On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:17:09 +0100, Anton Piatek an...@piatek.co.uk
wrote:
For those that attended the Hants LUG meeting at Hursley on Saturday I
would appreciate feedback on how the day went.
Things that went well
Things that could have been done better
This should help improve any further
Hi,
Does ID3 tagging support multiple tags of the same type? I don't think I've
ever seen it and I'm not sure it can be done.
Cheers,
Paul.
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
-Original Message-
From: Leo li...@fractal.me.uk
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:45:55
To: Hampshire LUG
Leo wrote:
Sean Gibbins wrote:
Hi Leo
Please could you give examples of them?
I think you may be missing something with regard to all of them, but
without a specific example to work through it's difficult to be sure.
With the first one I have not experienced issues with 'various
On 15/09/09 09:38, Paul Stimpson wrote:
Hi,
Does ID3 tagging support multiple tags of the same type? I don't
think I've ever seen it and I'm not sure it can be done.
No, but vorbis comments, which both flac and ogg use, allow multiple
tags with the same title. In general, players will return
Hi,
I have a situation where I need to keep data on several PCs on a LAN in
sync. Any PC may update the data, with suitable locking, which must be
pushed out to all the others. It must be possible for a PC to go down
and be brought back on line again without impacting the others. The
amount
Have you thought about the in-memory databases that can do this ?
OSS ones don't come straight to mind, but I know Oracle times ten can do
this.
Alternatively clustering mysql should be something to look at, but if
it's anything like Oracle RAC, it can get a bit messy.
HTH - Tony Lambert
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Chris Simmonds ch...@2net.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
I have a situation where I need to keep data on several PCs on a LAN in
sync. Any PC may update the data, with suitable locking, which must be
pushed out to all the others. It must be possible for a PC to go down
and
On 15/09/09 17:15, Chris Simmonds wrote:
Hi,
I have a situation where I need to keep data on several PCs on a LAN in
sync. Any PC may update the data, with suitable locking, which must be
pushed out to all the others. It must be possible for a PC to go down
and be brought back on line
On Tuesday 15 September 2009 18:30:01 John Cooper wrote:
On 15/09/09 17:15, Chris Simmonds wrote:
Hi,
I have a situation where I need to keep data on several PCs on a LAN in
sync. Any PC may update the data, with suitable locking, which must be
pushed out to all the others. It must be
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 17:15:18 +0100 (+0100), Chris Simmonds wrote:
One option I have considered is using, say, MySQL with one master node
replicating to all the others and some mechanism to elect a new master
if the original went down. But, that sounds messy. There must be a
neater
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Adrian Bridgett adr...@smop.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 17:15:18 +0100 (+0100), Chris Simmonds wrote:
One option I have considered is using, say, MySQL with one master node
replicating to all the others and some mechanism to elect a new master
if the
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 20:17:56 +0100 (+0100), Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote:
I thought the OP wanted to make the data available over 50 nodes!
DRBD can only have two simultaneous primaries.
Ah yes, I was taking that as meaning that it needed to withstand
failure of a (master) node, but still be
2009/9/15 Tony Whitmore t...@tonywhitmore.co.uk:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:17:09 +0100, Anton Piatek an...@piatek.co.uk
wrote:
For those that attended the Hants LUG meeting at Hursley on Saturday I
would appreciate feedback on how the day went.
Things that went well
Things that could have been
13 matches
Mail list logo
