[Geotools-devel] employer status update

Quick update, with the recent acquisition of Boundless I am now an employee of Planet Federal. My participation in the PMC is as an individual on my own time :) -- Jody Garnett ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https

Re: [Geotools-devel] API deprecation cleanup

confidential or otherwise protected from > disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679 > “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information > herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If

Re: [Geotools-devel] MBStyles translation issues

857 0.8 8 0.6 22 1.0 *Zoom level >22* - 2183915.0935581755 - opacity: 1 -- Jody Garnett On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 at 09:54, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 a

Re: [Geotools-devel] Postgis raster module

That sounds great +1 -- Jody Garnett On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 at 11:03, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Hi folks, > > Following up on a post from a few months back I've been working on a > module that supports reading rasters from a postgis database. I'd like to > contribute it

Re: [Geotools-devel] slow start to geotools release train

e* - © Copyright 2017, GeoTools should change to (c) 2019 OSGeo and include a link to CCbyA lcense - may wish to include a LICENSE.md file - future ideas: process README.html to link to the docs in the folder - future ideas: standalone docs could probably have a different theme -- Jody Garnett On Thu,

Re: [Geotools-devel] slow start to geotools release train

geotools revision = 3a7f800a39ed72a6529699cc85c5f09a090e6eca geowebcache version = 1.15-SNAPSHOT geowebcache revision = 03b9bac431a00d943128cb61d94fd86392b80695/03b9b The draft blog post is ready for review (I am getting very tired of editing in blogger). -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 22:24

Re: [Geotools-devel] Understanding JTS last minute upgrade

Reviewing release notes: https://github.com/locationtech/jts/releases/tag/jts-1.16.1 show HilbertCode and MortonCode (new functionality), improved InteriorPointArea performance/robustness and some bug fixes. While we took on this upgrade to solve a bug reported during our RC testing I I am not int

Re: [Geotools-devel] slow start to geotools release train

That is exactly what is taking place, jts 1.16.1 has fixes and improvements only (as befitting a dot release). -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 22:54, Andrea Aime wrote: > I recommend limiting the API change to master, one between a RC and final > is inappropriate at best. >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Bringing OGR back into the build, and discussing backwards compatibility issues and improvements

I am happy to test, I never seem to have the right version GDAL/OGR installed on my system. Updating now takes me from GDAL 2.3.1 to GDAL 2.4.0, if that is sufficient to test count me in. On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 10:25 AM Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > Earth managed to spin 3 times by now, assuming n

Re: [Geotools-devel] PMD to check proper handling of Closeable(s), step one

That is a great result, reviewed the pull request. I don't know if I should be impressed or horrified at how much better a job we can do at closing all the things. On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 10:05 AM Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi all, > here is a pull request that enables PMD checks over closeables: > >

Re: [Geotools-devel] filter function ECQL round-trip bug

allow here). -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 14:56, Emilio Lahr-Vivaz wrote: > Hello, > > I've hit a bug in the GeoTools ECQL parsing. I've got a fix, but wanted > to raise the issue here before opening a pull request. > > We've got a custom filter fun

[Geotools-devel] slow start to geotools release train

As per "subtle jts api change" thread a jts 1.16.1 release is being made this afternoon and then the GeoTools release process will start up in earnest tomorrow. I am starting by creating the draft blog post today, so everyone has an opportunity to edit before this goes live. -- Jo

Re: [Geotools-devel] subtle its api change

ia PRs? > > Cheers > Andrea > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 3:54 AM Jody Garnett > wrote: > >> Given a bug Hugh Saalmans found the JTS developers were looking at >> rolling out a fix. >> >> Sadly in testing the fix I ran into a subtle API change >> <htt

[Geotools-devel] subtle its api change

When the time comes to upgrade to JTS we will need to ask jai-ext to recompile. -- Jody Garnett ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] Getters and thread safeness

. -- Jody Garnett On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 at 23:40, Patrick Valsecchi < patrick.valsec...@camptocamp.com> wrote: > Hello, > > While investigating a bug [1] in MapFish print, I've found what I consider > a bug in DefaultFeatureCollection.getBounds method. > > Maybe I'

Re: [Geotools-devel] JSONPointer function backport

Fair enough. That said we are still on for release next week. Everything is clear on the geotools side of things (working on documentation as a nice to have). -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 07:48, Andrea Aime wrote: > Thank you, but no thank you! You know how I feel about last min

Re: [Geotools-devel] JSONPointer function backport

I read you correctly, I think this function is useful and would make a good addition to 21.0. It will of course also make a good addition to 21.1 in a couple months time... -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 07:31, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Jody, > I believe you misread my messag

Re: [Geotools-devel] JSONPointer function backport

We usually do a call out for any last moment fixes and back ports ahead of a release ... if this is you answering the call I am fine with the back port. The new dependency is the only thing giving me pause. -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 01:11, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > I

Re: [Geotools-devel] adjust versus adjst?

It is a protected method so API impact is minimal (and it is part of a function so we do not expect much direct use). A pull request would be welcome :) -- Jody Garnett On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 19:43, Kurt Schwehr wrote: > Would it be possible to change adjstRelative to adjustRelative so t

Re: [Geotools-devel] Filter-CQL issues

In todays meeting we compared the library science CQL which uses "foo/bar.baz" with the OGC CSW CQL which uses "foo.bar.baz" - sigh :) - https://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/cql/spec.html - http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=20555 -- Jody Garnett On Tue,

Re: [Geotools-devel] Filter-CQL issues

eers, > Devon > ___ > GeoTools-Devel mailing list > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > -- -- Jody Garnett ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] Last minute proposal: enabling JAI-EXT by default

ed recipient is prohibited. If you > have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by > telephone or e-mail.* > ___ > GeoTools-Devel mailing list > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > -- -- Jody Ga

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget

e sprint a year is too much imho (unless the > companies involved live large or > have very little work to do anyways...) > > Cheers > Andrea > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 8:13 PM Jody Garnett > wrote: > >> Unless anything changes in this thread I will just indicate

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 20.2 artifacts are available for testing

Testing: - userguide - README.html links to latest (not stable or 20.2) - project - builds fine thanks :) Thanks! -- Jody Garnett On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 11:16, Torben Barsballe wrote: > GeoTools 20.2 artifacts are available for testing from > https://build.geoserver.org/geotools/releas

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget

is a good opportunity. Personally I am perusing "running geotools workshops at regional events" but I do not require extra funding to do so, indeed I think I will run those workshops when conferences add an extra "code sprint" day since those turn into developer outreach anyways

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 20.2 release scheduled for Friday, Jan 18

Thanks Torben, this will be a good test of the updated repository release credentials :) -- Jody Garnett On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 15:17, Torben Barsballe wrote: > Hello all, > > Just a reminder that the GeoTools 20.2 release is happening this Friday. > If there are any last-minute

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget

regional events? If there is any interest in the above idea, or any ideas to add to the mix, I am happy to ask for more then the 2k proposed by the board. -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 13:07, Jody Garnett wrote: > We made some use of our budget in 2018 > <https://github.com

Re: [Geotools-devel] Tightening the screws a bit more with PMD: empty code areas

ne or e-mail.* > _______ > GeoTools-Devel mailing list > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > -- -- Jody Garnett ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

[Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget

We made some use of our budget in 2018 <https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/GeoTools-Budget-Request-2018>, any priorities for this upcoming year? -- Jody Garnett Dear OSGeo project members, > Over the previous years, OSGeo has been proud to support a growing > number of project

Re: [Geotools-devel] Documentation pointing to the wrong branch?

Thanks, that "missed a spot" should not be required - the version number is supposed to be passed in from the maven script :P -- Jody Garnett On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 at 11:04, Torben Barsballe wrote: > If I recall correctly, the doc build was split from the regular build to > re

Re: [Geotools-devel] QA branch merged and checks integrated in build

rein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you > have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by > telephone or e-mail.* > _______ > GeoTools-Devel mailing list > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 21-M0 Milestone Release

GeoTools project is closing out 2018 with a GeoTools 21-M0 milestone release featuring Java 11 compatibility: - geotools-21-M0-bin.zip

Re: [Geotools-devel] getting set for java 11 compatible milestone release

The bin download starts up in Java 11 and Java 8 and displays the usual previews; looks good enough for a milestone release. -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 at 20:04, Jody Garnett wrote: > Draft geotools blog is ready to publish, hoping for a review. Was unable > to quickly get s

Re: [Geotools-devel] getting set for java 11 compatible milestone release

Garnett On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 at 12:43, Jody Garnett wrote: > Looks like I have been able to do everything except update the website: > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/geowebcache/files/geowebcache/1.15-M0/ > https://github.com/GeoWebCache/geowebcache/releases/tag/1.1

Re: [Geotools-devel] getting set for java 11 compatible milestone release

GeoServer release next. -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 at 11:27, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Jody, > it's dinner time already here and then we have new year celebrations. > Maybe tomorrow but I'm not sure, I'll ping you back > > Cheers > Andrea > > Il gio

Re: [Geotools-devel] getting set for java 11 compatible milestone release

810abfb6/05d7e > > > So, seems to have been working. > > About moving those files to the build folder, careful to update the > references to them :-) > > Cheers > Andrea > > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 6:40 PM Jody Garnett > wrote: > >> Okay starting in

Re: [Geotools-devel] QA branch ready for merge, objections?

Thanks for doing the docs Andrea, they were nice and clear and address my request. With the changes documented (so all tasks complete) I do not see the need to go to extra effort with a proposal. -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 at 02:39, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi all, > the QA bra

Re: [Geotools-devel] getting set for java 11 compatible milestone release

nd a few other files to the build folder *GeoWebCache* This is next on the list, ... -- Jody Garnett On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 at 17:43, Jody Garnett wrote: > I would like to start the release process for GeoTools 21-M0 and GeoServer > 2.15-M0. > > Checking the CITE tests we may

Re: [Geotools-devel] getting set for java 11 compatible milestone release

in by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you > have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by > telephone or e-mail.* > -- -- Jody Garnett ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

[Geotools-devel] getting set for java 11 compatible milestone release

this work to fold in? -- Jody Garnett ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] ContentDataStore transactions are not really properly isolated?

leaving readers (temporarily) going over a corrupted file. > > Cheers > Andrea > > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 8:24 PM Jody Garnett > wrote: > >> Makes sense, think we arrived at the same spot (narrowing the conflict >> down to the commit). The comment about respons

Re: [Geotools-devel] ContentDataStore transactions are not really properly isolated?

> 10. This is a corner case of a corner case and I would recommend going with it as a known limitation. On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:00 AM Andrea Aime wrote: > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 6:42 PM Jody Garnett > wrote: > >> Yeah I am aware of the gap, we did not implement a two phase co

Re: [Geotools-devel] ContentDataStore transactions are not really properly isolated?

as provided by European Regulation 2016/679 > “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information > herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you > have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by > telephone or e-m

Re: [Geotools-devel] Java 11 Milestone release in December

Blog post is the key one, we would like to highlight the work done, link to the new docs, and thank everyone who attended or supported the activity. -- Jody Garnett On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 09:19, Torben Barsballe wrote: > In todays PMC meeting, we discussed putting out a milestone release

Re: [Geotools-devel] Shapefile datastore does not support transactions and filters correctly

At some level the writer needs to read over all the features (it needs to write out all the features), so passing a filter into the reader may act as a delete. On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 1:37 AM Peilke, Hendrik wrote: > Hi, > > > > I use a shapefile datastore in conjunction with a transaction. When

Re: [Geotools-devel] Residual split packages

Thanks, so next steps are blog post and milestone release? -- Jody Garnett On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 11:04, Torben Barsballe wrote: > This never quite got finished, so Jody and I finished most of what was > left last week (everything except spatialite), mostly going off of your > suggest

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pruning dead branches: referencing mediators?

notify us immediately by > telephone or e-mail.* > _______ > GeoTools-Devel mailing list > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > -- -- Jody Garnett ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] Promoting MongoDB as an extension \ supported plugin

Okay found it under extensions, I had been looking for it under datastores. -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 23:45, Jody Garnett wrote: > > >>- The module has a page in the user manual >> >> Yes, this true for both GeoTools and GeoServer. >&

Re: [Geotools-devel] Promoting MongoDB as an extension \ supported plugin

> >- The module has a page in the user manual > > Yes, this true for both GeoTools and GeoServer. > Nuno to double back to this, I was writing up the release notes for 2.14.1 release, and wanted to link to the mongodb geoserver page ... and could not find it? __

Re: [Geotools-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: geotools-master-online-postgis #788

Cheers > Andrea > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 9:59 PM Jody Garnett > wrote: > >> So the question then is if I proceed with the release. >> >> I think I would like to, with a note that cite test results have not been >> verified? >> >> On Sat, N

Re: [Geotools-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: geotools-master-online-postgis #788

So the question then is if I proceed with the release. I think I would like to, with a note that cite test results have not been verified? On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 12:56 PM Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 7:14 PM Jody Garnett > wrote: > >> Do we think this has tak

Re: [Geotools-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: geotools-master-online-postgis #788

Do we think this has taken out the cite test as well? It fails on the same day ... -- Jody Garnett On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 05:49, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > looks like postgresql is unreachable? > > Cheers > Andrea > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 2:28 PM wrote

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer PMC meeting - 2018-11-13

> The idea seems cool, but at the same time, I'm wondering if we should be > investing the money in the project instead, there > are a variety of things that could be done, e.g. start pushing more > aggressively towards code quality (PMD, findbugs and the like in the > builds), > refreshing CITE te

Re: [Geotools-devel] Why gt-main cannot be split: CommonFactoryFinder

interfaces across the different modules. -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 11:35, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 5:34 PM Torben Barsballe < > tbarsba...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > >> Given this, how does everyone feel about merging gt-main and gt-data &

Re: [Geotools-devel] Why gt-main cannot be split: CommonFactoryFinder

: > Hi Jody, > I stopped after realizing the issues with common factory finder and > reverted the changes. So nope, no branch, sorry. > > Cheers > Andrea > > Il Dom 28 Ott 2018, 21:26 Jody Garnett ha > scritto: > >> Andrea do you have a branch started for this a

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] OSGeo Java Code Sprint 2018 (Stage 3)

se/java-2018-code-sprint-david-vick/ > > > > ___ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > geoserver-de...@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel > -- -- Jody Garnett ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] Why gt-main cannot be split: CommonFactoryFinder

Okay I will have a look :) On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 1:41 PM Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Jody, > I stopped after realizing the issues with common factory finder and > reverted the changes. So nope, no branch, sorry. > > Cheers > Andrea > > Il Dom 28 Ott 2018, 21:26 Jo

Re: [Geotools-devel] Why gt-main cannot be split: CommonFactoryFinder

this e-mail or the information > herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you > have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by > telephone or e-mail.* > ___ > GeoTools-Devel mailing list > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > http

Re: [Geotools-devel] EMF Update - Inadvertent WFSConfiguration rename?

ersion of the EMF base runtime, and > apparently 2.14.0.v20180706 of the EMF code generation - both are what > update considers the latest version on Ubuntu. > > Ian > > On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 at 08:04, Jody Garnett wrote: > >> So just to confirm you did rename WFSConfiguration

Re: [Geotools-devel] EMF Update - Inadvertent WFSConfiguration rename?

Turton wrote: > I'd completely forgotten (or erased from my memory) about the code-gen > stuff. > > Ian > > > On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 at 02:41, Jody Garnett wrote: > >> I have been trying to chase this down, unable to open wfs.genmodel: >> >&g

Re: [Geotools-devel] EMF Update - Inadvertent WFSConfiguration rename?

Looking at this with Kevin, .. we can find lots of examples where this has been configured, run once, and comment out. The generator can specify the target package so I am comfortable refactor the gt-xsd modules to use org.geotools.xsd (to fix split package on org.geotools.xml). -- Jody Garnett

Re: [Geotools-devel] EMF Update - Inadvertent WFSConfiguration rename?

wfs.v1.0 does not appear in the above configuration? It contains: OGC-exception.xsd WFS-basic.xsd WFS-capabilities.xsd WFS-transaction.xsd Ian did you run any of this stuff, or was the WFSConfiguration_1_0.java renamed accidentally? -- Jody Garnett On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 17:43, Torben Barsb

[Geotools-devel] geotools master freeze

geotools repackaging currently inflight please holding off merging any PRs on mast for the next couple of hours -- Jody Garnett ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools

Re: [Geotools-devel] JDK11 GT repackaging and the Logging utility

e "subject" class being logged. -- Jody Garnett On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 16:07, Torben Barsballe wrote: > The org.geotools.util.logging.Logging class provides two public methods > to get a logger: > >- public static Logger getLogger(final Class classe) >- public stati

Re: [Geotools-devel] JDK 11: GeoTools restructure to address split-package restriction

orate.* org.geotools.decorate.AbstractDecorator org.geotools.util.decorate.AbstractDecorator org.geotools.decorate.Wrapper org.geotools.util.decorate.Wrapper We will add to this list as we go, it can be used for docs and possibly a sed script. -- Jody Garnett On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 00:52, Andrea Aime

[Geotools-devel] JDK 11: GeoTools restructure to address split-package restriction

pi change) - Need a sample application ready to test using geotools on the module path -- Jody Garnett ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

[Geotools-devel] repackaging the geotools library updates and PMC feedback needed

aller modules" will work. *Holding off on this due to impact on downstream code, and the pain of updating EMF models.* *Going to keep this for a future proposal.* -- Jody Garnett ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.n

Re: [Geotools-devel] MBTiles format & JPG tile format

that sound easier are often easier to maintain). Overkill remains an option if more kill is desired. -- Jody Garnett On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 06:31, Murray McDonald wrote: > Hi, > > I have run into a problem trying to load an MBTiles file with GeoTools > 16.2. The problem is exactly t

Re: [Geotools-devel] SWT module

). -- Jody Garnett On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 07:20, andrea antonello wrote: > Hi all, > we are looking at the SWT module for the java 11 migration. > > At the time the jdep analysis results in some issues coming from the swt > libs: > - > Uses java

Re: [Geotools-devel] Stepping down from GeoTools PMC

That is .. great news - glad you have an exciting prospect! It has been an honour to work with you these many years :) -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 14:26, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > I hereby step down from the GeoTools PMC. > > Thanks everyone. I have had a great time. I

Re: [Geotools-devel] JDK11: run build with illegal reflective access checks, here is a report

> > *4) NIOUtilities* > WARNING: Illegal reflective access by org.geotools.resources.NIOUtilities > (file:/home/aaime/devel/git-gt/modules/library/metadata/target/gt-metadata-21-SNAPSHOT.jar) > to method java.nio.DirectByteBuffer.cleaner() > > This is legit, but without that cleaner on Windows shap

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2018-10-16

> The PRs that I've sent do not just compile, they pass a full "mvn clean > install", that includes tests, > if you take the time to build every bit from sources, in turn. Not sure > how this got overlooked. > It is more we did not have the information readily on hand, trying to assemble it now :)

[Geotools-devel] Time to start a java11 branches

I am assembling a preflight checklist for next week, one of the items is to checkout all the projects and build locally. For now I am recommending java 8 / master - but would like to start jdk11 branches if we think we are ready :) -- Jody Garnett

Re: [Geotools-devel] Reminder: GeoTools / GeoServer meeting at 19:30 UTC on Tuesday

Reminder the meeting has swapped to jitsi because new Skype hates linux. https://meet.jit.si/GeoServerMeeting -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 at 13:14, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > GeoTools / GeoServer committee meeting on Skype at 19:30 UTC on Tuesday: > > https://www.timean

Re: [Geotools-devel] OGR Module Support

Q: For (2) is it possible to detect when GDAL is not compiled with GEOS support - and disable the OGR module? -- Jody Garnett On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 at 13:58, Jared Erickson wrote: > I would like to volunteer to be the maintainer of the ogr module. I am > working on a branch with three

Re: [Geotools-devel] advise code sprint participants to book travel

> 3) GeoTools PMC > > The GeoTools PMC has an allocated budget of *$3000* which we have not > spent. Some of that was to help members attend the Bonn code sprint which > ended up not being needed. > > The GeoTools Budget Request >

[Geotools-devel] proposal: Approve up to $1500 to support code sprint participants

a Aime - Ben Caradoc-Davies - Ian Turton - Jody Garnett +1 (initial motion) - Nuno Oliveira - Simone Giannecchini - Torben Barsballe -- Jody Garnett ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourcefor

[Geotools-devel] advise code sprint participants to book travel

consider participation. References: - https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Budget_2018 - https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/GeoTools-Budget-Request-2018 -- Jody Garnett ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourcefo

Re: [Geotools-devel] Quiet builds in preparation for the code sprint

you > have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by > telephone or e-mail.* > ___ > GeoTools-Devel mailing list > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > -- -- Jody Garnett ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2018-10-02

Of course, name the time. -- Jody Garnett On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 10:08, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 6:29 PM Jody Garnett > wrote: > >> Java sprint upgrade, tech discussion meeting: >> >> >> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?m

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2018-10-02

Participants Andrea Aime Ian Turton Jody Garnett Kevin Smith Topics 1. Jitsi meeting: https://meet.jit.si/GeoServerMeeting 2. Europe site for code sprint 3. update sprint planning & budget Previous Actions (from August 7th) - Jim & Jody: JTS issues

Re: [Geotools-devel] Backporting geometries measures (M) related fixes

Our policy is to keep things on master for a month to promote stability, but since this is a new/optional feature that has been added ... and you are now finding formats that break I think we can consider it a "fix" to be back ported. So I am +1 -- Jody Garnett On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 0

Re: [Geotools-devel] Backporting GEOT-5971

That seems a safe change, an additional configuration option that is not on by default. -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 07:45, Mauro Bartolomeoli < mauro.bartolome...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > Any blockers in backporting > https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-

Re: [Geotools-devel] Backporting native filter and where clause support

istake, please notify > us immediately by telephone or e-mail. > > ___ > GeoTools-Devel mailing list > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > -- -- Jody Garnett ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] Java 11 upgrade: looking for internal API usage, GeoTools edition

s/d/1bSuf32MjgP7NKZcqvV7IilpxakKdocJ4CPUEF8jq5Z4> The next OSGeo board meeting is second Saturday of the month (just before our event.) On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 6:12 AM Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 2:21 PM Jody Garnett > wrote: > >> I think we are all arriving at a similar place, it

Re: [Geotools-devel] Java 11 upgrade: looking for internal API usage, GeoTools edition

t know if > jdk.unsupported is > visible or not in that situation (one should try with an application that > places a proper module > as the application one, depend onto one that use Unsafe that is being > treated as an automatic > module, and see if that works). > > Cheers

Re: [Geotools-devel] Java 11 upgrade: looking for internal API usage, GeoTools edition

”), si precisa che ogni > circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali > allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i > destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per > errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: Restructure GeoTools into Jigsaw modules

> By the way, how does Jigsaw work with optional dependencies? Can we > still leave out unused dependencies like with the current classpath? Or > will Java 11 spit the dummy? > Good question, here is my speculation: If the dependency is something like log4j and we have adapting code that we can u

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: Restructure GeoTools into Jigsaw modules

Hey Ben - are you available for the code sprint? Completely understand if you are not being a small business, but we would really love your help. Additional comments/confusion inline: On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 at 14:50, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Does Jigsaw prevent classpath trickery like gt-xsd-gml

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: Restructure GeoTools into Jigsaw modules

> "I think it is a requirement for the work". The work is "Restructure > GeoTools into Jigsaw modules" and covers two items: > * Providing an automatic module name for each jar > * Refactoring the codebase to avoid package conflicts > > Can you explain how this package renaming is required for the

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: Restructure GeoTools into Jigsaw modules

experimentation: - breaking the library into much smaller modules (to see if we like that approach) - Eclipse "api-baseline" based refactor of geotools, then replay the same steps on GeoServer - Refactor of geotools, along side sed script for updating GeoServer -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 17 S

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: Restructure GeoTools into Jigsaw modules

1. remove org.opengis packages > >> It seems like good timing, and with the module system any conflict over >> org.opengis packages will be more keenly felt. >> >> Here is the proposal renaming org.opengis to org.geotools.api: >> - org.geotools.api.filter.Filter >> - org.geotools.api.filter.Proper

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 20.0 Released

Thank you Torben for the release, and to everyone here who contributed! -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 09:26, Torben Barsballe wrote: > The GeoTools team is pleased to announce the release of GeoTools 20.0 > <https://sourceforge.net/projects/geotools/files/GeoTools%2020%20Rele

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: Restructure GeoTools into Jigsaw modules

and may contain > information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from > disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679 > “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information > herein by anyone other than the

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: Restructure GeoTools into Jigsaw modules

stinct package. I am not sure if more sensitivity is required here? -- Jody Garnett On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 09:49, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Jody, > I got myself a book on java modularity and reading through it in my spare > time. > Will take a couple of weeks I believe before I can

Re: [Geotools-devel] [GEOS-8915]Support SSL connection to postgresql

I don't mind it, but perhaps review java certificate management practices? When run in geosever or other web application their may be a keystore (rather than a keyfile). -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 at 05:15, Rémi Desgrange wrote: > Hi, > > I’d like to add support for SSL

Re: [Geotools-devel] New coordinates formatting options for WFS

Would it be worth just providing a number format template? #,##0.00 The approach would It would cover all these options ... Reference: - https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/text/DecimalFormat.html -- Jody Garnett On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 at 03:32, Mauro Bartolomeoli < mauro.bartol

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 20-RC blog post

published -- Jody Garnett On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 at 17:22, Torben Barsballe wrote: > I noticed during the PMC meeting today that this blog post was never > published - can someone with the requisite permissions publish it? (Aside: > I only seem to have the ability to edit and publish pos

[Geotools-devel] proposal: Restructure GeoTools into Jigsaw modules

Proposal is here: Restructure GeoTools into Jigsaw modules <https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Restructure-GeoTools-into-Jigsaw-modules> Feedback welcome, I expect we will have some discussion before voting. -- Jody Garnett ___ GeoTools

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposing Nuno Deoliveira and Torben Barballe for PMC

I could not agree more: Nuno +1 Torben +1 -- Jody Garnett ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >