Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-09-20 Thread Andrew Zhang
Patch uploaded, Harmony-1501. :-) On 9/19/06, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/19/06, Richard Liang wrote: On 9/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Andrew Zhang wrote: On 9/18/06, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/18/06, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-09-20 Thread Richard Liang
On 9/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sep 19, 2006, at 2:13 AM, Richard Liang wrote: On 9/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Zhang wrote: On 9/18/06, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you mean we will check the jetty jars into

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-09-20 Thread Richard Liang
On 9/19/06, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/19/06, Richard Liang wrote: On 9/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Andrew Zhang wrote: On 9/18/06, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/18/06, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, It's me again.

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-09-20 Thread Andrew Zhang
On 9/20/06, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/19/06, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/19/06, Richard Liang wrote: On 9/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Andrew Zhang wrote: On 9/18/06, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/18/06, Andrew Zhang

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-09-19 Thread Richard Liang
On 9/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Zhang wrote: On 9/18/06, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/18/06, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, It's me again. Seems no big progress on jetty. I'd like to take the job if no one objects. Here are

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-09-19 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Sep 19, 2006, at 2:13 AM, Richard Liang wrote: On 9/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Zhang wrote: On 9/18/06, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you mean we will check the jetty jars into Harmony svn? Yes. Is it OK? Or put the jar in depends folder?

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-09-19 Thread Stepan Mishura
On 9/19/06, Richard Liang wrote: On 9/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Andrew Zhang wrote: On 9/18/06, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/18/06, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, It's me again. Seems no big progress on jetty. I'd like to take the job if

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-09-18 Thread Andrew Zhang
Hi, It's me again. Seems no big progress on jetty. I'd like to take the job if no one objects. Here are my suggestions: 1. jetty version: I suggest that Harmony adopt jetty 6. Because many 5.xAPIs are deprecated in jetty 6, we'd better follow latest jetty version. 2. location to put jetty

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-09-18 Thread Richard Liang
On 9/18/06, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, It's me again. Seems no big progress on jetty. I'd like to take the job if no one objects. Here are my suggestions: Great :-) 1. jetty version: I suggest that Harmony adopt jetty 6. Because many 5.xAPIs are deprecated in jetty 6, we'd

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-09-18 Thread Andrew Zhang
On 9/18/06, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/18/06, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, It's me again. Seems no big progress on jetty. I'd like to take the job if no one objects. Here are my suggestions: Great :-) 1. jetty version: I suggest that Harmony adopt jetty 6.

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-09-18 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
Andrew Zhang wrote: On 9/18/06, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/18/06, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, It's me again. Seems no big progress on jetty. I'd like to take the job if no one objects. Here are my suggestions: Great :-) 1. jetty version: I suggest that

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-08-17 Thread Mikhail Loenko
2006/8/17, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Andrew Zhang wrote: Hi folks, I'd like to say something more about jetty integration. We should reach an agreement on how to integrate/use jetty in Harmony. There are some concerns I can image now: 1. Where to put jetty? support or luni

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-08-17 Thread Stepan Mishura
On 8/17/06, Andrew Zhang wrote: Hi folks, I'd like to say something more about jetty integration. We should reach an agreement on how to integrate/use jetty in Harmony. There are some concerns I can image now: 1. Where to put jetty? support or luni module or somewhere else? It depends on

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-08-17 Thread Andrew Zhang
On 8/17/06, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/17/06, Andrew Zhang wrote: Hi folks, I'd like to say something more about jetty integration. We should reach an agreement on how to integrate/use jetty in Harmony. There are some concerns I can image now: 1. Where to put jetty?

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-08-16 Thread Andrew Zhang
On 8/8/06, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes, jetty has kept that as a goal, while Tomcat has built out and expanded its options and configurations. jetty also doesn't implement any JSP logic, only http and servlet. creating a custom light-weight tomcat, may be more work than

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-08-16 Thread Mikhail Loenko
Might be related to this topic: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1186 [classlib][nio] unable to Http connect to Jetty server on Harmony Thanks, Mikhail 2006/8/16, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 8/8/06, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes, jetty has kept that

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-08-16 Thread Andrew Zhang
Hi folks, I'd like to say something more about jetty integration. We should reach an agreement on how to integrate/use jetty in Harmony. There are some concerns I can image now: 1. Where to put jetty? support or luni module or somewhere else? It depends on question 2. 2. How to use jetty? How

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-08-16 Thread Richard Liang
Andrew Zhang wrote: Hi folks, I'd like to say something more about jetty integration. We should reach an agreement on how to integrate/use jetty in Harmony. There are some concerns I can image now: 1. Where to put jetty? support or luni module or somewhere else? It depends on question

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-08-08 Thread Richard Liang
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: as a lurker, any reason for not choosing Tomcat, as it already is an ASF project? I'd be happy to help out with that effort, IMHO, we only need an embedded light-weighted server for unit testing purpose, which could be run in the same process of Harmony unit

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-08-08 Thread Andrew Zhang
Hi Filip, We want to use jetty to eliminate any external dependency, which means we do not need to start an external web server when we run Harmony test. Jetty is suitable for this job, while tomcat may not work. Furthermore, jetty is lightweight, and can be easily integrated to Harmony from

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-08-08 Thread Alexei Zakharov
Guys, Does somebody have numbers why Jetty is so light-weighted comparing to Tomcat? I believe Tomcat can also be executed directly from Java code. And a lot of stuff can also be removed from Tomcat - connectors, examples and so on. Am I wrong? Regards, 2006/8/8, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-08-08 Thread Mikhail Fursov
AFAIK embedding Tomcat is an easy task too. Examples: http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2002/04/03/tomcat.html?page=1 http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.0-doc/catalina/docs/api/org/apache/catalina/startup/Embedded.html but you have to add a lot of JAR files to make it work: -

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-08-08 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
yes, jetty has kept that as a goal, while Tomcat has built out and expanded its options and configurations. jetty also doesn't implement any JSP logic, only http and servlet. creating a custom light-weight tomcat, may be more work than needed, I can look into that. I'd be happy to look into

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-08-08 Thread Alexei Zakharov
Hi Andrew, It seems a big problem to me. :) I haven't find any solution yet. Futhurmore, ftp server also needs to be substituted. Do you have any suggestions? No! This is why I have asked you :) Have you heard about Apache FTP server [1]? Just found this in Google. It has the right words in

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-08-08 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Alexei Zakharov wrote: Hi Andrew, It seems a big problem to me. :) I haven't find any solution yet. Futhurmore, ftp server also needs to be substituted. Do you have any suggestions? No! This is why I have asked you :) Have you heard about Apache FTP server [1]? Just found this in Google.

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-08-07 Thread Andrew Zhang
Alexei, sorry for my late reply. It seems a big problem to me. :) I haven't find any solution yet. Futhurmore, ftp server also needs to be substituted. Do you have any suggestions? Anyway, let's start from http server -- jetty. :) Any committers would like to integrate jetty to Harmony? Thanks!

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-08-07 Thread Stepan Mishura
On 8/8/06, Andrew Zhang wrote: Alexei, sorry for my late reply. It seems a big problem to me. :) I haven't find any solution yet. Futhurmore, ftp server also needs to be substituted. Do you have any suggestions? Anyway, let's start from http server -- jetty. :) Any committers would like to

Re: [test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-08-07 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
as a lurker, any reason for not choosing Tomcat, as it already is an ASF project? I'd be happy to help out with that effort, Filip Andrew Zhang wrote: Alexei, sorry for my late reply. It seems a big problem to me. :) I haven't find any solution yet. Futhurmore, ftp server also needs to be

[test] Jetty integration progress ? (was Re: [classlib] jetty based tests)

2006-07-31 Thread Andrew Zhang
Hi folks, I volunteer to work on excluded tests in luni module, most of which are dependent on external servers(http server, socks proxy and etc.). As we discussed some months earlier, we'd integrate Jetty to Harmony test framework for eliminating external http server, but seems no more