Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 13:49:51 schrieb ext deface:
> Just an IMO, compiling OO is idiotic, use the -bin
Here's another one: using a binary package that most likely doesn't fit into
your otherwise self-compiled system is even more idiotic.
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs
Dirk Heinrichs schrieb:
> Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 13:49:51 schrieb ext deface:
>
>> Just an IMO, compiling OO is idiotic, use the -bin
>
> Here's another one: using a binary package that most likely doesn't fit into
> your otherwise self-compiled system is even more idiotic.
>
> Bye...
>
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Dirk Heinrichs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 13:49:51 schrieb ext deface:
>
>> Just an IMO, compiling OO is idiotic, use the -bin
>
> Here's another one: using a binary package that most likely doesn't fit into
> your otherwise self-com
Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 14:14:25 schrieb ext Dirk Uys:
> Another reason is that OO is reputed for having a very complicated
> build system that takes up a lot of resources to complete. Depending
> on the hardware you are doing this on "using a binary package that
> most likely doesn't fit i
On 20/11/08 deface said:
> Just an IMO, compiling OO is idiotic, use the -bin
Then maybe the gentoo docs should instruct that.
Mind you, I thought that compiling from source was the only point to using
Gentoo. I'm getting quite a mixed message here.
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTE
081120 Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> On 20/11/08 deface said:
>> Just an IMO, compiling OO is idiotic, use the -bin
> Then maybe the gentoo docs should instruct that.
> I thought that compiling from source was the only point to using Gentoo.
> I'm getting quite a mixed message here.
Don't feed tro
Hello everyone,
I guess you all missunderestimated the alert about Random Access Memory.
I had the same problem, I could not compile openoffice.
I just had the same warning message and the merge stopped.
I only had 512 of RAM from which 128 are used by my graphic card,
and with the system running
On 20/11/08 Qian Qiao said:
> That still doesn't show where the error occured, try to dig out the
> actual error in build.log, or attach it.
http://home.digitaltorque.ca/build.log.gz
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex...
On 20/11/08 Redouane Boumghar said:
> SO please check how much available memory you have
I have 1Gig in this system, and I'm planning to add more.
I've had issues in the past with Gentoo on small memory systems, but if that's
the problem here, it's the first time it's happened since install.
Mik
Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 15:51:54 schrieb ext Michael P. Soulier:
> On 20/11/08 Qian Qiao said:
> > That still doesn't show where the error occured, try to dig out the
> > actual error in build.log, or attach it.
>
> http://home.digitaltorque.ca/build.log.gz
So you should add this part of it
Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 20 November 2008 14:14:25 schrieb ext Dirk Uys:
>
>
>> Another reason is that OO is reputed for having a very complicated
>> build system that takes up a lot of resources to complete. Depending
>> on the hardware you are doing this on "using a binary package
Florian Philipp wrote:
..and the additional featuresd which the binary distro doesn't offer:
http://go-oo.org/discover/
oooh - Go-OO! indeed! I'm scrapping my oo-bin straight away!
--
Iain Buchanan
BOFH Excuse #414:
tachyon emissions overloading the system
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Iain Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Florian Philipp wrote:
>
>> ..and the additional featuresd which the binary distro doesn't offer:
>> http://go-oo.org/discover/
>
> oooh - Go-OO! indeed! I'm scrapping my oo-bin straight away!
This only applies to OOo 2.x
Redouane Boumghar wrote:
Hello everyone,
I guess you all missunderestimated the alert about Random Access Memory.
so we overestimated it then?
"They misunderestimated me."
George W. Bush
November 6, 2000
Comment made in Bentonville, Arkansas.
"Those who think that they can say we're only goi
Am Freitag 21 November 2008 01:26:28 schrieb ext Paul Hartman:
> This only applies to OOo 2.x ebuilds... there is no Go-oo of 3.x and I
> don't think Gentoo uses it from what I could tell.
You should read the ebuild, then. It has all the facts.
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs |
2008/11/21 Paul Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> This only applies to OOo 2.x ebuilds... there is no Go-oo of 3.x and I
> don't think Gentoo uses it from what I could tell.
>
So what do you think are the following SRC_URI's from the current
openoffice-3 for?
MY_PV="3.0.0.3.5"
PATCHLEVEL="OOO300"
ha ha ! :)
Ok thanks for the GWB citations
there is one I love too :
"I beleive that fish and human being can coexist !"
GWB
At Some Conference where he had random access.
Ok by the way the RAM doesn't seem to be a problem
since Micheal(?) has 1GB and I hope 256 MB were at least free during the
On 20/11/08 Michael P. Soulier said:
> On 20/11/08 Redouane Boumghar said:
> > SO please check how much available memory you have
>
> I have 1Gig in this system, and I'm planning to add more.
So, I killed firefox to free up memory and let it build overnight. The build
completed successfully. Perh
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:52 AM, Daniel Pielmeier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/11/21 Paul Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> This only applies to OOo 2.x ebuilds... there is no Go-oo of 3.x and I
>> don't think Gentoo uses it from what I could tell.
>>
>
> So what do you think are the followi
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Michael P. Soulier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20/11/08 Michael P. Soulier said:
>> On 20/11/08 Redouane Boumghar said:
>> > SO please check how much available memory you have
>>
>> I have 1Gig in this system, and I'm planning to add more.
>
> So, I killed firef
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Michael P. Soulier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20/11/08 Michael P. Soulier said:
>> On 20/11/08 Redouane Boumghar said:
>> > SO please check how much available memory you have
>>
>> I have 1Gig in this system, and I'm planning to add more.
>
> So, I killed fire
Bertram Scharpf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in OpenOffice, when hitting F1, I only get a dialog saying:
> "The help file for this topic is not installed."
>
> I cannot find any package or USE Flag. Asking Google I only
> get noise.
>
> The package installed is openoffice; I did not realize there
> is a precom
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 20:44:13 +0100
Bertram Scharpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> in OpenOffice, when hitting F1, I only get a dialog saying:
> "The help file for this topic is not installed."
Is it possible you don't have the java USE flag enabled? The openoffice
ebuild contains the following warn
Hi Chris,
Am Freitag, 03. Nov 2006, 23:15:16 -0500 schrieb Chris Atkinson:
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 20:44:13 +0100
> Bertram Scharpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > in OpenOffice, when hitting F1, I only get a dialog saying:
> > "The help file for this topic is not installed."
>
> Is it possible yo
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 18:15:46 +0100, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
> I did something like "emerge openoffice && halt" and left
> the computer alone for a night. So I couldn't see that
> output.
"genlop -i openoffice" will show you the USE flags used to emerge it.
--
Neil Bothwick
Few women admit thei
Good Lord man... why would you want to compile OO from source?
emerge openoffice-bin
:-)
Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to build OpenOffice from source. After hours of copmiling it
> fails with:
>
> Cleaning /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.2-r1/image//usr/lib/openoffice
From: Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OpenOffice build failed.
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 00:17:27 -0400
> Good Lord man... why would you want to compile OO from source?
Since gentoo offers this...
Or in other words:
Why does gentoo offer it, if one needs to be god
well with most people. But in my
defense, it is just
a toy computer that I have fun tinkering around with.
--- Meino Christian Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OpenOffice build failed.
> Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 00:17:
Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
>From: Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OpenOffice build failed.
>Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 00:17:27 -0400
>
>
>
>>Good Lord man... why would you want to compile OO from source?
>>
>>
>
> Since ge
Richard Broersma Jr wrote:
>I was having problems getting OO to build. I issued the following bug report.
>http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126937
>
>In my case the it was due to a hardware issue. I kept retrying the emerge and
>at last it
>succeeded (on a very very cold evening...). My
On Thu, 25 May 2006 00:17:27 -0400, Jeff wrote:
> Good Lord man... why would you want to compile OO from source?
>
> emerge openoffice-bin
Maybe because he is using an architecture for which the bin package is
not available? It takes around 16 hours to compile 2.0.2 on my laptop.
but it's better
On Thu, 25 May 2006 04:50:41 +0200 (CEST), Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
> I tried to build OpenOffice from source. After hours of copmiling it
> fails with:
>
>**
>ERROR: ERROR: Could not register all components!
>in function: crea
Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to build OpenOffice from source. After hours of copmiling it
> fails with:
>
> What did I so badly wrong here ?
>
> Kind regards,
> mcc
>
I have the same problem, looks to be same bug posted in:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126777
From: Kenton Groombridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OpenOffice build failed.
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 17:16:51 -
Hi,
As suggested I tried to install the newest hunspell available and
installed openoffice-2.0.2-r2.
The build failed again with the same error while inst
On 5/28/06, Meino Christian Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Kenton Groombridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OpenOffice build failed.
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 17:16:51 -
Hi,
As suggested I tried to install the newest hunspell available and
installed openoff
060528 Richard Fish wrote:
> On 5/28/06, Meino Christian Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You might also do the same with 'df'.
> Building OOo requires an insane amount of disk space...
2.0.2 needed 4 GB on my machine: make sure PORTAGE_TMPDIR is big enough.
I have a big 13 GB partition w
From: "Richard Fish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OpenOffice build failed.
Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 22:17:32 -0700
> On 5/28/06, Meino Christian Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Kenton Groombridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
On 5/29/06, Meino Christian Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Before I will restart the whole thing again I would be happy if you
could take a look on the logfile. I have attached it to this mail,
Here is the error:
Systemcall:
/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.2-r2/work/ooo-build-2.0.2.11/build/O
> CFLAGS="-O3 -m3dnow -march=athlon-xp -mtune=athlon64 -msse -msse2 -msse3
> -m3dnow -mfpmath=sse -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
> -falign-functions=4 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2"
Before doing anything else, please clean up your CFLAGS and do
"# emerge -e system
From: Matthias Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OpenOffice build failed.
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 21:14:25 +0200
>
> > CFLAGS="-O3 -m3dnow -march=athlon-xp -mtune=athlon64 -msse -msse2
> > -msse3 -m3dnow -mfpmath=sse -funroll-loops -fomit-fr
On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 21:31 +0200, Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
> From: Matthias Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OpenOffice build failed.
> Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 21:14:25 +0200
>
> >
> > > CFLAGS="-O3 -m3dnow -march=
On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 21:31 +0200, Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
> From: Matthias Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OpenOffice build failed.
> Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 21:14:25 +0200
>
> >
> > > CFLAGS="-O3 -m3dnow -march=
> > PS: I symlinked /var/tmp/portags to /tmp/portage (I carefully copied
> > all permissions settings...) due to space problems.
I've not noticed this before:
Neil Botwick once wrote to me here, in gentoo-user:
If you want to move directories, avoid wholesale symlinking like this as
it always
Besides, by looking at the terminal while merging packages, you will
soon notice, that lot's of packages add their very own CFLAGS to your
default ones. For example mplayer or xine-lib was compiled with '-O3' on
my system, allthough i have '-O2' in my CFLAGS. (As far as i know, "gcc
-O3 -O2" == "g
Hi,
first of all: A BIG thank you to all that send replies to my initial
cry. :)
The real reason behind the unsuccessful build of OpenOffice was a
wrong PYTHONPATH, which I had fixed in the user settings but not for
the root account. They were rests from older settings, which I had
took ove
Matthias Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Besides, by looking at the terminal while merging packages, you will
> soon notice, that lot's of packages add their very own CFLAGS to your
> default ones. For example mplayer or xine-lib was compiled with '-O3' on
> my system, allthough i have '-O2'
Tuesday 30 May 2006 07:41 skrev Graham Murray:
> > Besides, by looking at the terminal while merging packages, you will
> > soon notice, that lot's of packages add their very own CFLAGS to your
> > default ones. For example mplayer or xine-lib was compiled with '-O3' on
> > my system, allthough i h
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 08:04 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> Tuesday 30 May 2006 07:41 skrev Graham Murray:
> > > Besides, by looking at the terminal while merging packages, you will
> > > soon notice, that lot's of packages add their very own CFLAGS to your
> > > default ones. For example mplaye
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I hadn't used it for a month or so. Perhaps it got resentful.
Anyway, recent attempts to start any flavor of OpenOffice have failed
early.
It does ask about plugins, and whether it shour restore my session,
but shortly after that it simply dies. There's no dialog box,
and
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I hadn't used it for a month or so. Perhaps it got resentful.
Anyway, recent attempts to start any flavor of OpenOffice have failed
early.
It does ask about plugins, and whether it shour restore my session,
but shortly after that it simply dies. There's no dialog box,
and
Am Mittwoch 24 September 2008 07:28:42 schrieb ext Kevin O'Gorman:
> I hadn't used it for a month or so. Perhaps it got resentful.
> Anyway, recent attempts to start any flavor of OpenOffice have failed
> early.
>
> It does ask about plugins, and whether it shour restore my session,
> but shortly
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:33 AM, Dirk Heinrichs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 24 September 2008 07:28:42 schrieb ext Kevin O'Gorman:
>> I hadn't used it for a month or so. Perhaps it got resentful.
>> Anyway, recent attempts to start any flavor of OpenOffice have failed
>> early.
>>
>>
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>>
>> I hadn't used it for a month or so. Perhaps it got resentful.
>> Anyway, recent attempts to start any flavor of OpenOffice have failed
>> early.
>>
>> It does ask about plugins, and whether it shour res
Am Donnerstag 25 September 2008 05:37:14 schrieb ext Kevin O'Gorman:
> > openoffice-bin has been compiled with a given set of use flags and on a
> > machine that may or may not match what you have. Compiling it yourself is
> > always the better idea.
>
> Not so obviously better when it fails. Her
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Dirk Heinrichs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 25 September 2008 05:37:14 schrieb ext Kevin O'Gorman:
>
>> > openoffice-bin has been compiled with a given set of use flags and on a
>> > machine that may or may not match what you have. Compiling it yoursel
On 10/25/05, Konstantin V. Gavrilenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have emerge OpenOffice 2.0 recently and noticed a strange problem,that whenever I try to access the file located on the nfs, the OO2hangs. The rest of the applications are working fine with nfs, and suchproblem never happened with O
On Oct 26, 2005, at 2:08 PM, Bruno Lustosa wrote:On 10/25/05, Konstantin V. Gavrilenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have emerge OpenOffice 2.0 recently and noticed a strange problem,that whenever I try to access the file located on the nfs, the OO2hangs. The rest of the applications are working fin
On 10/26/05, John Jolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
in
my experience samba works better for that sort of thing anyway.
If a server serving an nfs share goes down, all the computers with that
share mounted will go nuts, spending 100% cpu trying to get the share
back. Samba seems to fail more gracef
Solved the problem.
Apparently you need to disable file locking by commenting out the
following lines:
# file locking now enabled by default
#SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING=1
#export SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING
in /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice
as simple as it gets.
yours,
kos
--
Respectfully,
On 10/27/05, Konstantin V. Gavrilenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Solved the problem.Apparently you need to disable file locking by commenting out thefollowing lines:# file locking now enabled by default#SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING=1#export SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING
in /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice
tried it,
but it did not solve the issue on my box.
I guess, i'll stick to the commenting out the file_locking
yours,
kos
--
Respectfully,
Konstantin V. Gavrilenko
Arhont Ltd - Information Security
web:http://www.arhont.com
http://www.wi-foo.com
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel: +
Konstantin V. Gavrilenko wrote:
Apparently you need to disable file locking by commenting out the
following lines:
either that or run lockd...
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Bruno Lustosa wrote:
It seems rpc.statd isn't running, because status monitor doesn't show on
the list.
ah.. that's right. lockd needs statd. silly nfs.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
As discussed in this thread
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54586
QTE
++
1 On certain Linux machines, file locking is known to fail due to the
NFS lock demon not running.
2 On certain other Linux machines, it appears that file locking fails
due to some other, not yet analyze
Make sure all nfs services are running on client and server.
OR
you have iptables running and you are blocking random nfs service ports.
Check both client and server.
run rpcinfo -p on each machine to see what ports need to be open. It might
be better to just allow anything to go between ser
On 12/2/05, Jeff Cranmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just upgraded to the latest version of openoffice
>
> It seems to be broken.
> When I start openoffice writer, I get the error
>
> "/usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx: error while loading
> shared libraries: libuno_sal.so.3: cannot ope
Richard Fish wrote:
>If you are compiling from source, you will need _at least_ 4G of free
>space for PORTAGE_TMPDIR at the start of the merge.
>
>-Richard
>
>
>
He is not kidding either. My /var is on my / partition and that puppy
got big while compiling OOo. It's back to normal now though.
I thought it was fully compiled, but I didn't check back before I closed
the compile window (my bad). There are only 3.5GB free on my \var
directory, so it's possible.
I tried replacing the /var/tmp/portage directory with a symlink to my
data drive to a directory owned by portage (group and user)
WORD OF WARNING. I HAVE NEVER DONE THIS!
I think it is in make.conf. Looks something like this:
># PORTAGE_TMPDIR is the location portage will use for compilations and
># temporary storage of data. This can get VERY large depending upon
># the application being installed.
>#PORTAGE_
On 12/3/05, Jeff Cranmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought it was fully compiled, but I didn't check back before I closed
> the compile window (my bad). There are only 3.5GB free on my \var
> directory, so it's possible.
Don't feel bad. I think in some cases the build and installation
looks
On 12/3/05, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't forget to remove the "#" though. May want to change it back
> afterwords too.
You can change it temporarily in the environment:
PORTAGE_TMPDIR=/mnt/data emerge openoffice
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Franta schreef:
> Hi all
> Openoffice has now display settings for a (nearly) blind person. The
> icons in the taskbar aren't big. They are huge.
>
> I'd like to change some font settings in Evolution too.
>
> . Can anyone tell me which part of Gnome to install to be able to
> change the displa
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 00:17 +0100, Holly Bostick wrote:
> Franta schreef:
> > Hi all
>
> > Openoffice has now display settings for a (nearly) blind person. The
> > icons in the taskbar aren't big. They are huge.
> >
> > I'd like to change some font settings in Evolution too.
> >
> > . Can anyon
Catalin Trifu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I've just recompiled my system using gcc-4.1 and of course
> openoffice does not work, the compilation fails while the binary one
> segfaults.
>I searched the archives but found no clue.
>Anyone else experienced the same issues ?
When glibc 2
Jim Cunning wrote:
> I´m trying to get OpenOffice 3.0.0 to recognize and enter French accented
> characters (e.g., ´ + e or ^ + a , etc.) I´ve set up KDE keyboard layouts
> and can get the proper characters displayed on console, xterm, kmail and
> other windows, but the dead key combinations i
Jim Cunning wrote:
> I´m trying to get OpenOffice 3.0.0 to recognize and enter French accented
> characters (e.g., ´ + e or ^ + a , etc.) I´ve set up KDE keyboard layouts
> and can get the proper characters displayed on console, xterm, kmail and
> other windows, but the dead key combinations i
On Monday 04 May 2009 18:10:50 Saphirus Sage wrote:
> Jim Cunning wrote:
> > I´m trying to get OpenOffice 3.0.0 to recognize and enter French accented
> > characters (e.g., ´ + e or ^ + a , etc.) I´ve set up KDE keyboard
> > layouts and can get the proper characters displayed on console, xterm,
>
Jim Cunning schrieb:
> I´m trying to get OpenOffice 3.0.0 to recognize and enter French accented
> characters (e.g., ´ + e or ^ + a , etc.) I´ve set up KDE keyboard layouts
> and can get the proper characters displayed on console, xterm, kmail and
> other windows, but the dead key combinations
Jim Cunning wrote on 08/05/09 06:49:
>>> I´m trying to get OpenOffice 3.0.0 to recognize and enter French accented
>>> characters (e.g., ´ + e or ^ + a , etc.) I´ve set up KDE keyboard
>>> layouts and can get the proper characters displayed on console, xterm,
>>> kmail and other windows, but the
On Monday 09 May 2005 06:46 am, rob3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Genoo mailing lists are great. They are on par with the FreeBSD and
> OpenBSD general mailing lists, except with OpenBSD getting chewed out by
> Theo is your initiation, haha.
So here, instead of Theo, is it Ciaran or Neil? ;)
On Friday 05 September 2008 16:01:17 Grant Edwards wrote:
> After my last "emerge -auvND world", openoffice stopped working
> for non-root users. When I run
>
> strace /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice -writer
>
> I observe that the program hangs doing a waitpid() call on a
> child that was fo
2008/12/1 James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Any ideas how to fix?
>
> ispell, hunspell, aspell, myspell-en and aspell-en are
> all installed.
>
> James, ooo 3 use extensions to install dictionaries.
>
>
> James
>
>
>
>
>
On Monday 01 Dec 2008, Fernando Antunes wrote:
> 2008/12/1 James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Any ideas how to fix?
> >
> > ispell, hunspell, aspell, myspell-en and aspell-en are
> > all installed.
> >
> > James, ooo 3 use extensions to install dictionaries.
> >
> >
> >
> > James
http://forums.gent
On 10/16/05, John J. Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip long-windedness and get to the point]Is anybody else seeing revdep-rebuild weirdness with the latest OOo's, rc2 and rc3?Yes,
I too have the same problems, mostly it would seem, with some embedded
python interpreter. I ignore it and things
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 07:49:28PM -0400, Michael Crute wrote:
>On 10/16/05, John J. Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is anybody else seeing revdep-rebuild weirdness with the latest OOo's,
> rc2 and rc3?
>
>Yes, I too have the same problems, mostly it would seem, with some
On 10/16/05, John J. Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 07:49:28PM -0400, Michael Crute wrote:>On 10/16/05, John J. Foster <[1]Gentoo-[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> Is anybody else seeing revdep-rebuild weirdness with the latest OOo's,
> rc2 and rc3?>>Yes, I to
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 09:35:55PM -0400, Michael Crute wrote:
>
>Well the only thing I can think is emerge -C openoffice-bin. But that has
>other side-effects that you may like even less than a non-clean run of
>revdep-rebuild :-)
Yeah - I guess that would teach that stinking depend
051016 John J. Foster wrote:
> I've been fighting the install of OOo rc3 for a few days now.
> Everything is fine until running revdep-rebuild,
> which wants to re-install the OOo I just installed.
I haven't done this with OO, but my experience is
that Revdep-rebuild always wants to remerge what I
John J. Foster schreef:
> Good evening,
>
> I've been fighting the install of OOo rc3 for a few days now.
> Everything is fine until running revdep-rebuild, which wants to
> re-install the OOo I just installed. I remember having trouble with
> various binary packages before, including OOo, which I
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 05:58 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> 051016 John J. Foster wrote:
> > I've been fighting the install of OOo rc3 for a few days now.
> > Everything is fine until running revdep-rebuild,
> > which wants to re-install the OOo I just installed.
>
> I haven't done this with OO, but m
yes,i am wait a long time too
i have another problem too
when i double click one file,openoffice can't open it ,gave me some error message look like "can't find file ***.xls"
but the ***.xls was exist
thx2005/10/22, Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I've been using OpenOffice 2.0 since the 1.9.xx beta er
Hi,
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:24:07 -0600
Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been using OpenOffice 2.0 since the 1.9.xx beta era. For a while,
> I've had issues with the responsiveness when I click a menu or use the
> scroll bar with my mouse. Clicking a menu or scrolling with the mouse
> ca
Joseph wrote:
Is there a benefit of compiling Openoffice 2.0 vs. installing from
binary.
I've AMD 1.8Mhz with 1Gb or Ram and it has been compiling OO 2.0 for
7-hours already.
It's likely to take somewhere around 8-11 hours on such a machine. It
took somewhere around 10 hours for me on a 15
I have used both versions. The compiled version seems to be more stable on my
system.
Uwe
Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
Joseph wrote:
Is there a benefit of compiling Openoffice 2.0 vs. installing from
binary.
I've AMD 1.8Mhz with 1Gb or Ram and it has been compiling OO 2.0 for
7-hours alread
Uwe Klosa wrote:
> I have used both versions. The compiled version seems to be more
> stable on my system.
>
> Uwe
>
I always compile mine to. It is downloading it now. Why is it only
32MBs this time? It was over 200MBs last time.
Dale
:-)
--
To err is human, I'm most certainly human.
--
The first file is only 32MB. There are more to come. :)
Uwe
Dale wrote:
Uwe Klosa wrote:
I have used both versions. The compiled version seems to be more
stable on my system.
Uwe
I always compile mine to. It is downloading it now. Why is it only
32MBs this time? It was over 200MBs las
I'll agree here: I sometimes download a new binary to test before seeing
if I really want it - then compile it. Compiled is usually subjectively
faster, and definitely more stable.
Besides, as someone else put it, its more fun ...
BillK
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 09:00 +0100, Uwe Klosa wrote:
> I h
Uh Oh. Here goes my dial-up. I only get 26K here. Last time it took
three nights to get it all, about 24 hours total.
I may go visit my friend that has DSL. LOL
Dale
:-)
Uwe Klosa wrote:
> The first file is only 32MB. There are more to come. :)
>
> Uwe
>
> Dale wrote:
>
>> Uwe Klosa wrote:
On 2005-11-30 08:12:34 +0100 (Wed, Nov), Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
> Joseph wrote:
>
> >Is there a benefit of compiling Openoffice 2.0 vs. installing from
> >binary.
> >
> >I've AMD 1.8Mhz with 1Gb or Ram and it has been compiling OO 2.0 for
> >7-hours already.
> >
> >
> >
> It's likely to tak
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 03:00 am, a tiny voice compelled Uwe Klosa to
write:
> I have used both versions. The compiled version seems to be more stable on
> my system.
I've installed OO both ways in the past and stability hasn't been an issue.
The only thing I noticed is that the compiled v
101 - 200 of 259 matches
Mail list logo
