-solutions.it]
*Gesendet:* Freitag, 14. September 2012 09:47
*An:* Arne Kepp
*Cc:* geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
*Betreff:* Re: [Geoserver-users] requests with no matching cached resolution
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Arne Kepp wrote:
So why not just use WMS ? The ability to combine
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Arne Kepp wrote:
> So why not just use WMS ? The ability to combine tiles was written for
> a very extreme case, a legacy WMS backend that was unbearably slow and
> couldn't be fixed.
>
Arne, you'd be surprised how many recently (that is, not legacy)
published W
Yeah, the case you describe is very similar to the one for which this
feature was written. And now I do see you said it in one of the follow
ups I obviously missed, sorry.
That is the only way forward that I can think of. And tell all of the
providers to switch to clusters of GeoServers for inc
Hi Arne
The reason is that we collect WMS from different providers. The idea with
caching is, that we have a "copy" of the data in our cache - und can serve
our system with this, when one of the "source WMS" of which we haven't any
control, isn't working.
I'm not sure if this is really possible?
I've read the followups, but it is stilll unclear to me why you are
invoking GWC at all ?
GWC stores many small tiles in PNG or JPEG format. It is rather
expensive to decode these tiles and to combine them into a new image.
Last time I checked it was a lot slower than using an optimized GeoTIFF
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Christian Höhener <
christian.hoehe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrea
>
>
>
> Thanks you.
>
>
>
> Has anybody experience with that on geoserver ? Quality seems to be bad,
> how is it with performance?
>
>
>
>
>
> I tried it with mapproxy. There it’s possible to cho
the
interpolation.
Thanks for any advice.
Regards,
Christian
*Von:* Andrea Aime [mailto:andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it]
*Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 13. September 2012 09:27
*An:* cmaul
*Cc:* geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
*Betreff:* Re: [Geoserver-users] requests with no matching cached
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:52 AM, cmaul wrote:
> Christian,
>
> Jukka pointed you in the correct direction. However, I would strongly
> advise
> a) to stick to one of the scale sets in the OGC WMTS standard, b) to ask
> your users to get them using the getCapabilities statement and only look at
> t
Christian,
Jukka pointed you in the correct direction. However, I would strongly advise
a) to stick to one of the scale sets in the OGC WMTS standard, b) to ask
your users to get them using the getCapabilities statement and only look at
them using the correct scale/resolution and c) ask them not t
Hi,
Read about "Support for Regular WMS Clients" from
http://geowebcache.org/docs/current/services/wms.html
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Christian Höhener wrote:
> Hi,
> Sorry, the mail before was sent to early...
> I want to use gesoserver with caching enabled to serve
Hi,
Sorry, the mail before was sent to early...
I want to use gesoserver with caching enabled to serve data to use in
different GIS-systems, where there are no fix zoom levels.
I found out that mapproxy is able to do that:
"For requests with no matching cached resolution the next best resolution
11 matches
Mail list logo
