ot;serving that" either, maybe you should try the Acronis
boot disk, no?
On 10/8/2010 11:59 AM, Soren wrote:
To say it straight, forget about Linux's dd, and Acronis in this case,
as I want
absolute reliablity, and neither do serve that.
I know Symantec is working on a new version
Hello Duncan,
Most BSOD's are caused by malware on the computer interfering with the network
settings, and not by poor drivers as many tend to believe.
The best possible (free) solution to this is:
www.safernetworking.org - pls donate a few bucks to keep him running...
Remember to update the
srware.net
/s
ity, and neither do serve that.
I know Symantec is working on a new version of Ghost that works within Win7, so
this could be a common problem?
Any suggestions?
If SATA's the problem (seems obvious), where do I find a boot floppy for
this??? (bootdisk.com doesn't fix this)
Thanks.
/soren
good try but was able to notice that this time it is not two partitions
but is seen as two drives and Gparted says physically write protected check
jumpers.
Must be locked by the manufacturer. Are no jumpers.
need program, me like 8-)
thanks
fp
At 02:50 PM 9/3/2010, Soren Poked the stick with:
Mr
OK, so far my impressions are that the Win7 installation footprint should be in the area
of "only" around 14 GB.
I need to do some partition resizing and so, including deletion of several propreritary HP progs, and cleaning up the registry. Hopefully, this will end satisfactory. In
a few days I
Mr. Fred, maybe using one of the so called "live-distros", e.g. knoppix.org,
would help?
The util Gparted will tell u which properties the drive has, including write
protection. Enable/disable is then just a flag away.
HTH.
FORC5 wrote:
Have a flash drive my son got at ASU, has the school ma
ybrid of the Premium Home version.
Don't know if that particular version is special for Europe or not.
Note: is is about 60% of a vista install, so its slimmed down quite a bit
I hear you. Slipstreaming is the next subject on the menu.
/s
--Original Message------
From: Soren
Sender
Hi,
I recently bought my mom a laptop with Win7. Fine.
Not so fine is that the C: partition seems to occupy +34 gigabytes.
What I want is to be able to make a ghost image within reasonable limits. +34
gigabytes doesn't seem so.
As of yet unexperienced with Win7, is this the normal disk (ab)us
t;Z:\\Cookies"
"Recent"="Z:\\Recent"
"Cache"="Z:\\Temporary Internet Files"
"History"="Z:\\History"
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet
Settings\Url History]
"Directory"="Z:\\History
OK, I'll dig them up for you.
Right now the time is 1:32 AM at my place, and my server is shut down for the
day, so I'll post them when I get back to life..
Thane Sherrington wrote:
At 07:07 PM 03/08/2010, Soren wrote:
Still have some .reg files somewhere that originally was mad
Inline..
Thane Sherrington wrote:
At 10:51 PM 02/08/2010, Soren wrote:
Sorry, not entirely true. There seem to be a common misunderstanding
about the O/S allocation of RAM.
E.g. WinXP can only allocate 3GB RAM for the O/S, which is often
enterpreted as the whole system can only make use of
XP CE).
To my knowledge, the PAE boot switch is only used if one wants to allocate more
than 3GB RAM to the OS.
Thanks for the link, but I don't trust the MS sites about RAM and OS's
anymore...
Soren
Greg Sevart wrote:
I'm still quite confident that you're mistaken. Clien
ons. AFAIR, the Home version doesn't support more than 4GB.
Thane Sherrington wrote:
At 04:53 PM 03/08/2010, Soren wrote:
BTW, one of the finer benefits from using a large amount of RAM, is
that the swap file can be allocated to RAM, which makes makes the
system very responsive. This alloc
0 to 7/2008 R2, can be found here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366778(VS.85).aspx
Greg
-Original Message-----
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Soren
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 8:51 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subjec
This might be what you're looking for: ghisler.com
It's a very generous piece of shareware, and works for most people as is.
Brian Weeden wrote:
My work is moving from Gapps to Microsoft BPOS, as I've brought up on here
before. Is there a way to have offline access to all my archived email th
Sorry, not entirely true. There seem to be a common misunderstanding about the
O/S allocation of RAM.
E.g. WinXP can only allocate 3GB RAM for the O/S, which is often enterpreted as
the whole system can only make use of 3GB RAM in total.
Actually, XP can only use 3GB RAM for the O/S, any remai
, 27 Jul 2010, Soren wrote:
Inline...
Christopher Fisk wrote:
Hey Folks,
I've been using my old version of Ghost for years, with no problem.
Booting from a floppy and migrating my windows install from smaller to
larger and larger drives. I've finally got to the point where that
v
Inline...
Christopher Fisk wrote:
Hey Folks,
I've been using my old version of Ghost for years, with no problem.
Booting from a floppy and migrating my windows install from smaller to
larger and larger drives. I've finally got to the point where that
version no longer supports my hardware,
Plug & Play Service disabled?
(Right Click on This Computer-> Administrate-> Services)
/s
Winterlight wrote:
I own a 18 month old ACER Aspire 6930 that came with vista 64 Bit Home
Premium. Flashed with the latest BIOS.
Last December I did a new clean install of Win 7 Pro. ACER has posted
d
Hi,
This is a common problem that I have seen before.
The main two reasons are, 1: the disc is scratched (data corruption), 2: the
reading laser needs realignment.
if 1: data corruption is recoverable to a certain degree. Try reading the same disc from a *nix live CD, this often solves the pro
dvdshrink is available. Just a note ;)
Best,
Soren
Brian Weeden wrote:
Got another weird one. My HTPC has suddenly developed an issue where it
turns it self off. Not crash, but completely powers off. And the only time
it happens is when I ask it to encode video, such as using Handbrake. It
alternatives, such as Firefox+Thunderbird, or Opera (www.opera.no).
The local culprits are still the combo of Flash (any version), and MS JScript
(a malformed hybrid between JavaScript and Java).
Please, don't shoot the messenger :)
Soren wrote:
If I may add, there's currently a
Document- and printer sharing between XP and W7 is a no-go. It can probably be
done, but only by inside knowledge from M$. Who's first? :)
In your shoes, look for physical ports located on the back of the printer. If there's both Parallel and USB ports, two different cables might work with two d
Do you have any links to support this, pls?
I'm very interested in this subject, as I work with different types of cables
on a daily basis.
JRS wrote:
Solid CAT5 cable supports longer length runs and works best in fixed wiring configurations like office buildings. Stranded CAT5 cable, on the o
No problem. According to specs, USB 3 should be backwards compatiple with both
2.0 and 1.1
Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
Anyone using these?
I bought a PCIe x 4 board that has 2 USB 3.0 ports adn 2 SATA 6G slots.
I also have an enclosure that uses USB 3.0 (and is backwards compatible).
Will stan
Consider installing the O/S using only the boot disks on the onboard RAID
controller, and then later add any additional controllers/drives.
Winterlight wrote:
I don't use RAID very often. However, I am putting together a older PC
for some specific jobs, and since I had two second generation 74G
If I may add, there's currently a virus around that potentially manage to mess
up the BIOS of any M/B.
So, if your system or server is showing a strange date/day/year, some of your
drives aren't recognized, or your system suddently simply won't boot, this
might be the cause.
The attack appear
Yes.
Edit>preferences> in FF.
The old certificate is somewhat still saved on your computer, though.
Thane Sherrington wrote:
If the Gmail SSL certificate gets screwed up on one's computer, is it
possible to delete it and download it again?
T
Try this one:
qtparted.sourceforge.net
If you know your way around in Fdisk, this will probably suit your needs.
/soren
Rick Glazier wrote:
This seems "hardware" to me. (At least a "workaround" for hardware.)
I have refused to use DDOs for the last 16 years so this is a
t bases for an audio rack platform, no matter
the price.
/Soren
t and follow directions). NO? Boot from HDD >F8 >command prompt >[fix boot] - NO? >F8 >command
prompt >[fix mbr]
For a full list of commands type [help /?]
Still no-go, pop a mail. Easier roads ahead.
//soren
Sam Franc wrote:
My wife has a W2000 box and she is computer ill
A plain copy of your mail folder to your new sys, and then pointing the new
Thunderbird towards that direction in Preferences should solve the problem.
//s
Steve Tomporowski wrote:
Okay, now I am coming live from Windows 7No complaints so
far...except with M-Audio. It seems that they wrot
is
definately the way to go.
Otherwise, new isn't always good, and vice versa.
IMHO, it's all about a sensible balance between things.
//soren
Soren wrote:
www.geoffchappell.com/notes/toc.htm ;)
maccrawj wrote:
2^32 IS 4GB, you do the math! ;)
From the MS page that lead me to the
cture processor, Pentium
Pro or later, more than 4 GB of RAM, and Windows 2000, Windows XP, or
Windows Server 2003."
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/server/PAE/PAEdrv.mspx
Soren wrote:
Hey Brian,
As far as I know, the Windows NT generation is not limited to 3GB RAM,
only to 64GB (
ada
+1 (202) 683-8534 US
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Soren wrote:
Hey Brian,
As far as I know, the Windows NT generation is not limited to 3GB RAM, only
to 64GB (32bit O/S limit - do your own math ;). One thing is what the O/S
reports (and what MS wants us to believe), and another
Nah, this is unfair, as you also begin to imply chipset support. Hence unneeded
to mention that both MB and chipset have to support +4GB :)
To my experience, adding a load of RAM (and/or a +2GHz procesor) also stresses
the need of a faster disk system. Things usually go hand-in-hand.
One could
Hey Brian,
As far as I know, the Windows NT generation is not limited to 3GB RAM, only to 64GB (32bit O/S limit - do your own math ;). One thing is what the O/S reports (and what MS
wants us to believe), and another thing is what's actually doable. Nothing new there, unfortunately.
MS have sev
Yup, 5 linsences are the absolute minimum.
No- or only limited malware/spyware protection, though. Depends on Definitions.
Why not run some layered security, e.g. SpybotS&D together with Norton Internet
Security or 360?
Only a suggestion.
//s
Winterlight wrote:
I see where you can buy as lit
I'll bet a virtual sixpack that your system is infected with something.
Try download SpyBot at www.safer-networking.org - note the definitions update.
In the Features section you can see everything that is loaded by the O/S, and
delete whatever entry.
Or, you could simply do a Run>RegEdit, and
vation to keep updating.
Would really like to get a source because I have several clients who
need AV in a business setting and SAVCE 10.2 is my choice.
Soren wrote:
For corporate use, Norton/Symantec still kicks. Updates are still #one
in the business.
Heh-he.
A firm alternative could be antivir.com. They're usually ahead of the rest of
the business (read: confusement), and will serve private users well, as in free
beer.
www.antivir.com
Btw, I still run the Norton/Symantec bulk on several of my desktops.
Reason?
Antivir has a flaw in thei
Actually, Hitachi make some very decent harddrives.
Some statistics (not documented, since they're coming from 'the source' - be
afraid, very afraid :)
+90 pct of returned harddrives are due to malware/spyware that makes the drive
unusable.
With Hitachi drives it may be a good idea to make us
runs from
DOS.
If the need is only imaging on a regular basis, I still believe Ghost CLI wins
hands down, despite the need for booting a DOS diskette/CD.
//soren
Rick Glazier wrote:
I used Ghost until they took too long to support writing the Image files
(when recording originally) TO NTFS dr
her.
Yep, you're absolutely right, different tools for different jobs. But I'd like
to hear more about your professional experiences with Acronis, anyways.
Good discussion, btw, thanks :)
//soren
Greg Sevart wrote:
Several counters to several points... :)
1. Of course speed is variable,
companies that have bastardized them.
True, true.
Soren wrote:
Hey FP,
Your message made me think a little further.
The boot disk used must have support for standard IDE ATAPI drives to
be able to burn images to CD/DVD. The primary force of Ghost is not
any longer (since v5.0, I believe) making
believe Ghost will still be my no. one for some time to come. Until someone can show me a fast working
DOS util that does an even better job.
//soren
Greg Sevart wrote:
Several points
1. Sector by sector copies are amazingly space and time inefficient. I'd
much rather have a prod
years ago, so knock
yourself out.
Having everything one needs on a bootdisk, including complete O/S, is not too
bad. I'm writing this from such a disk ;)
//soren
FORC5 wrote:
rarely use ghost from a fdd but on occasion have to, only problems ever had wad
usually the disk.drives fault.
I
"others" didn't bother to read the fine print (a.k.a. the Manual), and hence is left into the eternal, bottomless abyss, without any sign of forgiveness.
OK, I'm just guessing here ;)
//soren
FORC5 wrote:
rarely use ghost from a fdd but on occasion have to, only problems ever ha
To avoid any questions of any kind of which/what media to boot from, you could use a boot manager. Google is you friend, use the most popular one. IRL, it's a matter of
taste.
If going back from a boot manager to XP, @ command promt /fixmbr usually does
the job.
//soren
Steve Tompor
I just read this whole thread, because it sounded like a wet teenage dream.
Man, was I disappointed... ;)
Seriously, NONE of the suggested sites nor features will help anyone in
anonymizing data.
For instance, let's take covertsurfer.com: It would not be my personal first
choice regarding ano
distinguish between
"clone" and "sort of clone", but that's probably only me ;)
About Ghost I want to say one thing: RTFM (Read The Fine Manual).
/soren
tmse...@rlrnews.com wrote:
The acronis boot cd has a few major perks (imho)
Sorts out multi-os installs way better
dated to the new Snort engine, meaning new versions. I don't know if
Smoothwall does the same, but probably. Several are releasing new versions during September and October.
If it's for private use or for a school, Astaro (astaro.com) will throw a free
license your way.
/soren
R
Also known as "Scripting by Access".
The very nice util - WebWasher - that I've been shamelessly recommending ;)
does the +same job + more.
Brian Weeden wrote:
"Click Jacking" (more formerly known as "UI Redressing" is the process where
you hide a page with links in an HTML layer behind anothe
I hear you.
Most new stuff is odd.
On a new MB one have to upgrade the BIOS 3-5 times before the MB works as
advertised. Price doesn't appear to matter.
HDDs are shipped with bogus data and degraded performance, and then - maybe - a
BIOS update.
A good hint could be sticking to the brands th
If you place progs and utils on another drive letter, 4-8 Gigs is sufficient.
That is, if the swap file is set to a static size (e.g. 1.5*RAM)
DHSinclair wrote:
What is a reasonable partition size for WinXP?
I ask this because I have watched both W2K and WinXP getting close to
outgrowing the 4
Hey Joe,
Joe User wrote:
Hello Soren,
Friday, October 3, 2008, 2:19:48 AM, you wrote:
Why are you addressing yourself?
I usually trim that out when i reply to my own post. Forgot.
Oh..
Why are you at all worrying about that?
I guess the same reason you might be asking me about it
maccrawj wrote:
Soren wrote:
maccrawj wrote:
Even if you were to fix Flash in this way, it's still blocking other
functions like scripting.
Yep, but only Cross Site Scipting exploits.
My point was removing flash blocking globally (suggestion offered I
replied to) != whitelist the d
maccrawj wrote:
Even if you were to fix Flash in this way, it's still blocking other
functions like scripting.
Yep, but only Cross Site Scipting exploits.
If one wants protection against scripts acting on page load and page exit,
there's no way around web washer.
Sure sounds like he has not
Hey Scott,
Watch below...
Scott Sipe wrote:
On Oct 3, 2008, at 1:00 AM, Soren wrote:
Scott Sipe wrote:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 10:10 PM, Soren wrote:
In your shoes, I would not bet my dimes on VNC alone. If a security
breach happens because of VNC (it does from time to time, and VNC
scans
Hi,
Judging from your info, it mostly sounds like a browser hi-jacking. Nice ;)
Currently no way to avoid this sh*t when using IE, sorry.
Back up your data before doing anything else.
Being in your shoes for a moment, I'd check the assigned IP addy, the assigned
Gateway addy, and the assigned
Hi Thane,
Yup, Open VPN, even it still freezes every now and then (mostly insufficient
hardware resources).
Else, a proven, closed source (ouch! ;) solution.
Thane Sherrington wrote:
Hi Soren,
If Hamachi isn't secure, is there a similar service which you would
recommend?
T
t, but at least, please, get your facts
straight :)
Best,
soren
Joe User wrote:
Hello Joe,
Well, hello, 'Joe'. Or should I instead call you by your real name, George A.
Moore?
Why are you addressing yourself?
Does anyone else see my msg's being received before they were sent?
Why are you at all worrying about that?
-- To be honest, why don't you com
strongly sarcarstic statement.
Marketing + Assembler + .gov ties is not excactly my kind of wet dream ;)
---
Brian Weeden
Technical Consultant
Secure World Foundation <http://www.secureworldfoundtion.org>
+1 (514) 466-2756 Canada
+1 (202) 683-8534 US
On Fri, Oct 3,
oundation <http://www.secureworldfoundtion.org>
+1 (514) 466-2756 Canada
+1 (202) 683-8534 US
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Soren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brian Weeden wrote:
Google VNC vulnerabilities, there have been a bunch in the past and still
some open:
http://www.real
on.org>
+1 (514) 466-2756 Canada
+1 (202) 683-8534 US
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Scott Sipe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 10:10 PM, Soren wrote:
In your shoes, I would not bet my dimes on VNC alone. If a security breach
happens because of VNC (it does from tim
em.
---
Brian Weeden
Technical Consultant
Secure World Foundation <http://www.secureworldfoundtion.org>
+1 (514) 466-2756 Canada
+1 (202) 683-8534 US
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Soren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMHO, I think the key words for your considera
Joe User wrote:
I think he may be saying...
VNC is open source and/or popular - lots of little proggys made to
find and break into it - brute force, etc?
Nope, I'm saying systematic, automated exploits aimed directly towards VNC, due
to e.g. poor coding, etc.
Not sure on RDP, but
myself I
...down below
Scott Sipe wrote:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 10:10 PM, Soren wrote:
In your shoes, I would not bet my dimes on VNC alone. If a security
breach happens because of VNC (it does from time to time, and VNC
scans/exploits are automatic!), your client might become 'slightly
upset
IMHO, I think the key words for your considerations may be 'there will be
sensitive data accessed', and precautions taken according to that.
Of course, there's a lot of ways this can be done, and you say that you already
have an aplliance to take care of the matter - but here are my thoughts.
???
Brian Weeden wrote:
You a Security Now podcast listener? If not, you should really check it out
as they tackle the computer security issue fairly deeply.
--
Brian
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Soren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Duncan,
About the 'home cinem
Heh-he, right on!
How many on this list have a seriously overconfigured system that only serves a
'real' purpose like surfing the web, really?
That meaning anything beyond 19" monitors and win 3.0 running on a 15GHz
processor w/2TB RAM ;)
Brian Weeden wrote:
And don't forget trying to figure
t some experience with me? Ohhh, yes!
And so very much thanks to the Old Farts of the HWG :)
DHSinclair wrote:
Soren,
Welcome back. I, for one, have missed your calm, crisp, reasoned
replies.
Our List has changed as the needs and desires of the community
and available technology have changed
Brian
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Soren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all,
As some of you may remember, I was on the original HWG list initiated by
Tom Pabst.
Back in about 2000-2001, when Spam sort of took over the internet, I was
unwillingly unsubscribed. My ISP just cou
global hardware
designers, and we should all be proud of that.
On a personal level, I would not be where I am today without this list (thx Jim
E.)
Where are you today?
Best,
Soren
ail me off the list, no reason to lose all your data,
as your system can be made to work again.
Best,
Soren
DHSinclair wrote:
I have zero idea what "it" may cost.
I do not have a web site.
I believe the this is the rage, but, I choose not to play.
Yes, cost is, at this level, is a fai
system can be made to work again.
Best,
Soren
DHSinclair wrote:
No. I do NOT know that I have 2 failed drives. That was my posit at this
point.
Certainly, if I do have 2/3 dead, I would expect to be dead in the water
completely.
Kiss my last install and all my data goodbye!
Am I close?
I suspe
Forgot to say that this technology is *not* reactionless, contrary to what some
might 'think'.
However, if converted properly into storage technology, the 'feeling' could be
"reactionless".
Go figure ;)
G.Waleed Kavalec wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EmDrive
Man this would be TOO DAMN C
http://emdrive.com/faq.html
http://emdrive.com/theorypaper9-4.pdf
http://journal-download.co.uk/digitalmagazines/EU/index.php?pdffile=eu01may2007fulleu.pdf
G.Waleed Kavalec wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EmDrive
Man this would be TOO DAMN COOL if it turns out to be real.
The Chinese spac
Maybe your router is only WEP compatible?
Winterlight wrote:
I am working on a Thinkpad that has wind 2K SP4 fully patched and I have
installed a Bilken Wireless PMCIA adaptor but when I bring up the
wireless router, I am only seeing WEP inputs.
Is there anyway to get WPA2 to work with
Most probably XP SP3 leftovers.
Right clicking on the relevant file or folder, and changing access rights, the
file or folder should then be accessible.
If you want to be more certain, get Dependency Walker from www.dependencywalker.com, just to confirm if (or if not) all of the .dll files' dep
ther or not you like facebook, it IS almost 5 years
old, so I'm not quite sure it counts as "new" :-P
Scott
On Sep 21, 2008, at 2:21 AM, Soren wrote:
Yeah, beacuse 'new' equals 'good'?
No-f*king-way!
Think again, Naushad :D
Naushad Zulfiqar wrote:
Ar
Christopher Fisk wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Soren wrote:
Who would want to use Snotmail these days? ;)
Seriously, consider other options.
IMO, if you're going to bash something at least answer their question at
the same time.
I am sorry, you're absolutely right. I have
ny of there is, they're just pathetic :D
Anyway, with e.g. PfSense, I could fall back to use my Asus T2P4 w/64MB RAM again (which has been spinning since 1995!, and only got 'archived' a few weeks ago due to
Snort memory issues).
Anyone have experience running m0n0wall/
Who would want to use Snotmail these days? ;)
Seriously, consider other options.
Best,
Soren
Winterlight wrote:
How do you insert a picture in a hotmail ? I can see how to attach
something easily enough but how do you drop a picture into a email?
thanks
Yeah, beacuse 'new' equals 'good'?
No-f*king-way!
Think again, Naushad :D
Naushad Zulfiqar wrote:
Are you guys on facebook?
If yes, then lets create a Hardware Group "Group".
I set up one of those for my dad some months ago, as they needed some more
power (big old house with thick brick walls).
Works flawlessly, easy to setup, smooth internet connetion whereever in the
house (using full encryption), with two laptops sharing only 1Mbit.
Cards in the laptops are D-Li
x27;ll check out the alternative firmwares, there might be something interesting.
Thanks.
Best,
Soren
j m g wrote:
Have you looked at any of the dedicated firewall/routers out there
with 3rd party flashes?
tomato, dd-wrt, etc - Specifically the Linksys models?
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Sor
the better.
Best,
Soren
Scott Sipe wrote:
On Sep 15, 2008, at 1:45 AM, Soren wrote:
What I am seriously considering switching to, is:
1. A very small laptop solution for the firewall, e.g. one of the new
Atom based laptops, with USB adaptors as second and third NICs.
AMIbios is preferred.
Hey Thane,
Just out of curiousity, did you find a solution?
Best,
Soren
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Thane Sherrington wrote:
Is there a good program that I can run on a computer and set it to
whitelist certain sites and block all others?
T
w, the Google Chrome Bowser is developed in cooperation with
FF/Moz team.
Maybe both Google and Mozilla has been made so called 'useable idiots' by MS to
take FF off the market.
Smart move.
Best,
Soren
DHSinclair wrote:
Thanks Alex,
Odd and interesting. Believe I will wait until thi
nice and
clean, non-BS solution:
1. Copy your CD to a directory [ "c:\xpcd" for example]
2. Acquire SP3 [rename it to "SP3.exe" for example]
3. Type this command: SP3.exe -s:C:\XPCD
...and that should be it.
Clean and simple, yet not especially detailed ;)
Best,
Soren
mac
127.0.0.1, or IPofBadHost
127.0.0.1
Using HOSTS alone will open up for some exploits, though, as it's really just a primitive redirection. Use with care, and be sure to enable Write Protection after
editing(!) If you Google "hosts file", some pre-compiled, updated files will
rocessor brand, while the so called
"high end" RAM types are designed for Intel processor timing specs.
Changing the RAM in that system to standard Samsung RAM solved the problem, and
the system has been running flawlessly ever since.
Might be the same thing you're experiencing ri
Loaded sectors to "4"
15. goto "Label" and type in the ISO9660 name you want, e.g. "WXPSP3VOL_EN", and then
select "New"
16. drag'n drop all the files from the folder "C:\XP"
17. now burn the bastard
18. send me a bottle of +25yrs Single
I've used this one on several occasions.
However, it does not recover the password, only allows for a reset.
Not all the versions listed on the web site works properly, so you'll have to
figure out which does.
Best,
Soren
Winterlight wrote:
At 06:34 PM 8/23/2008, you wrote:
T
if there are any
bottlenecks on the way.
Hint: streamaudio.com/site/StreamTimeout.aspx
Best,
Soren
DHSinclair wrote:
Soren,
Thank you. ATM I forget a test for half-duplex.
Switch says 1000baseT for this nic.
ipconfig /all shows all normal.
I did run all the Marvell diagnostics and they come
Maybe a NIC running in half duplex?
Do you have any tweak options for the buffer in your media player?
Best,
Soren
DHSinclair wrote:
I like to listen to remote radio programs with the PC.
I am having trouble with one from LA (krla870). It comes via
streamaudio.com and
the Salem radio network
99 matches
Mail list logo