Guys - unfortunately, I think you're barking up the wrong proverbial
tree. I think I understand this problem, but if my answer here is
incorrect, I'm sure that somebody will say so. 8)
The problem is that the application has no control which interface it
uses when opening a socket to a remote
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 06:41:52AM -0500, Cole Tuininga wrote:
The problem is that the application has no control which interface it
uses when opening a socket to a remote system. This is a function of
the network stack within the kernel - not a system call. Hence, this is
not something that
On 3/23/06, Cole Tuininga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is that the application has no control which interface it
uses when opening a socket to a remote system.
man bind(2)
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
On 3/22/06, Bill Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a box with the iso files on it, mounted via the loop
back device, and vsftpd running behind my router.
Is your router between the FTP server and the FTP client? Is the
router performing NAT and/or firewall duty? If so, that
I just want to mention that eventhough the OP was looking for a source code
tool to help him understand the code, the Intel C++ compiler tends to do a
much better job of optimizing C++ code than the current version of G++ does
(although there is now a GCC optimization project going on).
Last
Bill Ricker writes:
The Great Circle GC library works nicely to debug memory leaks, but
their platform/distribution left us. I forget the name of the tool
we're using on AIX now; Purify from IBM/Rational is a top drawer tool
that I've used in the past on other projects for this and some
On Wednesday, Mar 22nd 2006 at 14:30 -0500, quoth Michael ODonnell:
=
=
= What was the name of the tool from Red Hat that did code
= inspections? It was supposed to be the best of them all. It was
= commercial for a while and then RH released it as open src. Anyone?
=
=
=I just installed
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 08:12 -0500, Ben Scott wrote:
On 3/23/06, Cole Tuininga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is that the application has no control which interface it
uses when opening a socket to a remote system.
man bind(2)
Right - this is for *listening* sockets. Sending an
Ben Scott writes:
On 3/22/06, Bill Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a box with the iso files on it, mounted via the loop
back device, and vsftpd running behind my router.
Is your router between the FTP server and the FTP client? Is the
router performing NAT
On Thursday 23 March 2006 8:36 am, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
I *HIGHLY* recommend Valgrind for memory leak detection. It supports
C++ name mangling, and works on multithreaded code.
I've used a large variety of memory checking tools over the years;
Valgrind is one of the very best. The
Cole Tuininga writes:
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 08:12 -0500, Ben Scott wrote:
On 3/23/06, Cole Tuininga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is that the application has no control which interface it
uses when opening a socket to a remote system.
man bind(2)
Right - this is for *listening*
Jerry Feldman writes:
I agree that Valgrind is an excellent tool. However Rational's (IBM's)
Purify Plus puts it to shame for a mere $10,000.
I've found bugs with Valgrind that Purify never found.
I've found bugs with Purify that Valgrind never found.
For serious development, I'd make
On Thursday 23 March 2006 9:52 am, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
Jerry Feldman writes:
I agree that Valgrind is an excellent tool. However Rational's (IBM's)
Purify Plus puts it to shame for a mere $10,000.
I've found bugs with Valgrind that Purify never found.
I've found bugs with Purify that
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 08:56:00AM -0500, Cole Tuininga wrote:
That said, my suspicion would be that this setting only dictates what
interface(s) that postfix *listens* on. Not what interface(s) it sends
mail *out* on.
Nope. When one IP that my machine exists on was blocked by AOL (some
moron
On 3/23/06, Cole Tuininga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
man bind(2)
Right - this is for *listening* sockets.
As Kevin says, it isn't limited to listening sockets. Read the man
page carefully.
Sending an email out requires the server to make a connection to a remote
server - it doesn't use
Cole Tuininga wrote:
Guys - unfortunately, I think you're barking up the wrong proverbial
tree. I think I understand this problem, but if my answer here is
incorrect, I'm sure that somebody will say so. 8)
The problem is that the application has no control which interface it
uses when
Ben Scott writes:
On 3/23/06, Bill Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both machines are on the inside side of the router, from which
point of view I presume that it acts like a switch or hub.
Oh. I believe you are correct, there. So much for that theory. :-/
An
On 3/23/06, Bill Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An interesting additional data point is that if I tell the ftp
client on Knoppix to use passive mode, then I can no longer do
transfers.
Ah-ha! I, too, suspect the cause of that problem is also causing a
problem for the installer. I would
Ben Scott writes:
On 3/23/06, Bill Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An interesting additional data point is that if I tell the ftp
client on Knoppix to use passive mode, then I can no longer do
transfers.
Ah-ha! I, too, suspect the cause of that problem is also causing a
On 3/23/06, Bill Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was a good try. With the subnetword temporarily isolated
from the rest of the world, and the server firewall disabled, I could
ftp from knoppix in passive mode, including data connections ...
Woo who!
... but FC5 installer still
Ben Scott wrote:
Since that obviously sucks for any number of reasons, passive mode
was created. PASV has the *server* listen on an ephemeral port, which
it tells the client about. The client then connects to that port for
the data channel.
Just a minor nit; PASV mode wasn't invented to
I always say things that are wrong and discover within 5 minutes of
saying them that they are wrong.
IE has an option to use passive mode in Internet Options. I saw it just
now when trying to find another option. (I'm doing something for work
that pretty much requires IE at the moment.)
I
On 3/23/06, John Abreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a minor nit; PASV mode wasn't invented to deal with firewalls; if I
recall correctly, it was part of the ftp spec early on, and its intended
purpose was for server-to-server transfers.
Ah. Interesting. I stand corrected.
On 3/23/06,
On 3/23/06, Jason Stephenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always say things that are wrong and discover within 5 minutes of
saying them that they are wrong.
It always happens after posting in a public forum. I think it's a
law of nature or something.
I just wanted to admit my mistake before
Ben Scott wrote:
Perhaps, an upgrade or a switch to a different firewall software is in order.
What are you using now?
Currently, it is a relatively old release of IP Filter (ipf) from
http://coombs.anu.edu.au/~avalon/ that was hacked up by the OpenBSD
folks before the licensing
Jason Stephenson writes:
... It must have something to do with that machine having an AT
keyboard port and I'm using an AT/PS-2 adapter to connect it to the
KVM.)
At keyboard and PS/2 keyboard use the same electrical and
signalling protocol. An adapter is just connectors and wire,
26 matches
Mail list logo
