Re: [Geotools-devel] Expunge Jalopy from developer docs?

2009-02-03 Thread Andrea Aime
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: > As my coworker just discovered, Jalopy modifies all code, even code that > has not been changed. This is a Bad Thing. > > We both use Eclipse with the GeoTools formatter build/eclipse/formatter.xml > > Mixing and matching with Jalopy will only cause pain. I don't

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2321) JDBCDataStore.getCount should get a full Query object

2009-02-03 Thread Andrea Aime (JIRA)
JDBCDataStore.getCount should get a full Query object - Key: GEOT-2321 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2321 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Improvement Components: data jd

[Geotools-devel] Report on geotidy work

2009-02-03 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
To keep peoples informed: All map GT2 projections are working, plus a few new projections (including support on ellipse for projections that were previously supported only on sphere). WKT parsing and formatting do not confuse anymore the various parameter names used by different authorities (O

[Geotools-devel] Hudson build is back to normal: geotools-2.5.x #263

2009-02-03 Thread Hudson
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-2.5.x/263/changes -- Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM) software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and c

Re: [Geotools-devel] ECQL finished

2009-02-03 Thread Adrian Custer
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 20:04 +0100, Mauricio Pazos wrote: > Hi list, > > I have finished the ECQL documentation and I have changed to "public" the > ECQL > facade in trunk. > > User Doc > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTDOC/03+ECQL+Examples > > Design > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/G

Re: [Geotools-devel] Expunge Jalopy from developer docs?

2009-02-03 Thread Jody Garnett
Fair enough kill it On 03/02/2009, at 6:19 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > As my coworker just discovered, Jalopy modifies all code, even code > that has not been changed. This is a Bad Thing. > > We both use Eclipse with the GeoTools formatter build/eclipse/ > formatter.xml > > Mixing and

[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-2.5.x #262

2009-02-03 Thread Hudson
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-2.5.x/262/changes Changes: [aaime] First cut of GEOT-2102, deal with offset in memory when no native support is available [aaime] First cut of GEOT-2102, deal with offset in memory when no native support is available --

Re: [Geotools-devel] ArcSDE GCE may go JAI

2009-02-03 Thread Gabriel Roldan
Hi Saul, thanks for the comments, some more inline On Monday 02 February 2009 17:32:28 Saul Farber wrote: > Gabriel, > > I tried a bit of stronger JAI integration early in my ArcSDE rasters > implementation, but ran into some hurdles around tile-ordering (tiles from > ArcSDE came in a weird orde

Re: [Geotools-devel] ECQL finished

2009-02-03 Thread Mauricio Pazos
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 14:43:06 Adrian Custer wrote: > congratulations on all the hard work to get this to land! Thanks -- Mauricio Pazos www.axios.es -- Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with

Re: [Geotools-devel] ArcSDE GCE may go JAI

2009-02-03 Thread Saul Farber
> I understand. My approach is as follows > > - we pick up the correct pyramid level before issueing the request > just as its being done now, then instruct JAI to request always the > image at index 0. this allows a single query to carry over all the > tiles for the chosen level, and jai sees it

[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-trunk #1321

2009-02-03 Thread Hudson
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/1321/changes -- started Updating http://svn.osgeo.org/geotools/trunk ERROR: Failed to update http://svn.osgeo.org/geotools/trunk org.tmatesoft.svn.core.SVNException: svn: Compression of svndiff data fai

[Geotools-devel] Catching the 2.6 release train

2009-02-03 Thread Jody Garnett
I am catching up to the 2.6 release train ... 2.6-M0 was tagged by Emily on October 8th, 2008 - I am marking it released in Jira. 2.6-M1 was tagged by me, today and represents the version of GeoTools used for the recent uDig release mentioned in my last email. I will check out this tag and deploy

[Geotools-devel] Geoserver 1.7.2 imageioExt iussue

2009-02-03 Thread Andrea Cappugi
I all, I have installed geoserver 1.7.2 from war in tomcat55 on a debian 40r5. Geoserver throws an error when I try to publish e geotiff dataset, error following: .. INFO: Illegal access: this web application instance has been stopped already. Could not load it.geosolutions.imageio.stream.inpu

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: OnlineTestCase support for failure on failed connection

2009-02-03 Thread Andrea Aime
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: > I propose that an optional key be added to OnlineTestCase to cause test > failure on failed connection: > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/OnlineTestCase+support+for+failure+on+failed+connection Works for me. Just a minor note, there is one other case in

Re: [Geotools-devel] Report on geotidy work

2009-02-03 Thread Michael Bedward
Many thanks for this and the other updates Martin Michael -- Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM) software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to buil

Re: [Geotools-devel] ECQL finished

2009-02-03 Thread Michael Bedward
>> I have finished the ECQL documentation and I have changed to "public" the >> ECQL >> facade in trunk. Nice docs Mauricio - I like the format of a range of simple examples and then the grammar if you want more detail. Thanks ! Michael

Re: [Geotools-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-trunk #1322

2009-02-03 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Looks like some recent changes to arcsde have brought the build down? Hudson wrote: > See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/1322/changes > > -- > [...truncated 2539 lines...] > [INFO] Building jar: > http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/g

Re: [Geotools-devel] ECQL finished

2009-02-03 Thread Jody Garnett
Nice work - that is worth a news post.- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2009/02/03/Extended+Common+Query+Lanaguage+Finished Jody On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Mauricio Pazos wrote: > Hi list, > > I have finished the ECQL documentation and I have changed to "public" the > ECQL > fac

[Geotools-devel] 2.6-M1 deployed

2009-02-03 Thread Jody Garnett
The release train of 2.6-M1 continues; Jira is tagged; and it looks like everything is deployed correctly right now. Thanks to Justin for walking me through some of the build order issues during yesterdays IRC chat. The only break I found was in the directory datastore not being in the default

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: OnlineTestCase support for failure on failed connection

2009-02-03 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Andrea Aime wrote: > Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: >> I propose that an optional key be added to OnlineTestCase to cause test >> failure on failed connection: >> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/OnlineTestCase+support+for+failure+on+failed+connection > > Works for me. Just a minor note,

[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-trunk #1322

2009-02-03 Thread Hudson
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/1322/changes -- [...truncated 2539 lines...] [INFO] Building jar: http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/ws/gt_trunk/modules/library/xml/target/gt-xml-2.6-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar [INFO] [ja

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: OnlineTestCase support for failure on failed connection

2009-02-03 Thread Jody Garnett
Read over the proposal; I think this is a case were we can come to a decision without a formal proposal since this just effects us the devel community and the change is not visible to user code. But that is my take on it - we are still sorting out when a proposal is useful and when it is a waste of

Re: [Geotools-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-trunk #1322

2009-02-03 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Gabriel, I added a gt-arcsde test dependency on the pure Java jai_imageio to fix the build. This will be required to build with any JDK without the native JAI imageio installed. Gabriel is probably using native JAI, and so will not have seen the failure. Gabriel, please confirm that the depend

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: OnlineTestCase support for failure on failed connection

2009-02-03 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Jody Garnett wrote: > I think this is a case were we can come to a decision without a formal > proposal since this just effects us the devel community and the change is not > visible to user code. But that is my take on it - we are still sorting out > when a proposal is useful and when it is a w

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: OnlineTestCase support for failure on failed connection

2009-02-03 Thread Jody Garnett
Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Jody Garnett wrote: >> I think this is a case were we can come to a decision without a >> formal proposal since this just effects us the devel community and >> the change is not visible to user code. But that is my take on it - >> we are still sorting out when a propo

[Geotools-devel] Hudson build is back to normal: geotools-trunk #1323

2009-02-03 Thread Hudson
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/1323/changes -- Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM) software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: OnlineTestCase support for failure on failed connection

2009-02-03 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Jody Garnett wrote: > Hrm you are right; Justin wanted proposals for things that effect the > build. I think he was mostly focused on maven; but broad changes to the > entire test process would qualify. I think you are just asking the super > class to support a new option which you are going to

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: OnlineTestCase support for failure on failed connection

2009-02-03 Thread Jody Garnett
Got it. Checking that the proposal says what you mean... you even found the developers guide page that needs to change :-D+1 Jody On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Jody Garnett wrote: > >> Hrm you are right; Justin wanted proposals for things that effect the >> build.

Re: [Geotools-devel] Report on geotidy work

2009-02-03 Thread Jesse Eichar
I second that. Thanks for the update. On 4-Feb-09, at 12:46 AM, Michael Bedward wrote: > Many thanks for this and the other updates Martin > > Michael > > -- > Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with