My experience is that Edge Cache bounces between on, and off, and you can't
depend on it working. Oddly, It has never not worked for my MS Apps, only
my HR have issues.
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Joshua Bronson
Sent: Thursday
i got the answer. It is the "to" and "bcc" field setup problem.
I used to like set bcc field to send mail, but GAE did't allow me to only
set bcc. Then i set the "to" and "bcc" field at the same time, and for the
gmail recipients, the gmail server will filter the same mail for duplicate
mails
Hi Joshua,
The edge cache is just that - a cache. It doesn't guarantee that no 304
requests will reach your app, only that they will be satisfied by the cache
if possible - and if the headers you set permit it. The more popular your
content is, the more effect you're likely to see from the cache.
nice idea but you are not counting the "search for an entity that is 3+
months old" data stores cycle
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Rishi Arora wrote:
> In my app I have a an Entity group that stores user activity data - like a
> high level application log of user activity. This is the En
Ah yes, good point. So I suppose I should assume I'm not saving any CPU
cycles. And cycles spent in a end-of-day cron job deleting old data, will
now be spent searching for old entities at the time of writing new ones. I
also found out that reading an entity and writing it back with a different
I just read inside this discussion:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/29836be55ad7491d/f4039f9f27f31617
...that the query performance is not improved significantly.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engin
Here's what I read in the documentation:
For front-ends:
(http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/urlfetch/overview.html#Requests)
"*You can set a deadline for a request, the most amount of time the service
will wait for a response. By default, the deadline for a fetch is 5 seconds.
The maximum
Hi,
I am trying to know user presence on my application.
If i add xmpp presence service to my application, can i get all the users
status who are registered my application or all the users of gtalk?
I have tried adding xmpp presence, request coming to one of my servlet but
it saying that
I have this problem from my app that uses federated login. When I try enable
datastore admin it says
Error: Not Found The requested URL
/_ah/login_required?continue=http://ah-builtin-python-bundle-dot-latest-dot-.appspot.com/_ah/datastore_admin/was
not found on this server.
--
You received th
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Nick Johnson
wrote:
> Hi Joshua,
>
> The edge cache is just that - a cache. It doesn't guarantee that no 304
> requests will reach your app, only that they will be satisfied by the cache
> if possible - and if the headers you set permit it. The more popular your
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Brandon Wirtz wrote:
> My experience is that Edge Cache bounces between on, and off, and you can’t
> depend on it working. Oddly, It has never not worked for my MS Apps, only
> my HR have issues.
>
It sounds like it's related to request rate and not M/S vs HR. J
Going through a similar process myself.
(combining multiple entities into single entities as bundles of Json)
I think it's a good idea and I think you will want to do experiments
to see what size works best for you.
I have made it so I can tweak the point at which my entities are
forked into sepa
I have the same problem.. Datastore quota at 100% and unable to delete an
entity either through admin or using map/reduce. What I did is set up a
script to delete x records at a time. I've managed to decrease data by 45%
in 2 days but I then hit cpu quota so I'm guessing it's gonna take a few
m
>From my experience (at least with Java) I believe sleep() continues to eat
cpu time despite the cpu not really doing anything. My cpu times skyrocketed
when I used sleep() with long-held http connections to implement http push
back before channel api was available. I recommend breaking the work
Thanks for the input. If you don't mind me asking, how large were
your entities when you noticed deserialization taking a long time?
Cheers,
Steve
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Suppose you have lots of entities of a certain kind in the datastore
and you want to change some of their properties (e.g. of type
StringProperty) to unindexed (whereas they were previously indexed).
Once you set indexed=False on the property, what happens to the
existing index? Does it get delet
current instances for my small site:
0.683 156.9 ms58 0 0:03:14 87.4 MBytes Dynamic
Icon Dynamic
0.050 0.0 ms 1 0 0:00:07 54.1 MBytes Dynamic Icon
Dynamic
0.017 177.0 ms4 0 0:23:48 76.6 MBytes Dynamic
I
After about 4 minutes, instance snapshot:
0.200 356.3 ms18 0 0:03:46 88.2 MBytes Dynamic
Icon Dynamic
0.050 16726.0 ms 1 0 0:00:28 74.3 MBytes Dynamic
Icon Dynamic
0.000 0.0 ms 4 0 0:27:26 76.6 MBytes Dynam
Another 4 minutes passed,
0.000 0.0 ms 4 0 0:04:21 78.8 MBytes Dynamic Icon
Dynamic
0.000 0.0 ms 4 0 0:31:20 76.6 MBytes Dynamic Icon
Dynamic
The idle instance still haven't handle any requests in the new 4
minutes.
On Sep 17, 2:06 am, Tapir
On Sep 16, 10:37 am, Alex Epshteyn
wrote:
> Suppose you have lots of entities of a certain kind in the datastore
> and you want to change some of their properties (e.g. of type
> StringProperty) to unindexed (whereas they were previously indexed).
>
> Once you set indexed=False on the property,
we are using federated login to enable openid authentication,
It throws the below errror when we try to access via google
authentication,
http://xyz.appspot.com/_ah/login_required?openid=google.com/accounts/o8/id&continue=
Error: Server Error
The server encountered an error and could not complete
I'm experiencing issues with the Channel API only being able to
successfully send 1 message to my connected clients. After the one
message is received any subsequent messages are not received by the
client until I reestablish the socket connection?
Is this related to this service outage?
Client
You're not the first to make these points.
Unfortunately I don't think they are widely understood.
And for that reason GAE may be fatally wounded from the recent poorly
informed outrage.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To
helps-> /_ah/login_redir?claimid=*www.*
google.com/accounts/o8/id&continue=...
we need to know why this happens
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Rishi Arora wrote:
> In my app I have a an Entity group that stores user activity data - like a
> high level application log of user activity. This is the Entity Group that
> I expect to grow the fastest over time, and I have decided to keep only the
> last 3 mont
This morning, the openId-login on one of my applications, suddenly stopped
working.
I use the following basic code (found on
http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/openid.html#fa)
<%
Map openIdProviders;
openIdProviders = new HashMap();
openIdProviders.put("Google", "google.com/accounts/o
Hi there,
We are using the Mail Java API to send emails from our application,
and we have found that some reason we don't know, there are certain
emails that don't reach recipients at Google Apps accounts. There no
errors while sending and there are no bounces.
This happens when we try to reach j
http://www.help-live-chat.com is suffering too and the same error
still persists after many errors. Keeping an eye out on the outage
page but no activity there.
On Sep 15, 3:05 pm, ShinTEZUKA wrote:
> Me too... I got that error a few hours ago. But 7 hours ago, it woks
> fine(in JAPAN).
> And it
Iam also facing the same problem from today morning
as James Broberg told,I used www.google.com instead of google.com it
works fine..
http://xyz.appspot.com/_ah/login_required?openid=www.google.com/accounts/o8/id&continue=
Thanks,
Vivek
On Sep 16, 10:54 am, Lucian Baciu wrote:
> My users are s
Hello,
We received several remote API call: I/O errors while call the remote api at
3:02 AM East Coast last night. Was there a brief outage or was some
maintenance occurring?
Thank You,
- steve
com.google.appengine.tools.remoteapi.RemoteApiException: remote API call:
I/O error
at
co
Hi,
I'm trying to do some work with openid - I don't want to use the federated
login as I also want to support
facebook connect. (I'm open to advice on the best approach to do this, but
for now, I've been looking into
rolling my own openid functionality).
I've been looking at the example provid
FWIW I find myself really wanting to be able to set different settings
for different versions as well. Here's my use case.
We have apps that check in with a server for messages related to
product promotion, down services, house ads etc. As new versions of
our product come out, we got better at pas
첨부가 없어요.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:56 PM, ramesh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to know user presence on my application.
>
> If i add xmpp presence service to my application, can i get all the users
> status who are registered my application or all the users of gtalk?
>
> I have tried adding x
> > The edge cache is just that - a cache. It doesn't guarantee that no 304
> > requests will reach your app, only that they will be satisfied by the cache
> > if possible - and if the headers you set permit it. The more popular your
> > content is, the more effect you're likely to see from the cac
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Bryce Cutt wrote:
>
> The onus is always on you to have as many levels of cache in place as
> you can get away with so, depending on what you are caching, you are
> going to benefit from using the edge cache, memcache, and instance
> global variable caching all at
I have to say, I went through the same thing. I originally saw my costs go
up about 8x with the new pricing, so I posted that I was going to look into
other options. I did, and they seemed comparable, but transferring the
database was going to be a cost problem. Then we got the news that the
ins
Maybe I have also encounter this problem.
Half of my website new users didn't activate their account.
I really don't know if they have received the activation email or not.
Neither errors returned nor emails bounced when sending the
activations emails.
It is very frustrated.
Luis wrote:
> Hi there
The first question I would ask is: Is this really a problem? Have
you looked at your bill and decided for certain that the savings would
be worth changing your code & possibly cluttering your business logic?
That said, I would be tempted to see what optimization you can make
with memcache. Seem
The new 28 hours free computing is absolutely a right decision.
But I think the overall prices are still too high.
On Sep 17, 2:36 am, Rachel Gollub wrote:
> I have to say, I went through the same thing. I originally saw my costs go
> up about 8x with the new pricing, so I posted that I was goin
I test send emails to an address that doesn't exist at all.
But there is still no errors returned or emails bounced.
So I think the send-mail system of gae is problematic.
On Sep 17, 2:38 am, Tapir wrote:
> Maybe I have also encounter this problem.
> Half of my website new users didn't activate t
Hi,
I am using JAXWS 2.1 client on GAE 1.5.4 and gets the following exception.
com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.reflect.Accessor$FieldReflection :
Unable to make javax.xml.ws.wsaddressing.W3CEndpointReference.address
accessible.
java.lang.SecurityException: java.lang.IllegalAccessException:
Reflectio
Hi Jeff,
Yes, it's really a concern. Previously fetching 20 small sequential
entities cost about the same as fetching 1 large entity 20x the size of the
small ones. Now it's costing 10-20x as much because of the per-read (and
per write for puts) pricing.
I'm already using memcache extensivel
Hi Tapir,
I do agree it is really frustrating. Did you create an issue? If not,
I would suggest you create one to have someone from the GAE team
looking at this.
I did create one last Monday (http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/
issues/detail?id=5876), but didn't get any feedback. Just that
Does a Model.put() call incur Write Ops for every indexed property in
an entity regardless of whether the actual property values have
changed?
In other words, if I update a stored entity having only changed one
property, does the datastore update just that one index with 2 write
ops (asc & desc) o
The B1 backend specs are the same as frontend specs.
Will we be able to buy discounted instance-hours for backend B1
instances?
Any possibility of a similar discount being applied to B2/B3/B4 for
pre-commitment?
j
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"G
In the billing history, I see:
Resource Used Free Billable
Charge
Datastore Writes: $1.00/Million Ops 0.050.050.00$0.00
Datastore Reads: $0.70/Million Ops 0.060.050.01$0.01
what the free 0.05 means? 0.05 * Million Ops = 50k o
I have no proof, but I think Edge cache is X size for all of Google. And
When Google Traffic goes up, your app gets less edgecache. This is
conjecture. But based on how I would design a system, and what I have seen
of the way it works... I think that they can't give you a spec because you
are po
Generally email api's will not be able to tell you if you are sending
to a bad email address. Just because mail.send returns to you it does
not mean the email has actually been sent. It may sit in a queue for
an arbitrary amount of time before going out. The issue however, is
that gae email has
If I use aws, why I should still use gae?
On Sep 16, 5:02 pm, JH wrote:
> Generally email api's will not be able to tell you if you are sending
> to a bad email address. Just because mail.send returns to you it does
> not mean the email has actually been sent. It may sit in a queue for
> an arb
We don't plan to provide it just yet but could do so in the future.
Greg
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Jason Collins wrote:
> The B1 backend specs are the same as frontend specs.
>
> Will we be able to buy discounted instance-hours for backend B1
> instances?
>
> Any possibility of a similar
Hey everyone,
Yeah, that's the correct fix. The original documentation should have shown
that the www prefix is the officially supported prefix.
Is there anyone that can't deploy a change with this fix anytime soon? There
is a fix being worked on but it won't go out soon.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer P
The same to me!
HELP!! ..
On Sep 16, 12:49 am, Vivek Madurai
wrote:
> we are using federated login to enable openid authentication,
>
> It throws the below errror when we try to access via google
> authentication,http://xyz.appspot.com/_ah/login_required?openid=google.com/accounts/...
>
> Er
Change the url to be www.google.com instead of google.com.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
plus.ikailan.com | twitter.com/ikai
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Miguel wrote:
> The same to me!
>
> HELP!! ..
>
> On Sep 16, 12:49 am, Vivek Madurai
> wrote:
> > we
Bump #3
=)
On 12 September 2011 00:38, Sergey Schetinin wrote:
> Bump #2
>
> On 7 September 2011 13:53, Sergey Schetinin wrote:
>> Bump
>> On Sunday, 4 September 2011 14:20:31 UTC+3, Sergey Schetinin wrote:
>>>
>>> So when we deploy a new version, let's assume there was one instance
>>> running
> > The onus is always on you to have as many levels of cache in place as
> > you can get away with so, depending on what you are caching, you are
> > going to benefit from using the edge cache, memcache, and instance
> > global variable caching all at the same time.
>
> Sure, but when designing ou
I take that back, a rollback was completed after all. This issue should not
be affecting users anymore
For future reference, the www prefix is the officially supported prefix (it
also works better). I've updated this article to use the full URL:
http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/openid.ht
Somehow I found I have some data are categorized as "NULL" property by
checking it in the admin console, Datastore Statistics (As attached image).
And the size is 119MBytes.
And I found one of my model have duplicated properties, for example.
comment Text 780 Bytes (0% of the entity)
comment N
57 matches
Mail list logo
