On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 22:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> With all due respect, there's been no follow-up on anything. Just
> lobbing a request out to the list at large asking for volunteers
> doesn't work well. We've had precisely 1 "planning" meeting where
> some number of action items wer
This discussion *really* needs to move to the discuss list:
In a message dated: 28 Jan 2004 19:56:43 EST
Bruce Dawson said:
>> > I didn't understand that's what was needed of the "library project". For
>> > some reason, I got the impression that it needs some programming and
>> > presentations,
In a message dated: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:42:49 EST
Rob Lembree said:
>The original posting identified the library as Nashua Public. I
>don't have time to hand-hold more than one at the moment. The
>rest are details that I'd work out with the contributors. For
>example, you can mail them to me,
In a message dated: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:32:59 EST
Ed Lawson said:
>I am going to contact the presenter and see what might be done.
>I will report back to this list with his response.
How about reporting back to the general discussion list and including
some background on what's going on, and a
In a message dated: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:32:46 EST
Rob Lembree said:
>This is a perfect example of something that we should be involved
>with. My year-old grand scheme would be that Ed or someone step
>forward with the opportunity, volunteer to lead a project, and
>ask for participation. A few p
In a message dated: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:22:55 EST
Rob Lembree said:
>On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 10:19, Ed Lawson wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:21:25 -0500
>> Rob Lembree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > Case in point: I'm now doing the public library project all
>> > by myself, because it's
In a message dated: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:19:19 EST
Rob Lembree said:
>> Do anything! Like the library project! Like the web site. Like the
>> distribution disks. Like the booth at Hosstraders.
>>
>> It seems we have a problem coordinating things with multiple people
>> (except probably drinking b
In a message dated: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:56:03 EST
Ed Lawson said:
>I think the issue rob is point out is that he did ask for help on the
>list. I think the only person other than me who responded was Randy out
>in the pacific. There is no mechanism for getting a few people together
>and mulling
Sorry for not joining this earlier. I have so little time lately,
and I'm so far behind in e-mail (approx. 2200 unread messages and
counting :(
In a message dated: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:21:25 EST
Rob Lembree said:
>We have the paperwork complete, and I am willing to donate the
>$25 filing fee -
On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 13:36, Randy Edwards wrote:
> > For example the Ruby session coming up could be followed by one showing
> > how to use a common application such as Gaim or Firebird or Abiword, [...]
>
> I think if the goal is to broaden the group beyond geeks/coders/admins,
> that idea
For example the Ruby session coming up could be followed by one showing
how to use a common application such as Gaim or Firebird or Abiword, [...]
I think if the goal is to broaden the group beyond geeks/coders/admins,
that idea is a must. Ed's perspective of keeping apps in mind is a key for
I think the only person other than me who responded was Randy out
in the pacific.
Actually, I'm now back in NH, dipping my toes into the job market here
(now I know what they mean when they say "jobless economic recovery"?!:-).
--
Regards, | There are 10 kinds of people in the world:
.
ere talking about until I went pawing through the archives.
No, I meant this:
>
>
> From:
> Ed Lawson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
> Re:
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 19:56, Bruce Dawson wrote:
>
> > > I didn't understand that's what was needed of the "library project". For
> > > some reason, I got the impression that it needs some programming and
> > > presentations, ...
> > Just CDs for the moment. It'd be nice to do talks too, and th
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 17:42, Rob Lembree wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 17:16, Bruce Dawson wrote:
>
> > Hmmm. I think we dropped something - Ed's workshop possibility - unless
> > he's described this earlier (like: weeks or months ago).
> He mentioned it this afternoon in this thread. Linux trai
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 17:16, Bruce Dawson wrote:
> Hmmm. I think we dropped something - Ed's workshop possibility - unless
> he's described this earlier (like: weeks or months ago).
He mentioned it this afternoon in this thread. Linux training
with the guy from Maine, for educators, etc.
> But,
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 15:09, Ed Lawson wrote:
> On 28 Jan 2004 15:17:01 -0500
> Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But I suspect others might have similar requirements. And most people
> > aren't familiar with the tools (hmmm: that could be a meeting topic),
> I think it has been raised be
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 16:06, Rob Lembree wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 15:09, Ed Lawson wrote:
> > So we are going to have dinner before the meeting next week or beer
> > afterwards and redesign the world or what?
> I might be able to make it up there for such a meeting.
> I'd suggest that afterwa
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 16:04, Rob Lembree wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 15:17, Bruce Dawson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 14:19, Rob Lembree wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 10:56, Bruce Dawson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 10:21, Rob Lembree wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 10:06
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 15:09, Ed Lawson wrote:
> On 28 Jan 2004 15:17:01 -0500
> Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > But I suspect others might have similar requirements. And most people
> > aren't familiar with the tools (hmmm: that could be a meeting topic),
>
> I think it has
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 15:17, Bruce Dawson wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 14:19, Rob Lembree wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 10:56, Bruce Dawson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 10:21, Rob Lembree wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 10:06, Bruce Dawson wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 08:2
On 28 Jan 2004 15:17:01 -0500
Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But I suspect others might have similar requirements. And most people
> aren't familiar with the tools (hmmm: that could be a meeting topic),
I think it has been raised before and you have raised it again. It
would absol
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:32:46 -0500
Rob Lembree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simple as that, if people volunteer.
I am going to contact the presenter and see what might be done.
I will report back to this list with his response.
Ed Lawson
___
Gnhlug-or
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 14:19, Rob Lembree wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 10:56, Bruce Dawson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 10:21, Rob Lembree wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 10:06, Bruce Dawson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 08:26, Ed Lawson wrote:
> > > > > On 27 Jan 2004 22:13:06 -0500
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 10:56, Ed Lawson wrote:
> On 28 Jan 2004 10:56:33 -0500
> Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > I think you're doing the right thing - then advertise the effort to
> > the GNHLUG group. Sure, solicit help, (which you did), and it'll come
> > if there's sufficient i
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 10:19, Ed Lawson wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:21:25 -0500
> Rob Lembree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Case in point: I'm now doing the public library project all
> > by myself, because it's something I believe it, and because
> > nobody stepped forward to help out.
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 10:56, Bruce Dawson wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 10:21, Rob Lembree wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 10:06, Bruce Dawson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 08:26, Ed Lawson wrote:
> > > > On 27 Jan 2004 22:13:06 -0500
> > > > Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:21:25 -0500
Rob Lembree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Case in point: I'm now doing the public library project all
> by myself, because it's something I believe it, and because
> nobody stepped forward to help out.
Bob, you must have missed by e-mail. I have collections o
On 28 Jan 2004 10:56:33 -0500
Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you're doing the right thing - then advertise the effort to
> the GNHLUG group. Sure, solicit help, (which you did), and it'll come
> if there's sufficient interest.
I think the issue rob is point out is that he did
On 28 Jan 2004 10:06:38 -0500
Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I believe you have your gripes with the group - considering all the
> "waffling" we've done on the "formalization" of the group.
No, it was never a point of dispute. I believe there is value in having
a legal entity for t
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 10:21, Rob Lembree wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 10:06, Bruce Dawson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 08:26, Ed Lawson wrote:
> > > On 27 Jan 2004 22:13:06 -0500
> > > Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I'd like to suggest that the groups have created a comfortab
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 10:06, Bruce Dawson wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 08:26, Ed Lawson wrote:
> > On 27 Jan 2004 22:13:06 -0500
> > Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'd like to suggest that the groups have created a comfortable
> > > structure and that they feel they don't need Quar
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 08:26, Ed Lawson wrote:
> On 27 Jan 2004 22:13:06 -0500
> Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to suggest that the groups have created a comfortable
> > structure and that they feel they don't need Quarterly "global"
> > meetings anymore. But that they do like
On 27 Jan 2004 22:13:06 -0500
Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to suggest that the groups have created a comfortable
> structure and that they feel they don't need Quarterly "global"
> meetings anymore. But that they do like (or don't care about) the
> infrastructure that GNHLUG
34 matches
Mail list logo
