Sendmail response time issue

2002-02-04 Thread Ray Bowles
I've been experiencing terrible response times in sending mail using outlook, is this a know issue or is it that my setup is botched? My config is as follows: Debian (Potato using proposed updates and security apt-get sites) Sendmail 8.9.3-23 Is anything else necessary? I've been running this se

Welcome to VI Care

2002-02-04 Thread jbd
At http://news.gnhlug.org/article.php?sid=2 is: This is the initial setup for VI Care. There is not much here right now, but as the good book says: "In the beginning there was darkness". Now, its up to the members to add some light! To do so, just click on "Submit News" at the top of this page.

Re: Remote X problem (Linux to SCO Unix)

2002-02-04 Thread Thomas Charron
Quoting Vince McHugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Thomas Charron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I think I'm a little confused. 'Run its app'? > > What is the app? > at this point I would like to get any app (xterm or > xclock) to run, but ultimately there is apparently a > script that launches and open s

Re: Remote X problem (Linux to SCO Unix)

2002-02-04 Thread Vince McHugh
--- "Anthony J. Gabrielson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If your just trying to do apps that no you shouldn't > be interested in > XDM. If I can get to the xdm login and I login as a valid user I THINK (could be wrong) it will run the login script that will start the nessasary apps for the user

RE: Remote X problem (Linux to SCO Unix)

2002-02-04 Thread Vince McHugh
Hey Tim, This may be just what I'm looking for. I will give it a try and let you know how it works. --- "Keller, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Vince, > > I've had luck getting this to work with connecting > to HPUX boxes. After > getting the appropriate xauth/xhost permissions set > pr

Re: Remote X problem (Linux to SCO Unix)

2002-02-04 Thread Derek Atkins
Vince McHugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just to clarify is the xdm login window the standard > SCO GUI login??? Because that IS what I am trying to > do. A google search on "linux x-terminal" (without the quotes) returns a bunch of useful links to answer this question. -derek -- Dere

Re: Remote X problem (Linux to SCO Unix)

2002-02-04 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 14:00:51 PST Vince McHugh said: >> What error do you get at this point? > >The error I get when I type xterm & or xclock & is >"error: can't open display" I don't have your original post, but I seem to remember you doing something like: export DI

Re: Remote X problem (Linux to SCO Unix)

2002-02-04 Thread Vince McHugh
> Thomas Charron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I think I'm a little confused. 'Run its app'? > What is the app? at this point I would like to get any app (xterm or xclock) to run, but ultimately there is apparently a script that launches and open several apps (xterm, xclock and a proprietary dispatc

Re: Remote X problem (Linux to SCO Unix)

2002-02-04 Thread Derek Atkins
Vince McHugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What error do you get at this point? > > The error I get when I type xterm & or xclock & is > "error: can't open display" This means that either: a) DISPLAY isn't set properly, or b) you didn't xhost, or c) you need to hack around with xauth -d

Re: Remote X problem (Linux to SCO Unix)

2002-02-04 Thread Vince McHugh
> Right, there is no response from export. However, > at this point > you should be able to run any X application on sco2 > and it should > display properly linux1. For example, if you run > 'xterm &' on > sco2, it should display fine on linux1. Try it. > > What error do you get at this poin

Commerce Software on Linux question...Sorry for the HTML post

2002-02-04 Thread Ray Bowles
I know this isn't exactly in the scope of what we generally discuss here, but it isn't completely way out there either. So for my own comfort I thought I'd ask anyway so I know I covered all of my bases. If I'm out of the scope of the list lemme know and if you have any suggestions on wh

Re: RH 7.2 bash 2.05.8(1) whacked?

2002-02-04 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Paul Lussier wrote: > I expect Unicode to supercede ASCII about the same time IPv6 supercedes > IPv4. Actually, to make the transition go smoothly, they will probably > implement both simultaneously. > > I expect to pushing up daisies long before either happen. Like I said

Re: RH 7.2 bash 2.05.8(1) whacked?

2002-02-04 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 13:01:32 PST "Karl J. Runge" said: >Sorry, I wasn't clear. Just a nit: I only meant 'export FOO=bar' is >bash specific. Some people work only on Linux where sh -> bash, but in >a heterogeneous environment it could make a difference... (no sh wars pls). Ohh

Re: RH 7.2 bash 2.05.8(1) whacked?

2002-02-04 Thread Karl J. Runge
On Mon, 04 Feb 2002, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >That's not as portable as what Derek wrote. > > That may be so, but unless you're outside the US, or non-English > speaking, how much would that matter? I've always had LANG=C, and > I've never needed to change anything. Sorry

Re: RH 7.2 bash 2.05.8(1) whacked?

2002-02-04 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Derek D. Martin wrote: > This really *shouldn't* be much of a problem, as there are already > well-established routines for decoding Unicode, through which applications > should feed their input at such time as that becomes appropriate. Note > the emphasis on "shouldn't" above

Commerce Software on Linux question...

2002-02-04 Thread Ray Bowles
I know this isn’t exactly in the scope of what we generally discuss here, but it isn’t completely way out there either. So for my own comfort I thought I’d ask anyway so I know I covered all of my bases. If I’m out of the scope of the list lemme know and if you have any suggestions on where

Re: RH 7.2 bash 2.05.8(1) whacked?

2002-02-04 Thread Derek D. Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Benjamin Scott said: > On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Derek D. Martin wrote: > > The problem is that Red Hat, and probably other vendors, have changed the > > default locale. > > Expect this problem to get worse as more and more of the three billion or > so

Re: RH 7.2 bash 2.05.8(1) whacked?

2002-02-04 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 15:43:46 EST Benjamin Scott said: >On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Derek D. Martin wrote: >> The problem is that Red Hat, and probably other vendors, have changed the >> default locale. > > Expect this problem to get worse as more and more of the three billion or >so no

Re: RH 7.2 bash 2.05.8(1) whacked?

2002-02-04 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 12:43:32 PST "Karl J. Runge" said: >That's not as portable as what Derek wrote. That may be so, but unless you're outside the US, or non-English speaking, how much would that matter? I've always had LANG=C, and I've never needed to change anything. Can y

Fwd: Re: RH 7.2 bash 2.05.8(1) whacked?

2002-02-04 Thread Derek D. Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Lussier said: > Couldn't you just: > > export LANG=C Yes, but there may be reasons not to do that. If you're English-speaking and live in the US (which, granted, is most of us) then this works fine for you, since that's basically the be

Re: RH 7.2 bash 2.05.8(1) whacked?

2002-02-04 Thread Karl J. Runge
On Mon, 04 Feb 2002, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Derek D. Martin" said: > > >LANG=en_US > >LC_COLLATE=C > >export LANG LC_COLLATE > > Couldn't you just: > > export LANG=C That's not as portable as what Derek wrote.

Re: RH 7.2 bash 2.05.8(1) whacked?

2002-02-04 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Derek D. Martin wrote: > The problem is that Red Hat, and probably other vendors, have changed the > default locale. Expect this problem to get worse as more and more of the three billion or so non-English-speaking people in the world begin using computers. Personally, I

Re: RH 7.2 bash 2.05.8(1) whacked?

2002-02-04 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 15:19:21 EST "Derek D. Martin" said: >LANG=en_US >LC_COLLATE=C >export LANG LC_COLLATE Couldn't you just: export LANG=C ? -- Seeya, Paul God Bless America! If you're not having fun, you're not doing it rig

Re: [TriLUG] RH 7.2 bash 2.05.8(1) whacked?

2002-02-04 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
James Manning wrote: > > [Rodent of Unusual Size] > > Anyone else seen this? Or have a suggestion on how to proceed? > > sounds like the LANG/LC/etc settings issues. iirc, LC_SORT=C > LANG=C, or something like that. I forget :) *@&#*(&@!!! LANG="en_US", LC_COLLATE=(not set). Changing to LC

Re: RH 7.2 bash 2.05.8(1) whacked?

2002-02-04 Thread Derek D. Martin
Rodent of Unusual Size said: > Something seems *really* whacked out with bash wildcards. > Firstly they aren't being listed in case-sensitive lexical > order (A B C a b c) they way they should be, and secondly > ranges are *really* screwed up: Welcome to the new default behavior of posixly-corre

Re: RH 7.2 bash 2.05.8(1) whacked?

2002-02-04 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 15:12:44 EST Rodent of Unusual Size said: >Something seems *really* whacked out with bash wildcards. Did you check your LANG setting? Make sure it's 'C'. -- Seeya, Paul God Bless America! If you're not having fu

RH 7.2 bash 2.05.8(1) whacked?

2002-02-04 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Something seems *really* whacked out with bash wildcards. Firstly they aren't being listed in case-sensitive lexical order (A B C a b c) they way they should be, and secondly ranges are *really* screwed up: % cd /tmp % mkdir test % cd test % touch A B C a b c % /bin/ls -1 a A b B c C % /bin/ls -1

Re: Spam via sourceforge???

2002-02-04 Thread Kevin D. Clark
Jack Hodgson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Probably not from sourceforge. The spam in question. > > === > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: URGENT BUSINESS PROPOSAL. ( CONFIDENTIAl) > > FROM:BARR.IBRAHIM ALI > > ATTN: Jack Hodgson > > com

Mr. Gates vs. The Patriots

2002-02-04 Thread Bayard Coolidge USG
See today's User Friendly cartoon at http://www.userfriendly.org/static/ for today, until they move it into its permanent URL. Bayard * To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug'

Re: Remote X problem (Linux to SCO Unix)

2002-02-04 Thread Derek Atkins
Vince McHugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Here is what I have done so far... I wont comment on the lack of security, however > On my local linux box (linux1) I typed > > xhost sco2 > it returned the message that sco2 was added to the > access list. Ok, this means that 's

Credit Protection

2002-02-04 Thread Paul Lussier
--- Begin Message --- Thought you might all be interested in this. We often talk about security with respect to computers and networks, but most people never pay attention to their own personal security. Seeya, Paul Place the contents of your wallet on a photocopy machine. Do both sides o

Remote X problem (Linux to SCO Unix)

2002-02-04 Thread Vince McHugh
Hi All, I attempting to set up a Linux desktop at my company. I am using SUSE 7.3. Our core apps run on 2 different SCO Unix servers. To the one we simply telnet into and run it's app (I understand that telnet is insecure but I would like to not turn this thread into that discussion).

Re: Just for Fun... From LinuxWorld

2002-02-04 Thread Jon 'maddog' Hall, Executive Director, Linux International
Greg, And people laugh at me when I talk about my refrigerator someday being on the internet. Thanks for the pictures, and yes, if you had a greater resolution, I would appreciate them. md * To unsubscribe from this list, se