Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My apologies. As I said, I am a linux novice. I actually don't know
> how svn is hosted. Django is definitely mod_python. I'm pretty sure
> Trac is CGI. I'm pretty sure svn is *not* hosted on my private Apache
> and does not have a process running under m
Does anyone know a virtual environment for the PPC-based Macs? I have
a PowerBook G4 that I'd like to be able to play with some stuff on.
Specifically, I'd like to play around with a couple of the BSDs and
possibly some different Linux distros.
I found QEMU in Darwin ports, but it doesn't suppor
Paul Lussier wrote:
Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Trac and svn are running as CGIs behind Apache. I have access to the
app-specific config files but not the Apache instance that runs them.
What do you mean by this? How is svn run as a CGI behind Apache?
My apologies. As I said,
"Thomas Charron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 3/9/07, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Trac and svn are running as CGIs behind Apache. I have access to the
>> > app-specific config files but not the Apache instance that runs them.
>> What
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'd like to do is have
each function in a C source file appear in different subfiles. But I
want to be able to perform text operations over the whole bunch of
them... query-replace, isearch-forward, etc.
I don't think it would require any extra structure in
For those of you that have Palm Pilots that automatically update for
DST, the Palm company has given out a free update to all their models
which adjust automatically:
http://News.palmnewsletters.com/cgi-bin13/DM/y/ekJa0PWZkg0HXE0Zlu0G1
This even covers models that are quite old:
* Treo 70
On 3/9/07, David A. Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The iptables NETMAP target looks like it might do this
efficiently ...
It may. I don't know if NETMAP also invokes the connection tracking
and packet rewriting stuff or not. If not, then protocols which need
to know about their own addresse
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 17:42 -0500, Ben Scott wrote:
> On 3/9/07, Jon 'maddog' Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Anyone know what the facts are here?
> > >
> > 1900 was not a leap year
>
> Now, I *know* you're way smart enough to understand what I was
> asking there, and "Was 1900 a leap
On 3/9/07, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Trac and svn are running as CGIs behind Apache. I have access to the
> app-specific config files but not the Apache instance that runs them.
What do you mean by this? How is svn run as a CGI behind Apac
Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Trac and svn are running as CGIs behind Apache. I have access to the
> app-specific config files but not the Apache instance that runs them.
What do you mean by this? How is svn run as a CGI behind Apache?
--
Seeya,
Paul
--
Key fingerprint = 1660 FECC
I have a small sequential block of public IP addresses I would like to
filter through to matching servers on my private network. The iptables
NETMAP target looks like it might do this efficiently (combined with a
lot of other rules to filter out unwanted traffic). But I cannot
understand how the
On 3/9/07, Jon 'maddog' Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone know what the facts are here?
>
1900 was not a leap year
Now, I *know* you're way smart enough to understand what I was
asking there, and "Was 1900 a leap year?" was obviously not it. I can
only assume you're being obtuse o
"Ben Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 3/9/07, Jerry Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Apparently, not only does Windows need to be patched, but also various
>> programs.
>
> That much is hardly unique to Microsoft. Among other things, Sun's
> Java Runtime Environment needs fixes. P
> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 12:44:30 -0500
> X-Authentication-Warning: cmarib.ramside: rusat set sender to
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> mp3s can be stored in multiple directories but are all sorted
> alphabetically by filename on boot, so the sort order of the base
> filenames is the order in which the
On March 09, 2007, Drew Van Zandt sent me the following:
> Does anyone in the LUG have colocation experience with MV
> communications? I know I've heard good things in general about them
> on the LUG, but I'm specifically looking for experience with their
> Manchester colocation facility. The gir
>
> Anyone know what the facts are here?
>
1900 was not a leap yearyup, pretty sure that is true:
http://www.dpbsmith.com/leapyearfaq.txt
So anything else was and is a bug, and should be fixed, not
"standardized" and (IMHO) because it was a stupid bug, the bug fix
should be freely availa
On 3/9/07, Drew Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone in the LUG have colocation experience with MV
communications?
You might say that. The GNHLUG website and/or mailing list have
been hosted with MV, in their Manchester colo facility, for years.
Free of charge. I think we've only
On 3/9/07, Bill Sconce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
4 OpenXML supports two systems for converting numbers to their date format
representations:
5 1. The 1900 date base system represents the technical decisions,
including technical errors, of a prominent
6 early spreadsheet implementa
On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:39:51 -0400
Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been using them [MV] for years, and have had no trouble. The only
> time they seem to have power problems is when the power is out for over 3
> hours (like the substation fire a few years ago). Although I don't know
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:15:33 -0500
"Jon 'maddog' Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
md> The document can be accessed at
md>http://www.computerworld.com/pdfs/Ecma.pdf.
md> Best Regards,
md> Jomar
Indeed. Dates off? No problem:
4 OpenXML supports two systems for converting numbers
I've been using them for years, and have had no trouble. The only time
they seem to have power problems is when the power is out for over 3
hours (like the substation fire a few years ago). Although I don't know
if they have that much capacity in the UPS.
The bandwidth depends on your price - the
Christopher Schmidt wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 06:28:29AM -0500, Kent Johnson wrote:
In my new job I am hosting a web site at WebFactional. I thought you
might be interested in some first impressions.
I believe webfaction -- which it looks like is the same thing as
webfactional -- is run b
On Mar 9, 2007, at 10:17 AM, Drew Van Zandt wrote:
Does anyone in the LUG have colocation experience with MV
communications? I know I've heard good things in general about them
on the LUG, but I'm specifically looking for experience with their
Manchester colocation facility. The girl on the pho
Does anyone in the LUG have colocation experience with MV
communications? I know I've heard good things in general about them
on the LUG, but I'm specifically looking for experience with their
Manchester colocation facility. The girl on the phone said they had
UPS's but no backup generator, so u
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 06:28:29AM -0500, Kent Johnson wrote:
>
>
> Ted Roche wrote:
> >A client with a database-backed LAMP application is considering moving
> >to a new hosting provider for their system. Surfing the web, they find
> >all of these $6.95/month deals and can't figure out why an
On Mar 9, 2007, at 6:28 AM, Kent Johnson wrote:
In my new job I am hosting a web site at WebFactional. I thought you
might be interested in some first impressions.
We are hosted at the Shared 1 level ($9.50 / month). At present I am
running a minimal Django app, a Trac site and a Subversion
r
On 3/9/07, Jerry Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Apparently, not only does Windows need to be patched, but also various programs.
That much is hardly unique to Microsoft. Among other things, Sun's
Java Runtime Environment needs fixes. Plenty of application software
will need attention, to
On 3/9/07, Jon 'maddog' Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is that a per-system $4,000., or a site-wide $4,000.?
$4000 gets you all of the DST fixes for this issue, for Exchange and
Windows, for your organization. I haven't read the EULA, but I
presume you cannot give it out to people outside yo
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:54:35 -0500
Jason Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really can't understand all the fuss over something that we've had
> nearly two years to prepare? Don't those people run a real operating system?
I heard that the MSFT patch for Exchange costs $4000. The Linux patc
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:21:32 -0500
"Jon 'maddog' Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Microsoft's path is so much easier. Just brain-wash everyone to think
> that whatever you do is "standard". A much easier path. Even Pope
> Gregory would have agreed on that point.
They followed IBM's lead. The
Ted Roche wrote:
A client with a database-backed LAMP application is considering moving
to a new hosting provider for their system. Surfing the web, they find
all of these $6.95/month deals and can't figure out why anyone would pay
more. I know there are a number of folks on the list who pro
31 matches
Mail list logo
