I just posted a reply on SO.
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 6:09:42 AM UTC+2, vikceo wrote:
some one please advise we are really stuck on this
Thankx and Regards
Vik
Founder
http://www.sakshum.org
http://blog.sakshum.org
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Vik vik...@gmail.com
For the purposes of getting stack traces, SuperDevMode is the same as
production mode. For this, you have two options:
(1) Deobfuscate your stack traces on the server (see StackTraceDeobfuscator)
(2) Emulated stack traces
When you do either or both of these, you still don't get something quite
thx thomas,
if you hav no answer who else could :-( ?
I've got some new info: On of us could run dev mode from eclipse (indigo),
on at least two machines - helios, juno it is not working. The one that has
the working config is thze only one whoe uses java 7 as execution
environment. I also
It is running with java 7!
(don't ask why)
On Thursday, 13 September 2012 09:43:19 UTC+2, tanteanni wrote:
thx thomas,
if you hav no answer who else could :-( ?
I've got some new info: On of us could run dev mode from eclipse (indigo),
on at least two machines - helios, juno it is not
I need to absolute position an image in a page. A possible solution would
be to use a popup panel, but to make the page cleaner I prefer to absolute
position the image itself. I tried the code below (and some variations of
it), but the image appears contained in a div, which has top, left,
I starting using 2.5RC now in my local testing with GWTP, GWT-Bootstrap.
Superdev is fast! Reduced compile time considerably. Though, setting up is
a bit of pain.
Any ideas when is 2.5 getting released? Looking fwd to it. Keep up the good
work
On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 10:39:07 PM UTC+2,
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 10:10:54 AM UTC+2, Rahul wrote:
I starting using 2.5RC now in my local testing with GWTP, GWT-Bootstrap.
Superdev is fast! Reduced compile time considerably. Though, setting up is
a bit of pain.
Any ideas when is 2.5 getting released? Looking fwd to it.
Great. Looking forward to it!
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 10:52:18 AM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote:
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 10:10:54 AM UTC+2, Rahul wrote:
I starting using 2.5RC now in my local testing with GWTP, GWT-Bootstrap.
Superdev is fast! Reduced compile time
I'm working on a project in development mode using Eclipse and Chrome. The
log window fills up with exceptions like this:
Caused by: com.google.gwt.dev.shell.HostedModeException: Something other
than a double was returned from JSNI method
Hi Derek,
Thanks for the advice.
I tried to put var $wnd= $self but what about var $document ?
if you have some time to check your code, it is welcome :)
Regards,
Harold
2012/9/10 Derek derekad...@gmail.com
I'd need to look at my code again (not convenient to do right now), but I
recall
Hey,
I seem to be seing similar issues when putting a GWT application in an
IFrame and then removing the IFrame. It looks like the entire GWT
application leaks.
I saw your bug report in the bug tracker of GWT. I added my comment there
with a suggestion on how they could maybe fix this issue
Thanks for the reply. So, I guess I will wait until 2.5 comes out and see
whether there are any changes made in the near future.
I can live with a null value there for a while as it's only in development
stage.
You guys are great.
Drew
On Wednesday, 5 September 2012 16:18:24 UTC+1, Jens
Hi,
did you noticed that you are accessing
/com.interbookerappl.interbookerappl/EntityService
but in web.xml you mapped the servlet on /interbookappl/EntityService ?
Don't know why the full package name is there but i suppose that
changing the url-pattern should
solve the problem (note that there
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 11:07:00 AM UTC+2, walker1c wrote:
I'm working on a project in development mode using Eclipse and Chrome.
The log window fills up with exceptions like this:
Caused by: com.google.gwt.dev.shell.HostedModeException: Something other
than a double was returned
Was anyone able to get CellTable column sorting working in version 2.5 RC1?
On Thursday, 9 August 2012 19:50:18 UTC+3, Pete wrote:
Hi all,
I am using GWT 2.5 to create a CellTable with a sortable Date column.
All goes well until I click on the sortable column's header, but its not
When you add a widget to a LayoutPanel, it takes up all the space unless you
specify it's position (see below). Also, you can add only one widget to the
RootLayoutPage. You can't add an image directly to it, unless your entire app
consists of this image and nothing else.
So, try this:
You don't need a TimeZone for parsing dates, as you observed in your post. I
also had to implement my own box for parsing time, because I want my users to
be able to enter time in any format they like (2pm, 2:00 PM, 2:00p, 14:00).
Then I adjust the raw time (in milliseconds) using time zone's
My understanding is that you can do this on the client side if you only
need to edit in the timezone of the browser. The problem I had was that my
users have a timezone preference that can be different than the browser and
the browser doesn't provide access to every timezone. Because the
Hi, thank you for your reply
Actually, what you suggest doesn't work, because the image is correctly
positioned in the panel but now is the panel taking the whole space.
Unless there is some other trick, using a popup panel is the only solution
that works.
On Thursday, September 13, 2012
Okay, I've looked at my code.
I modified the DedicatedWorkerTemplate.js file from speedtracer to include
the following lines near the top (first two should already be there):
$self = self;
$sessionId = null;
$wnd = self;
$doc = self;
window = self;
This kept a lot of the code I was using that
I guessing that there are quite a few shops that use a formal message
bundling strategy without every having a real requirement to support
multiple languages.
Welcome to the party :)
On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 3:25:41 PM UTC-4, Robert Konigsberg wrote:
Hello,
I am generalizing an
Great thread.
For simplicity , I use a single EntryPoint for multiple urls. Code
splitting ensures that I'm only bringing in what I need for a given
request.Are there guidelines for moving to multiple EntryPoints.
(besides OSGI).
thanks
--
You received this message because you are
It does not matter which widget you are going to add to the RootLayoutPanel
- it will take the whole space. Which is great, because this is exactly how
GWT apps are built.
In my example you can add as many widgets to your LayoutPanel as you need,
and position them anywhere you want. I hope
I am not using browser's time zone and its offset - it would not work, as
you correctly stated. I am using GWT's TimeZone object and its offset. I
build this TimeZone object using the time zone ID which a user specified in
his preferences. This requires me to pass the correct JSON string from a
Hi again,
Your problematic should give headache :-p
In this case i always choose to rewrite the library by myself. I think this
saves lot of time in the long term.
Btw, I have modified the DedicatedWorkerTemplate.js as you wrote but this
does not make any change to the generated worker script
For me the scrollbar dissapears when i use: setVisibleItemCount(int count),
to be one more item than the ListBox are holding.
So if you have 10 items in the ListBox, set VisibleItemCount to 11. Not a
nice solution, but it seems to work.
Den onsdagen den 16:e februari 2011 kl. 20:28:57 UTC+1
Got it. I considered that approach as well, but it seemed a bit more
complicated. Where are you getting the JSON data to present to the client?
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 11:02:40 AM UTC-4, Andrei wrote:
I am not using browser's time zone and its offset - it would not work, as
you
It should be
a1.getDate().getTime().compareTo(a2.getDate().getTime())
or
a1.getDate().after(a2.getDate())
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Image img = new Image();
RootLayoutPanel.get().add(img);
RootLayoutPanel.get().setWidgetTopHeight(img, 100, Unit.PX, 12, Unit.PX);
RootLayoutPanel.get().setWidgetLeftWidth(img, 100, Unit.PX, 12, Unit.PX);
should work I guess. RootLayoutPanel is just a singleton LayoutPanel.
-- J.
--
You
Hi nino, i'm making a second Java API for my yuigwt project, on top of my
JSO based Java API, wrapping JSO objects and delegating methods to it. I
have a couple of questions for you about this. I'm not sure, perhaps the
best is to create another thread for this questions, but here they go:
I
Hi all,
lets look at the code:
public class MyView implements IMyView {
Button click;
.
public HasClickHandlers getClick(){
return click;
}
}
public class MyPresenter {
public interface IMyView {
public HasClickHandlers getClick();
}
As your view is singleton you have to tell the presenter that it should
detach itself from the view, e.g. by introducing a public
Presenter.unbind() method. You then have to call that unbind() method
before you throw away your presenter instance. Your presenter needs to
remember the
Hello,
Just wanted to see what are pros and cons of GWT MVP4G vs GWT Activities
Places?
If moving to GWT MVP4G will make us miss any features which Activities
Places offer or MVP4G is self sufficient enough to replace Activities and
Places.
I used extensively Activities and Places and that
In one our our project we have a base which goes something like
public class ProxyObject {
protected JavaScriptObject jsObj;
protected ProxyObject() {
}
}
The we do
public class View extends ProxyObject {
public View() {
createPeer();
}
Found on StackOverflow: http://stackoverflow.com/q/12403658/116472
We have a critical issue with RequestFactory (AutoBeans actually): we use
static HashMaps as shared caches without any synchronization!
Short-term fix: because neither ConcurrentHashMap or
Collections.synchronizedMap are
Yes - we can put it into rc2 assuming its small and you can get it in today.
On Sep 13, 2012 6:33 AM, John A. Tamplin j...@jaet.org wrote:
Yeah, just add a synchronized block for now.
John A. Tamplin (android)
On Sep 13, 2012 8:02 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
Found on
On 2012/09/13 09:57:02, manolo.carrasco wrote:
RF fails in the case of @ProxyFor pointing to a domain-interface
instead of a
domain-implementation, could you consider to include the patch
https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1764804/ as well in 2.5?
I think that counts as a new feature
Well, if you ask me, it can wait the next release.
There's a workaround in the meantime: don't rely on ValidationTool to
generate the Deobfuscator.Builder, generate it yourself by other means. I
wrote such a generator for a project, 'cause we had many
@SkipInterfaceValidation methods (and much
On 2012/09/13 17:16:52, skybrian wrote:
Since this API is essentially just a wrapper around the JavaScript
object and
there's no place to stash the desired response type, adding the setter
and
deprecating create() with a response type seems like the way to go.
Done.
I wonder if we
https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1830803/diff/2003/user/src/com/google/gwt/xhr/client/XMLHttpRequest.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/xhr/client/XMLHttpRequest.java (right):
https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1830803/diff/2003/user/src/com/google/gwt/xhr/client/XMLHttpRequest.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/xhr/client/XMLHttpRequest.java (right):
Should we kill off the ResponseType enum and just take a String? It's
simpler, and this is low-level, after all.
- Brian
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:08 AM, j...@jaet.org wrote:
https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1830803/diff/2003/user/src/com/google/gwt/xhr/client/XMLHttpRequest.java
File
I don't see any usages of XmlHttpRequest.ResponseType in Google code. We
could have constants instead of the enum.
https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1830803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
We are using domain interfaces in a couple of projects and finally we
decided to patch this file to avoid such amount of extra code.
I thought this was a very small piece of code which IMHO fixes an
important issue, and could be related with this commit, so that is the
reason to suggest the
Reviewers: unnurg, jtamplin,
Message:
I've grep'ed in all com.google.web.bindery and didn't find any other
instance.
I also quickly looked into com.google.gwt in case there could have been
similar issues with GWT-RPC or some shared code, but didn't find
anything either.
Description:
Synchronize
LGTM after fixing for comment or deciding to disregard it.
https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1829804/diff/1/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/shared/impl/AutoBeanCodexImpl.java
File
user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/shared/impl/AutoBeanCodexImpl.java
(right):
On 2012/09/13 18:35:35, manolo.carrasco wrote:
We are using domain interfaces in a couple of projects and finally we
decided to
patch this file to avoid such amount of extra code.
I thought this was a very small piece of code which IMHO fixes an
important
issue, and could be related with
On 2012/09/13 18:23:04, skybrian wrote:
I don't see any usages of XmlHttpRequest.ResponseType in Google code.
OK, so I'll remove the create(ResponseType).
We could have constants instead of the enum.
I kind of like the enums as in com.google.gwt.dom.client.Style (also
used in SafeStyles),
https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1829804/diff/1/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/shared/impl/AutoBeanCodexImpl.java
File
user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/shared/impl/AutoBeanCodexImpl.java
(right):
On 2012/09/13 20:22:43, tbroyer wrote:
I kind of like the enums as in com.google.gwt.dom.client.Style (also
used in
SafeStyles), but I'll make the setResponseType(String) public, and add
a
getResponseTypeString() to the enum.
Oops, I guess I should have responded. I'm fine with it either
LGTM
https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1830803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: skybrian,
Description:
Add experimental GWT.unloadModule() function.
Enable via set-property name=gwt.unloadEnabled value=true/
Invoke via window.__gwt_activeModules[moduleName].unloadModule().
Attempts to do the following:
1) Cleanup all outstanding non-primitive properties from
Appreciate any further suggestions for cleaning up memory usage. The
additional of Disposable roughly parallels the same use in
JSCompiler's Closure Library. In theory. V8's GC should be good enough
to clean up everything if you just blow away the script tag and
iframe and remove the DOM elements,
LGTM
https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1829804/diff/1/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/shared/impl/AutoBeanCodexImpl.java
File
user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/shared/impl/AutoBeanCodexImpl.java
(right):
54 matches
Mail list logo
