for reviewing class library patches and helpful
discussions
On 11/16/06, Alexei Fedotov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library
unit
tests pass on DRLVM. Thank you all! It takes 44 days for the
great
team we
Alexei Fedotov wrote:
Folks,
According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library unit tests
pass on DRLVM. Thank you all! It takes 44 days for the great team we
are. Thanks for your thoughtful, diligent work and deep inspiration. Kudos
to you for the following (and not limited
Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
We have to evolving systems - classlib and DRLVM. To check commits to
classlib we need a stable DRLVM which can pass 100% of HUT. Otherwise it's
impossible to use DRLVM for pre-commit testing - you never know whether
your
test fail because of your patch or due to latest
2006/11/16, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
We have to evolving systems - classlib and DRLVM. To check commits to
classlib we need a stable DRLVM which can pass 100% of HUT. Otherwise it's
impossible to use DRLVM for pre-commit testing - you never know whether
your
, November 16, 2006 12:37 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [drlvm][unit] 100% of class library tests pass
Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
We have to evolving systems - classlib and DRLVM. To check commits to
classlib we need a stable DRLVM which can pass 100% of HUT. Otherwise
it's
: [drlvm][unit] 100% of class library tests pass
Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
We have to evolving systems - classlib and DRLVM. To check commits to
classlib we need a stable DRLVM which can pass 100% of HUT. Otherwise
it's
impossible to use DRLVM for pre-commit testing - you never know
whether
your
test
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 12:37 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [drlvm][unit] 100% of class library tests pass
Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
We have to evolving systems - classlib and DRLVM. To check commits
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Alexey Varlamov wrote:
2006/11/16, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
We have to evolving systems - classlib and DRLVM. To check commits to
classlib we need a stable DRLVM which can pass 100% of HUT. Otherwise it's
impossible to use
Egor Pasko wrote:
I am for (2) too. But a small correction: rollback is not always
reasonable. We can explicitly agree if we do rollback or fix ASAP (as
we did with TM and launcher).
Of course, thank you -- it is always better to fix it and move forward
when that can be done quickly rather
Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
Sorry to say but it actually does not work until there is no notifications
to the mailing list and no immediate reaction to the regressions.
I agree -- we need to be alerted to failures, and respond to them.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java
Alexei Fedotov wrote:
Folks,
According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library unit
tests
pass on DRLVM. Thank you all! It takes 44 days for the great team we
are.
Awesome!
--
Paulex Yang
China Software Development Lab
IBM
16 Nov 2006 17:15:14 +0600, Egor Pasko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On the 0x223 day of Apache Harmony Alexey Varlamov wrote:
2006/11/16, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
We have to evolving systems - classlib and DRLVM. To check commits to
classlib we need a stable DRLVM
100% of class library
unit
tests pass on DRLVM. Thank you all! It takes 44 days for the great
team we are. Thanks for your thoughtful, diligent work and deep
inspiration. Kudos to you for the following (and not limited to
this):
* Alexey Varlamov and Elena for driving the whole
Tim Ellison wrote:
Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
We have to evolving systems - classlib and DRLVM. To check commits to
classlib we need a stable DRLVM which can pass 100% of HUT. Otherwise it's
impossible to use DRLVM for pre-commit testing - you never know whether
your
test fail because of your
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
And I hope we will have other workloads running on Harmony nightly and
reporting regressions to the list.
Speaking of which, is there a J9 for x86_64 available?
If so, I could start getting a more complete testing scenario on the
server that runs gump
--
Stefano.
PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library
unit
tests pass on DRLVM. Thank you all! It takes 44 days for the great
team we are. Thanks for your thoughtful, diligent work and deep
inspiration. Kudos to you for the following
patches and helpful
discussions
On 11/16/06, Alexei Fedotov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library
unit
tests pass on DRLVM. Thank you all! It takes 44 days for the
great
team we are. Thanks for your thoughtful
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
And I hope we will have other workloads running on Harmony nightly and
reporting regressions to the list.
Speaking of which, is there a J9 for x86_64 available?
Nope, we have not put a Harmony VME up on Developerworks for x86_64.
And
: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 12:37 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [drlvm][unit] 100% of class library tests pass
Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
We have to evolving systems - classlib and DRLVM. To check commits to
classlib we need
results to http://harmonytest.org.
With best regards,
Alexei Fedotov,
Intel Java XML Engineering
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 12:37 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [drlvm][unit] 100% of class
3:05 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [drlvm][unit] 100% of class library tests pass
Alexei Fedotov wrote:
Pavel,
The life started showing that you were correct. Today there were no
report on http://harmonytest.org. Even if I would like to be a living
notification, I
Folks,
According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library unit tests
pass on DRLVM. Thank you all! It takes 44 days for the great team we
are. Thanks for your thoughtful, diligent work and deep inspiration. Kudos
to you for the following (and not limited to this):
* Alexey Varlamov
Oops, I've missed:
* Andrew Zhang for reviewing class library patches and helpful discussions
On 11/16/06, Alexei Fedotov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library unit tests
pass on DRLVM. Thank you all! It takes 44 days for the great
Alexei Fedotov wrote:
Folks,
According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library unit tests
pass on DRLVM.
Yay!
There are still open issues with reliability, multiprocessor and other
special configurations, so the page
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM
in our CI testing
framework.
geir
Alexei Fedotov wrote:
Oops, I've missed:
* Andrew Zhang for reviewing class library patches and helpful discussions
On 11/16/06, Alexei Fedotov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library unit
tests pass
Alexei Fedotov wrote:
Oops, I've missed:
* Andrew Zhang for reviewing class library patches and helpful
discussions
On 11/16/06, Alexei Fedotov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library unit
tests pass on DRLVM. Thank you all! It takes 44
://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library unit
tests pass on DRLVM. Thank you all! It takes 44 days for the great
team we are. Thanks for your thoughtful, diligent work and deep
inspiration. Kudos to you for the following (and not limited to this):
* Alexey Varlamov and Elena for driving
/06, Alexei Fedotov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library unit
tests pass on DRLVM. Thank you all! It takes 44 days for the great
team we are. Thanks for your thoughtful, diligent work and deep
inspiration. Kudos to you
and helpful
discussions
On 11/16/06, Alexei Fedotov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library unit
tests pass on DRLVM. Thank you all! It takes 44 days for the great
team we are. Thanks for your thoughtful, diligent work
29 matches
Mail list logo