[google-appengine] [Python] Endpoints vs ProtoRPC ~200ms overhead

I'm not sure it's even possible (to reduce the overhead), and I do understand there's another infrastructure layer that uses ProtoPRC lib, but still comare this: @endpoints.api(name='test', version='v1') class EndpointsTest(remote.Service): @endpoints.method(VoidMessage, TestMsg) def test(re

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.7.7 is now available!

https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=9167 On Apr 12, 2013 6:21 PM, "tz" wrote: > I have the same problem as Panjie: I can no longer use the api explorer > on the local development server, instead it gets redirected to > https://developers.**google.com/apis-explorer/#p/

[google-appengine] Different python ProtocolBuffer implementations on dev and prod

eworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/pickle.py", line 858, in load dispatch[key](self) File "/opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/pickle.py", line 1083, in load_newobj obj = cls.__new__(cls, *args) AttributeError: class

[google-appengine] Re: Python Cloud Endpoints Cache Control headers

n Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:19 PM, alex wrote: > Hey guys, I was trying to set cache-control headers today (see old emails > below) and seem to bump into the same issue: both dev and production servers > always respond with "cache-control: no-cache". > > Just wanted to check i

[google-appengine] Python Cloud Endpoints Cache Control headers

ble yet. There doesn't seem to be anything related on the public issues tracker. Thanks! -- alex -- Forwarded message -- From: "Danny Hermes" Date: Nov 2, 2012 12:33 AM Subject: Re: Python Endpoints Expires headers > Doug, > > Thanks for bringing this up. It

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Important for Python developers - Updates to the Development Server in 1.7.6

On Friday, March 22, 2013 12:35:37 PM UTC-4, Kaan Soral wrote: > No one forces anyone to use anything, you can always use previous versions > of SDK/Devappserver > > They've stated why It's currently not possible to debug with > devappserver2, as someone watching the development of devappserver2

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Important for Python developers - Updates to the Development Server in 1.7.6

python appengine users will turn to when first running into a problem. If you no longer wish to support pdb, then at the very least, I think google should provide a supported and documented alternative. https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=9027 --Alex -- You received t

[google-appengine] Re: Very large entity ids on 1.7.6 dev server

On Thursday, March 21, 2013 5:10:30 AM UTC-4, Jesse Rohwer wrote: > We are aware of this issue and will have it fixed before we release > scattered ids in production. Does this mean that scattered ids will become the default id generation strategy in production? How does that affect allocate_i

[google-appengine] Search API: duplicate document ID found (#8553)

I think there's a little bug in the search.put() of SDK 1.7.6. Maybe it's the desired behaviour but please correct me if I'm doing something wrong here: The following seem to fail (where it shouldn't, I think) running SDK 1.7.6: doc1 = search.Document(fields=[... valid search fields ...]) # i

[google-appengine] How to create a domain of the fourth level

example: buy.techsoft.appspot.com how is this achieved? P.S. sorry for my English, I'm from Russia. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google

[google-appengine] Re: Still getting blank page for Datastore Admin link

On Sunday, March 17, 2013 12:45:10 PM UTC-4, Carl Schroeder wrote: > Using Go appengine 1.7.4 SDK. > Tried disabling and enabling datastore admin. > Supposedly this was fixed. > > Ideas anyone? > This can happen if you are logged into more than 1 google account at the same time. You can go dire

[google-appengine] Re: Blobstore filename created in MapReduce job too long to create BlobKey

27;t causing the job to finalize properly and therefore not getting the shorter filename. I would take a look at your logs to see if there are any errors. They may be causing the MR job to not finish properly and then return unfinalized filenames. --Alex -- You received this message because

[google-appengine] latency and pending_time in RequestLog

_time + latency In other words, latency, start_time, end_time all have to do with processing the request, while pending_time is the wait before processing starts. Is this correct? Also, the App Engine dashboard logs, there is a timing field. Is that latency or latency + pending_time? Thanks! --Ale

Re: [google-appengine] Re: our app is awesome slow recently

How about profiling your app first and posting results here before "demanding" any answers to questions that are probably really hard to answer w/o a decenlty developed telepathic ability? On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:10 PM, FrEaKmAn wrote: > Hello, > > I can also confirm that my clients app is also

[google-appengine] Re: Query speed benchmarks

On Saturday, February 23, 2013 4:59:45 PM UTC-7, GAEfan wrote: > So, let's say I wanted to make a version of Twitter. If I wanted to > search for any tweets in the datastore with a certain #hashtag, that seems > best handled asynchronously. Speed is important there. What to do? > Running a

[google-appengine] Re: Query speed benchmarks

ng django non-rel is that you can't use async RPC calls which can make a big difference if you're doing a lot of calls in a request. ndb also has memcache builtin which is nice. You can use memcache with django but most of the libraries which do this transparently are not designed with even

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine 1.7.5 SDK now available!

Ryan, I hope you actually meant your message to be a big joke. From the point I'm standing at, there's no other platform that can beat App Engine today in terms of completeness, easiness of development and deployment, autoscailing feature, extra services/APIs and stuff like Cloud Endpoints. If yo

Re: [google-appengine] Penetration Testing on Google App Engine Applications

ps. I now finally understand what's really happening and who's fault this is when appengine starts acting weird. On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:46 PM, alex wrote: > please, don't do it on the servers where my apps are running :) > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Tha

Re: [google-appengine] Penetration Testing on Google App Engine Applications

please, don't do it on the servers where my apps are running :) On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Thanos Makris wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to know whom should I notify about penetration testing > activities that will be performed against two App Engine Applications. > Indicative tests that will

Re: [google-appengine] Whitelisting App Engine IPs in Google APIs console

Just wondering, is a proxy still the best way available for this? Is there something in the pipeline that would allow Google APIs to play well with App Engine? Thanks, Alex On Sunday, June 19, 2011 10:23:08 PM UTC-4, Nick Johnson (Google) wrote: > > Hi Alexander, > > Sending API

Re: [google-appengine] giving up with GAE

it's funny (or not) how often people tend to blame someone else when a problem arises. it's not always black and white. On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Siegfried Hirsch wrote: > Thanks Michael for the update. I was not aware, that this could lead to such > problems and I am a little astonished, t

Re: [google-appengine] Re: EU datacenters

Hey, Randy. huh... true. that seems to do the trick, thanks! I'm totally happy now :) On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Randy Shoup wrote: > Hi, Alex -- > > Thanks for the re-report. We are looking into your Memcache Viewer issue > now. FWIW, it looks like the behavior is

Re: [google-appengine] Too much Small Operations counted instead of Read/Write?

gt;> faster. The relative latency of serialization vs the RPC is slanted >> towards the later, and makes hybrid queries more generally useful. >> But still, in the rare case where you don't want this behavior, you >> can call hybrid(false) on your query command. >>

Re: [google-appengine] Too much Small Operations counted instead of Read/Write?

n 29, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Jeff Schnitzer wrote: > NDB's primary problem is that python serialization costs are severe; > even cache hits don't help performance much. Java does not share this > problem. > > Jeff > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:13 AM, alex wrote: >>

Re: [google-appengine] Too much Small Operations counted instead of Read/Write?

That is not always optimal as you might easily get into low cache hit rate. For instance, that is the reason why NDB doesn't do that automatically (which it could). You can find more info/benchmark here: http://code.google.com/p/appengine-ndb-experiment/issues/detail?id=118#c6 On Mon, Jan 28, 201

Re: [google-appengine] EU datacenters

> myapp.appspot.com is usually a CNAME to > ghs.google.com, googlehosted.com sorry, what I meant is myapp.example.org CNAME ghs.google.com On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:33 PM, alex wrote: > Hey Igor, > > I'm not sure what you mean: ping and wget really use different > protoco

Re: [google-appengine] EU datacenters

owded there? :) > > And more importantly, what are latencies? Like, approximately, what's > the delta between "ping ghs.google.com" and "time wget http://$EUAPP";? > From what I see with edge-cached pages it might be around 30+ ms. > > Thanks. > > On Mon

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Working with images : need help regarding tilling of images

Hey Renzo, there's even a simpler approach: url = images.get_serving_url(instance.blob) resized_64 = url + '=s64' resized_128_crop = url + '=s128-c' That way you're calling get_serving_url only once, so it should be even faster. I think the '=size' thing is described somewhere in the Images AP

Re: [google-appengine] Re: HRD migration process - needs better explanation of steps and user processes

> However, another point that would be good to document: you will end up > creating a new local dev app that matches the hrd app. And it will start > with no data. > For my website, it's a non-trivial process to initialize the website from an > empty datastore. you could use bulk loader. works fo

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Our application is very slow and appengine.google.com is unreachable

I'm still seeing timeouts. Also, the app engine status page is timing out for me as well. On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 11:38:09 AM UTC-5, Christina Ilvento wrote: > > Hi All, > > We had a brief > issue

Re: [google-appengine] Re: GAE keeps starting new instances causing lots of user facing loading requests

I wonder how you guys do real work while keep sending screenshots every 5 mins, which starts getting really annoying. On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Francois Masurel wrote: > Again... > > >

Re: [google-appengine] Re: EU datacenters

I don't really know but it feels like they're separated so I guess app engine team folks will add links/combo box to the status page with eu/us. but that'll probably happen when eu location will be generally available, I suppose. On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Marcel Manz wrote: > I fully agree

[google-appengine] EU datacenters

I've been playing around with an app hosted on EU datacenters for the past few days and I've gotta say it's been a freaking awesome experience so far, especially for what concerns latency. It's been so great that I think we'll go live next month with this app. There's one thing I'm not sure of: it

Re: [google-appengine] Re: GAE keeps starting new instances causing lots of user facing loading requests

Carl, your case seems to be fitting nicely with the new Servers feature: On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Chris Ramsdale wrote: > We're excited to announce a new App Engine feature called "Servers" that > allow developers to segment large-scale applications into logical components > that are able

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Oh, she scales

looks like it's a crawler so there's not much you can do when external sites respond slowly, except for fanning out. On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Jeff Schnitzer wrote: > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Kristopher Giesing > wrote: >> >> 16s average latency though... > > > ...and 294 instances

Re: [google-appengine] Simple Invoicing as Service

I don't think so: "Powered by Industrial Strength Technologies including AppFog, Python, MYSQL and running on HP OpenStack Cloud Platform" $ curl -I http://www.microbill.net/signin HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: nginx Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Keep-Alive: timeout=20 Vary: Accept-Encoding D

Re: [google-appengine] Understanding keys-only query costs

are you running this on dev or production server? On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Ryan Chazen wrote: > > > Ouch ouch, it's even worse than expected. I ran an query with an IN filter > w

Re: [google-appengine] channel api not working on production

sily, there is onerror callback called and client simply > creates new channel, no big deal.. Much worse is when client and server do > not know about the problem as I described above.. > > пятница, 4 января 2013 г., 10:20:20 UTC+2 пользователь alex написал: >> >> http://code.

Re: [google-appengine] channel api not working on production

http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4940 On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Aleksei Rovenski wrote: > I can confirm this issue. It is there from August, it was the first time I > noticed at least. For us it looks like this - everything connected and > works, messages flow, then

Re: [google-appengine] Simple Servlet doesn't work: EXCEPTION java.lang.ClassNotFoundException

Does it run successfully on localhost? If it does, I'd try doing the same thing from cmd line: 1. "dev_appserver.sh path/to/war/generated/by/eclipse" and try browsing to localhost:8080 2. if (1) goes ok, "appcfg.sh --oauth2 update path/to/war" On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Alessandro Alessio

Re: [google-appengine] Re: cannot delete the task from the default queue

This is expected behavior. Most likely the task failed and got re-queued while you were purging the queue. On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Aswath Satrasala < aswath.satras...@gmail.com> wrote: > I did a pause queue and then did the purge. Now, the queue is empty and > fine. > I am not sure why

Re: [google-appengine] Urgent - Production Issue with AppEngine and TaskQueue

If you have tasks that sort of re-enqueue themselves (or add new tasks) purging the queue is not probably what you want. Try *pausing* the queue instead, and then purge it if you must (keep the queue paused). On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Mike wrote: > Hi there > > It seems there was some kind

Re: [google-appengine] App Engine custom domains: Google Apps not free anymore

https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-appengine/pVZfdeky-ow/discussion http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=8517 On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Florian wrote: > As you may have noticed there is no free version of Google Apps anymore: > > http://googleenterprise.blogspot.c

[google-appengine] Re: The extra billing boost in the Admin Console today

Hi I didn't get any budget boost and my application now gets 402 OverQuotaError because the billing estimates usage for an hour equal to the daily budget (that's really equal to regular week usage). After I doubled apps' daily budget error has gone but not completely - estimated cost continues

Re: [google-appengine] User authentication in GAE

And if you need to auth users from third parties, besides engineauth there's mozilla persona, gae-simpleauth :) and a bunch of others. On Dec 7, 2012 7:08 PM, "alex" wrote: > RTFMs: > > https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/python/users/ > https://developer

Re: [google-appengine] User authentication in GAE

RTFMs: https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/python/users/ https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/python/oauth/overview http://endpoints-trusted-tester.appspot.com/ (last item in the FAQ) On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Emmanuel Mayssat wrote: > [Following on the webapp2 vs django t

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google Apps No Longer Free

> Perhaps it's time the App > Engine team put some serious consideration into how they might decouple the > two services so that we can use our own domains in a more traditional > manner? http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=8517 On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:19 PM, notreadbyhum

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google Apps No Longer Free

Another suggestion: make it so that App Engine apps can be served from a custom domain w/o creating a new Google Apps account. I couldn't find an issue for that so I went ahead and created one. Please, mark it as a duplicate if there is one. http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?i

Re: [google-appengine] Re: webapp2 versus django on GAE

webapp2 doesn't provide a 'user account management' thing. App Engine is something much more than just app instances hosting. Take for instance built-in Users/authentication service. Using that you can make it so that any user on the planet with Google Account, OpenID, OAuth 1 or OAuth 2 (via Clou

Re: [google-appengine] Reminder: Hangout Wed. Dec. 5th, 4pm PST - new experimental dev appserver for Python

I'm so sorry I didn't make it but just watched it recorded. Really great work on devappserver2! Brian is funny as always :) Would love to seem him more in the App Engine hangouts. Thanks Amy for organizing. Guys, keep it coming! On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Amy Unruh wrote: > Reminder- this

Re: [google-appengine] Re: GAE app with images stored on S3

rks really fast - we see noticeable > improvements in client pages rendering by browsers. > > We used "boto" library to work with S3 that is not coupled with Django in > any way (as far as I know) so you can try it as well. > > Good luck, > > Alex > Founder

Re: [google-appengine] Incorrect price for Channel API

$0.01/100 Opens. On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Srdjan Mitrovic wrote: > Prices on these 2 pages are all consistent except the price for Channel API. > > https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/billing#Billable_Resource_Unit_Cost > https://cloud.google.com/pricing/ > > On the first page it

Re: [google-appengine] Splitting Client and Server side in 2 AppEngines to keep server side code confidential

Here's something that might come in handy: http://code.google.com/p/make-open-easy/wiki/MoeIntro On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Ben wrote: > Dear All, > > Here is the problem: we would like to give freely the source code of the > client side of our java GWT application while keeping the serve

Re: [google-appengine] Re: How to clear a model without incurring huge costs

btw, I couldn't find a feature request for this. I'm pretty sure it must be somewhere. Anyone has a link? On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:09 AM, alex wrote: > Agree. I didn't say it wasn't "janky", just as a partial workaround: > delete data 'till you hav

Re: [google-appengine] Re: How to clear a model without incurring huge costs

Agree. I didn't say it wasn't "janky", just as a partial workaround: delete data 'till you have <= 1gb, then disable and delete the app. On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Jeff Schnitzer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:25 AM, alex wrote: >> >> >

Re: [google-appengine] Re: How to clear a model without incurring huge costs

> Sometimes I wonder if Google should simply double the price of a write > operation and make delete operations "free" what I wonder is when App Engine will get a Spanner implementation :) > but they *are* that expensive since all data will eventually get deleted. not unless you disable => delet

Re: [google-appengine] Re: SDK 1.7.3 not detecting source file changes - ANNOYING!

wtf. there's a tracker issue on this. what's the point in msg like this one? please, stop. On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 10:03 PM, GAEfan wrote: > Very frustrating to have to restart the dev environment after changes! > Wasting hours of developers' lives. > > Seems you're caching code. Impossible to tr

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Some dynamic flexibility in selecting the type of instances would be really useful

As far as I remember min/max/whatever latency configuration options and other auto scaling stuff works with default versions only. Am I missing something? On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:19 PM, pdknsk wrote: > Well, not exactly, because dynamic backends don't scale and have 15m > cost penalty. > > -- >

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Latency doubled since Nov 19 -- our Pingdom stats look pretty awful

Sorry, I meant Rackspace EU <=> GAE US. On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 2:22 PM, alex wrote: > Huh... I would've expected a little less than 150ms. I have some small > Go and Python apps that respond quite constantly within around 140ms > (Rackspace EU <=> US). A little Jav

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Latency doubled since Nov 19 -- our Pingdom stats look pretty awful

Huh... I would've expected a little less than 150ms. I have some small Go and Python apps that respond quite constantly within around 140ms (Rackspace EU <=> US). A little Java app that does some weird xmlenc with Bouncy Castle in around 200ms. Probably I'm just doing less stuff during a request. I

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Latency doubled since Nov 19 -- our Pingdom stats look pretty awful

Hey Marcel, I'm curious whether you've noticed latency decrease for users located in EU. Any change you have a couple charts comparing US user => EU app vs EU user => EU app ? On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Marcel Manz wrote: > We have setup an application in the EU datacenters lately and no

Re: [google-appengine] New experimental development server for Python

Brian, this is awesome! I've already tried it with a side project of mine that uses task queues and urlfetch. Even though it runs a couple backends too, the code already handles different cases, dev vs production, because of an open issue with addressing backends (5105). It all runs smoothly! Rea

Re: [google-appengine] link -> login page (if not logged already logged in) --> destination page

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10858834/google-app-engine-simpleauth-redirect-url-on-the-fly On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Emmanuel Mayssat wrote: > I would like to send emails with url pointing to specific pages/urls in my > app. > When clicking on the link, users may not be logged in or

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Update on our GAE Experience

http://mashable.com/2012/10/09/google-artificial-intelligence/ On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Cesium wrote: > Alex wrote: > >> >> What I'm saying is, guys like Brandon can move off/to Rackspace, AWS >> and what have you, but it's often not a solution - jus

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Update on our GAE Experience

Personally, I believe these "synthetic" limits are more than just best practices: http://www.google.com/patents/US20110302243. Background and Summary sections of the Description are actually pretty interesting. If I'm not mistaken, that's where Appengine comes from. At least partially. Aside from

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Update on our GAE Experience

:) that's exactly kind of things I often heard from windows users coming to mac os or linux: "where's that thing I used to have in Windows? Damn, I can't work like this!" I already imagined you've tried everything up to a point to consider you and your team to be experts in every single subject. I

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Update on our GAE Experience

Also, you should really give Go a try. It's amazing how fast you can process data (including images) comparing to Python or Java. Plus, your loading requests will be 10x faster. Obviously, RPC calls to App Engine services will be the same though. On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:52 AM, alex

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Update on our GAE Experience

What I understand from this is "I want this and I want that, with sugar". Problems that don't seem to be caused by the platform but because you probably haven't found the right/better solution yet. That's it. And it seems to have nothing to do with statements like "backends don't scale". On Fri, N

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Update on our GAE Experience

> When Analyzing a large body of text you can't really "chunk" the task. > While chapter marks kind of work, not really. Store intermediate data in memcache/datastore/task post body and re-enqueue. > Same for image processing, we do shape detection and trim large images you > can't "chunk" the ta

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Update on our GAE Experience

> but if they are user initiated that is a lot harder. Then, don't do that. Personally, I prefer not to let users initiate background tasks/backends directly, but to launch it from a frontend instance. It's just safer that way (both security and load control). Plus, it's easier to change my underl

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Update on our GAE Experience

And at the end of the day, if nothing else works for you, there's also Compute Engine. Have you tried that? On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:15 AM, alex wrote: >> We use that some, but that doesn't help with things that take a long time. > > You just probably need to shard it

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Update on our GAE Experience

> We use that some, but that doesn't help with things that take a long time. You just probably need to shard it in a different way, so that each chunk requires less time to get processed, i.e. within the limits. Some other times, for simpler tasks, we employ a little trick by enqueueing a simple t

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Update on our GAE Experience

We have too and it always works as expected, unless there was a bug in our code (which happend a few times). Backends are really a great addition to the platform, and I keep loving them. There's also Mapreduce/Pipeline - you might wanna check that if backend isn't solving your problem. On Fri, No

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Update on our GAE Experience

On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Brandon Wirtz wrote: > We get “busy” errors. There is still an open issue on that. > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12478321/why-are-dynamic-backends-on-google-appengine-not-auto-scaling > > http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=8053 He d

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Update on our GAE Experience

Still boring... Good luck though! On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Brandon Wirtz wrote: > > >>Finally! The seeds of an Alex-Brandon dust-up appear! > >>This group has been so BORING! > > > >>David > > > > Sorry, we built a product that makes SRI’s

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Update on our GAE Experience

> I’m not quite ready to give referrals in Google’s own house. If you follow Oh come on! When did that happen? And where's the BackOps half-a-screen signature with images and all? This is not Brandon I knew... On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Brandon Wirtz wrote: > I’m not quite ready to give

Re: [google-appengine] Cannot assign additional domain managed from my main Apps domain to my Google App Engine app

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10754273/google-app-engine-use-google-apps-non-primary-domain On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Ralph Barbagallo wrote: > > So I added another domain via the control panel for my main domain--verified > ownership, verified MX records, etc. This additional domain

Re: [google-appengine] Google Play running on GAE?

App Engine or not, what you described touches mostly design issues anyway, e.g. good car vs bad driver or bad car vs goog driver. On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Jeff Schnitzer wrote: > I bought a Nexus 4 today and noticed that the order numbers look something > like this: > > 15731260465432488

Re: [google-appengine] Re: SDK 1.7.3 not detecting source file changes - ANNOYING!

Has anyone created an issue on the tracker? I'd star it too. (Mac OS) On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Nijin Narayanan wrote: > +1 On windows 7. Same issue here. Because of this issue we have downgrade to > 1.7.2. :( > > -Nijin Narayanan > HP: +91 96 56 56 41 91 > > > > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8

Re: [google-appengine] Google Drive API through Google App Engine

I think this might help: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iK14bfd6qhs -- alex On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Luca Matteis wrote: > I'm trying to use the Google Drive API through the App Identity interface > provided with Google App Engine. This basically allows my web app

Re: [google-appengine] how to download/backup db data, high replication, Please HELP!!!

Try with --application='s~myappname-hrd' On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 6:57 PM, ste...@nortd.com wrote: > > I have recently switched from master/slave to high replication and noticed > that my backup routine stopped working. Other posts seem to hint that > "appcfg.py download_data" does not work with

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Awesome loading requests

Yes, 260ms. Not only that one, the average. That's an unrealistic *if* for Java apps, but I'm not starting a language flame. Just wanted to post something positive today. On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Benjamin Possolo wrote: > So you are saying that your loading request only took 260ms? > >

[google-appengine] Re: Web site completely down + appengine console not accessible

On Friday, October 26, 2012 11:18:00 AM UTC-4, Damian del Rivero Lagunes wrote: > My Apps are also down. http://code.google.com/status/appengine is also > down. i was able to load the status page after a long wait. here's a screenshot in case anyone is curious:

Re: [google-appengine] Resolved Failed

Outbound sockets feature is still in the Trusted Tester program. You can sign up here: https://docs.google.com/a/cloudware.it/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dF9QR3pnQ2pNa0dqalViSTZoenVkcHc6MQ -- alex On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Danyal Alliy wrote: > I've deployed my java applicatio

Re: [google-appengine] Re: 1.7.3 Pre-release SDKs Available

I assume you're talking about Windows users only. On Mac OS and Linux, I'm always using dev server with sqlite (mostly py/py27) for many months now and it's blazing fast (for a dev server), can't complain. -- alex On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Kenneth wrote: > If you&#

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Persona and Shiro for identity and authorization

f experience showing why these > are horrible ids. Whether you like it or not, email address is the > *only* widely adopted, widely understood, distributed identity > mechanism available. > > OAuth does not address identity or authentication. > > Jeff > > On Wed, Oct 1

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Persona and Shiro for identity and authorization

way, a fallback to a random password actually seems pretty ridiculous living almost in 2013. I haven't registered with a new password for about a year now. A registration/signup form with a password field makes me go away. It's a good thing OAuth 2.0 has finally become an RFC, actuall

Re: [google-appengine] Downloading only recent data from Datastore

BTW, there's a built-in '__version__' property of '__entity_group__' that could be used instead of an auto-updated timestamp: https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/metadataentityclasses#EntityGroup https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/python/ndb/metadata On Wed, Oc

Re: [google-appengine] Re: NullPointerException in Oauth getCurrentUser

t I certainly hope they fix it at some point, this is > certainly throwing a wrench in my testing! > > Anyone know where to download older versions of the SDK? > > On Oct 17, 12:00 am, alex wrote: > > I got the same error today (only with the latest SDK version). Deployed on

Re: [google-appengine] NullPointerException in Oauth getCurrentUser

BTW, if you want to look at the source code of that part, it's over here: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fjava%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Fcom%2Fgoogle%2Fappengine%2Fapi%2Foauth On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:59 PM, alex wrote: > I got the same error today (only

Re: [google-appengine] NullPointerException in Oauth getCurrentUser

I got the same error today (only with the latest SDK version). Deployed on production servers works fine so it seems to be a dev server only issue. Could you create a bug on the issue tracker? I'll star it :) Given OAuth 1.0 is deprecated I'm not sure when and if it'll be resolved though: hopefull

Re: [google-appengine] GAE & BigQuery

a analysis, dashboards, charts, etc. -- alex On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Richard Watson wrote: > One of the issues of the datastore is a lack of SQL-like aggregates, or easy > ad-hoc queries in general. This adds a lot of cost to reporting, > dashboards, etc. Is BigQuery the default ch

Re: [google-appengine] Re: European hosted apps - when will $500 fee be lifted?

elopers.google.com/appengine/docs/premier/location > > > On Thursday, October 11, 2012 10:25:27 AM UTC+1, alex wrote: >> >> I might have missed something, but I think you guys misunderstood an >> important point. >> >> The description of running in EU datacenters f

Re: [google-appengine] Re: European hosted apps - when will $500 fee be lifted?

I might have missed something, but I think you guys misunderstood an important point. The description of running in EU datacenters feature does say that you will be able to run your app in EU but it also says that the data processing might still happen in countries outside of EU, so this won't hol

[google-appengine] Re: Code reviews

ote: > > So for appengine sdk patches, why should I expect the > code reviews list to be better than filing bugs? Was anyone > from Google planning to pick up reviews on the patches? > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 6:00 AM, alex > > wrote: > > Hey there, > &g

[google-appengine] Code reviews

:) A longer description can be found here: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/appengine-code-reviews/w2z1KaD27Ao/discussion What do you guys think? -- alex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send

Re: [google-appengine] Re: gae blobstore 502 error

If I'm not mistaken Blobstore single call limit is 32M. You could try Cloud Storage upload HTML form or Google Drive as alternatives. On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Alejandro J Gómez López < ago...@securempresa.com> wrote:

Re: [google-appengine] How reliable is google high replicaiton data storage ?

Don't forget about Backup/Restore features (https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/adminconsole/datastoreadmin) which you can use to back your data up on Cloud Storage too. On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Gopal Patel wrote: > I found google high replication pretty stable. > > what I would

Re: [google-appengine] webapp2 sessions get_sessions (max_age) does not override default config

e None. > But if the user clicks on the "Remember me" checkbox, their session to last > longer than the browser session. > > > On Monday, October 1, 2012 1:32:46 AM UTC-7, alex wrote: >> >> I believe you can do this by setting session_max_age con

Re: [google-appengine] webapp2 sessions get_sessions (max_age) does not override default config

I believe you can do this by setting session_max_age config param. See this for more details: http://webapp-improved.appspot.com/_modules/webapp2_extras/sessions.html Also, the webapp2 group is actually here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/webapp2 -- alex On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:17

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >