See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/1329/changes
--
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> I will wrap up my contribution to this thread with an amusing story ...
> just so you know you are not alone.
>
> When I first started with the GeoTools community they ad 1.5 build
> process; an ant build process which hated me; and a maven 1 b
I will wrap up my contribution to this thread with an amusing story ...
just so you know you are not alone.
When I first started with the GeoTools community they ad 1.5 build
process; an ant build process which hated me; and a maven 1 build which
was supposed to work.
And I was to shy to compl
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/1328/changes
Changes:
[groldan] engaged the JAI coverage reader for arcsde
--
[...truncated 2520 lines...]
[INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] [compiler:compile]
[INFO] Co
Sunburned Surveyor a écrit :
> I wonder if Geotools look something like this in the future:
>
> A set of core modules maintained by the community using Maven and other tools.
> A set of modules maintained by individuals or teams that utilize code
> from the core Jars. Each module maintainer would
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/1327/changes
Changes:
[groldan] committing ArcSDE gce JAI prototype advances
--
[...truncated 2518 lines...]
[INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] [compiler:compile]
[INFO]
I'm surprised at all the programmers that hate Maven but see no
alternative. It's sort of like paying $10,000 for one license of
AutoCAD because there is no real alternative. :]
Michael Bedward's post helped me understand some of the issues better.
It sounds like a lot (or at least some) programme
Hi Tim, cc'ing the list
confirmed we lack a binding in our parser for the ows:extendedCapabilities
element.
What would be good in order to make sure we support ArcGIS server is for you
to create a JIRA issue for it (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT), assign
to the data-wfs module, me (grol
Graphic Fills displayed upside down for PolygonSymbolizers
--
Key: GEOT-2324
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2324
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
I wonder what's the difference between an "IN" filter over a property named
"ID"
or a feature id.
eg,
"ID in ('value1', 'value2', 'value3')"
what happens if the featuretype has a property named "ID", is it gonna be a
feature id filter or one based on the "ID" property?
Gabriel
On Tuesday 03
SLDParser does not respect standard whitespace handling in mixed content
sections
-
Key: GEOT-2323
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2323
Project: GeoTools
Can't wait to get a new mac :). (I have 10.5 on my machine but can't
install Java 6 on it yet)
On 5-Feb-09, at 11:22 AM, Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> Jody Garnett a écrit :
>> My understanding was Java 6 was now available for the mac; although
>> perhaps it is included with the latest operatin
2009/2/5 Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> Yes, I'm on mac since a few weeks :)
Excellent - welcome to the fold :-)
Michael
--
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
software. With Adobe
Michael Bedward a écrit :
> Some of us are going to be stuck with Java 5 for a while yet.
Well, as said in my previous email a "geotidy for geotools" mercurial clone may
be required anyway in order to reinject some deprecated methods that I removed.
Keeping this clone compatible with Java 5 will
Michael Bedward a écrit :
> 2009/2/5 Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
>> Not only Linux distributions. Maven 2.0.6 is bundled "out of the box" in
>> MacOS 10.5.
>>
>
> Is it ? Are you sure ?
Yes, I'm on mac since a few weeks :) (but still loving Linux and will probably
move between those two worlds)
Andrea Aime a écrit :
> That's just because you're cherry picking the epsg factory you decided
> to use. Really make one big jar with all the epsg factories we have in
> the build and I don't believe it'll be working.
Right... But this is an other thing that I'm fixing.
Martin
-
Jody Garnett a écrit :
> My understanding was Java 6 was now available for the mac; although
> perhaps it is included with the latest operating system?
Java 6 is now bundled in MacOS 10.5, together with Maven 2.0.6 and Subversion
1.4.
Martin
---
Jody Garnett a écrit :
> Martin also suggested we could simplify - martin do you have specific
> ideas of complexity that can be stripped out of our maven configuration?
We could try to reduce the amount of profiles as much as we can. For example
the
"ordinary tests" vs "OnlineTest" setting cou
2009/2/5 Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> Not only Linux distributions. Maven 2.0.6 is bundled "out of the box" in
> MacOS 10.5.
>
Is it ? Are you sure ?
I've got 10.5 but I didn't find maven in /usr/bin or in the Developer
Tools bin dir. Unless I deleted it at some stage and then deleted my
memor
Sunburned Surveyor ha scritto:
> It seems that Maven is tightly integrated into GeoTools. I am
> wondering what benefits this provides to the GeoTools project, and if
> these benefits outweigh the costs.
Just to chime in late and share my opinion, I sincerely love to hate
maven :)
If there was a b
Jody Garnett a écrit :
> To add fuel to a slightly different fire - the maven plugin system is
> magic to the point of being unstable. There is a branch of maven that
> "hard codes" the plugins used so you can get repeatable stable builds
> (justin recommended it).
This is Maven 2.0.9 if I unde
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> Hello Jody
>
> Jody Garnett a écrit :
>> The reason
>> we cannot have one big jar of geotools (tm) is more to do with the
>> choice of FactorySPI as the plugin system than anything to do with maven.
>
> This is not true. Geotidy build daily one big JAR with eve
Jody Garnett a écrit :
> I may propose another route - of bring GeoTools 2.6 to Java 6. Given our
> yearly release schedule I think I can get support for this. GeoServer
> will only be using GeoTools 2.6 for GeoServer 2.0; uDig is already using
> Java 6 on most platforms (and I am waiting word
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Do tell - I am trying to sort out what the market will look like for
> GeoTools; we were stuck at the Java 1.3 mark for years waiting on Java
> Enterprise Edition developers ... are we going to be caught in a similar
> trap?
Maybe? J2EE 6 is still not around and once
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> You are correct the weekly IRC meeting has lost its will to live. In
> 2003 when I joined the project was run by module of maintainers (each a
> mini dictator for a section of code); and the weekly IRC meeting was the
> venue when agreement and direction was taken.
>
A good discussion :).
Landon I hope you haven't been scared off by some of it and I take off
my hat to you for bravely starting such an exciting conversation.
A quick POV from me:
As far as i can tell there are 2 main options out there:
Maven and
Ant + Ivy
Ant is nice in its simplicity and I
Hello Jody
Jody Garnett a écrit :
> The reason
> we cannot have one big jar of geotools (tm) is more to do with the
> choice of FactorySPI as the plugin system than anything to do with maven.
This is not true. Geotidy build daily one big JAR with everything in it since
last summer. With Maven,
27 matches
Mail list logo
