Hi,
Sounds like an opportunity for an SSVN to me.
What is the vox populi on the notion of SSVNs anyway?
Cheers,
--ldl
On 1/14/06, Jim Self [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bhaskar wrote:
Code specific to each MUMPS implementation should belong in the kernel,
isolated from the applications.
I'll be dumb. What is SSVN?KevinOn 1/14/06, LD 'Gus' Landis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,Sounds like an opportunity for an SSVN to me.What is the vox populi on the notion of SSVNs anyway?
Cheers,--ldlOn 1/14/06, Jim Self [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bhaskar wrote: Code specific to each MUMPS
On Jan 14, 2006, at 5:00 AM, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
I'll be dumb. What is SSVN?
Kevin
SSVN = Structured System Variable Name.
I'm told that GT.M doesn't support them (correct me if I'm wrong),
but if you're using Cache or another MUMPS implementation, you might
try $ORDERing through
Something else that I think would greatly benefit the language is
support for namespaces and modules, and it's a real shame that it
wasn't properly standardized. Think about it: One of the biggest
headaches of VistA development is having to assign name and
numberspaces to each application.
SSVNs are an attempt to provide a standard way to provide access to
some features that were previously provided in a non-standard way on
different MUMPSen. Unfortunately, M standardizes the names of SSVNs but
not their behavior, so they are effectively useless as standards - it's
much easier to
All I've ever had to do is Stop Cache under the Cache Cube and select
Shutdown, swap out the desired cache.dat and then Start Cache under the
Cache Cube. I've never stopped any service under Control Panel. I wonder
if you nailed a service that shouldn't have been stopped, or stopping it
under
May I ask what version of Cache you are running? Mine is 5.018 and I didn't
have trouble with some of the older ones doing this. They acted just like
you discribe, except that I had to be sure they shut down all the way
because, unlike now, the Cache controller in Services entry would not
Cache 5.0.11
I wonder if journaling is involved. There may have been a different default
on your later install. If it's just a difference in the version, that's
pretty ugly for those of us who need to frequently restore accounts quickly.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How can you demonstrate the interleaving of jobs without disturbing
it with explicit synchronization? I actually did this in PLT Scheme
as follows
(define (the-body x)
(begin
(let loop ((i 0))
(begin
(if ( i 25)
(begin
(display x)
On Jan 14, 2006, at 10:29 AM, Bhaskar, KS wrote:
SSVNs are an attempt to provide a standard way to provide access to
some features that were previously provided in a non-standard way on
different MUMPSen.
That sounds right.
Unfortunately, M standardizes the names of SSVNs but
not their
OK. I have just spent at least 2 hrs trying to get it working, and I
have failed again. I don't have apache2. I have scoured the net and
have not figured out how to uninstall my apache and install apache2.
Apt-get install apache2 -- can't find package. apt-get install
apache-mpm-prefork -- no
I am going to take a stab at this from what I know from using apt on my
system, thanks to my son who takes good care of my Linux issues when he is
available.
I suspect that you have to define what servers apt is allowed to use. In
Debian, that is done in /etc/apt/sources.list . This is the
Well, I edited the entries in the httpd.conf so that all references to
apache2 where removed or changed to httpd equivalents, and now it is
starting. But when I browse to a default home page, I am gettting a
GT.M compile error.
I'll keep working on this.
.
Kevin
On 1/14/06, Kevin Toppenberg
On 1/14/06, Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am gettting a
GT.M compile error.
I'll keep working on this.
Actually it's not a compile error, but just that it hadn't been
compiled. A simple zl filename fixed the problem. I have seen
Baskar do a command that will compile all the
On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 21:03 -0600, Gregory Woodhouse wrote:
[KSB] ...snip...
so they are effectively useless as standards - it's
much easier to accommodate differences in syntax than it is
differences
in semantics.
I'm not quite sure what you mean here. In fact, one of my major
Joseph's and John's words reminded me of a course I once did
with the World Health Organisation. Amazingly, I have the
monograph in front of me, Educational Handbook for Health
Personnel, J-J. Guilbert, 1992.
In it, they draw heavily on the work of Mager (mid-50s) and
strongly advise that
I came across the following in a footnote to The Structure and
Interpretation of Computer Programs:
A perfectly rational dog placed between two equally attractive
sources of food will starve
to death. --Jean Buridan (14th cent. French philosopher)
The context was a discussion of lock
Gregory wrote:
How can you demonstrate the interleaving of jobs without disturbing
it with explicit synchronization?
JOB BODY(A)
JOB BODY(B)
where BODY is just a FOR loop
BODY(X) ;
FOR I=1:1:25 WRITE X
QUIT
But, of course that's not allowed, because background jobs can't
write to the
18 matches
Mail list logo
