[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Launcher crashes on OSX

Already done, Adam: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34532833/google-app-engine-launcher-crashes-on-osx I tried the command line and it appeared to work fine. Thanks for the tip. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Launcher crashes on OSX

Thanks, Kaan. Command line works fine. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Launcher crashes on OSX

It still may be worth posting this as a new question to Stack Overflow and referencing the old one, since in your case the solution didn't work. Are you seeing any issues when you run the application without the launcher, using 'dev_appserver.py app.yaml' from your app's directory? On

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Launcher crashes on OSX

It's not directly related but it's a great idea to just use the command line tools On OSX, any google program acts like a malware anyway, popping up continuously for updates with no clear path to disable interruptions I just download the SDK source, run it with python, it just works (the GUI

[google-appengine] Re: google App Engine Geosearch Alpha Program

I meant "GAE Geosearch" https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/geosearch Le mercredi 30 décembre 2015 16:30:46 UTC+1, Gacem Ayoub a écrit : > > Hi All, > I wish to add my project to GAP Geosearch Alpha program to support > geospatial query. Someone knows how to do? Please help.

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Developers Console - logs viewer somewhat flaky

Thanks Christian, I'll check it out On Friday, December 11, 2015 at 9:03:34 PM UTC+2, Richard Cheesmar wrote: > > Hi, All > > Has anyone noticed flaky behavior with the console log viewer. I am using > firefox mainly (latest version v42.0 on Mac OS El-Capitani). I noticed that > the logs do

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine "login URL" behaves strangely on mobile

There is a major problem with login urls in chrome. Not sure if it is chrome to blame or appengine for generating such urls. I am not sure if you have the same issue. But this problem has been out there for some time, causing pain to everyone and still ignored by Google. Probably, they can;t

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine - Spring, MySQL & AngularJS

You might want to take a look at the App Engine docs which may answer some of your questions. You may find that App Engine may replace some parts of this stack and others may not work well or at all. For example, you'll likely need to use Task

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK Windows 1.9.30

Hi Tasos, Can you give some more information? What exactly do you run, what code do you have in your handler, how do you run it, what's in your logs? Anything in the console? Cheers! On Tuesday, December 1, 2015 at 3:26:23 PM UTC-5, Tasos Kallergis wrote: > > Actually trying to run the

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK Windows 1.9.30

Also what platform are you running on? Mac? Windows? On Wednesday, December 2, 2015 at 7:42:05 AM UTC-8, Patrice (Cloud Platform Support) wrote: > > Hi Tasos, > > Can you give some more information? What exactly do you run, what code do > you have in your handler, how do you run it, what's in

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK Windows 1.9.30

Today when i have executed the application again, it worked fine. I don't know why this issue happened to my pc yesterday but now everything is fine. My doubt is that yesterday i forgot to check my memory for stack overflow and maybe that happened. However i have restarted my PC 2-3 times and

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK Windows 1.9.30

Actually trying to run the application and nothing happens. It is stuck on request. Loading for a long time and there is no response. I thing trying to execute php script, but cannot be recognizable. However i am running a python application and works fine -- You received this message because

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK Windows 1.9.30

Hello Tasos, Can you comment what error message you are seeing? Thanks! On Tuesday, December 1, 2015 at 8:31:46 AM UTC-8, Tasos Kallergis wrote: > > Good evening, I have an issue trying to launch a php application > with Google App Engine Launcher Version 1.9.30. I also tried to create a >

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine & Google Play Music... making apps that manage playlists on GAE

If you want to use the API so badly, why not use a non GAE server setup? On Friday, November 13, 2015 at 3:52:56 PM UTC, Cliff Hill wrote: > > I did, it won't work because Google is blocking the url s for Google Play > Music from being accessed by Google App Engine. > > People wanting "smart

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine & Google Play Music... making apps that manage playlists on GAE

The thing is, it IS asking a lot. It's not like it'll take one guy an afternoon of work. I highly doubt they'll make any form of API for Google Music, as you can create playlists etc on the website already. People wanting an API for their own personal projects are going to be numbered in the

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine & Google Play Music... making apps that manage playlists on GAE

I did, it won't work because Google is blocking the url s for Google Play Music from being accessed by Google App Engine. People wanting "smart playlist" capabilities are not measured "in tens", it is something a lot of people I have seen online ask for. This, to me, is a way it can be

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine & Google Play Music... making apps that manage playlists on GAE

I am going to be forced to do so. I was hoping for a full Google implementation, where I don't have to go outside of Google to use Google services with Google services. *"I'm not responcabel fer my comuter's spleling errnors"** - Xlorep DarkHelm* Website: http://darkhelm.org On Fri, Nov 13, 2015

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine & Google Play Music... making apps that manage playlists on GAE

Looks like my issue was with python's requests library. I ended up getting it working with the Unofficial Python API, so I can continue. Would be nice to have an official API, but the Unofficial one works. On Friday, November 13, 2015 at 1:29:42 PM UTC-5, Cliff Hill wrote: > > I am going to be

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine version 1.9.28 SDK

Yes, that is directly-referring to that issue. It's been fixed in the recent release. On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 3:25:14 PM UTC-4, Zdenko Hrcek wrote: > > What exactly "Improved accuracy of Geo filtering in Search queries." > means? I am aware of this bug: >

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine version 1.9.28 SDK

What exactly "Improved accuracy of Geo filtering in Search queries." means? I am aware of this bug: https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=8824 but I guess it's not related to it? thanks, Zdenko On Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 10:55:55 PM UTC+1, Sang Park wrote: > >

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine and Google Apps domain restriction

Hey Joakim, Be advised that this forum isn't the best place to get specific-issue technical support. For that, stackoverflow is much better, and you should use it in future if you have such a question, since we monitor there as well, although there's also a much larger user-base. From reading

[google-appengine] Re: Google app engine Cloud SQL connection error

Hi David, Normally on such a thread, I'd suggest you to go to Stack Overflow with your question, as Google groups are more appropriate for open-ended discussions then specific questions about how to use the platform. Since we monitor Stack Overflow for our tags, you're not losing any

[google-appengine] Re: google app engine python encoding not work properly

Hey Maksym, A thread like this is off-topic for Google Groups, and should be posted to Stackoverflow . While I'd like to help you, this isn't the place to do it. If you post to stackoverflow.com, where we also monitor, you'll be in touch with a much larger user-base

[google-appengine] Re: google app engine python encoding not work properly

Hey Maksym, I've also just noticed that you posted this issue to the public issue tracker . Please refrain from cross-posting and instead try to find the most accurate place to make your thread. Given that this could possibly be

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine version 1.9.26 SDK available

Can someone elaborate on the "Capability to provision applications for current load and configure elastic provisioning based on both VM and application level metrics." feature? On Friday, September 4, 2015 at 4:25:51 PM UTC-7, Sang Park wrote: > > Hello! > > > We have released a new version of

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine version 1.9.25 SDK available

Salutations, You can read more here about empty lists https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/entities#Java_Using_an_empty_list . On Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 8:26:46 PM UTC-4, husayt wrote: Finally, I see a new feature to datastore. Can you please elborate more, or

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine version 1.9.25 SDK available

Finally, I see a new feature to datastore. Can you please elborate more, or maybe provide links to documentation on the following: - Datastore now allows properties to represent the empty list. Thanks Huseyn On Saturday, August 15, 2015 at 12:33:45 AM UTC+1, Sang Park wrote: Hello,

[google-appengine] Re: Google app engine intermittent ping failure for custom URL

We have a blog subdomain which is served by blogspot.com. To enable this, the CNAME is configured to ghs.googlehosted.com. We are noticing the intermittent timeout for this site as well. Here again, the IP address is *74.125.200.121* - the same rouge IP which is timing out intermittently.

[google-appengine] Re: Google app engine intermittent ping failure for custom URL

Salutations Aravindan, Our Issue Tracker https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/entryis the best forum to report this. When you create it I need a few ping requests that fail, a tracert, your location and App ID. When you create it please post it here and I will investigate it.

[google-appengine] Re: Google app engine intermittent ping failure for custom URL

Thanks Ryan. I've created an issue in the issue tracker: https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=12223 Currently the ping is fine. In the issue I've given the information you asked: - the output of ping requests when the failure happened - tracert now (I don't have tracert

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Laucher extra flags listen to --host 127.0.0.1

Thank you Nick for your answer, i appreciate it. With Google app engine i have tested the behaviour of host flags, and i think it works fine. That means that when i set the --host to my computer ip i.e(192.168.1.2) or set the host to (0.0.0.0), i have access to that google app engine server from

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Laucher extra flags listen to --host 127.0.0.1

Hi Tasos, I think there may be some issue in language between us, and my apologies in advance if I've misunderstood you, since it seems some negations were added / omitted which would help me to make sense of your reply. From what I understand about Apache, and remember this isn't an Apache

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Laucher extra flags listen to --host 127.0.0.1

So Nick you think that when i change from httpd.conf file the ip address to listen to 127.0.0.1, is a valid ip and i may access that service from remote. I.e now i change this file to listen to ip 127.0.0.1. I type from another laptop the internal ip of that xampp server that i changed (i.e

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Laucher extra flags listen to --host 127.0.0.1

Hey Tasos, The behaviour of the ip addresses was described quite clearly Anbarasan above. As far as I know, httpd.conf works the same way as well, where 127.0.0.1 is not going to make your server accessible to any other device than localhost. You can read about localhost on wikipedia

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Laucher extra flags listen to --host 127.0.0.1

What do they mean that 127.0.0.1 is a valid ip address and can be used -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Laucher extra flags listen to --host 127.0.0.1

Ok but i thought that 127.0.0.1 is a valid ip address, and can used. I.e if you know Xampp Server when i go to Xampp Computer and change the httpd.conf file to listen to the ip address 127.0.0.1, is not a problem to connect to this Xampp Server from a remote device i.e (Mobile device). When i

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Laucher extra flags listen to --host 127.0.0.1

--host 127.0.0.1 - server will listen on the loopback interface and not on the externally accessible interface (network). i.e. will work only on the host machine, and not from anywhere else. --host 192.168.1.3 - server will listen on the externally accessible interface with the given address.

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Laucher extra flags listen to --host 127.0.0.1

I'm not sure if I fully understand your question, but 127.0.0.1 is the local loopback interface (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Localhost), so if you want to allow remote connections, you must use either --host ip address or --host 0.0.0.0. On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Tasos Kallergis

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Laucher extra flags listen to --host 127.0.0.1

So you say that --host 127.0.0.1 is not available, and may be used from somewhere else? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Laucher extra flags listen to --host 127.0.0.1

The --host flags limits the IP addresses the dev_appserver binds to (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_sockets#bind.28.29). Use --host 0.0.0.0 to bind to all available IP addresses on the machine. On Monday, July 27, 2015 at 8:15:40 AM UTC-7, Tasos Kallergis wrote: Hello, i set --host

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine version 1.9.24 SDK available

Hey Kaan, The email authentication for old versions will continue to work for a short time, so you should be able to transition those projects to interface with OAuth using the --oauth2 flag and the appcfg oauth2 credentials generated by going through the oauth2 flow once with either an old or

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine version 1.9.24 SDK available

The password depreciation breaks my workflow at extremes 1) I have an old project with a dedicated and modified old SDK, I'm not sure whether an updated SDK would be able to accommodate that project 2) I'm unsure how the new deploy command works, at the very least, a forced SDK update breaks my

[google-appengine] Re: google app engine edge cache not work for app domains anymore?

Hi Jeff, Happy that it got fixed and you can see the results :). Lucemia, can you confirm if on your end this has been fixed as well? Cheers! On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 11:12:37 AM UTC-4, Jeff Deskins wrote: Just to update... Edge cache now appears to be working when calling app engine

[google-appengine] Re: google app engine edge cache not work for app domains anymore?

Just to update... Edge cache now appears to be working when calling app engine app from either custom domain or APP_ID.appspot.com. I see 204 response code in the logs now for both. Didn't change any code. Thanks, Jeff On Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 8:41:13 PM UTC-5, Jeff Deskins wrote:

[google-appengine] Re: google app engine edge cache not work for app domains anymore?

Yes, I can confirm the issues has been solved, Thanks AppEngine Team, it runs really well now!! Best Regards Patrice (Cloud Platform Support)於 2015年7月21日星期二 UTC+8上午12時39分00秒寫道： Hi Jeff, Happy that it got fixed and you can see the results :). Lucemia, can you confirm if on your end this

[google-appengine] Re: google app engine edge cache not work for app domains anymore?

After researching this for the original poster on stackoverflow, I am seeing the same thing with my own custom domains. When hitting a route that has public caching setup - the edge cache doesn't work when hitting that url from the custom domain. It always returns 200 status in app engine

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine inter module communication authorization (python)

I can confirm this is occurring, and I've reproduced the issue. The issue is being tracked over in theApp Engine public issue tracker https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=12069. Follow there for any updates. For now, I think it's much better to be manually-inspecting the

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK version 1.9.22 released

Custom certificate bundle is for the full version of cURL (e.g. cURL using sockets), not curl lite. On Sunday, 14 June 2015 04:57:20 UTC+10, Alex Kerr wrote: Users can supply a customer CA certificate bundle with their application. How does one do that - are there any docs? I'd like to use

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK version 1.9.22 released

Users can supply a customer CA certificate bundle with their application. How does one do that - are there any docs? I'd like to use the Curllite feature in PHP Appengine to connect to Facebook's API and it wasn't working because of just this issue! (according to something I read by Stuart

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine (Question about using Google app engine and Java)

You are at the bottom of a very long learning curve. You can surmount it but you need to start reading basic documentation for all of these components. When you understand the concepts, then it will be easy to answer those questions. Asking for direct answers to a test is inappropriate; we're not

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine (Question about using Google app engine and Java)

This looks suspiciously like some sort of exam question. Jeff On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Ryan (Cloud Platform Support) rbruy...@google.com wrote: Salutations Peter, Welcome to the forms. There are many ways to do what you want to do. I will answer from my personal experience but you

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine (Question about using Google app engine and Java)

Jap! On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org wrote: You are at the bottom of a very long learning curve. You can surmount it but you need to start reading basic documentation for all of these components. When you understand the concepts, then it will be easy to

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine (Question about using Google app engine and Java)

Salutations Peter, Welcome to the forms. There are many ways to do what you want to do. I will answer from my personal experience but you will need to adapt to your specific use case. 1) The user data I would store in the Datastore. It is designed to do such work. I would index the players

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine (Question about using Google app engine and Java)

Hi Jeff.. yes it's a kind of expertise test but I know how to develop it in Java and oracle db (local database where I can use table triggers, JPA and java).. or any kind of other database like (mysql or derbydb).. The problem is that I don't have knowledge on Google Cloud services (which

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK version 1.9.21 now available

I also recently started using GCS through the Blobstore API. I found the docs to be super confusing but I'm happier with my new GCS-based solution than my Old-Blobstore solution. The documentation doesn't make it clear when you should use BlobKey and when you should use the gcsobjectname. It

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK version 1.9.21 now available

Hi Jeff, you mentioned: appears you can make a BlobKey from the objectname and delete that. I thought it would be useful to mention how: final BlobKey blobKey = ImagesServiceFactory.makeImageFromFilename(cloudStorageUrl).getBlobKey(); if (blobKey != null) { ImagesService

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK version 1.9.21 now available

@Hiroshi, While it doesn't solve the entire issue, incorporating the gcloud SDK into the automation process would allow the use of a service account to download the App Engine SDKs via gsutil. On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Wilson MacGyver wmacgy...@gmail.com wrote: My usage case is simple,

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK version 1.9.21 now available

My usage case is simple, I just need to serve data. I use createGsBlobKey(Google Storage filename) https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/java/javadoc/com/google/appengine/api/blobstore/BlobstoreService#createGsBlobKey(java.lang.String) then just call .serve on it

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK version 1.9.21 now available

Thanks, Josh. While it doesn't solve the entire issue, incorporating the gcloud SDK into the automation process would allow the use of a service account to download the App Engine SDKs via gsutil. Yeah, it is a way. On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:28 AM, 'Josh Moore' via Google App Engine

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK version 1.9.21 now available

- The Files API, which has been deprecated since June 2013, will soon be restricted to existing users only in preparation for its future removal. Further information about the removal of this API is available here: https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/deprecations/

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK version 1.9.21 now available

Non proprio!-) Signed URLs are the Cloud Storage way to serve large files without using CPU instance time AND without making them public -- see https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/access-control#Signed-URLs . Ciao Alex, I've been looking for something like that, I just didn't know

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK version 1.9.21 now available

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Emanuele Ziglioli theb...@emanueleziglioli.it wrote: - The Files API, which has been deprecated since June 2013, will soon be restricted to existing users only in preparation for its future removal. Further information about the removal of this API

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK version 1.9.21 now available

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Emanuele Ziglioli theb...@emanueleziglioli.it wrote: Non proprio!-) Signed URLs are the Cloud Storage way to serve large files without using CPU instance time AND without making them public -- see

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK version 1.9.21 now available

Update: I've tried again by serving GCS files using the Blobstore API and, after fixing some problems, it's been working well all day. The problems were: 1. lack of BlobInfo (as documented) 2. file names containing some characters such as blank spaces Because I used Blobinfo in order to get the

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine 1.9.19 and google-api-python-client-gae-1.2

We had a similar issue with this error in our tests. We have our own (old, 1.2) versions of these libraries in our app. The new SDK seems to include its own (newer) version of libraries. This seems to cause an import conflict. We solved it for our tests by making sure our app's path is used

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK version 1.9.19 is now available

The ability to specify the network for a Managed VM is huge! Thank you! Goodbye unnecessary public-exposed proxies! On Thursday, April 16, 2015 at 2:28:51 PM UTC-4, Sarah Murphy wrote: *Java* - appcfg now outputs a warning if OAuth2 is not used for authentication - When deploying or

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK version 1.9.19 is now available

*Java* - appcfg now outputs a warning if OAuth2 is not used for authentication - When deploying or managing an application. OAuth2 will become the default in the 1.9.20 release. - Fixed an bug in the Java SDK where LogQuery throws an exception when more than 20 log entries are

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Task Queue: googleapi: Error 500: Backend Error

Hey, thanks for this Frank(s)! Solved my problem too. I'm submitting a feedback request to Google's documentation on this. One other thing I had to do was make sure my project in the URL was prefixed with s~, as suggested in responses to the SO question here:

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.9.18 is now available

Sound Great but I had open a cases because file_get_contents('https://cloud.bloombees.com/api/bbchat/updates/XX?nolog') shows an error: failed to open stream: SSL certificate error - certificate invalid or non-existent, [Errno 8] _ssl.c:507: EOF occurred in violation of protocol in

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.9.18 is now available

Acknowledged by Google since September 2013, yet still no release: https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=9931 This core service really needs to be supported! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.9.18 is now available

We need official support to use datastore in PHP. I don't want to use MySQL, nor to connect to an instance running MongoDB, I wand datastore please. Regards On Friday, February 20, 2015 at 2:55:26 AM UTC+1, Ramki Krishnan wrote: Hi All, Version 1.9.18 of Google App Engine SDK is out with a

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine for beginners - Tutorial (Java)

Looking forward to your next tutorials! Cheers, Emanuele On Thursday, 26 February 2015 14:57:02 UTC+13, Maciej Arkit wrote: Hi Emanuele, I agree with you. Materials I've posted are part of workshop tutorial (and lectures) which also touches billing and pricing areas (I will publish whole

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine for beginners - Tutorial (Java)

Hi Emanuele, I agree with you. Materials I've posted are part of workshop tutorial (and lectures) which also touches billing and pricing areas (I will publish whole materials soon). Probably I've named this post incorrectly (misleading 'tutorial' world). Anyway, I've been always struggling with

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine for beginners - Tutorial (Java)

Ciao Emanuele, I'm biased, of course -- but I've found App Engine a life saver for many web apps that just don't fit the constraints you're so adamant about. Many of them internal (but we DO get charged internally, albeit in funny money, so if it was much cheaper to deploy web apps otherwise we

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine for beginners - Tutorial (Java)

Thank you. I think though that every tutorial should start with the question: 1. is GAE for you? (if you're gonna deal with large data, likely not, cause costs of getting data in and out will kill you) 2. do you accept vendor lock-in? Be aware that moving your App off GAE will require your

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.9.18 is now available

There is an annoying behavior in this newest release that requires confirmation in a browser window every time the Deploy button is clicked: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28622954/annoying-new-confirmation-page-in-google-app-engine-launcher -- You received this message because you are

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Official George swaggybre...@gmail.com wrote: I want for real Sorry, it's opaque to me what you mean by that. Elucidate please? Alex On Oct 4, 2013 6:06 AM, rcp rc.phe...@gmail.com wrote: -1 from an 'enthusiast programmer'; SO considers me un-washed

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

I want for real On Oct 4, 2013 6:06 AM, rcp rc.phe...@gmail.com wrote: -1 from an 'enthusiast programmer'; SO considers me un-washed despite my relentless effort to be concise and precise. On Monday, February 6, 2012 6:14:54 PM UTC-8, Ikai Lan wrote: *Hi App Engine

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

Hi Clark, right -- *some* questions are system administration, so my plan (and I'm pushing as hard as I can to make this happen soon!) is to use tag google-cloud-platform on ServerFault for sysadm Qs (whether on GAE or any other parts of GCP). I just recently (2 months, inc. holidays c)

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Clark Van Oyen cl...@countable.ca wrote: Great idea! Agreed, on it being a great thing that we can recursively define priorities within an established set of priorities in order to arrive at one deterministic path :) Best of luck in your new job! I believe the

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine, custom domain and SSL error

I'm not very fluent in the dynamics of domains and SSL lately However the issue seems to be the naked domain, imho, can you access https://www.domain.com? Unfortunately you need to manually redirect the naked domain to a subdomain yourself somehow (I use CloudFlare just for these simple

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

I'm not having a lot of luck getting a response on SO, since apparently not all App Engine discussions are related to programming... http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28285552/being-flooded-with-traffic-and-the-remote-ip-reported-in-app-engine-logs-as-sta?noredirect=1#comment44925358_28285552

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine, custom domain and SSL error

Hi Fredrik, It's Google App Engine the webserver so yes, it should listen to https. Plus the domain.appstore.com works with https. Thanks Sandro On Friday, 30 January 2015 05:48:27 UTC+1, Fredrik Enestad wrote: Does your webserver listen to https (port 443)? On Wednesday, January 28, 2015

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine, custom domain and SSL error

Got your pm with your domain, doing a curl I got Server aborted the SSL handshake Login to apps.google.com and verify this: 1. Go to Security, click Show more, click SSL for Custom Domains Under the cert that you've added, are your url listed under Assigned urls? otherwise add them, and make

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine, custom domain and SSL error

Does your webserver listen to https (port 443)? On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 at 8:22:24 PM UTC+1, Sandro wrote: Hi, I'm trying to setup Google App Engine with custom domain and SSL. I've added the certificates to Google Apps and added the custom domains to Google App Engine. I can

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine, custom domain and SSL error

Sorry, to early in the morning and pre coffee. Have you also attached the domain to the cert in app engine? I know at least in the past it was easy to forget to click the “save”-button. Otherwise, if you do a curl -v -i https://domain.com what output do you get? something about the cert? or

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Objectify get grandson of entity

Yes, I should write KeyBlague blagueKey = Key.create(userKey, Blague.class, blague.getId()); instead of KeyBlague blagueKey = Key.create(Blague.class, blague.getId()); in the API method. Thank you for your help -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Task Queue: googleapi: Error 500: Backend Error

Hi Did you solve your problem? I got the same problem... Just solved it by supplying to request body a property, queueName, which is not documented. Frank, yet another :) On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 12:49:00 AM UTC+8, Frank Blechschmidt wrote: Hey :) I've defined a pull queue for my app

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google app engine speed python vs java execution time

I just noticed the OP's other question to this forum. Damn, I (we) got trolled. Here is the correct answer to this question: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=java+vs+python Jeff On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org wrote: Oh yes, definitely... which goes to show that

[google-appengine] Re: Google app engine speed python vs java

You dont really give any indication of the project you need to be 'fast' so sorry if i under-estimate your skill, but just as a reminder to anyone starting out... Unless your webapp (and it is a webapp, otherwise you would not pick appengine, right?) is **REALLY** heavy in need for CPU,

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google app engine speed python vs java execution time

Oh yes, definitely... which goes to show that there are usually many more important factors than than raw execution speed. Although that said, if the app truly is compute-heavy, Python is almost certainly the wrong answer. For that matter, GAE is probably the wrong answer since instances are so

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google app engine speed python vs java execution time

Let's not forget how long the instance startup time is for Java applications vs Python and Go. Of course, once Java gets warmed up it's quick, but that loading request can be painful. Though to be fair, it's much much better than it used to be. On Friday, August 22, 2014 1:15:23 AM UTC-4, Jeff

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google app engine speed python vs java execution time

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Luna Duclos luna.duc...@palmstonegames.com wrote: Go is by far the fastest runtime for appengine currently, as it is (as far as I'm aware) the only compiled language currently in the mix. This is not true. Java is JIT-compiled. See

[google-appengine] Re: Google app engine speed python vs java execution time

Sorry to take so long to chime in! A couple things occurred to me that you might want to consider: 1. App Engine is addressed primarily towards building web sites and services, not heavy back end processing. That doesn't mean it can't be made to work, but you might want to consider building

[google-appengine] Re: Google app engine console problem

Works OK for me... Did you try both new interface: https://console.developers.google.com/ and the old one: https://appengine.google.com/ ? Different browser/account? On Friday, August 15, 2014 10:35:30 PM UTC-5, Steven wrote: Hi, Whenever I go into the app engine console for my app

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK for Python ships vulnerable PHP

1.9.8 has just been shipped with PHP 5.4.30 https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/wiki/SdkReleaseNotes On Wednesday, 23 July 2014 18:07:36 UTC+1, david gunnells wrote: Google App Engine SDK for Python 1.9.7 ships an older, vulnerable PHP (5.4.28). ETA on shipping with an updated PHP?

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Bitcoin billing

You don't need to comment, just star the issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Bitcoin billing

A general worst case scenario is not being able to pay the appengine costs, if the owner dies the apps would follow shortly after I don't use bitcoin, not interested in bitcoin, however if they enable bitcoin, a routine might be implemented in apps that would detect that the owner is no longer

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Bitcoin billing

We just passed the 200 stars mark, thanx everybody! On Friday, August 1, 2014 4:53:24 PM UTC+2, Francois Masurel wrote: Crypto-currency lovers, it's time to vote for this issue : Issue 10820: Accept Bitcoin and other altcoins for billing purposes

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine Bitcoin billing

That's a very interesting use case I didn't think about, thanx. On Friday, August 1, 2014 9:16:46 PM UTC+2, Kaan Soral wrote: A general worst case scenario is not being able to pay the appengine costs, if the owner dies the apps would follow shortly after I don't use bitcoin, not interested

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >