have its expected Pytnon version. Catch is that it appears that the current version is 2.4, which seems to be installed: dev-la

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge asynchronous anomoly

On Sunday, 3 October 2021 10:28:49 CEST n952162 wrote: > Is it so on top of things that it's downloading many packages early, > and the download is so aggressive, that nothing else can run? emerge downloads distfiles for all packages to install in the background while the compile jobs are runnin

[gentoo-user] emerge asynchronous anomoly

Hallo, there's probably an explanation ... I'm emerging at this point: >>> Emerging (51 of 93) perl-core/Encode-3.120.0::gentoo and there's NO additional log output for a very long time. Looking at ps(1) shows this: root 22366 21993  0 07:46 pts/1 00:00:00  |   \_ sudo

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge -u -k package install order - broken system [SOLVED]

Am Montag, 6. September 2021, 16:33:32 CEST schrieb Alexander Puchmayr: > Hi there, > > I just tried to upgrade a older installation via binary packages and this > broke my system. After around 25 packages of almost 300 it stopped with > error and failing packages. > > $ emerge > Failed to valida

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge -u -k package install order - broken system

Am Montag, 6. September 2021, 19:38:38 CEST schrieb Jack: > On 2021.09.06 10:33, Alexander Puchmayr wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > I just tried to upgrade a older installation via binary packages and > > this > > broke my system. After around 25 packages of almost 300 it stopped > > with error > > a

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge -u -k package install order - broken system

On 2021.09.06 10:33, Alexander Puchmayr wrote: Hi there, I just tried to upgrade a older installation via binary packages and this broke my system. After around 25 packages of almost 300 it stopped with error and failing packages. $ emerge Failed to validate a sane '/dev'. bash process sub

[gentoo-user] Emerge -u -k package install order - broken system

Hi there, I just tried to upgrade a older installation via binary packages and this broke my system. After around 25 packages of almost 300 it stopped with error and failing packages. $ emerge Failed to validate a sane '/dev'. bash process substitution doesn't work; this may be an indication of

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --sync keeps failing

On 8/2/21 2:01 PM, Michael wrote: On Monday, 2 August 2021 12:10:12 BST n952162 wrote: On 8/1/21 8:32 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On Sun, 2021-08-01 at 17:32 +0200, n952162 wrote: * Verifying /var/db/repos/gentoo/.tmp-unverified-download-quarantine ...!!! Manifest verification failed:

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --sync keeps failing

On Mon, 2021-08-02 at 13:10 +0200, n952162 wrote: > > > > I have this problem every month.  Why does it fail?  Is it just a > timeout because my network is slow?  Can that be tweaked? > I'm not really sure. I've seen it fail in the past due to bad memory or a dying hard drive, but it also "just

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --sync keeps failing

On Tuesday, 3 August 2021 11:49:23 BST Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 03 Aug 2021 09:55:46 +0100, Michael wrote: > > Anyhow, I recall using git to sync a live ebuild - from some repo > > and portage started downloading gigabytes of cruft. Presumably whole > > decades of old commits I didn't ne

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --sync keeps failing

On Tue, 03 Aug 2021 09:55:46 +0100, Michael wrote: > Anyhow, I recall using git to sync a live ebuild - from some repo > and portage started downloading gigabytes of cruft. Presumably whole > decades of old commits I didn't need or have space for. I subsequently > discovered I had to set "EG

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --sync keeps failing

On Tuesday, 3 August 2021 02:28:09 BST John Covici wrote: > On Mon, 02 Aug 2021 18:42:29 -0400, > > Michael wrote: > > > > On Monday, 2 August 2021 22:17:35 BST Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > On Mon, 02 Aug 2021 13:01:40 +0100, Michael wrote: > > > > > I have this problem every month. Why does it fa

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --sync keeps failing

On Mon, 02 Aug 2021 18:42:29 -0400, Michael wrote: > > [1 ] > On Monday, 2 August 2021 22:17:35 BST Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Mon, 02 Aug 2021 13:01:40 +0100, Michael wrote: > > > > I have this problem every month. Why does it fail? Is it just a > > > > timeout because my network is slow? Ca

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --sync keeps failing

On Monday, 2 August 2021 22:17:35 BST Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 02 Aug 2021 13:01:40 +0100, Michael wrote: > > > I have this problem every month. Why does it fail? Is it just a > > > timeout because my network is slow? Can that be tweaked? > > > > I get this problem over here, but on rare

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --sync keeps failing

On Mon, 02 Aug 2021 13:01:40 +0100, Michael wrote: > > I have this problem every month. Why does it fail? Is it just a > > timeout because my network is slow? Can that be tweaked? > > I get this problem over here, but on rare occasions. Leaving it for > half a day usually fixes it. Have yo

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --sync keeps failing

On 8/2/21 2:01 PM, Michael wrote: On Monday, 2 August 2021 12:10:12 BST n952162 wrote: On 8/1/21 8:32 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On Sun, 2021-08-01 at 17:32 +0200, n952162 wrote: * Verifying /var/db/repos/gentoo/.tmp-unverified-download-quarantine ...!!! Manifest verification failed:

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --sync keeps failing

Michael wrote: > On Monday, 2 August 2021 12:10:12 BST n952162 wrote: >> On 8/1/21 8:32 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >>> On Sun, 2021-08-01 at 17:32 +0200, n952162 wrote: * Verifying /var/db/repos/gentoo/.tmp-unverified-download-quarantine ...!!! Manifest verification failed:

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --sync keeps failing

On Monday, 2 August 2021 12:10:12 BST n952162 wrote: > On 8/1/21 8:32 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On Sun, 2021-08-01 at 17:32 +0200, n952162 wrote: > >>* Verifying /var/db/repos/gentoo/.tmp-unverified-download-quarantine > >> > >> ...!!! Manifest verification failed: > >>Manifest misma

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --sync keeps failing

On 2021-08-02 09:20:19, n952162 wrote: > On 8/1/21 8:32 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On Sun, 2021-08-01 at 17:32 +0200, n952162 wrote: > >>  * Verifying /var/db/repos/gentoo/.tmp-unverified-download-quarantine > >> ...!!! Manifest verification failed: > >>  Manifest mismatch for metadata/new

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --sync keeps failing

On 8/1/21 8:32 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On Sun, 2021-08-01 at 17:32 +0200, n952162 wrote:  * Verifying /var/db/repos/gentoo/.tmp-unverified-download-quarantine ...!!! Manifest verification failed:  Manifest mismatch for metadata/news/Manifest I've raised this question before and the only

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --sync keeps failing

On 8/2/21 9:20 AM, n952162 wrote: On 8/1/21 8:32 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On Sun, 2021-08-01 at 17:32 +0200, n952162 wrote:    * Verifying /var/db/repos/gentoo/.tmp-unverified-download-quarantine ...!!! Manifest verification failed:    Manifest mismatch for metadata/news/Manifest I've raise

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --sync keeps failing

On 8/1/21 8:32 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On Sun, 2021-08-01 at 17:32 +0200, n952162 wrote:  * Verifying /var/db/repos/gentoo/.tmp-unverified-download-quarantine ...!!! Manifest verification failed:  Manifest mismatch for metadata/news/Manifest I've raised this question before and the only

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --sync keeps failing

On Sun, 2021-08-01 at 17:32 +0200, n952162 wrote: >  * Verifying /var/db/repos/gentoo/.tmp-unverified-download-quarantine > ...!!! Manifest verification failed: >  Manifest mismatch for metadata/news/Manifest > > I've raised this question before and the only useful answer I got was to > keep try

[gentoo-user] emerge --sync keeps failing

 * Verifying /var/db/repos/gentoo/.tmp-unverified-download-quarantine ...!!! Manifest verification failed:  Manifest mismatch for metadata/news/Manifest I've raised this question before and the only useful answer I got was to keep trying Today, I get this on two machines.  On one, I've run it 6

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --depclean

> x11-libs/libvdpau > selected: 1.4 >protected: none > omitted: none > I'm guessing that would be pulled in by USE +vdpau, so if you've removed it then done an emerge with -N or -U it won't be required anymore. > > x11-drivers/xf86-video-amdgpu > selected: 19.1.0 >protecte

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --depclean

On 5/7/21 6:57 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I'm trying to clean up packages on a remote computer and running emerge > --depclean list some packages that I am not sure about: > >[snip] > > Many of these packages are I see on my other systems and I think they are > needed like: > acct-gro

[gentoo-user] emerge --depclean

I'm trying to clean up packages on a remote computer and running emerge --depclean list some packages that I am not sure about: acct-group/video selected: 0-r1 protected: none omitted: none dev-libs/jansson selected: 2.13.1-r1 protected: none omitted: none virt

[gentoo-user] Emerge --root= headerfiles taken from / or ROOT?

Hi there, I'm just trying setup a small target image with the --root (env SYSROOT), - config-root and --sysroot options, and some builds fail, because the header files as well as cmake include files are not taken from the path specified to root/sysroot, but from /. How can I make emerge/ebuild

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge failure for dev-lang/R-4.0.4

On Wed, 2021-04-07 at 22:15 +0200, k...@aspodata.se wrote: > > yea, it was a try to make c++ programs to behave under changing > compiler and library situations. Seems that some such programs > don't want to be built statically so they break whenever some "random" > lib changes. > That's my best

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge failure for dev-lang/R-4.0.4

Michael: > On Wed, 2021-04-07 at 12:54 +0200, k...@aspodata.se wrote: > > # emerge -pv1 dev-lang/R > > ... > > [ebuild R] dev-lang/R-4.0.4::gentoo USE="... static-libs ..." > > Thanks, this is really good debugging information. Is that USE=static- > libs a global flag on your system? That m

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge failure for dev-lang/R-4.0.4

On Wed, 2021-04-07 at 12:54 +0200, k...@aspodata.se wrote: > # emerge -pv1 dev-lang/R > ... > [ebuild R] dev-lang/R-4.0.4::gentoo USE="... static-libs ..." Thanks, this is really good debugging information. Is that USE=static- libs a global flag on your system? That may explain why your bu

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge failure for dev-lang/R-4.0.4

Michael: ... > What USE flags does "emerge -pv1 dev-lang/R" show? # emerge -pv1 dev-lang/R ... [ebuild R] dev-lang/R-4.0.4::gentoo USE="X jpeg nls openmp perl png readline static-libs tiff -cairo -doc -icu -java -lapack -minimal (-prefix) -profile -test -tk" 0 KiB > Are you willing to wa

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge failure for dev-lang/R-4.0.4

On Mon, 2021-04-05 at 18:29 +0200, k...@aspodata.se wrote: > > So, how much memory does R need to build ? > I have: > > $ free >    totalusedfree shared buff/cache > available > Mem: 6103628 1807560 2631444 146376 1664624 > 310786

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge failure for dev-lang/R-4.0.4

Michael: > On Mon, 2021-04-05 at 16:10 +0200, k...@aspodata.se wrote: > > system call failed: Cannot allocate memory > > Segmentation fault > > Is this a low-memory machine? So, how much memory does R need to build ? I have: $ free totalusedfree shared buff/

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge failure for dev-lang/R-4.0.4

On Mon, 2021-04-05 at 16:10 +0200, k...@aspodata.se wrote: > system call failed: Cannot allocate memory > Segmentation fault Is this a low-memory machine? If so, there's no much you can do here except set a lower number of jobs in MAKEOPTS for the dev-lang/R build: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge failure for dev-lang/R-4.0.4

> On Mon, 2021-04-05 at 00:44 +0200, k...@aspodata.se wrote: ... > > $ cp -a ... > > $ cd ... > > $ make -j1 > > ... > > $ echo $? > > 0 > > > > It builds without failure in that case. > > > > That's (potentially) good news. Can you now try it with the > CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS and LDFLAGS from your `em

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge failure for dev-lang/R-4.0.4

On 4/4/21 6:44 PM, k...@aspodata.se wrote: Jack: On 2021.04.03 07:15, k...@aspodata.se wrote: ... make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs Try running with -j1 ... I already have: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--jobs 1 ... in make.conf. Don't know why it still wants to run in parallel. --job

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge failure for dev-lang/R-4.0.4

On Mon, 2021-04-05 at 00:44 +0200, k...@aspodata.se wrote: > Michael: > > $ cp -a ... > $ cd ... > $ make -j1 > ... > $ echo $? > 0 > > It builds without failure in that case. > That's (potentially) good news. Can you now try it with the CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS and LDFLAGS from your `emerge --info`? If

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge failure for dev-lang/R-4.0.4

Michael: > On Sat, 2021-04-03 at 13:15 +0200, k...@aspodata.se wrote: > > Is there a way to run emerge step by step to find out why it fails ? > > > > No easy way. You can `cp -a` the source/build directories out of > /var/tmp/portage and then re-run `make -j`. That should re- > start the build m

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge failure for dev-lang/R-4.0.4

Jack: > On 2021.04.03 07:15, k...@aspodata.se wrote: ... > > make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs > Try running with -j1 ... I already have: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--jobs 1 ... in make.conf. Don't know why it still wants to run in parallell. Regards, /Karl Hammar

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge failure for dev-lang/R-4.0.4

On Sat, 2021-04-03 at 13:15 +0200, k...@aspodata.se wrote: > Is there a way to run emerge step by step to find out why it fails ? > No easy way. You can `cp -a` the source/build directories out of /var/tmp/portage and then re-run `make -j`. That should re- start the build more or less where it fa

[gentoo-user] emerge failure for app-editors/pluma-1.24.1

hi people, I got problems for building app-editors/pluma-1.2.4.1 that is required for the desktop environment "mate". any ideas that could solve this problem ? Thanks in advance. the full info is here: https://pastebin.com/raw/PDkt7nwM and the complete build log: https://pastebin.com/raw/ar

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge failure for dev-lang/R-4.0.4

On 2021.04.03 07:15, k...@aspodata.se wrote: Is there a way to run emerge step by step to find out why it fails ? /// I get this: make[1]: Entering directory '/Net/gentoo/tmpdir/portage/dev-lang/R-4.0.4/work/R-4.0.4/doc' make[1]: Leaving directory '/Net/gentoo/tmpdir/portage/dev-lang/R-4.

[gentoo-user] emerge failure for dev-lang/R-4.0.4

Is there a way to run emerge step by step to find out why it fails ? /// I get this: make[1]: Entering directory '/Net/gentoo/tmpdir/portage/dev-lang/R-4.0.4/work/R-4.0.4/doc' make[1]: Leaving directory '/Net/gentoo/tmpdir/portage/dev-lang/R-4.0.4/work/R-4.0.4' help2man: can't get `--version'

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge world, Python, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9

On 2020.12.10 12:30, Andrew Lowe wrote: Hi all, Quick question - an "emerge world" produces heaps of work due to Python 3.7 -> 3.8. Is 3.8 around for a while or are we kicking over to 3.9 in the next week or so? In other words, is it worth doing the 3.8 upgrade or waiting for 3.9?

[gentoo-user] emerge world, Python, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9

Hi all, Quick question - an "emerge world" produces heaps of work due to Python 3.7 -> 3.8. Is 3.8 around for a while or are we kicking over to 3.9 in the next week or so? In other words, is it worth doing the 3.8 upgrade or waiting for 3.9? Thoughts greatly appreciated,

Re: [gentoo-user] "emerge --sync" and "gemato" screwed

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 12:20:16AM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote > = > > And before anyone asks, "emerge -pv1 portage" shows rsync-verify > is disabled... > > = > Calculating depe

Re: [gentoo-user] "emerge --sync" and "gemato" screwed

Walter Dnes wrote: > Here's tail-end of a recent "emerge --sync" plus an update attempt... > > = > Total bytes sent: 334.55K > Total bytes received: 51.72M > > sent 334.55K bytes received 51.72M bytes 343.63K bytes/sec > total size is

[gentoo-user] "emerge --sync" and "gemato" screwed

Here's tail-end of a recent "emerge --sync" plus an update attempt... = Total bytes sent: 334.55K Total bytes received: 51.72M sent 334.55K bytes received 51.72M bytes 343.63K bytes/sec total size is 178.09M speedup is 3.42 !!! Unab

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge warnings or errors

On Thu, 2020-11-12 at 18:26 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > About 6 different complaints about my kernel configuration that blew off > the screen as packages were being emerged. Does any way exist to have > emerge write these to a log file of some sort for later checking and > action? Others have a

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge warnings or errors

On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:26:55 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > About 6 different complaints about my kernel configuration that blew off > the screen as packages were being emerged. Does any way exist to have > emerge write these to a log file of some sort for later checking and > action? Look at the

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge warnings or errors

https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Elogv On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:27 AM Jude DaShiell wrote: > About 6 different complaints about my kernel configuration that blew off > the screen as packages were being emerged. Does any way exist to have > emerge write these to a log file of some sort for later c

[gentoo-user] emerge warnings or errors

About 6 different complaints about my kernel configuration that blew off the screen as packages were being emerged. Does any way exist to have emerge write these to a log file of some sort for later checking and action? -- United States has 633 Billionaires with only 10 doing any annual signifi

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @world command successful

On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 20:00:29 -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote: > One interesting thing that happened is when I tried doing emerge > --depclean I was told I have no @world file. Once again, please post the exact command you used and the actual output. -- Neil Bothwick All generalizations are false.

[gentoo-user] emerge @world command successful

I did the command in the handbook after adding a few accessibility packages for the system and I have -j2 in MAKEJOBS in /etc/portage/make.conf. The older machine doesn't like to do parallel compiles with acpi, but it had no issue doing them with apm on. If you will use linux, you will learn lots

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @world output unfamiliar. Am I updated?

On 10/02/20 16:25, David M. Fellows wrote: On 2020-10-02 10:45, n952162 wrote: Have I successfully updated my system? I ran this command: emerge \     -v \     --verbose-conflicts \     --deep \     -update \     --changed-use \     --keep-going \     --with-bdeps=y \     --changed-dep

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @world output unfamiliar. Am I updated?

On 10/02/20 12:40, John Covici wrote: Did you actually do the emerge i.e. answer the question at the end about do you wish to emerge these packages? :-) The first time I ran my script, I wondered if I'd actually indeed forget to simply accept like you  said, and ran it again ... Also, I w

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @world output unfamiliar. Am I updated?

On 2020-10-02 17:49, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 02 Oct 2020 11:25:54 -0300, David M. Fellows wrote: Assuming the above is an accurate transcription of the command you used. -update is definitely NOT the same as --update. -update is equivalent to -u -p -d -a -t -e Nice catch :-) :-)  In

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @world output unfamiliar. Am I updated?

On Fri, 02 Oct 2020 11:25:54 -0300, David M. Fellows wrote: > Assuming the above is an accurate transcription of the command you used. > > -update is definitely NOT the same as --update. > > -update is equivalent to -u -p -d -a -t -e Nice catch :-) -- Neil Bothwick Next time you wave at me,

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @world output unfamiliar. Am I updated?

>On 2020-10-02 10:45, n952162 wrote: >> Have I successfully updated my system? >> >> I ran this command: >> >> emerge \ >>     -v \ >>     --verbose-conflicts \ >>     --deep \ >>     -update \ >>     --changed-use \ >>     --keep-going \ >>     --with-bdeps=y \ >>     --changed-deps \ >>     --bac

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @world output unfamiliar. Am I updated?

On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 4:45 AM n952162 wrote: > > Have I successfully updated my system? > ... > and these snippets: > I wrote a lengthy reply explaining all of your issues. Here is a snippet: ...hope that helps. In the future, please attach your command line and full output. Did that answer y

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @world output unfamiliar. Am I updated?

On Fri, 02 Oct 2020 05:25:29 -0400, n952162 wrote: > > On 2020-10-02 10:45, n952162 wrote: > > Have I successfully updated my system? > > > > I ran this command: > > > > emerge \ > >     -v \ > >     --verbose-conflicts \ > >     --deep \ > >     -update \ > >     --changed-use \ > >     --keep-

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @world output unfamiliar. Am I updated?

On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 10:45:32 +0200, n952162 wrote: > Have I successfully updated my system? > > I ran this command: > > emerge \ >     -v \ >     --verbose-conflicts \ >     --deep \ >     -update \ >     --changed-use \ >     --keep-going \ >     --with-bdeps=y \ >     --changed-deps \ >

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @world output unfamiliar. Am I updated?

On 2020-10-02 10:45, n952162 wrote: Have I successfully updated my system? I ran this command: emerge \     -v \     --verbose-conflicts \     --deep \     -update \     --changed-use \     --keep-going \     --with-bdeps=y \     --changed-deps \     --backtrack=100 \     @world and got tons o

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @world output unfamiliar. Am I updated?

n952162 wrote: > Have I successfully updated my system? > > I ran this command: > > emerge \ >     -v \ >     --verbose-conflicts \ >     --deep \ >     -update \ >     --changed-use \ >     --keep-going \ >     --with-bdeps=y \ >     --changed-deps \ >     --backtrack=100 \ >     @world > > and go

[gentoo-user] emerge @world output unfamiliar. Am I updated?

Have I successfully updated my system? I ran this command: emerge \     -v \     --verbose-conflicts \     --deep \     -update \     --changed-use \     --keep-going \     --with-bdeps=y \     --changed-deps \     --backtrack=100 \     @world and got tons of stuff that looks like spurious debu

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge emerge --info '=sys-devel/bison-3.7.1-r1::gentoo'

Ah!, great. Thank you On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 07:46:53AM +0200, netfab wrote: > Le 10/09/20 à 05:59, urp...@gmx.com a tapoté : > > Hi, I don't know what's wrong here. I've attached the build log. > > > > emerge -pqv '=sys-devel/bison-3.7.1-r1::gentoo' > > [ebuild U ] sys-devel/bison-3.7.1-

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge emerge --info '=sys-devel/bison-3.7.1-r1::gentoo'

Le 10/09/20 à 05:59, urp...@gmx.com a tapoté : > Hi, I don't know what's wrong here. I've attached the build log. > > emerge -pqv '=sys-devel/bison-3.7.1-r1::gentoo' > [ebuild U ] sys-devel/bison-3.7.1-r1 [3.1] USE="nls -examples > -static -test" Hi, You should sync and upgrade package to

[gentoo-user] emerge emerge --info '=sys-devel/bison-3.7.1-r1::gentoo'

Hi, I don't know what's wrong here. I've attached the build log. emerge -pqv '=sys-devel/bison-3.7.1-r1::gentoo' [ebuild U ] sys-devel/bison-3.7.1-r1 [3.1] USE="nls -examples -static -test" emerge --info '=sys-devel/bison-3.7.1-r1::gentoo' Portage 3.0.4 (python 3.8.5-final-0, default/linux/

[gentoo-user] emerge --sync booby-trap with portage +/- rsync-verify flag

Long story short... emerging portage with USE="-rsync-verify" also requires setting sync-rsync-verify-metamanifest = no in /etc/portage/repos.conf/gentoo.conf to actually function. I assume that you have to set sync-rsync-verify-metamanifest = yes in /etc/portage/repos.conf/gentoo.conf *I

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge-fetch.log not always updating

Andrey F. wrote: > Can you reproduce by manually curling it?  > I had to look up curl to see if I even have it installed.  I've seen it mentioned but no idea what it is but it is installed here.  I'm not worried about the server that was slow since I removed it.  I think it was easylist or somethi

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >