You really shouldn't post peoples personal information like that. I'd pull
the source, reset the repo (look under admin..) , and post a clean source
code copy.
Code hosting isn't for private projects, and it is going to be crawled by
google and other search engines. There are other project hosts
I hate to tell you, but we're not going to be doing this. Projects are
welcome to ask for donations of course, but when a similar system of tips
and donations was implemented in sourceforge, it was comically underused
and led to imo deep divides within projects that have more than 1
developer.
Malware, warez and no source that we can see.
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Никита Сидоров shlyah...@gmail.comwrote:
Why you close my code google? code.google.com/p/vmatymbe
Thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Project Hosting on Google
It's just not a good idea for us to re-parent projects that have code in
them and some moderate level of activity.
I'm happy to forward something on to the author in case he missed your
mail...
Chris
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Raghav Sood raghavs...@gmail.com wrote:
I have tried to
We can't make an exception. It's not right, but I'll email him too.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Raghav Sood raghavs...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote him 3 mails, so the chance of him missing them are slim. In any
case, I'd appreciate it if you could ask him to add me at least as a
committer
Looks like it.
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Lizbeth Pratt li...@powabunga.com wrote:
I got the person who put up the code to take it down . . . can someone
please confirm to me that it has been taken down?
Thanks,
Libby
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Lars Viklund zao...@gmail.com
We have no idea what code you're talking about. Link?
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 1:24 PM, DawnB memoriesdes...@gmail.com wrote:
I was looking at Google's terms of use for the html 5 js and it
speaks to against commercial use - now my question is whether or not
this is specific to the code
In the meantime, know that we do not host that kind of closed project.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Sverre Rabbelier srabbel...@google.comwrote:
Please star Issue 1829 if you want that feature to be implemented.
[0] http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=1829
On Thu Mar 29
confirm that filing a formal DMCA request with Google
would help Linagora retrieve the ownership of the forge ?
Thanks for your help.
Sincerely,
Ludovic Schurr
Le 27/02/2012 18:40, Chris DiBona a écrit :
Or please use this form and file a formal DMCA request with us:
http
o, it isn't.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Nico nicomelchi...@gmail.com wrote:
The project is http://code.google.com/p/support/
Thanks
On Dec 1, 7:07 pm, Nico nicomelchi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
One of my projects was marked as Scheduled for deletion I didn't
realize that I was
I've chosen to set this person to 'moderated' so as to avoid future
emails like this.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:23 PM, atSimon atsi...@gmail.com wrote:
from ###
to Lucas Bergman s...@google.com
date Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:56
don't bring shame on google - the meaning of open? !
-
I'll look into it.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:10 PM, James Kidd kkl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey, User http://code.google.com/u/mikaya.irakli/ is violating the GPL at
http://code.google.com/p/jamella/downloads/list
He is packaging our sources from https://github.com/raistlinthewiz/d3sharp
without
I can undelete it for you. You can reset your own repository then.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Simon
simon.richard.perk...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
My project has been deleted. I did this because I needed to wipe the
source repository clean, however it appears I can't reuse my old
1) Email them first, they probably don't understand licenses.
2) Let us know how it goes.
3) We may or may not need a dmca request from you to pull the project:
http://www.google.com/support/bin/static.py?page=ts.csts=1114905
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Daniel Andre zege...@gmail.com wrote:
That works!
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Nathaniel Manista nathan...@google.comwrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Wadim Kehl wadimk...@googlemail.comwrote:
I wanted to ask you whether you could delete the project with the name
openwar. The project was created 4 years ago and saw
I'll hide them until they provide source. Thanks.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Michael Giacomelli
michael.giacome...@duke.edu wrote:
Hi,
I'm a developers for the rockbox project (www.rockbox.org). Recently one
of our users pointed us to these projects asking for help:
FYI to list: Replying off list
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Carolyn Rowland caro...@nist.gov wrote:
NIST, a branch of the US Government would like to use Google Code
and Google Groups but our Chief Counsel's office says to contact
Google to find out if there are Government-specific
You have a nice day too. If you are looking for just raw file hosting, and
not version control or anything like that, see sites.google.com, it can do
that for you. The downloading component of code.google.com can do that for
you too, but it seems you're uninterested in that.
Chris
On Sun, Sep
It's probably worth rephrasing, or bolding something :-) Thanks.
Chris
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Dmitry Chestnykh dch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, July 16, 2011 1:20:03 AM UTC+2, augie wrote:
Switch back to your old VCS, get a checkout/clone of the wiki, then switch
back and
Yes, select other osi license in the drop down.
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Sudarshan email2sudhars...@gmail.comwrote:
I want to confirm that as of now, I am permitted to use the AGPL for
my projects. Thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
We obviously won't get in the middle of some contractor dispute.
Please see this if you think you have a claim against a project hosted on
google code.
http://www.google.com/support/bin/static.py?page=ts.csts=1114905
Chris
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Charles John
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Scott Elcomb pse...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Chris DiBona cdib...@google.com wrote:
We obviously won't get in the middle of some contractor dispute.
While I agree on contractor disputes, this really sticks out:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011
It's okay here, try reloading, you're net connection (or somewhere
inbetween) might have been wonky.
Chris
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:29 AM, feynmansbastard j...@pracplay.com wrote:
the css or html seems to be messed up all over google project
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/
Your. not You're. Darn it.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Chris DiBona cdib...@google.com wrote:
It's okay here, try reloading, you're net connection (or somewhere
inbetween) might have been wonky.
Chris
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:29 AM, feynmansbastard j...@pracplay.comwrote
Thanks. Looks like one of my colleagues killed it before me. It's a race
where no-one loses... :-)
Chirs
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Andrew Dunbar adun...@gmail.com wrote:
This file is malicious:
comprovantesdeposito.googlecode.com/files/ComprovanteDep294956.exe
--
You received this
Also, please don't take this the wrong way, but you shouldn't expect us to
weigh in on look and feel matters.
Chris
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 6:37 AM, Lucas Bergman s...@google.com wrote:
Google isn't in the business of adjudicating intellectual property
disputes. If a project otherwise
Google did not remove this project. The user may have decided to.
Chris
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:02 AM, scanff sca...@yahoo.com wrote:
Was this removed?
I'd have to agree with Chris.
Using an idea or duplicating a look is not infringing on copyright
unless you hold a patent, even then
Actually in this case, I'd prefer the project forks into a new project. I'm
changing it back.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Nathaniel Manista nathan...@google.comwrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Anatol Pomozov
anatol.pomo...@gmail.comwrote:
I forgot to mention that I tried to
cc'ing Amit who would like to comment on this.
Chris
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Chris DiBona cdib...@google.com wrote:
Actually in this case, I'd prefer the project forks into a new project. I'm
changing it back.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Nathaniel Manista
nathan
Please only do this after we can talk with the googler, it will save us some
hassle. We should be trying to get people to fork more, anyhow.
--
Open Source Programs Manager, Google Inc.
Google's Open Source and Developer programs can be found at
http://code.google.com
Personal Site and Weblog:
This group is for questions around google's project hosting service. Are you
looking for google checkout or something? If your bank statement says
something like Google* pew pew pew , studio up and you can't remember the
transaction that led to that, then I would check out this page:
Thanks. No source code, so they don't fit into our carve out for security
reseach, so I've removed the project.
Thanks.
On Apr 10, 2011 6:42 AM, Mark Goll mdg...@gmail.com wrote:
These guys are hosting eggdrops, bnc, tcl, etc:
https://code.google.com/p/variant/downloads/list
--
You
Thanks. I'll ping them.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Josh dataj...@gmail.com wrote:
Project extendedcontrols appears to be using the Google Code site only for
issue tracking. It does not appear to be open source, it has no source on
Google Code or the project’s official website, http:/ /
Once you create a project, we offer 8 options for documentation licensing in
the admin interface. Go ahead and create your project using 'other' and then
select fdl or whichever you use.
As to the appropriateness, who knows. We respond to the DMCA as anyone
might, but law often isn't subject to
We really shouldn't be giving advice on which licenses to use for which
hybrid model. I'd suggest picking up a copy of Van Lindbergs book.
Chris
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Varun Mehta va...@protonfever.com wrote:
Jason,
I'm not that good with legal stuff, could you suggest which
I'll look into it. Thanks!
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:47 AM, Joxean Koret joxean.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The project malwareanalyzer (http://code.google.com/p/
malwareanalyzer/) didn't released the source code for it. I tried to
contact him via e-mail (28/02/11) and by opening an issue (as
Actually, yes, we've been in on and off discussion with the doc and state
department since the advent of project hosting and personally, since I
helped launch Sourceforge. Depending on the administration, they sometimes
telegraph that they'd like to lighten up on the non-encrypting enabled
And if they own the copyright to the entier work, they can relicense it
commercially no problemo.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Ben Collins-Sussman suss...@google.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:07 AM, mooredan moore...@suncup.net wrote:
I am a member of the s3fs project. The owner has
There is a chilling effects link on that site. You were hosting someone
else's java book and we received a dmca request to pull it down. Thus
having abused this site, you are no longer welcome to use it.
Chris
On Mar 2, 2011 9:25 AM, Jeffery Huang jefferyhuang2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
My
This is what you want:
http://www.google.com/support/bin/request.py?contact_type=lr_dmcaproduct=code
Please have specific project links, not random search terms, in your DMCA
request so that we can actually act on them.
http://www.google.com/support/bin/static.py?page=ts.csts=1114905Chris
That's fine, but be careful how you write those attachments, they are
often written in such a way that they become additional restrictions
and thus become non-open source. Also, I wouldn't reccomend using them
as they are both removable by any third party that consumes your code
(and thus are
This discussion shows the problems with 7, but here, read this from
the text of the gpl:
When you convey a copy of a covered work, you may at your option
remove any additional permissions from that copy, or from any part of
it. (Additional permissions may be written to require their own
removal
I'm not, I think it's stupid to modify the license in such a way that
isn't preserved, nor is required to be preserved, from codebase to
codebase. Also, when most people get their hands on that section they
write permissions so poorly that they introduce restrictions on use.
Warranty disclaimers
The discussion doesn't matter, the text does.
When you convey a copy of a covered work, you may at your option
remove any additional permissions from that copy, or from any part of
it.
Chris
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:44 PM, LWC lwc4...@gmail.com wrote:
But according to that discussion,
If you read 5, it says that in reference to 7, which says:
And again, from 7: : When you convey a copy of a covered work, you
may at your option
remove any additional permissions from that copy, or from any part of
it.
Again: section 7 is a pain.
And before you go all section 8 on me, which
I should have pasted the whole paragraph, where the removal language
is, sorry. This thread is getting overly long any how.
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Chris DiBona cdib...@google.com wrote:
I think this bit is important too, in case you think I'm overly
fixated on permissions (which I am
to be careful how these are written...
Chris
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Chris DiBona cdib...@google.com wrote:
I should have pasted the whole paragraph, where the removal language
is, sorry. This thread is getting overly long any how.
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Chris DiBona cdib...@google.com
We do not support renaming, you should start a new project and sync the
contents over.
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:46 PM, James Rhodes
jrho...@redpointsoftware.com.au wrote:
Could one of the Google staff rename the roket3d project (
http://code.google.com/p/roket3d/) to redpoint? There does
That's because you can't rename. You can create another project and retire
the one you have. Look into svnsync to sync your repos without loss.
Chris
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:59 PM, James Rhodes jrho...@roket-enterprises.com
wrote:
Still awaiting a response or rename on this issue. I can't
This is ridiculous, at some point, people have to take responsiblity for
their projects.
Chris
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:30 AM, calin calin.tenit...@gmail.com wrote:
the checkbox undeletable repository during google life time would
make this a better service
please implement and comparison
I notice that this is the second gmail account you are posting from.
Chris
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:56 PM, jason stallings octalm...@gmail.comwrote:
Yeah. that would work. I'd just rather have the original back. Theres
a bunch of pages linking to it already.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 8:35
one.
On 11/15/10, Chris DiBona cdib...@google.com wrote:
I notice that this is the second gmail account you are posting from.
Chris
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:56 PM, jason stallings octalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yeah. that would work. I'd just rather have the original back. Theres
It's also okay to leave the mit stuff in and just mark the project gpl.
Chris
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Christopher cbc...@gmail.com wrote:
What legal complexities? He is just using different licenses for
different parts of his project.
He could just as well have split his project
thanks.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:30 AM, GAMZAZ GAMZAZ gam...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
the following projects seems to be up and running for a while but the
source wasn't published
http://code.google.com/p/bustop
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
No. We are not a simple file host, your project will not be reinstated.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Vince W vincewil...@gmail.com wrote:
my project is widgets-and-gadgets
On Aug 22, 11:23 pm, Vince W vincewil...@gmail.com wrote:
My project is listed as scheduled for deletion. I believe
we should have a right to write our own licenses, or at least
have public domain as an option.
-Keanen
On Aug 22, 9:37 am, Chris DiBona cdib...@google.com wrote:
Right now, we only host those programs licensed under the licenses
listed on
the site. There are other sites
I was scheduled for deletion, so now it's all yours. I don't honestly care
about the editorial about other project members.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:52 AM, PowerPatrick lllpowerpatrick...@gmail.com
wrote:
Well, the original author got emotional issues, where the result is a
deletion on all
. a confirmation by email that the request was received,
whether there were missing fields (or something like that= and whether
the request was valid?
Best regards,
Jonas Kaufmann
On 20 Jul., 18:33, Chris DiBona cdib...@google.com wrote:
Once we get a valid DMCA request, we act pretty
Once we get a valid DMCA request, we act pretty quickly.
Chris
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Jonas Kaufmann
jonas.kaufm...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I am with a small company that also develops widgets, gadgets,
extensions etc. For this we have created an API that all of these
widgets
In reviewing your issue, I note you have no source code (and I won't be
running the exe to find out if you have that). As such, I'm going to hide
your project until you upload the code.
Chris
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:25 AM, BigV v...@ivz.ca wrote:
Dear group, please help. We have our product
I'm looking into open source hardware and open source tools to reverse
engineer hardware in an attempt to open up the hardware space a
little. As part of that, I'd like to start posting commercial chip
die photos and reconstructed standard cell libraries that have passed
the 10 year mask
This is a fine place. That project was not open source, so it was shut down.
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Nikolay Matsievsky
sunny.dreamw...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm getting a message about violation but no additional info, and no
support e-mail to get this info or conatct to close this issue.
Three projects, all non-oss and hackign tools. Why would we ever want you on
this site?
Chris
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 11:29 PM, 零魂 izeros...@gmail.com wrote:
I just found I couldn't visit my google code project when I was logon a few
months ago,then I'm aware of that it because myself.
I
Well, this is a fine place. Could you could send us the url to the project?
chris
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Ryan Tate ryant...@ryantate.com wrote:
There's an utterly crap Google Code project that is defacto Mac
malware - can't be uninstalled, screws up your computer, tons of
It's close enough to it that I'd be fine with you using the bsd option from
the drop down.
Chris
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Mike Norman mwnor...@gmail.com wrote:
Pardon if this has been asked already, but what isn't the ISC License
the same as the 'new BSD' license? If - in the opinion
Yes, I know, I post a few files that are not allowed to spread.
I do not know what is not allowed, because I have not read the Terms
of Service, but hey, who reads them.
but you know they were 'not allowed to spread'?
However, the service could send a warning one week before the ban. And
I
If the new project isn't open source, then yes.
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:37 AM, vendion vend...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok I have a quick question that I thought I should ask before I leap,
on one of my projects I am playing with the idea of doing a code
rewrite and with that even relicense the
Either. We've not parted it out. Jsut ntoe it in your summary.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:55 AM, samlin google@lintusoft.com wrote:
Hi,
When trying to create a project
http://code.google.com/hosting/createProject
I can choose GNU Lesser General Public License. Does this license
refer to
I'm sorry but we've decided to take a very specifically negative view of
those who are using the service for malware hosting. Do it somewhere else.
Chris
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 5:24 AM, azrael-sub7 azs...@gmail.com wrote:
Why is your in quotes ? and I think that the source was available it
for the bad english .
On Feb 22, 9:32 pm, Chris DiBona cdib...@google.com wrote:
I'm sorry but we've decided to take a very specifically negative view of
those who are using the service for malware hosting. Do it somewhere
else.
Chris
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 5:24 AM, azrael-sub7
just took a look at 'your' steam keylogger program and other projects and
I'm not convinced in any way that you should be allowed back. Google code is
for open source development, not non-source malware hosting.
Chris
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Azrael Sub7 azs...@gmail.com wrote:
I was
I don't see why we would trust you now.
2010/2/20 织染局孙亮 bjzr...@gmail.com
hi, dear
i know why is that (i use it to store my music), but i wonder how i can
get a chance to regain google code service? i promise it won't happen
again!
sincerely
--
You received this message because
You can indeed release your product commercially, you should find a lawyer
to help you, this list isn't really the right place to go for advice about
license compliance for closed source isvs.
Chris
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:22 AM, wizards ankiredd...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
i am new to
Not at this time. See some of these :
http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/list?can=1q=cdibona+agplcolspec=ID+Type+Status+Milestone+Priority+Stars+Owner+Summarycells=tiles
Totally okay. A project doesn't have to be 'popular' with anyone but its
users.(your calss and you)
Chris
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:56 PM, AllenDowney allendow...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to use Google Code for a software engineering class I am
teaching this spring, in order to expose
We generally run the numbers on license growth in April. Last cycle, it had
grown only a tenth of a percent or so from .04 when ranked against the other
licenses. I usually present the numbers at Oscon, if you go. Its adoption
hasn't been as quick as I expected, to be honest.
Chris
On Fri, Jan
/javascript/jsmin
Chris, maybe you should ask Doug for an IBM-style exemption. ;)
- Ryan
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Chris DiBona cdib...@google.com wrote:
As a side note, it's not a matter of violating the terms of service,
which
don't mention specific licenses, it is against our practices
I have to stress that we (google project hosting) don't really cater to this
kind of thing, and I'd like to stress to all subscribed that this is not a
google effort. There are a lot of masters students who want this and noone
seems to work together.
Chris
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Adam
Again, code.google.com is for open source projects who have source code,
also, your project looks very spammy and uses google language, sono.
Chris
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:51 AM, Fredj A,J info.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris DiBona Thank you so much for your help
I understand very well
Your project is not open source, and code.google.com is only for open source
projects.*
Chris
*
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Fredj A,J info.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Still working on my project (localhost)...almost done, but today i
noticed that, i can't access my hosting project and my
When a user resets their version control, where those wiki pages were
stored, and then they were no longer available, this is the
programmed behavior. This isn't an ambiguous result.
I might point out that the reset routine says in big red letters,
*Warning:* Resetting the repository will delete
I doomed it, but not because it is malware, but because there was no open
source for the same.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Allan Denot ade...@gmail.com wrote:
Any updates?
I checked today and this project now is hosting more malware than
before, as you can see in:
Basically we don't allow 'google' as a tag.
Chris
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Ich Neumon ichneumo...@gmail.com wrote:
So, I've put together a little php script that acts as an interface
between the Flickr API and Google Earth. It works well, and allows you
to browse a specified user's
the code elsewhere?
On Oct 7, 9:39 pm, Chris DiBona cdib...@google.com wrote:
Basically we don't allow 'google' as a tag.
Chris
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Ich Neumon ichneumo...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, I've put together a little php script that acts as an interface
between
Your email said that you'd create a new project and that name is taken.
So...what are you asking for?
Chris
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Jeroen jeroen.vansteirteg...@gmail.comwrote:
I hope that is not a problem? :$
-Jeroen
On Sep 6, 5:51 pm, Jeroen jeroen.vansteirteg...@gmail.com wrote:
project.
However, I have got the question a number of times, there are similar
smaller projects that have the same issue.
/Gerhard
On Jul 25, 4:04 am, Chris DiBona cdib...@google.com wrote:
I know you are thinking that you are asking for our permission for
something, but given the rights
.
However, I have got the question a number of times, there are similar
smaller projects that have the same issue.
/Gerhard
On Jul 25, 4:04 am, Chris DiBona cdib...@google.com wrote:
I know you are thinking that you are asking for our permission for
something, but given the rights ownership
I know you are thinking that you are asking for our permission for
something, but given the rights ownership issues that this presents,
I'm not going to say yea or nay here and suggest you consult a lawyer.
Chirs
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Gerhard
Olssongerhard.nos...@gmail.com wrote:
So I'd say that the former should remain reserved and the latter, not.
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Roy Lebanroyle...@groupthink.com wrote:
Sourceforge sure has a lot of dead projects! I have two open source
projects that I'll be releasing soon whose names are taken by dead
projects at
Please pass us a url. We're not psychic.
Chris
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:58 PM, flashmadandrewsko...@gmail.com wrote:
hello! What about this?
--
Open Source Programs Manager, Google Inc.
Google's Open Source and Developer programs can be found at
http://code.google.com
Personal Site
Great!
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Mike mca...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the input guys - the code sure is up there - now I just
have to write the doc/wiki stuff.
-Mike
--
Open Source Programs Manager, Google Inc.
Google's Open Source and Developer programs can be found at
What matters is that the code on code.google.com is released, with source,
we don't care if you say used by this proprietary package or something. As
to the questions of 2 projects and 2 licenses, just use two projects, they
don't cost nothin.
Again, what matters is that ths code is on the site.
There is no conflict between commercialization and the licenses we
offer, but we do not offer dual-license options on the site beyond
what is there for perl (artistic+)
Chris
2009/3/24 Russell Wallace russell.wall...@gmail.com:
I currently have two Google hosted projects, and am happy with
Hi Tenjin,
See here: http://www.google.com/dmca.html
Chris
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:50 PM, tenjin dar...@tenjin.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
The following project is hosting a data file that I created, but that
I did not make available to the project owner.
http://code.google.com/p/aracagenedb/
I suppose you could call it ideological, but I wouldn't preface that
with 'just'. Since open source folks generally shy away from
trademarks and similar name 'protecting' schemes, you will sometimes
see projects take on names that are already in use. It is usually
pretty frustrating for those
I thought hte atvmore and launchore were one in the same. I'm chatting
with the projects owner. It is important to us to make sure all code
on the side has source available on the site.
Chirs
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:29 PM, gbooker gboo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 1, 9:57 pm, Nathan
No does not reading the FAQs or seaching the group history to answer
his questions.
Chris
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Thomas Johnson ntmat...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe that the Google Code issue tracker may be a better forum for
your problems:
.
Apologies for the unhelpful and inflammatory response.
- Thomas
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Chris DiBona cdib...@google.com wrote:
No does not reading the FAQs or seaching the group history to answer
his questions.
Chris
- Show quoted text -
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 2:15 AM
Hi Daniel;
We are not planning on adding the ms-pl any time soon. We are trying
to take a principled stance against open source license proliferation.
I notice that Sourceforge supports the MS-PL, so you have an
alternative to Codeplex if you need it.
Chris
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:05 PM,
And, for the record, I actually like coding in c#. It's pretty fun.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Chris DiBona cdib...@google.com wrote:
Hi Daniel;
We are not planning on adding the ms-pl any time soon. We are trying
to take a principled stance against open source license proliferation
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
