On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 01:36:09PM +0200, Michael Schumacher <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'ts not that uncommon for a mailing list to have a queue time of one or two
> days.
>
> > And even weeks...
>
> This, however, can't be considered normal. IIRC, the mailing list system is
> slow, but not t
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 06:02:31PM +0200, Alexander Rabtchevich <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could it be done via additional menu item: open for the lossless
> transformations with only few operations active? The operation itself
> has sense for digital images with portrait orientation. It would
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 11:45:13AM +0100, Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> "free" refers to the terms that source code is distributed at no extra
> charge and with full modification rights, not to the actual price.
Actually, the GPL FAQ says:
Does the GPL allow me to charge a fee f
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 05:59:29PM +0800, steve hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> You will be pleased to know the GIMP is making handsome profits for this
> eBay pirate with no reference to the real name:
It might shock you, but it's completey legal, at least in most jurisdictions.
The (GPL)
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 01:13:51AM -0800, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 09:55:16AM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 10:32:06PM -0800, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > to do it in a was compatible to gimp.
> >
> okay.
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 10:32:06PM -0800, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> first the gimptoolkit needs to work in perl on windows and then gimp
> needs to work there. sorry.
the gimptoolkit works for years now, and so does gimp-perl, e.g. together
with the cygwin-gimp.
The problem is t
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 07:16:53PM +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As it works in coreldraw, inkscape or other tool.
> > Again:
> > designer's work is making documents with correct
> > kerning pairs, so manual kerning is the job of
> > designer's tool (here it is gimp).
>
> We d
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 10:08:30AM +0100, Colin Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got further with installation of GIMP 2 on Solaris, but have hit
> a problem in the Gtk installation, message included below.
>
> Once again, is anyone using GIMP 2 on Solaris ?
I have no idea
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 11:14:38AM -0300, "Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any reason for this, i.e.:
> > - Is tif/lzw compression excluded from gimp or only from the debian
> > build?
>
> only from de debian build.
(some others, too, what you meant was "not from the o
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 01:50:39PM +1000, David Burren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i am curious. do you think that if the adobe geniuses could make their
> > software compile on linux, if it would slow it down.
>
> No. In fact they've got it to compile on a Unix (ie. MacOS X) and
Slightly of
Yours ID chigeck
--
Thank
<>
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 12:43:18PM -0700, Steve Strobel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried using the perspective transform to adjust the corners of the image so the
> section lines would be horizontal and vertical.
That's actually correctly doing what the perspective transform is doing
(try to
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 05:24:51PM +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> writes:
>
> > Get used to it, that's how gimp-developer works :(
>
> Marc, your comment is highly inappropriate.
Eh, really? Yes, maybe I should have said "that's how g
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 01:26:09PM +0100, GSR - FR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what people is used to or the levels for typical images and finaly get
> my patch encouragingly classified as evil, I think I will stop wasting
> time and keep my ideas and suggestions to myself.
Get used to it, that's
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:12:10PM -0600, Eric Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, would you consider removing ESC as a binding to pop you out of
> full-screen mode? I think F11 is a sufficient (and common) toggle for
Well, ESC has a very low probability of being remapped by e.g. a windo
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 10:34:07PM +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > and reconfiguration, for example assign some F# keys to some Filters
> > that are going to be used a lot in a row, but probably not in next
> > work session or image.
>
> I am fully aware of this since I use this
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:14:40PM +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Xvfb. Additionally, I created two init.d scripts to automate the
> > start/stop of Xvfb and GIMP's Perl Server at start-up/shutdown. Both
> > scripts work great when executed manually, but when actually power
>
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 01:16:57PM +, Dave selby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since Debian compiles for a i386 & I have a PIII I have re-compiled
> Gimp, cupsys-driver-gimpprint & libgimpprint1. To my supprise this has
> made no difference.
You can expect a 3-20% performance increase even in
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 10:44:28PM -0600, Timothy Jedlicka bonzopad <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Is a setting of 1 truly equal to a lossless jpg?
No.
> 2. Is file size the only reason not to use quality=1. It still seems like a
> bargain compared to tif file size.
I think so, too, but it's
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 10:40:23AM +, david <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The second is proving trickier. The second dependency is a perl file
> called file::Slurp. Last night I cpan'ed the file. I thought
No matter how often you download and install File::Slurp, rpm won't take
notice of t
I received this, and, since it's probably meant for a larger
forum, forwarded it to the gimp-user mailinglist,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Forwarded message from Nq6 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Subject: contribution.
From: Nq6 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 23:54:05 -0300
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:33:39AM -0500, "Michael J. Hammel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 20:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > We should also consider that xfree86 currently falls aparts exactly
> > because of the board (and wrecks for quite some time already).
>
> Interest
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 01:40:12PM -0700, Daniel Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >with as well - how to take a loosely organized group and work with
> >outside, commercial groups who have more strict rules for interaction.
> >XFree86, Apache, and others all formed boards and/or non-profits to
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 03:09:32PM -0500, "Michael J. Hammel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> XFree86, Apache, and others all formed boards and/or non-profits to help
> deal with the situation. I believe its time the GIMP community
> seriously considered this as well.
We should also consider that x
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:33:31PM -0400, Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh no, you missed the issue. It was not about a whitespace, it was about
> creating a NEWLINE.
>
> There was a whole blank line BELOW the image.
>
> Unless... a whitespace could somehow create that newline...
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 03:27:12PM -0400, Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Try putting it all on one (admittedly ugly) line with no extra spaces:
> >
>
> That's really weird... but it seems to work.
Actually, to reassure you all, that is totally correct, documented,
standardized
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 07:00:53PM -0500, Eric Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not after circles. I'm even lines radiating from the center.
> Did you see the gif link above? Just like that minus the circle in the
> middle.
You could create a striped gradient fiurst and then use the gradi
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 03:44:11PM -0500, Michael Dingwall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subroutine Gimp::gimp_file_load redefined at /(path to Gimp.pm/Gimp.pm on line
> 541
This is probably a bug in gimp-perl with the compatibility syntax. Could
you try to use object-oriented syntax, i.e.
Gim
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 06:14:53PM +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I'm just new to script-fu and gimp. I was not aware scheme is used for
> >scripting in gimp. I loved that. :D Anyway, I've read the script-fu
> >part of the gimp manual. I have a directory tree with abo
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 02:08:05PM +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i need a script to convert x amount of png files into a single xcf
> > file, is that possible ?
>
> Writing that script in Script-Fu or Gimp-Perl should be trivial.
It might also work to just use a current versi
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 04:36:39PM +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are only making things worse if you convert from RGB to CMYK
Not really... people I talked to said they can perfectly handle that
(adjusting colours later in a layout program for example, or simply addign
a mat
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 12:31:56PM +0200, Mariusz Sapinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What surprises me is that among the 60 files i have to work on, i succeed
> with more than 40, and then i've met the problem. Another problem is
> that with the rest of the files, even if i choose "Save As" o
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 12:08:03PM +0200, Mariusz Sapinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "LZW compression in not available due to Unisys pattern enforcement"
>
> I have'n enforced any Unisys pattern? What's going on? How to repair it?
That should read "patent" instead of "pattern". I am not sure
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 01:24:53AM -0700, A Guy Called Tyketto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> If you run ./configure --help, you'll see an option for --disable-perl. The
> perl extentions for Gimp-Perl are enabled by default. so If you don't have
> Gimp-Perl installed, ./configure will blow up. do
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 05:00:42PM -0500, "Gebhart, Mark A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>installed; however, I can do a rlogin to a machine on the network that
>does have gimp. It freezes on my everytime I try to take the
>screenshot. Has anyone had luck doing a screenshot over a remote
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 12:58:12PM +0200, Matthias Brunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we have a lot of document scans, all sized 2432x3482 pixels, and
and which colour depth?
> The problem is that the standard scale algorithm renders the document
> unreadable (some text characters can still b
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 01:52:18AM -0600, Kevin Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that perhaps this can be accomplished with ImageMagick, but I don't
> seem to be able to figure out the proper command line parameters.
Well, you can't do it with ImageMagick ;) It does read the image in,
an
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 12:29:19PM -0600, Scott Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed ImageMagick now can read both xcf and psd files. But I saw a
> couple problems:
You could try xcftopnm, which comes with gimp. Since it starts gimp to
do the job, it's quite slow, but it should work for an
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 08:46:22PM -0600, Greg Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> problems. It appears that someone already has the same issues I have
> with running Script-Fu from perl (just like the tutorials said I would),
> but I am wondering if it applies to just scheme based script fu, or
>
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 07:04:42PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >convert sourcefile -filter mitchell -geometry destfile
>
> ok, I tried thisand I got an image that was not up to par with what can be
> done with Adobe's Image ready doing a similiar process. However, with Gimp, I
We
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 11:35:38AM -0500, PL O'Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually PNG does do animations and they are called MNG.
Actually PNG does NOT do animations, and it's not called MNG ;)
Both tiff and jpeg can store jpeg-like and losless images, they are still
different. MNG and P
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 11:23:38PM +1300, Thomi Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > The striking majority of browsers, not only IE on Windows. And PNG
> > can't do animations, which are very important. So GIF will need to
> > stay around for some time :(
>
> which ones exactly? as stated befo
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 01:35:58AM -0800, Joshua Thorin Messer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, wait when you wrote "Currently browsers do not support PNG
> widely enough to use PNG instead" you might have meant "Currently
The striking majority of browsers, not only IE on Windows. And PNG can't
d
First of all, please don't quote such a long mail without replying to
it. Believe us, we _did_ reeceive the original mail, too ;)
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:26:26PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> *) How does the "Xtns/Script-Fu" menu differ from the "Script-Fu"
> pop-up
> >>> menu?
>
> W
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:28:17PM -0500, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At what point is it better to use The GIMP for batch processing over
> Image Magick?
For one, whenever you want to interactively adjust sth. ImageMagick is a
blind flight, with gimp you can more easily change para
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 07:35:36PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> image resizing from the command line. I know that many of you out there are
> going to point out that ImageMagick will do what I am looking for. I have
> already gone down that path and the image quality of the scaled images is n
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:53:39AM -1000, Denis McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> tried it on a friend's computer and apart from CMYK conversion and print
> preparation it has virtually nothing The Gimp can't do. In the end I bought
Somebody please step forward and implement cheap CMYK sep
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 12:03:14AM +, As Signed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could anyone please help me get a perl script invoked from HTML
> via the local server run Gimp?
Run the script with -v to see gimp's error message. Protocol error 1 most
probably means that gimp couldn't start. Mo
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 07:04:32PM -0500, Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think spam filtering is basically an end-user problem. There is no way
> > to make lists spam-free, so "not large" seems fine to me.
>
> You can, by only permitting subscribers to post to the list, which many
> li
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 04:14:02PM -0500, John Culleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone provide a service to this list of filtering out the spam? the
> volume is not large but it is annoying. My other lists seem spam-free.
I think spam filtering is basically an end-user problem. There
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 08:20:19PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> some more perl-fu'ing (is there a specific perl-fu mailinglist?)
yes, see gimp.pages.de for details.
> Is there anyway to test if a given is a valid gimp image file?
no, and gimp can crash if you feed it garbage. not that ofte
51 matches
Mail list logo
