On 02-03-2022 03:18, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 11:07:49AM +0530, Prathu Baronia wrote:
- Compare the result of the macro with 0 instead of treating as bool to remove
the following warning.
dmenu.c: In function ‘setup’:
dmenu.c:24:30: warning: ‘*’ in boolean context,
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 11:07:49AM +0530, Prathu Baronia wrote:
> - Compare the result of the macro with 0 instead of treating as bool to remove
> the following warning.
>
> dmenu.c: In function ‘setup’:
> dmenu.c:24:30: warning: ‘*’ in boolean context, suggest ‘&&’ instead
>
commit 3a505cebe8adab204e5619357e0bfe3f9f3a92ff
Author: Hiltjo Posthuma
AuthorDate: Tue Mar 1 22:45:39 2022 +0100
Commit: Hiltjo Posthuma
CommitDate: Tue Mar 1 22:45:39 2022 +0100
remove false-positive warning for int comparison as bool
Reported by Prathu Baronia , patch
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 01:52:07PM -0600, Dave Blanchard wrote:
> I'll see myself out, and let you get back to your daily circlejerk.
Please don't do that. It'll be a massive loss if the only civilized
person in here; whos also made some loonix distro, is also a mechanic
and an astronut and a
Hi again Dave,
> > Let that be a poor lesson for everybody, to you that coming to
> > unfamiliar people with a negative attitude usually draws negative
> > attitude in response.
>
> Nothing was wrong with my comment. You just chose to interpret it poorly--for
> selfish reasons.
Allright, but
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 11:15:45 -0800
Jeremy wrote:
> I'm sorry
Yes, you are sorry. That's obvious.
--
Dave Blanchard
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 20:30:01 +0100
Quentin Rameau wrote:
> Let that be a poor lesson for everybody, to you that coming to
> unfamiliar people with a negative attitude usually draws negative
> attitude in response.
Nothing was wrong with my comment. You just chose to interpret it poorly--for
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 01:21:51PM -0600, Dave Blanchard wrote:
> You could have stopped your comment here, and my response would have
> been simply 'Ah, I see; thank you.' But now, given the continuation of
> your response below, I'll have to response in kind.
There was nothing stopping you from
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 01:26:28 +0600
NRK wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 08:54:15AM -0500, Sebastian LaVine wrote:
> > Christ, why do you choose to be so rude to someone you've never talked
> > to over a simple email?
>
> Similar question can be asked towards the initial mail. I'm not aware of
>
On Tue, 01 Mar 2022 08:54:15 -0500
"Sebastian LaVine" wrote:
> Christ, why do you choose to be so rude to someone you've never talked
> to over a simple email? He wants to write comments for a C program. It's
> not the end of the world. I personally will be interested in what he
> does; he isn't
Hi Dave,
> It's not the language that's the problem, it's the piss-poor attitude.
>
> At first, I thought his response might have been a fluke. But then after
> reading the other extremely rude comments made in response to mine, it seems
> this is a group of extremely toxic people who are
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 08:54:15AM -0500, Sebastian LaVine wrote:
> Christ, why do you choose to be so rude to someone you've never talked
> to over a simple email?
Similar question can be asked towards the initial mail. I'm not aware of
any civilized culture where going into a community
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 11:18:41 +0100
"Roberto E. Vargas Caballero" wrote:
>
> 'appkey' and 'appcursor' are modes in the vt100, you only have to search in
> the
> vt100 documentation [1] for application mode and/or numeric mode. You can also
> search for the terminfo sequences rmkx and smkx in
On 03/01/22 12:54PM, Dave Blanchard wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 07:49:21 -0800
> Jeremy wrote:
> No, I really don't. I just made an offhand comment regarding my initial
> impression of the code. I don't *need* to convince you of anything. After
> reading your asshole response, I'm not
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 14:15:03 +0100
Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> Hi David,
> It makes sense to me to add \033[1;5H. I'm not sure if \033[J is correct, it
> seems duplicate with XK_Home and XK_End also. Please test it properly.
I'm not sure if it's correct either; I'm not a terminal expert. It seems
On Tue, 01 Mar 2022 09:13:15 -0500
"Greg Reagle" wrote:
> Dave Blanchard, I am going to give you unsolicited advice on how to provide
> *constructive* criticism and/or *useful* feedback: Be specific, and give
> examples. Please read on for details.
What I *did* provide is constructive
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 07:49:21 -0800
Jeremy wrote:
> On 02/28/22 09:27PM, Dave Blanchard wrote:
> > On that note, regrettably it will be necessary for me to fork this project,
> > if for no other reason than to properly comment it, so that its
> > functionality can be understood and easily
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 19:30:11 +0100
Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> > But clearly you're too retarded to make a decent critisism like that. ;)
> >
>
> Please don't use language like this here.
It's not the language that's the problem, it's the piss-poor attitude.
At first, I thought his response
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 07:49:21AM -0800, Jeremy wrote:
> On 02/28/22 09:27PM, Dave Blanchard wrote:
> > On that note, regrettably it will be necessary for me to fork this project,
> > if for no other reason than to properly comment it, so that its
> > functionality can be understood and easily
On 02/28/22 09:27PM, Dave Blanchard wrote:
> On that note, regrettably it will be necessary for me to fork this project,
> if for no other reason than to properly comment it, so that its functionality
> can be understood and easily modified. It's a shame that such a nice little
> program is
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 08:54:15AM -0500, Sebastian LaVine wrote:
>
> Christ, why do you choose to be so rude to someone you've never talked
> to over a simple email? He wants to write comments for a C program. It's
> not the end of the world. I personally will be interested in what he
>
Dave Blanchard, I am going to give you unsolicited advice on how to provide
*constructive* criticism and/or *useful* feedback: Be specific, and give
examples. Please read on for details.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022, at 10:27 PM, Dave Blanchard wrote:
> It's a shame
> that such a nice little program
On Tue Mar 1, 2022 at 5:18 AM EST, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> > On that note, regrettably it will be necessary for me to fork this
> > project, if for no other reason than to properly comment it, so that
> > its functionality can be understood and easily modified. It's a
> > shame that
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 09:27:22PM -0600, Dave Blanchard wrote:
> Hello all,
>
Hi David,
> This patch for 'st' causes CTRL+HOME to send the ANSI sequence \033[J and
> \033[1;5H , which signals the user program to scroll to the top of the
> document, same as in Xterm.
>
> I have absolutely
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 09:27:22PM -0600, Dave Blanchard wrote:
>
> I have absolutely no idea what the 'appkey' and 'appcursor' fields do, as
> there are almost no comments anywhere to be found in the source code, and I
> haven't yet reverse engineered the code enough to figure out what
commit 1930624b9a9703c3449d2a877640e33c6d71f190
Author: Laslo Hunhold
AuthorDate: Tue Mar 1 09:27:12 2022 +0100
Commit: Laslo Hunhold
CommitDate: Tue Mar 1 09:27:12 2022 +0100
Properly handle cp == NULL in grapheme_decode_utf8()
During refactoring I totally forgot about it.
26 matches
Mail list logo
