The 100% won't help you, because the FlowPanel (which contains your
DataGrid as I understand it) has a height of 0 unless you fill it with
widgets that mount their own height.
In other words, you are creating a cycle: The FlowPanel asks its children
for the height they need, and the child
In my opinion, Super Dev Mode is an awesome addition to Dev Mode.
It fits in my workflow:
- For super-fast changes in client-side code (to fine-tune styling etc.), I
use Dev Mode, with a Debugger attached, and a simple button on the page
that rebuilds just the widget I am tuning. Nothing beats
On Thursday, November 15, 2012 2:53:37 AM UTC+1, Thomas Broyer wrote:
SourceMaps could then be used by your IDE so you could put breakpoints in
your editor window.
I can see the potential - it could be big. I do have a few doubts though:
1. Would this also allow me to inspect the internal
On Tuesday, November 6, 2012 10:13:59 AM UTC+1, Thomas Broyer wrote:
Couldn't you simply override the methods and refine the return type? (Java
has covariant return types)
interface Employee {
Employee getBoss();
}
interface EmployeeProxy extends Employee, EntityProxy {
I'd like to discuss how to best use (JPA) transactions with RequestFactory.
As a basis, I'm assuming the approach where one user interaction should
normally result in one DB transaction, so that the whole interaction can
either fail or succeed, atomically.
The first thing to consider with
On Thursday, November 1, 2012 6:36:54 PM UTC+1, Thomas Broyer wrote:
Guice Persist's @Transactional works great (of course with a
ServiceLayerDecorator to instantiate your services through Guice):
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/Transactions
That's the missing guice-extension
On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 5:42:11 PM UTC+1, Lars Ködderitzsch wrote:
Bummer, at least this finally confirms that anyone doomed to still use
Java 5 based servers will be unable to user anything newer than GWT 2.4
from this point on.
What I find interesting is, that companies who are
I'd like to check out the code for 2.5.0-rc2. For previous versions I can
find a tag, e.g.
http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/tags/2.5.0-rc1;, with the svn
log entry
r11147 | rda...@google.com | 2012-06-27
A Google search for site:www.spot...com [replace the ellipsis] just
returns www.spot...com.
But you don't have that page in your sitemap, and you're not using step 3
Handle pages without hash fragments of the Step-by-step guide:
In order to make pages without hash fragments crawlable, you
One alternative for serialization would be to work with AutoBeans.
- Advantage: They can be decoded from/encoded to Strings via
AutoBeanCodexhttp://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/AutoBean#AutoBeanCodex
.
- Disadvantage: AutoBeans (or the interfaces they represent) can't be used
as
That's a very interesting situation. Actually, this is a decision between
full-ajax site and js-enhanced site, and for that question it doesn't
even really matter which JS framework is used.
Server-side templating has always been a somewhat crazy idea (a hack, if
you want - but then again,
On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 4:38:47 PM UTC+2, David wrote:
When servlet engines first came on the scene , developers were writing
stringified content directly to the HttpResponse.
Absolutely, from that point of view (and I remember cgi scripts), template
engines are a big enhancement to
On Friday, July 20, 2012 6:42:02 PM UTC+2, Jens wrote:
Actually UiBinder special treats addStyleNames for normal widgets (it
works with my:MyViewImpl addStyleNames=...) but it stops doing so when it
sees something that does not extend Widget I guess.
FYI, this is true, the special code is
Yes, GWT includes an Audio class:
http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/2.5/com/google/gwt/media/client/Audio.html
However, not all browsers support all formats, e.g. Firefox doesn't support
mp3: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML5_Audio
So you may have to serve the file in
On Thursday, October 4, 2012 8:32:13 PM UTC+2, James wrote:
I extended IFrameLinker to return .cache.htm in getCompilationExtension.
GWT compiler generates all js files ending with cache.htm as expected.
But nocache.js still has cache.html in one place such as $intern_62 =
'.cache.html'.
Sorry, but definitely no. Admittedly, I've never actually encountered such
a GWT bug in my own code. But that's irrelevant. Imagine you're changing a
method temporarily to debug some code (in a way, that it always returns
true), and in compiled mode it will simply not do what you expect -
In my opinion, it's currently unnecessarily difficult to integrate basic
transaction management with GWT-RPC.
Usually, in a web application it's best to start a transaction, when a call
arrives at the server, and to commit it, when the server has finished
processing and created the response.
The documentation mentions, that it's possible to make all logging code
compile
outhttps://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideLogging#Making_All_Logging_Code_Compile_Out,
but it doesn't mention how to compile out only certain levels.
This is however possible: The property
Thanks for the link, Joseph - it's an old version of eclemma, but it works:
It shows client side coverage when running in dev mode (not in production
mode).
Then again, I'm not sure what the patch does exactly. I installed the
unpatched v1.3.2 and v1.5.3
from
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012 5:00:28 PM UTC+2, Celinio Fernandes wrote:
How can i save them ?
If you always only need the previously selected criteria, you don't have to
store them in the token:
- Either save the values somewhere in your Java objects (wherever you
want). When re-creating
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 1:55:53 PM UTC+2, Chris Lercher wrote:
you can use HTML5
Storagehttps://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideHtml5Storage
(consider
browser support).
Forgot to mention: You could also save them in a cookie.
--
You received this message
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012 7:59:16 AM UTC+2, maticpetek wrote:
2) When we get exception in client code, Dev mode will print out full
stacktrace. Is something like this available in SuperDev mode? For example,
the following code :
String bla = null;
bla.length(); // Exception
will
I want to add to that list, that running Dev Mode with a debugger can be
used to fine-tune user interfaces extremely quickly: What I usually do is
to put the unit which I need to optimize in a panel, and add a button that
refreshes the panel with a new instance of the unit. This doesn't even
On Thursday, September 20, 2012 3:54:41 AM UTC+2, Tim wrote:
Perhaps you want set some ImageOptions on the resource. Check
preventInlining and RepeatStyle
Thanks, according to the javadoc, ImageOptions.preventInlining actually
seems to disable all kinds of optimizations:
Set to {@code
According to
https://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideUiImageBundles,
multiple images in the same ClientBundle should usually be merged to a
composite image, quote:
Multiple ImageResources are declared in a single ClientBundle, which is a
composition of many images into a
Please excuse me for this negative feedback, but in my opinion, the survey
is rather suggestive in that it presupposes that GWT should develop into
something that better supports other technologies. It asks a series of
questions that point in this direction (and it offers some free text
What is the officially supported Hibernate Validator
versionhttp://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/groups/public-jboss/org/hibernate/hibernate-validator/that
should be used in conjunction with GWT
JSR 303 Bean
Validationhttp://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/BeanValidation?
Ok, thanks.
On Monday, September 17, 2012 3:34:48 PM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote:
This has actually been reported a few days ago:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7661, and in
the comments on the wiki page.
GWT is built against 4.1.0 Final and depends on
1. The java.util.Properties class isn't available on the client side. It's
possible to get a properties file to the client side (e.g.
using com.google.gwt.http.client.RequestBuilder), but you'd have to find a
way to parse it. So why not use JSON format instead? Or GWT-RPC (which can
contain
https://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideServerCommunication#DevGuideDeRPC
says
about Direct-Eval RPC:
This feature did not work out as planned, and the GWT team strongly
discourages its use.
However, the classes RpcServlet, RpcService etc. are not marked as
On Thursday, September 6, 2012 3:58:34 PM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote:
Would you mind filing an issue in the tracker (if no one already did it) ?
I did a few years ago:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5729
It was closed as a duplicate of
I assume it should be possible by extending IFrameLinker, and overriding
getCompilationExtension(...) to return .cache.htm. Then define and add
your linker as in /com/google/gwt/core/Core.gwt.xml
I haven't tried it though, so you may encounter some difficulties (?)
On Wednesday, September 5,
Another possibility would be to replace some classes with stubs (-
dependency injection) - only activating the functionality that is currently
interesting. The rest doesn't need to be compiled. Of course it depends on
the application's architecture, if this can be done easily or not.
On
They're in gwt-user.jar, in subdirectories of package
com.google.gwt.user.theme. You can also view them in the subversion
browser, e.g.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/tags/2.4.0/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/theme/standard/public/gwt/standard/standard.css
The css
To set the width of the stroke, use ctx.setLineWidth(double)
In general, FillStrokeStyle currently has three subclasses:
- CanvasGradient
- CanvasPattern
- CssColor
They don't have public constructors. CanvasGradient can be created by using
ctx.createLinearGradient() or
I analyzed this a bit more (this time on Linux), and I noticed, that the
number of Thread also grows: 1 thread per reload. Again, this happens only
with Firefox, not with Chrome. So probably the ClassLoader references will
be discarded only when the Thread terminates...
One more thing that
About Dart:
- I really (!) hope that Dart will succeed.
- Ideally, Dart would even become the new JavaScript alternative in all
browsers (however, AFAIK a few browser vendors have signaled, that this
ain't gonna happen). If not, then it could maybe still be successful with
dart2js.
About GWT:
Yes. I disabled all Add-Ons: All Extensions (except for the GWT Extension)
and all Plugins, and restarted Firefox.
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:12:03 AM UTC+2, Brian Slesinsky wrote:
Does the connection leak happen with all plugins (other than GWT) disabled?
--
You received this
Very useful. Great widget.
On Tuesday, August 28, 2012 10:34:09 PM UTC+2, Julien Dramaix wrote:
Dear community,
I just released the first version of GwtChosen. GwtChosen is the
entire rewritte in Google Web Toolkit of the Chosen component
(http://harvesthq.github.com/chosen/) making this
When I analyze a DevMode process's memory usage (e.g. using jconsole), it
shows that Heap and Non-Heap (PermGen) Memory usage increases, whenever the
page is reloaded.
This happens both when I run DevMode with Firefox 14, as well as Chrome 21.
The difference is however, that
- with Chrome,
There are several competing (or complemental) new/experimental (or
deprecated) classes around, which deal with rendering Widgets in
alternative (often lazy) ways in GWT:
- GXT2's lazy
@karthik: The problem is, that in general you can't simply retain the
original names. A very important (probably the most important) feature of
CssResources is, that each of them effectively gets its own namespace. If
you remove that concept (even just for testing), you will create conflicts,
Ok, thanks - opened an enhancement request:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5729
On Dec 8, 12:47 pm, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 déc, 15:30, Chris Lercher cl_for_mail...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
with GWT RPC, it's possible to elide/obfuscate
Hi,
with GWT RPC, it's possible to elide/obfuscate the type names from the
network traffic, by adding:
inherits
name=com.google.gwt.user.RemoteServiceObfuscateTypeNames/
to the .gwt.xml file. (This effectively sets the property
gwt.elideTypeNamesFromRPC to true.)
Is something like that also
How about using GWTQuery? It's easy to use (very similar to your
Mootols example), and it's highly optimized for speed (individually
for different browser).
http://code.google.com/p/gwtquery/
On Jun 24, 11:46 am, Paul Schwarz paulsschw...@gmail.com wrote:
In Mootools et al. it is really easy to
Don't worry about adding the entire GWTQuery library - the GWT
compiler takes care of outputting only the code parts it needs from
that library. This often means, that your code size will only increase
by a few hundred bytes.
On Jun 24, 12:47 pm, Paul Schwarz paulsschw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 24, 1:08 pm, Paul Schwarz paulsschw...@gmail.com wrote:
But getting back to GWTQuery, it looks interesting, but now that I've
solved my Element selector woes why else should I delve into
GWTQuery?
No need to do that, but GWTQuery provides the easy selector syntax you
mentioned in your
Hi,
would it be possible to somehow wrap a GWT-RPC in a JSONP call? I
mean, at the end of the day, GWT-RPC also just sends a string in an
HTTP POST message (along with some headers), so theoretically it
should be possible to use that String as a JSON string, maybe
alongside the headers to form a
Okay, thinking about it, maybe this is a stupid idea. Since I can send
only an URL (and not a POST body) with a JSONP call, I guess, the URL
probably can't take very long strings...
On Jun 16, 9:27 pm, Chris Lercher cl_for_mail...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
would it be possible to somehow wrap a GWT
Hi Sri,
I mean of course, that there would have to be a component (e.g.
Servlet) on the server side, that re-translates the get request, and
then calls the RemoteServlet (or something underlying), as if a usual
GWT-RPC request had been issued. Se we would basically use JSONP as a
tunnel.
[The
domain issues.
--Sri
On 17 June 2010 01:21, Chris Lercher cl_for_mail...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi Sri,
I mean of course, that there would have to be a component (e.g.
Servlet) on the server side, that re-translates the get request, and
then calls the RemoteServlet (or something underlying
@Sky: Yeah, compression is very important. Note, that you don't have
to do it yourself: Most servers and browsers support HTTP gzip Content-
Encoding (usually just a switch in the server config to turn it on).
Chris
On Jun 13, 4:46 am, Sky myonceinalifet...@gmail.com wrote:
Second, I seriously
Hi Stefan,
did you also enable the Firebug Console tab? Do you see any
JavaScript Errors/Warnings there?
Also, some quick things to try (probably you've already tried them): -
Clearing the browser cache. - Cleaning the project from all generated
files, then building again.
Chris
On Jun 11,
Daniel, IE 6 does have something like a standards mode - it's not
really standards compliant, but it does behave differently, when
putting it into that mode. That's because, when it's in quirks mode,
then it behaves like IE 5.5. See http://www.quirksmode.org/css/quirksmode.html
for more details.
Are you looking for this:
http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5397323
Probably, an even cleaner alternative would be to inject a JMS
ConnectionFactory using Annotations:
http://java.sun.com/javaee/5/docs/tutorial/doc/bnceh.html
- I assume, it would clean up itself when undeploying, but
Hi Stefan,
not sure, if it's only the CSS, or the entire UiBinder - but I had
assumed, that it's only the CSS, because the div has the same width as
the body (which makes sense, if the CSS selector of the div doesn't
find its CSS class).
Oh, the code I posted is all there is for this little test
[I see, that you replied to the first message in this thread - most of
the code is in the second message.]
The full thread is here:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/1c632fbbb37f6f66/54b2d8927811fe14
On Jun 8, 7:39 pm, Chris Lercher cl_for_mail...@gmx.net
You can cache all files that end with .cache.* forever, because they
automatically get a new name when the content changes.
You shouldn't cache the files that end with .nocache.* at all
(Caching them would result in a serious problem!)
See
Also, don't cache other files (like your entry html page, or anything
whose content might change without changing its name).
On Jun 7, 11:03 am, Chris Lercher cl_for_mail...@gmx.net wrote:
You can cache all files that end with .cache.* forever, because they
automatically get a new name when
/mnot_tutorial/how.html
On Jun 7, 11:06 am, Chris Lercher cl_for_mail...@gmx.net wrote:
Also, don't cache other files (like your entry html page, or anything
whose content might change without changing its name).
On Jun 7, 11:03 am, Chris Lercher cl_for_mail...@gmx.net wrote:
You can cache
( +
myComposite.getOffsetWidth()));
}
});
}
}
The first label shows 987 (or whatever the width of body is), the
second label shows 80.
On Jun 6, 9:58 pm, Chris Lercher cl_for_mail...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
I want to perform a size calculation on a composite generated
final sizing.
On Jun 6, 1:58 pm, Chris Lercher cl_for_mail...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
I want to perform a size calculation on a composite generated by
UiBinder, using UIObject.getOffsetWidth(). The composite's ui.xml
(simplified) looks like this:
ui:style
.test
Hi,
I want to perform a size calculation on a composite generated by
UiBinder, using UIObject.getOffsetWidth(). The composite's ui.xml
(simplified) looks like this:
ui:style
.test {
width: 80px;
height: 50px;
Hi Tobias,
have you tried to use
set-configuration-property name=CssResource.obfuscationPrefix
value=empty/
in your gwt.xml files? I haven't tried this with multiple modules yet,
but I think it should work, according to this description:
Hi,
are you on Linux? There's a limit of open files you can have. Google
for Too many open files to find a solution. Here's a good page:
http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/CONF29/Fix+'Too+many+open+files'+error+on+Linux+by+increasing+filehandles
If your parameters are in a normal range
Hi,
I think, many people (including myself) are a little bit unhappy with
the current situation of date and time handling
a) due to the use of deprecated methods of java.util.Date and
b) due to the general weaknesses of the java Date API
This topic crops up repeatedly on different forums, as
On May 31, 2:26 am, Paul Stockley pstockl...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using gwt-time. I haven't had any issues as yet. However, the
biggest
problem is that it adds 250 - 300 kb to the project js download.
That's massive, and it would be way too much for my project. I wonder,
why it's that large -
It can be done:
com.gwt.resources.Resources.gwt.xml defines the CssResource.style
property. Looking into
com.google.gwt.resources.rg.CssResourceGenerator.init() shows, that we
can set the property to pretty - so in your .gwt.xml file you would
write:
set-configuration-property
On May 28, 4:28 pm, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
Use a StringBuilder, it'll optimize dependending on the browser
(pushing into an array and then joining the items, or concatenating
strings, whichever has been benchmarked the fastest by the GWT team)
You're right - I just looked into
Hi Eric,
yes, I'm considering using an ImageBundle (actually only the getURL()
method from ImageResource) - but that solves a different problem
(reducing the number of requests)! I'll still have to create my
hundreds of similar elements, and add/remove them dynamically,
position them etc.
On
stefanbach...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi Chris,
this looks as you are going to program mine sweeper.
May be you should consider to use HTML5 canvas
Stefan Bacherthttp://gwtworld.de
On 27 Mai, 21:33, Chris Lercher cl_for_mail...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
I need to create lots (hundreds) of image tags
On May 28, 6:00 pm, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
Messages could help you, even if you don't use its localizable
facet:
public interface Images extends Messages {
�...@defaultmessage(img src='images/{0}.gif' style='top: {1}em;')
String image(String image, int emTop);
}
Hi,
one of the advantages of UiBinder is, that it's building DOM
structures by cramming big strings of HTML into innerHTML attributes
than by a bunch of API calls (http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/
latest/DevGuideUiBinder.html#Overview).
First of all, I want to admit that I don't yet fully
Thanks.
On May 27, 5:53 pm, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 mai, 13:13, Chris Lercher cl_for_mail...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
one of the advantages of UiBinder is, that it's building DOM
structures by cramming big strings of HTML into innerHTML attributes
than by a bunch
Hi,
I need to create lots (hundreds) of image tags, and attach them
dynamically to several plain div class=xy/div elements:
div class=xy
img src=images/a.gif style=top: 1em;/
img src=images/a.gif style=top: 2em;/
img src=images/b.gif style=top: 3em;/
...
/div
...
The img tags can have
with respect to IE, the fastest way is still to
construct a string and assign it to div's innerHTML... provided that
you can find an intelligent and fast way to create that string, as IE
(at least prior to 8) has a notoriously slow string concatenation.
On May 27, 9:33 pm, Chris Lercher cl_for_mail
Thanks, very interesting. I set a bookmark.
On Apr 19, 11:05 am, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
Because it implements the HTML5 parsing rules, algorithm that has been
written to predictably parse web pages as found in the wild, with
results that are as close as possible as what
Hi Parag,
I would use GWT for many things, but in this case, I would probably
decide between
- Using pure JavaScript (should usually be enough to do this.)
- Using jQuery selectors, if it gets more complex.
- Or write a quick standalone Java App which parses the HTML (using
htmlunit, or NekoHTML
Hi Thomas,
I agree. I just don't see any advantage for GWT in this case. So I'd
say, that using it only makes sense, if there are other reasons, which
weren't expressed in the question.
By the way, GWT uses NekoHTML, too (it's in gwt-dev.jar). Why do you
prefer the HTML parser you mentioned?
BTW, re-reading my original answer, maybe it was mistakable. It was
not my intention not suggest, that GWT is slower than the other
methods (even if it sounded that way). I just wanted to say, that for
the problem it doesn't look like the most natural choice.
--
You received this message because
There's an entry in the issue tracker:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=603
On Apr 14, 11:43 am, marclurr mbarrett.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm sure this has been asked somewhere before but I can't seem to find
it:
Is there likely to be a port of
Hi,
I don't want to comment on the design decisions (maybe others will).
But what you could do in your current situation to keep the web app
(your UI's server part) stateless, is probably to just retrieve the
object _again_ from the backend by looking it up via its ID. I hope,
the business tier
Hi David,
I haven't tried the same setup with Tomcat yet, but I expect it should
be the same procedure: In the Servers view in Eclipse, select the
server you deployed the EAR to. Right-click it and choose Debug.
This allows you to set breakpoints in your server side code.
To debug the client
If the JavaScript should be executed in the browser (as usual), then
it will have to be downloaded to the browser. This means, that it can
also be copied. GWT offers an option to obfuscate the generated code,
and one of the effects of this is, that it's harder for someone to
read the code. But it
IMO, this isn't feasible, because of what's probably the most common
scenario for GWT projects:
* You want to create a great website (non-corporate), taking advantage
of GWT, including its future improvements, and
* you also have to support IE6.
Most IE6 users have never encountered a website
I also had the same problem, and the only way I found was to do this
programmatically, with
@UiField(provided=true)
VerticalPanel verticalPanel;
And instantiating the vertical Panel + setting the horizontal
alignment before calling uiBinder.createAndBindUi(this)
On Mar 18, 9:27 am, Gecko
I think, the new GWT 2.0 Layout Panel address pretty much that -
they're designed for standards mode, and you can make do without
Tables (VerticalPanel etc). You can still use them for data tables, in
which case they're semantically correct.
On Mar 12, 2:19 pm, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you sure, that Eclipse is running on the Sun JVM? (About Eclipse -
Installation Details - Configuration) There are lots of problems
with Eclipse, when run with GCJ. I don't know, if that's the solution,
but I'd check this first.
On Mar 12, 3:49 pm, Thomas Holmes thomas.j.hol...@gmail.com
On Mar 12, 5:33 pm, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote:
These DOM structures are never serialized into static
content, for example. And it's also a fair question to ask what the
semantics of a stack of divs are, as opposed to a table -- they're both
semantically meaningless.
I'm still a little
Well, you can import any package, and bind it to a namespace prefix as
explained here:
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideUiBinder.html#Hello_Widget_World
I imagine, that it would also be possible to have an addRect(),
addCircle() method etc in your SVG class (or maybe some
On Mar 11, 3:42 pm, Gianluigi dava...@yahoo.it wrote:
...if you don't want to bind different EJB3TestRemotes to different
names.
not different names, different IMPLEMENTATIONS. The @Names annotation is a
selector to choose with concrete implementation of the local/remote ebj
interface
Hi,
adding it to the build path isn't enough in this case. The jar has to
be found by the server at runtime. To achieve this, you can put the
jar in the directory war/WEB-INF/lib.
Chris
On Mar 11, 12:25 am, khalid khalid@gmail.com wrote:
Hello every one
I am making this simple application
I think he isn't doing cross domain calls (the redirect is just from
http://mydomain/ to http://mydomain/MyApp/)
There was someone with a very similar question on this forum just a
few days ago (I can't find the post anymore, maybe you'll find it). I
think the solution may have had something to
I think he isn't doing cross domain calls (the redirect is just from
http://mydomain/ to http://mydomain/MyApp/)
There was someone with a very similar question on this forum just a
few days ago (I can't find the post anymore, maybe you'll find it). I
think the solution may have had something to
Sorry, I posted in the wrong topic...
On Mar 10, 4:24 pm, Chris Lercher cl_for_mail...@gmx.net wrote:
I think he isn't doing cross domain calls (the redirect is just
fromhttp://mydomain/tohttp://mydomain/MyApp/)
There was someone with a very similar question on this forum just a
few days
...@gmail.com wrote:
hey Chris,
You missed out the port 8080.
apparently he is using apache on port 80 and tomcat on port
8080.http://mydomain:8080is not the same ashttp://mydomain. those are 2
different domains.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Chris Lercher cl_for_mail...@gmx.netwrote:
I
Hi,
1) Make sure you're using a JavaEE container that works with EJB =
3.0.
2) If you do, you may face the same problem I had some time ago: GWT
usually uses a Deployment Descriptor (web.xml) in version 2.3. This
basically disables the EJB 3.x functionality. Make sure to change your
Deployment
Hi,
just gwt-compile the GWT parts using gwtc (In Eclipse, use the red
GWT Compile Project icon. Or alternatively use the ant target gwtc
or war from the build.xml that webAppCreator created for you.)
You can basically treat the compiled result as if it were static HTML
content in a web project -
Hi,
you're probably looking for the portable JNDI syntax, as explained
here: http://java.sun.com/javaee/6/docs/tutorial/doc/gipjf.html
And one last question, in the end the author mentions that the @Named
annotation is not useful. How would it look like without it?
I think he probably means
Hi,
you should be able to use GWT.getModuleBaseURL() or maybe in your case
GWT.getHostPageBaseURL()
Chris
On Mar 9, 3:29 am, San sarav...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I use Eclipse 3.5 (Galileo) and google plugin to develop my project.
I'm having an issue while accessing static files from
1 - 100 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
