Hi Geir,
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 06:44 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Nov 7, 2005, at 5:40 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 08:44 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Lets not count our chickens here. The LGPL policy is still in the
works, and may not allow anything but
Hi Graeme,
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 17:03 -0500, Graeme Johnson wrote:
Split-class (ClassX VMClassX) or customized-class solutions (Tim E's
Kernel classes) are different approaches to solving the same problem.
Not completely. I think they complement each other. The ClassX
VMClassX split
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 16:13 +, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
I'm delighted to be able to make a code contribution to the Harmony
project on behalf of IBM.
Let's the harmonization process begin :-)
Right! I have been thinking on how to move forward with this. And
I keep getting lost in the licensing discussions. I *think* the below accurately
represents where we are right now.
= The Unofficial Harmony, Licensing, the Universe and everything FAQ =
version 0.0.0.1-SNAPSHOT
Q: What do you mean, unofficial
A: Not
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Graeme,
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 17:03 -0500, Graeme Johnson wrote:
Split-class (ClassX VMClassX) or customized-class solutions (Tim E's
Kernel classes) are different approaches to solving the same problem.
Not completely. I think they complement each other. The
On Nov 9, 2005, at 5:59 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Geir,
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 06:44 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Nov 7, 2005, at 5:40 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 08:44 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Lets not count our chickens here. The LGPL policy is still
On Nov 9, 2005, at 6:17 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 16:13 +, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
I'm delighted to be able to make a code contribution to the Harmony
project on behalf of IBM.
Let's the harmonization process begin :-)
Right! I have been
On Nov 9, 2005, at 9:14 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
Mark Wielaard wrote:
That can be an issue indeed. But by marking the VMClasses package
private and final (or just have list in the jit/compiler) all
calls to
them should be able to be optimized away if needed.
Agreed. What you are pointing
On Nov 9, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Nov 9, 2005, at 6:17 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 16:13 +, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
I'm delighted to be able to make a code contribution to the Harmony
project on behalf of IBM.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Nov 5, 2005 5:09 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: compiling bootJVM with MSVC
Hi Tim,
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 22:29 +, Tim Ellison wrote:
...snip...
Lets make Harmony into that collaborative
On Nov 9, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Nov 9, 2005, at 6:17 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Would IBM be willing to assign this code to the FSF for inclusion
in GNU
Classpath or contribute it under a GPL-compatible license like MIT/X,
W3C, etc. so that it can be mixed and
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 16:13 +, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
I'm delighted to be able to make a code contribution to the Harmony
project on behalf of IBM.
Let's the harmonization process begin :-)
Right! I have been thinking on how to move
Enrico,
Good work! Sorry for the delayed reply, I've been
having an e-mail issue.
-Original Message-
From: Enrico Migliore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Nov 8, 2005 12:57 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: bootJVM successfully compiled and linked with MSVC
Hi,
I
Sebastian Hartte wrote:
Enrico Migliore wrote:
Sebastian Hartte wrote:
Hi you two,
I tried a similar thing (using Visual Studio 2005 Professional). The
empty structs are still an error in that compiler version (What do you
need empyt structs for anyway? Allocation a zero byte memory region
Tim,
Looks like the project team is going to be getting
_very_ busy, and soon! Thanks for going the
extra mile in putting together this contribution!
Dan Lydick
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Nov 8, 2005 4:49 AM
To: harmony-dev
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Nov 9, 2005 11:07 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: compiling bootJVM with MSVC
Sebastian Hartte wrote:
Enrico Migliore wrote:
Sebastian Hartte wrote:
...snip...
For a win32 pthread
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-12?page=all ]
Geir Magnusson Jr updated HARMONY-12:
-
Component: VM
[BootJVM] MakeSetup contains an uncorrectly escaped shell command
-
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-10?page=all ]
Geir Magnusson Jr updated HARMONY-10:
-
Component: VM
configure for [BootJVM]
Key: HARMONY-10
URL:
Leo Simons wrote:
Whoohooh! An actual vi-vs-emacs discussion! Now we are *really* getting started!
vi is quite a lot ahead of emacs.
http://jvi.sourceforge.net/ versus http://jemacs.sourceforge.net/
But anyone who chooses either must love to type a *lot* :)
--
Thorbjørn
Note when doing ant I get the following:
+++
cc -fpic -DLINUX -D_REENTRANT -O1 -march=pentium3
-DIPv6_FUNCTION_SUPPORT -DHYX86 -DHYPORT_LIBRARY_DEFINE
-I../include -c -o hyvmem.o hyvmem.c
hyvmem.c: In function `hyvmem_reserve_memory':
hyvmem.c:311: `SHM_HUGETLB' undeclared (first use in
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Note when doing ant I get the following:
+++
cc -fpic -DLINUX -D_REENTRANT -O1 -march=pentium3
-DIPv6_FUNCTION_SUPPORT -DHYX86 -DHYPORT_LIBRARY_DEFINE
-I../include -c -o hyvmem.o hyvmem.c
hyvmem.c: In function `hyvmem_reserve_memory':
hyvmem.c:311:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Note when doing ant I get the following:
+++
cc -fpic -DLINUX -D_REENTRANT -O1 -march=pentium3
-DIPv6_FUNCTION_SUPPORT -DHYX86 -DHYPORT_LIBRARY_DEFINE
-I../include -c -o hyvmem.o hyvmem.c
hyvmem.c: In function `hyvmem_reserve_memory':
Hi Jean-Frederic,
It sounds like you do not have a compatible VM to run with (i.e. a VM that
implements the proposed interface to the class libraries). As mentioned by
Tim the other day you can obtain one from the IBM developerWorks site at
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/harmony
Hi Jean-Frederic,
My understanding is that while huge TLB pages support was new in the 2.6
kernel it was made available as a backport in the RHEL3 2.4 kernel. Not
sure if this also made it into the 2.4 kernel for SuSE 8.1. Might be
worthwhile checking the documentation for your distribution.
24 matches
Mail list logo
