Hi,
I'd like to get some feedback on the following plan for the Blur
plug-in
(details are in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142318):
The plan is to remove the randomize and repeat functionality. That
would allow us to also remove the (quite confusing) dialog.
Filters-Blur-Blur would
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
I'd like to get some feedback on the following plan for the Blur
plug-in
(details are in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142318):
The plan is to remove the randomize and repeat functionality. That
would allow us to also remove the (quite confusing) dialog.
Sounds
Why not to simply add new plugin with 3x3 convolution and call it Blur?
And leave old one with new name Random blur.
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to get some feedback on the following plan for the Blur
plug-in
(details are in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142318):
The plan is to
Hi all,
Do people think that it is worthwhile for the GIMP to have a stand at
GUADEC? It would perhaps be a way to sell some t-shirts, have a couple
of computers with people doing demos, and have an easy popint-of-contact
for people when they were on their down-time.
The problem is that it
Hi,
Alexander Rabtchevich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why not to simply add new plugin with 3x3 convolution and call it
Blur? And leave old one with new name Random blur.
Because we are trying to simplify our menus. Suggesting to add yet
another entry to the Blur menu is counter-productive.
What do you need done?
Hi,
I am forwarding this mail to gimp-user because there hasn't been any
response on the gimp-developer mailing-list. Perhaps I can reach a
potential contributor here or at least get some user feedback...
___
Gimp-user
Hi,
Eric Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What do you need done?
Huh? The forwarded mail outlines it in all details. Which part did you
not understand?
Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-06-07 at 1149.52 +0200):
The plan is to remove the randomize and repeat functionality. That
would allow us to also remove the (quite confusing) dialog.
Filters-Blur-Blur would then be a simple blur with a 3x3 convolution
kernel. It would be fast and easy to use but of
Hi,
GSR - FR [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The plan is to remove the randomize and repeat functionality. That
would allow us to also remove the (quite confusing) dialog.
Filters-Blur-Blur would then be a simple blur with a 3x3 convolution
kernel. It would be fast and easy to use but of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-06-07 at 1649.35 +0200):
Sorry, but what other scripts or plug-ins are you referring to? IMO it
would be a good thing to have a simple and fast plug-in that does the
job w/o a dialog and I fail to see what other plug-in would provide
this functionality.
Convolution
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-06-07 at 1759.17 +0200):
calling the convolution matrix plug in and scripts to preset it a simple
replacement ?
Well, what would you call a script that just puts a menu entry and
calls convolution matrix with a fixed matrix?
Please rephrase that to a powerful
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Eric Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What do you need done?
Huh? The forwarded mail outlines it in all details. Which part did you
not understand?
Um, no it doesn't. I just has a short blurb about little response on the dev
mailing list and needing help with the
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Eric Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What do you need done?
Huh? The forwarded mail outlines it in all details. Which part did you
not understand?
Um, no it doesn't. I just has a short blurb about little response on the
dev
mailing list and needing help with
Hi,
GSR - FR [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-06-07 at 1759.17 +0200):
calling the convolution matrix plug in and scripts to preset it a
simple replacement ?
Well, what would you call a script that just puts a menu entry and
calls convolution matrix with a fixed matrix?
Hi!
Is there a separate list for gimp scripting, or should I ask script-fu
related questions here?
thx
Gergo
--
+-[ Kontra, Gergely[EMAIL PROTECTED] PhD student Room IB113 ]-+
| http://www.mcl.hu/~kgergelyOlyan langesz vagyok, hogy |
| Mobil:(+36 20) 356 9656 ICQ: 175564914
hi,
as i don't know how it is called what i wanna make, i paraphrise it:
at gnome.org and other gnome-related sites there is a background image
at the very top of the site, having alternating brighter and
normal-color stripes.
how can i reach this effect?
--
klaus triendl
On Monday 07 June 2004 15:31, Gergely Kontra wrote:
Hi!
Is there a separate list for gimp scripting, or should I ask script-fu
related questions here?
thx
Gergo
There is a script-fu list in yahoogroups.
But it has movement 0 - so you may ask your questions here, no problem.
The
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 08:31:48PM +0200, Gergely Kontra wrote:
Hi!
Is there a separate list for gimp scripting, or should I ask script-fu
related questions here?
please do not ask to ask. Ask.
carol
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Andrew Gaffney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What do you need done?
Huh? The forwarded mail outlines it in all details. Which part did
you
not understand?
Um, no it doesn't. I just has a short blurb about little response on
the dev mailing list and needing help with the
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 02:53:44PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
Hi,
I am having a terrible time getting 2.01 to run in my Suse 9.0
system.I do have 1.2 working ok, but I have read everything I can on
this, and spent 3 weeks on and off trying to get it to configure.I
feel
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
I am afraid you guys need to fix your mail readers. The message I sent
is a multipart message containing an attachment of
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
This is the recommended way of forwarding a message. Inside this
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 02:53:44PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
Hi,
I am having a terrible time getting 2.01 to run in my Suse 9.0
system.I do have 1.2 working ok, but I have read everything I can on
this, and spent 3 weeks on and off trying to get it to configure.
Hi,
On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 21:06, klaus triendl wrote:
at gnome.org and other gnome-related sites there is a background image
at the very top of the site, having alternating brighter and
normal-color stripes.
how can i reach this effect?
You could render a white grid (with only horizontal
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 02:53:44PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
pkg-config --modversion glib-2.0' returned 2.2.3 but GLIB ( 2.3.6 )
was found!
i had similar problems with debian. i did not type
Hello,
Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
take advantage of the linux origins of the software. building your
ownglib is very easy. it does not even need a lot of disc space.
Easy to build glibc, but much easier to hose your whole
system(everything) if glibc isn't built right. Also,
Robert Krueger wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 02:53:44PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
Hi,
I am having a terrible time getting 2.01 to run in my Suse 9.0
system.I do have 1.2 working ok, but I have read everything I
can on this, and spent 3 weeks on and off trying to get it to
configure.
Steve M Bibayoff wrote:
Hello,
Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
take advantage of the linux origins of the software. building your
ownglib is very easy. it does not even need a lot of disc space.
Easy to build glibc, but much easier to hose your whole
system(everything) if glibc isn't
Hello,
Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
glib != glibc
slaps palm to forhead.
Sorry about adding noise, wasn't following thread to closely.
Steve
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Schumacher wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
I have the feeling that if I just eliminate the files for glib 2.3.6
or the text that pkg-config found, that it would configure without
complaint. I don't know how to find and
Michael Schumacher wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
I have the feeling that if I just eliminate the files for glib 2.3.6
or the text that pkg-config found, that it would configure without
complaint. I don't know how to find and
Hello,
Forwarring, I haven't used Suse in a very long time, and
I rarely use pkg-config, so I may be leading you down a wrong
road.
Robert Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I need is for someone to work with me to find out how to
eliminate
all traces of 2.3.6 so pkg-config doesn't see
Hi,
klaus triendl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
as i don't know how it is called what i wanna make, i paraphrise it:
at gnome.org and other gnome-related sites there is a background image
at the very top of the site, having alternating brighter and
normal-color stripes.
how can i reach this
Hi,
Robert Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
system.I do have 1.2 working ok, but I have read everything I can
on this, and spent 3 weeks on and off trying to get it to configure.
Please go to http://gimp.org/unix/ and use the RPMS linked from there.
Sven
William Skaggs wrote:
You should be looking for a file named glib-2.0.pc, and it is
probably located in a directory called pkgconfig. In Fedora the
default is /usr/lib/pkgconfig but I believe it is different in
SuSE. If pkg-config data files are located elsewhere than in
the default directory,
Steve M Bibayoff wrote:
snip
Also, what does:
$ echo $PKG_CONFIG_PATH
give you?
Steve
I apologize for the deletion. Here's what I get:
/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/opt/gnome/lib/pkgconfig
Even though there are multiple locations for the directory /pkgconfig,
there is only
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 04:12:36PM -0400, Robert Krueger wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
are you absolutely married to suse for a distribution?
No offense, Carol, but this thread isn't solving my problem. And I
already did build glib from source...several times.
I'm not changing distributions
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Robert Krueger wrote:
checking for pkg-config... /usr/local/bin/pkg-config
checking for GLIB - version = 2.2.0...
*** 'pkg-config --modversion glib-2.0' returned 2.2.3, but GLIB (2.3.6)
*** was found! If pkg-config was correct, then it is best
*** to remove the old
On Monday 07 June 2004 06:58 pm, Robert Krueger wrote:
[...]
Steve and Bill,
I found the file you noted in /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig.It's
the only location on my system that has this particular file,
although I do have other *.pc files in another location
/opt/gnome/lib/pkgconfig. So,
38 matches
Mail list logo
