Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer: glibc detected memory corruption

2012-09-13 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 01:25:26PM -0500, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > VO: [gl] 320x240 => 320x240 Planar YV12 > > *** glibc detected *** mplayer: malloc(): memory corruption: > > 0x01957a60 *** > > try with "-vo xv" to see if perha

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer: glibc detected memory corruption

2012-09-13 Thread Paul Hartman
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > VO: [gl] 320x240 => 320x240 Planar YV12 > *** glibc detected *** mplayer: malloc(): memory corruption: > 0x01957a60 *** try with "-vo xv" to see if perhaps it is gl-related... Sometimes I have videos crash mplayer using vdpau b

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer: glibc detected memory corruption

2012-09-13 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 01:05:23 +0200 Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:51:02PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:41:20 +0200 > > Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > > > Hi List > > > > > > Every once in a while, my mplayer can't play a video from the > > > i

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer: glibc detected memory corruption

2012-09-12 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:51:02PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:41:20 +0200 > Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > Hi List > > > > Every once in a while, my mplayer can't play a video from the > > intertubes. It just crashes on load, it really drives me mad > > sometimes. I

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer: glibc detected memory corruption

2012-09-12 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:41:20 +0200 Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > Hi List > > Every once in a while, my mplayer can't play a video from the > intertubes. It just crashes on load, it really drives me mad > sometimes. I then need to x-kill the window, and if I started from > the console, I can't ev

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer: glibc detected memory corruption

2012-09-12 Thread Helmut Jarausch
On 09/12/2012 12:41:20 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: Hi List Every once in a while, my mplayer can't play a video from the intertubes. It just crashes on load, it really drives me mad sometimes. I then need to x-kill the window, and if I started from the console, I can't even get back i

[gentoo-user] mplayer: glibc detected memory corruption

2012-09-12 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Hi List Every once in a while, my mplayer can't play a video from the intertubes. It just crashes on load, it really drives me mad sometimes. I then need to x-kill the window, and if I started from the console, I can't even get back its prompt with Ctrl+C. It happens with videos from Wikipedia,

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer(2) ???

2011-09-22 Thread Mick
On Thursday 22 Sep 2011 08:53:46 Florian Philipp wrote: > Am 21.09.2011 23:58, schrieb Mick: > > On Wednesday 21 Sep 2011 09:19:39 Sebastian Beßler wrote: > >>> Does mplayer2 work with smplayer or kmplayer? > >> > >> I use mplayer2 with smplayer for a few month now and everything works > >> just f

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer(2) ???

2011-09-22 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 21.09.2011 23:58, schrieb Mick: > On Wednesday 21 Sep 2011 09:19:39 Sebastian Beßler wrote: >>> Does mplayer2 work with smplayer or kmplayer? >> >> I use mplayer2 with smplayer for a few month now and everything works >> just fine for me. > > Any idea when ffmpeg-mt might make it to the main po

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer(2) ???

2011-09-21 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 21 Sep 2011 09:19:39 Sebastian Beßler wrote: > > Does mplayer2 work with smplayer or kmplayer? > > I use mplayer2 with smplayer for a few month now and everything works > just fine for me. Any idea when ffmpeg-mt might make it to the main portage tree? -- Regards, Mick signature.

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer(2) ???

2011-09-21 Thread Sebastian Beßler
> Does mplayer2 work with smplayer or kmplayer? I use mplayer2 with smplayer for a few month now and everything works just fine for me. Greetings Sebastian Beßler signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer(2) ???

2011-09-21 Thread Dale
Florian Philipp wrote: Another advantage: It abolished the horrible internationalization mechanism of mplayer1 and uses gettext now. This means I can finally post English output on mailing lists and bug trackers by executing it like 'LC_ALL=C mplayer2 foo' instead of recompiling it. It also do

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer(2) ???

2011-09-21 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 21.09.2011 07:19, schrieb Stroller: > > On 21 September 2011, at 02:37, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > >> On 09/21/2011 12:07 AM, Stroller wrote: >>> >>> On 20 September 2011, at 16:11, James wrote: ... I have not kept up with the mplayer developments. Now I see: media-video/

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer(2) ???

2011-09-20 Thread Stroller
On 21 September 2011, at 02:37, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 09/21/2011 12:07 AM, Stroller wrote: >> >> On 20 September 2011, at 16:11, James wrote: >>> ... >>> I have not kept up with the mplayer developments. >>> >>> Now I see: media-video/mplayer2 >>> and media-video/mplayer >>> Avail

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer(2) ???

2011-09-20 Thread Stroller
On 20 September 2011, at 16:11, James wrote: > ... > I have not kept up with the mplayer developments. > > Now I see: media-video/mplayer2 > and media-video/mplayer > Available versions: 1.0_rc4_p20101114 > > > Any quick education on mplayer 2 would be appreciated. I believe this would

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer(2) ???

2011-09-20 Thread Nilesh Govindarajan
On Tue 20 Sep 2011 08:41:13 PM IST, James wrote: > Howdy, > > I have not kept up with the mplayer developments. > > Now I see: media-video/mplayer2 > and media-video/mplayer > Available versions: 1.0_rc4_p20101114 > > > Any quick education on mplayer 2 would be appreciated. > > > James > >

[gentoo-user] mplayer(2) ???

2011-09-20 Thread James
Howdy, I have not kept up with the mplayer developments. Now I see: media-video/mplayer2 and media-video/mplayer Available versions: 1.0_rc4_p20101114 Any quick education on mplayer 2 would be appreciated. James

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer id3v2

2011-05-13 Thread Andrey Moshbear
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 22:43, Indi wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 04:40:01AM +0200, Andrey Moshbear wrote: >> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:21, Paul Hartman >> wrote: >> > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Andrey Moshbear >> > wrote: >> >> Is there a patch for mplayer (1.0-rc4) that adds id3v2 s

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer id3v2

2011-05-13 Thread Indi
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 04:40:01AM +0200, Andrey Moshbear wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:21, Paul Hartman > wrote: > > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Andrey Moshbear > > wrote: > >> Is there a patch for mplayer (1.0-rc4) that adds id3v2 support? > >> Googling the mailinglist archives, it

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer id3v2

2011-05-13 Thread Andrey Moshbear
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:21, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Andrey Moshbear wrote: >> Is there a patch for mplayer (1.0-rc4) that adds id3v2 support? >> Googling the mailinglist archives, it was said that the previous >> implementation had vulns and was hence scrapped, b

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer id3v2

2011-05-13 Thread Paul Hartman
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Andrey Moshbear wrote: > Is there a patch for mplayer (1.0-rc4) that adds id3v2 support? > Googling the mailinglist archives, it was said that the previous > implementation had vulns and was hence scrapped, but it sucks not > having it. libavformat, which mplayer

[gentoo-user] mplayer id3v2

2011-05-13 Thread Andrey Moshbear
Is there a patch for mplayer (1.0-rc4) that adds id3v2 support? Googling the mailinglist archives, it was said that the previous implementation had vulns and was hence scrapped, but it sucks not having it. There are unofficial forks of mplayer which have id3v2, but there's no ebuild, in layman or

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer directfb permissions?

2011-04-26 Thread Indi
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:10:02PM +0200, Mick wrote: > > Are you running KMS in the kernel and have you emerged x11-drivers/radeon- > ucode (not sure if your card needs it) as per: > > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml > No. I have a pretty straight kernel, and my video card specifie

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer directfb permissions?

2011-04-26 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 14:34:05 Indi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:30:02AM +0200, Mick wrote: > > On Monday 25 April 2011 23:38:04 Indi wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 05:50:01PM +0200, Indi wrote: > > > > ...using the directfb for vo gives > > > > sterling results, with the worst file

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer directfb permissions?

2011-04-26 Thread Indi
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:30:02AM +0200, Mick wrote: > On Monday 25 April 2011 23:38:04 Indi wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 05:50:01PM +0200, Indi wrote: > > > ...using the directfb for vo gives > > > sterling results, with the worst files playing happily in sync just like > > > I always dream

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer directfb permissions?

2011-04-25 Thread Mick
On Monday 25 April 2011 23:38:04 Indi wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 05:50:01PM +0200, Indi wrote: > > ...using the directfb for vo gives > > sterling results, with the worst files playing happily in sync just like > > I always dreamed -- but only as root! > > > > Obviously there's a permissions

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer directfb permissions?

2011-04-25 Thread Indi
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 05:50:01PM +0200, Indi wrote: > > ...using the directfb for vo gives > sterling results, with the worst files playing happily in sync just like > I always dreamed -- but only as root! > > Obviously there's a permissions issue somewhere... Oh jeepers, I've made a silly

[gentoo-user] mplayer directfb permissions?

2011-04-25 Thread Indi
Greetings, My old thinkpad is showing its age lately, especially when using mplayer to play avi or mkv files. Fooling around with various options and config arguments has revealed that using the directfb for vo gives sterling results, with the worst files playing happily in sync just like I al

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer vs mplayer2

2011-03-30 Thread du yang
On Wednesday 03/30/11 17:14:00 CST, John Campbell wrote: > On 03/30/2011 01:35 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > > I am not seeing mplayer2 in the tree -- unless it came in the last day > > or so -- and which config takes the threads=5 parameter? > > It's in the multimedia overlay. > > The "t

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer vs mplayer2

2011-03-30 Thread covici
John Campbell wrote: > On 03/30/2011 01:35 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > > I am not seeing mplayer2 in the tree -- unless it came in the last day > > or so -- and which config takes the threads=5 parameter? > > It's in the multimedia overlay. > > The "threads=#" (where # less than total

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer vs mplayer2

2011-03-30 Thread Dale
John Campbell wrote: On 03/30/2011 01:35 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: I am not seeing mplayer2 in the tree -- unless it came in the last day or so -- and which config takes the threads=5 parameter? It's in the multimedia overlay. The "threads=#" (where # less than total threads available

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer vs mplayer2

2011-03-30 Thread John Campbell
On 03/30/2011 01:35 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: I am not seeing mplayer2 in the tree -- unless it came in the last day or so -- and which config takes the threads=5 parameter? It's in the multimedia overlay. The "threads=#" (where # less than total threads available on processor) parame

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer vs mplayer2

2011-03-30 Thread covici
John Campbell wrote: > On 03/29/2011 08:01 AM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: > > > While I've been quite pleased with mplayer as tweaked by Nikos > > Chantziaras to allow Multi threading on my core-I7 (Nvidia) (and I > > realize that MT will now be in the upstream distribution), I'm wondering > > if mpla

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer vs mplayer2

2011-03-30 Thread John Campbell
On 03/29/2011 08:01 AM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: While I've been quite pleased with mplayer as tweaked by Nikos Chantziaras to allow Multi threading on my core-I7 (Nvidia) (and I realize that MT will now be in the upstream distribution), I'm wondering if mplayer2 is now stable and better enough to me

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer: xvid and lavc

2010-03-22 Thread Arnau Bria
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:32:42 +0100 Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > Am Freitag 19 März 2010 schrieb Arnau Bria: > > On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:34:09 +0100 > > > > Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > Has this worked before? As fas a I know, AVI does not officially > > > support srt subs. > > > > It worked for

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer: xvid and lavc

2010-03-19 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Am Freitag 19 März 2010 schrieb Arnau Bria: > On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:34:09 +0100 > > Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > Has this worked before? As fas a I know, AVI does not officially > > support srt subs. > > It worked for me: > > mencoder ITC0101.avi -oac pcm -ovc xvid -xvidencopts bitrate=886 -su

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer: xvid and lavc

2010-03-19 Thread Arnau Bria
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:34:09 +0100 Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > Has this worked before? As fas a I know, AVI does not officially > support srt subs. It worked for me: mencoder ITC0101.avi -oac pcm -ovc xvid -xvidencopts bitrate=886 -sub ITC0101.srt -subfont-text-scale 3 -o video_final.avi my pr

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer: xvid and lavc

2010-03-18 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Am Donnerstag 18 März 2010 schrieb Arnau Bria: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to add some sub to a video with menconder (following a > receipt). > > I run something like: > > mencoder mi_video.avi -oac pcm -ovc lavc -lavcopts > vcodec=xvid:mbd=2:trell:autoaspect -sub mis_subs.srt -subfont-text-scale 3

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer: xvid and lavc

2010-03-18 Thread Arnau Bria
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:54:12 +0100 Norman Rieß wrote: > Um...it is not the exact command you should use in your case with the > subs, it is an example on how to bypass the lavc problem. > Producing a working command, that suits _your_ needs is still your > job ;-). Oh! thanks, going to see into

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer: xvid and lavc

2010-03-18 Thread Norman Rieß
Am 03/18/10 13:14, schrieb Arnau Bria: On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:38:01 +0100 Norman Rieß wrote: Hello, Hi Norman, i allways had problems with lavc so i used xvid in mplayer directly: mencoder sourcefile -ovc xvid -xvidencopts bitrate=vbitrate -oac mp3lame -lameopts abr:br=abitrat

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer: xvid and lavc

2010-03-18 Thread Arnau Bria
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:38:01 +0100 Norman Rieß wrote: > Hello, Hi Norman, > i allways had problems with lavc so i used xvid in mplayer directly: > mencoder sourcefile -ovc xvid -xvidencopts bitrate=vbitrate -oac > mp3lame -lameopts abr:br=abitrate -o result_path I don't get it source file

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer: xvid and lavc

2010-03-18 Thread Norman Rieß
Am 03/18/10 12:20, schrieb Arnau Bria: Hi all, I'm trying to add some sub to a video with menconder (following a receipt). I run something like: mencoder mi_video.avi -oac pcm -ovc lavc -lavcopts vcodec=xvid:mbd=2:trell:autoaspect -sub mis_subs.srt -subfont-text-scale 3 -o video_final.avi b

[gentoo-user] mplayer: xvid and lavc

2010-03-18 Thread Arnau Bria
Hi all, I'm trying to add some sub to a video with menconder (following a receipt). I run something like: mencoder mi_video.avi -oac pcm -ovc lavc -lavcopts vcodec=xvid:mbd=2:trell:autoaspect -sub mis_subs.srt -subfont-text-scale 3 -o video_final.avi but I get the error: [...] Selected audio

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer does not have man page & output info is chinese

2010-02-03 Thread Xi Shen
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Xi Shen wrote: > hi, > > my system is gentoo amd64. my /etc/env.d/01locale is empty. after i > compiled mplayer, the output info is chinese, and i cannot read it > console, even though i can read it in the xterm. how to make the > output to english? > > in my /etc/

[gentoo-user] mplayer does not have man page & output info is chinese

2010-02-03 Thread Xi Shen
hi, my system is gentoo amd64. my /etc/env.d/01locale is empty. after i compiled mplayer, the output info is chinese, and i cannot read it console, even though i can read it in the xterm. how to make the output to english? in my /etc/locale.gen file, i do have chinese support. and, my mplayer d

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-11-23 Thread Maxim Wexler
Got it. I clicked on the tri-color balls on the lower rt and it just gave me a list of sites where downloads may be found. The balls also appear above and to the left of the video window where the movie is supposed to appear. When I clicked on it I got the save-as window. But then I had to stop the

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-11-23 Thread Dale
Maxim Wexler wrote: If you have Firefox installed, you can use 'download helper' to grab those videos really easy. It works on youtube and other sites really well. I'm using it but can only download from a link to youtube in another web page or google, for example. Shouldn't there be a bu

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-11-23 Thread Maxim Wexler
> If you have Firefox installed, you can use 'download helper' to grab > those videos really easy. It works on youtube and other sites really well. I'm using it but can only download from a link to youtube in another web page or google, for example. Shouldn't there be a button on Youtube itself,

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-11-23 Thread Mick
2009/11/23 Helmut Jarausch : > On 23 Nov, Mick wrote: >> 2009/11/22 Daniel Pielmeier : >>> I am not able to play the Apple Trailers by clicking at the link to the >>> movie (maybe a problem with the java script popup). When I open the link >>> in a new window I can watch/download with gecko-mediap

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-11-23 Thread Helmut Jarausch
On 23 Nov, Mick wrote: > 2009/11/22 Daniel Pielmeier : >> Mick schrieb am 22.11.2009 20:02: >>> On Sunday 22 November 2009 17:27:26 Daniel Pielmeier wrote: Mick schrieb am 22.11.2009 14:48: > http://www.amd.com/us- > en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/T64X2_animation.wmv Wo

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-11-23 Thread Mick
2009/11/22 Daniel Pielmeier : > Mick schrieb am 22.11.2009 20:02: >> On Sunday 22 November 2009 17:27:26 Daniel Pielmeier wrote: >>> Mick schrieb am 22.11.2009 14:48: http://www.amd.com/us- en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/T64X2_animation.wmv >>> Works fine with gecko-mediaplayer

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-11-22 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Mick schrieb am 22.11.2009 20:02: > On Sunday 22 November 2009 17:27:26 Daniel Pielmeier wrote: >> Mick schrieb am 22.11.2009 14:48: >>> http://www.amd.com/us- >>> en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/T64X2_animation.wmv >> Works fine with gecko-mediaplayer and download-helper. > > Yes, thank

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-11-22 Thread Dale
Mick wrote: On Sunday 22 November 2009 14:06:57 Dale wrote: I went to that link and downloaded the video with no problem at all. Once it started to playing, I hit the download button and saved it to my desktop. It plays fine with splayer which uses mplayer as the back end. It even converted

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-11-22 Thread Mick
On Sunday 22 November 2009 17:27:26 Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > Mick schrieb am 22.11.2009 14:48: > > http://www.amd.com/us- > > en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/T64X2_animation.wmv > > Works fine with gecko-mediaplayer and download-helper. Yes, thank you. I've installed it now and it loo

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-11-22 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Mick schrieb am 22.11.2009 14:48: > http://www.amd.com/us- > en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/T64X2_animation.wmv > Works fine with gecko-mediaplayer and download-helper. -- Daniel Pielmeier signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-11-22 Thread Mick
On Sunday 22 November 2009 14:06:57 Dale wrote: > Mick wrote: > > On Sunday 22 November 2009 12:47:57 Dale wrote: > >> Mick wrote: > >>> On Sunday 22 November 2009 10:43:01 Dale wrote: > Mick wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I was using mplayerplug-in until it was substituted in the tree

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-11-22 Thread Dale
Mick wrote: On Sunday 22 November 2009 12:47:57 Dale wrote: Mick wrote: On Sunday 22 November 2009 10:43:01 Dale wrote: Mick wrote: Hi All, I was using mplayerplug-in until it was substituted in the tree for gnome- mplayer. I was happier with mplayerplug-in because I

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-11-22 Thread Mick
On Sunday 22 November 2009 12:47:57 Dale wrote: > Mick wrote: > > On Sunday 22 November 2009 10:43:01 Dale wrote: > >> Mick wrote: > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> I was using mplayerplug-in until it was substituted in the tree for > >>> gnome- mplayer. I was happier with mplayerplug-in because I could a

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-11-22 Thread Dale
Mick wrote: On Sunday 22 November 2009 10:43:01 Dale wrote: Mick wrote: Hi All, I was using mplayerplug-in until it was substituted in the tree for gnome- mplayer. I was happier with mplayerplug-in because I could also access the stream/file in /tmp/ and save it, resize it, replay it,

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-11-22 Thread Mick
On Sunday 22 November 2009 10:43:01 Dale wrote: > Mick wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I was using mplayerplug-in until it was substituted in the tree for > > gnome- mplayer. I was happier with mplayerplug-in because I could also > > access the stream/file in /tmp/ and save it, resize it, replay it, et

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-11-22 Thread Dale
Mick wrote: Hi All, I was using mplayerplug-in until it was substituted in the tree for gnome- mplayer. I was happier with mplayerplug-in because I could also access the stream/file in /tmp/ and save it, resize it, replay it, etc. With gnome-mplayer all I get is a socket in /tmp which I can'

[gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-11-22 Thread Mick
Hi All, I was using mplayerplug-in until it was substituted in the tree for gnome- mplayer. I was happier with mplayerplug-in because I could also access the stream/file in /tmp/ and save it, resize it, replay it, etc. With gnome-mplayer all I get is a socket in /tmp which I can't access direc

[gentoo-user] Mplayer multi-thread/multi-core ( FFmpeg-mt branch) upgrade

2009-10-30 Thread 7v5w7go9ub0o
Speed up the playback of 1080 H.264 files in MPlayer, on multi-core cpus. Thank You, Nikos Chantziaras

[gentoo-user] mplayer configure weirdness

2009-10-06 Thread Dirk Uys
Hi I had a lot of strange problems with mplayer the last two days. I was busy doing a system upgrade which failed halfway (due to the libxcb upgrade thing). This left my mplayer broken since ffmpeg was upgraded i guess. No problem, just emerge mplayer again. Tried it, and the emerge got stuck at

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer troubles since update world

2009-09-18 Thread Kelly Hirai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 i had trouble with console mplayer after the last update as mplayer was built against another version of /usr/lib/libx264.so revdep-rebuild fixed that. k. Harry Putnam wrote: > I didn't notice that mplayer wasn't working in firefox right away but > I

[gentoo-user] mplayer troubles since update world

2009-09-18 Thread Harry Putnam
I didn't notice that mplayer wasn't working in firefox right away but I think it may have started with a recent update. (All updated packages are listed at the bottom) Now I just get a black screen in player window on a web page. The player loads and indicates its loading the video and playing

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer and sound in firefox during playback

2009-09-09 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 01:49:15 Harry Putnam wrote: > I've installed mplayer and am able to play back online vidoes like > quicktime. However, I get no sound. > > Playing the same file retrieved from browser cache, directly with > mplayer, works with sound. > > What do I need to do with

[gentoo-user] mplayer and sound in firefox during playback

2009-09-08 Thread Harry Putnam
I've installed mplayer and am able to play back online vidoes like quicktime. However, I get no sound. Playing the same file retrieved from browser cache, directly with mplayer, works with sound. What do I need to do with firefox to get the sound of videos? I have the gecko-media player inst

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-01-14 Thread Nick Cunningham
2009/1/14 Michael P. Soulier > On 13/01/09 Paul Hartman said: > > > After getting fed up with emerge/compile issues with mplayerplug-in i > > switched to net-www/gecko-mediaplayer and it seems to work okay. > > Hmm. I would but > > msoul...@anton:~$ emerge --pretend net-www/gecko-mediaplayer > >

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-01-14 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 14 January 2009 21:02:20 Michael P. Soulier wrote: > On 13/01/09 Paul Hartman said: > > After getting fed up with emerge/compile issues with mplayerplug-in i > > switched to net-www/gecko-mediaplayer and it seems to work okay. > > Hmm. I would but > > msoul...@anton:~$ emerge --pretend

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-01-14 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On 13/01/09 Paul Hartman said: > After getting fed up with emerge/compile issues with mplayerplug-in i > switched to net-www/gecko-mediaplayer and it seems to work okay. Hmm. I would but msoul...@anton:~$ emerge --pretend net-www/gecko-mediaplayer These are the packages that would be merged, in

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-01-14 Thread Aaron Clark
Michael P. Soulier wrote: So, I interpret this as the mplayer plugin not being available for firefox 3.0, which is why it's pulling in the 2.0 stream. So, my best solution is probably just to uninstall the mplayer plugin, is that right? It seems to work fine in firefox 3.0. If I want to run the

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-01-14 Thread Allan Gottlieb
At Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:37:21 + Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:57:40 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > >> > It's because you're trying to emerge it with the firefox USE flag. >> > Remove that from make.conf and use xulrunner instead. >> >> I have both USE flags and have *noticed

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-01-14 Thread Willie Wong
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 08:57:40AM -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > I have both USE flags and have *noticed* any problems. However, I > prefer to avoid rather than fix problems. Can you point me at > documentation for when one should have firefox and/or xulrunner USE > flags? > C.f. this thread

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-01-14 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:57:40 -0500, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > > It's because you're trying to emerge it with the firefox USE flag. > > Remove that from make.conf and use xulrunner instead. > > I have both USE flags and have *noticed* any problems. However, I > prefer to avoid rather than fix pro

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-01-14 Thread Allan Gottlieb
At Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:00:41 + Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:19:04 -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > >> So, I interpret this as the mplayer plugin not being available for >> firefox 3.0, which is why it's pulling in the 2.0 stream. So, my best >> solution is probably just to

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-01-14 Thread KH
Michael P. Soulier schrieb: > So, I noticed this on an emerge > > !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled > !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict: > > www-client/mozilla-firefox:0 > > ('ebuild', '/', 'www-client/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.19',

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-01-14 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:19:04 -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > So, I interpret this as the mplayer plugin not being available for > firefox 3.0, which is why it's pulling in the 2.0 stream. So, my best > solution is probably just to uninstall the mplayer plugin, is that > right? It's because you

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-01-13 Thread Nick Cunningham
2009/1/14 Michael P. Soulier > So, I noticed this on an emerge > > !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been > pulled > !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict: > > www-client/mozilla-firefox:0 > > ('ebuild', '/', 'www-client/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-01-13 Thread Paul Hartman
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > So, I noticed this on an emerge > > !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled > !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict: > > www-client/mozilla-firefox:0 > > ('ebuild', '/', 'www-cl

[gentoo-user] mplayer plugin

2009-01-13 Thread Michael P. Soulier
So, I noticed this on an emerge !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict: www-client/mozilla-firefox:0 ('ebuild', '/', 'www-client/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.19', 'merge') pulled in by =www-client/mo

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer-1.0_rc2_p28058-r1 & USE dvdnav

2008-12-22 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 00:07:40 Stroller wrote: > On 22 Dec 2008, at 17:51, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> ... > >> I would prefer it if Portage handled this without USE flag masking > >> being necessary. If the required package is masked, or needs some > >> other keyword, then IMO `emerge -p mplay

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer-1.0_rc2_p28058-r1 & USE dvdnav

2008-12-22 Thread Arttu V.
On 12/22/08, Willie Wong wrote: > HAHA! Arttu, you also have a typo! ;) > > The file should be in > > /etc/portage/profile/package.use.mask > > Note that 'profile' is singular, not plural. Sorry, must've been the fever and cold I've been having for the last couple of days. But true, fever or no f

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer-1.0_rc2_p28058-r1 & USE dvdnav

2008-12-22 Thread Stroller
On 22 Dec 2008, at 17:51, Alan McKinnon wrote: ... I would prefer it if Portage handled this without USE flag masking being necessary. If the required package is masked, or needs some other keyword, then IMO `emerge -p mplayer` should simply give an "unable to fulfil this USE - packages may be m

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer-1.0_rc2_p28058-r1 & USE dvdnav

2008-12-22 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Monday 22 December 2008 15:43:24 Stroller wrote: > On 22 Dec 2008, at 11:33, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > > ... > > The problem was that the dvdnav USE-flag was masked and you unmasked > > the mplayer and dvdnav packages in the first place. This did not > > affect the mplayer package that was built

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer-1.0_rc2_p28058-r1 & USE dvdnav

2008-12-22 Thread Stroller
On 22 Dec 2008, at 11:33, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: ... The problem was that the dvdnav USE-flag was masked and you unmasked the mplayer and dvdnav packages in the first place. This did not affect the mplayer package that was built without dvdnav support as the flag was still deactivated. Here [1]

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer-1.0_rc2_p28058-r1 & USE dvdnav

2008-12-22 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
2008/12/22 Stroller : > > On 22 Dec 2008, at 05:36, Willie Wong wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 04:52:54AM +, Penguin Lover Stroller squawked: >>> >>> On 20 Dec 2008, at 04:34, Arttu V. wrote: >>> On 12/20/08, Willie Wong wrote: > > I think you can try use unmasking the flag:

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer-1.0_rc2_p28058-r1 & USE dvdnav

2008-12-21 Thread Stroller
On 22 Dec 2008, at 05:36, Willie Wong wrote: On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 04:52:54AM +, Penguin Lover Stroller squawked: On 20 Dec 2008, at 04:34, Arttu V. wrote: On 12/20/08, Willie Wong wrote: I think you can try use unmasking the flag: add a line to /etc/portage/package.use.mask It's

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer-1.0_rc2_p28058-r1 & USE dvdnav

2008-12-21 Thread Willie Wong
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 04:52:54AM +, Penguin Lover Stroller squawked: > > On 20 Dec 2008, at 04:34, Arttu V. wrote: > >> On 12/20/08, Willie Wong wrote: >>> I think you can try use unmasking the flag: >>> add a line to /etc/portage/package.use.mask >> >> It's profiles related stuff, so I thin

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer-1.0_rc2_p28058-r1 & USE dvdnav

2008-12-21 Thread Stroller
On 20 Dec 2008, at 04:34, Arttu V. wrote: On 12/20/08, Willie Wong wrote: I think you can try use unmasking the flag: add a line to /etc/portage/package.use.mask It's profiles related stuff, so I think /etc/portage/profiles/package.use.mask will be the right place. At least if one trusts po

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer-1.0_rc2_p28058-r1 & USE dvdnav

2008-12-20 Thread Willie Wong
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 03:43:05PM +, Penguin Lover Stroller squawked: >> libdvdnav-4.1.3 is keyworded ~x86, while mplayer-1.0_rc2_p28058-r1 is >> keyworded x86. The USE cannot be satisfied. > > I'm really sorry, I don't understand. The dvdnav mask was added when the libdvdnav was hardmasked.

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer-1.0_rc2_p28058-r1 & USE dvdnav

2008-12-20 Thread Stroller
On 20 Dec 2008, at 03:46, Willie Wong wrote: ... Yet the ebuild seems to say: dvdnav? ( >=media-libs/libdvdnav-4.1.3 >=media-libs/libdvdread-4.1.3 ) ... I think I have emerged the appropriate versions of libdvdnav & libdvdread: $ eix -I -c libdvd [I] media-libs/libdv

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer-1.0_rc2_p28058-r1 & USE dvdnav

2008-12-19 Thread Willie Wong
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 06:34:56AM +0200, Penguin Lover Arttu V. squawked: > On 12/20/08, Willie Wong wrote: > > I think you can try use unmasking the flag: > > add a line to /etc/portage/package.use.mask > > It's profiles related stuff, so I think > /etc/portage/profiles/package.use.mask will be

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer-1.0_rc2_p28058-r1 & USE dvdnav

2008-12-19 Thread Arttu V.
On 12/20/08, Willie Wong wrote: > I think you can try use unmasking the flag: > add a line to /etc/portage/package.use.mask It's profiles related stuff, so I think /etc/portage/profiles/package.use.mask will be the right place. At least if one trusts portage's man page. -- Arttu V.

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer-1.0_rc2_p28058-r1 & USE dvdnav

2008-12-19 Thread Willie Wong
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 02:16:09AM +, Penguin Lover Stroller squawked: > Anyone see what I'm doing wrong here, please? Yes. See below. > I can't seem to get mplayer to accept the dvdnav USE flag, which is always > (-bracketed) out when I pretend to emerge it: > > Yet the ebuild seems to s

[gentoo-user] mplayer-1.0_rc2_p28058-r1 & USE dvdnav

2008-12-19 Thread Stroller
Anyone see what I'm doing wrong here, please? I can't seem to get mplayer to accept the dvdnav USE flag, which is always (-bracketed) out when I pretend to emerge it: $ grep dvdnav /etc/portage/package.use media-video/mplayer dvd enca encode gif iconv jpeg live lzo mad mmx mp2 mp3 musepack

[gentoo-user] MPlayer build fails

2008-08-16 Thread Daniel D Jones
loader/module.o: In function `MODULE_GetProcAddress': module.c:(.text+0x109): undefined reference to `wrapper_target' module.c:(.text+0x10e): undefined reference to `wrapper' module.c:(.text+0x114): undefined reference to `report_entry' module.c:(.text+0x11e): undefined reference to `report_ret' lo

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer and fontconfig

2008-08-12 Thread dhk
dhk wrote: I recently started using tovid again and it seems to be having a lot of problems with the programs it uses. The last time I used it was in November and all worked well. First there was a problem with libGL.so.1, it didn't seem to be on my system. ldd `which mplayer` said it wasn'

[gentoo-user] mplayer and fontconfig

2008-08-10 Thread dhk
I recently started using tovid again and it seems to be having a lot of problems with the programs it uses. The last time I used it was in November and all worked well. First there was a problem with libGL.so.1, it didn't seem to be on my system. ldd `which mplayer` said it wasn't found. Af

Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer with libmp3lame

2007-10-31 Thread Pawel K
I found in media-video/mplayer/mplayer-1.0_rc1_p20070824.ebuild the following: RDEPEND= ... ... encode? ( aac? ( media-libs/faac ) mp2? ( media-sound/twolame ) mp3? ( media-sound/lame ) ) ... My USE flag looks like: + encode + mp3 - mp2 My configure shows the following: Checking for libmp3lam

  1   2   3   >