Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-03 Thread Michael Ressen
implications of UDP on a kernel, and wasn't in any way trying to imply it has no effect. That effect however, isn't the cause of our problems. Michael Ressen, Michigan Burbs Network Administrator www.michiganburbs.com ---- > Subject: Re: [hlds_linu

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-03 Thread Michael Ressen
Network Administrator www.michiganburbs.com > From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jonas_Andr=E9n?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c > Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:48:00 +0200 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > just a q while

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c required CPU too high

2003-06-03 Thread Steven Hartland
ginal Message - From: "Britt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:34 AM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c > wow. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Jeremy Brooking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-03 Thread Britt
wow. - Original Message - From: "Jeremy Brooking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 6:14 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c > On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 14:49, Michael Ressen wrote: > > WHAT? Are you on glue? E

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-03 Thread Jeremy Brooking
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 14:49, Michael Ressen wrote: > WHAT? Are you on glue? Explain to me how micro$oft, let alone, > windoze has ANYTHING to do with this??? Did they just buy Valve? Or > did they covertly purchase (or steal) RFC-768 recently without my > knowledge (or bid)? So how (I can

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-03 Thread Michael Ressen
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c > Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 13:09:57 -0500 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Apperently more so than you do. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Michael Ressen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-03 Thread kama
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, [iso-8859-1] Jonas Andrén wrote: > just a q while you at valve ar compiling for different 486/686/AMD couldnt > you do a native FreeBSD port too? :) im not a programmer so it might be > harder than i think.. but i would be really happy if that could be done. > > And if you w

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-03 Thread Serpent
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:16 AM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c > One thing I've noticed here - someone always nows more and at least every > other person is wrong. The only inteligent person I've seen post here is > the developer of Pi

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-03 Thread Serpent
Obviously you have not tested the retail version then. Brad - Original Message - From: "Rick Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:49 AM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c > -- > > > > >One of the i

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-03 Thread Stefan Huszics
Rick Thompson wrote: -- One of the issues tho is that the commercial version can not connect to 3.1.1.0 servers. So we miss out on a lot of players. So then we want those players so we go with 3.1.1.1 and get high CPU usage. Kinda puts us between a rock and a hard spot without the knife to cut

RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-03 Thread Eric (Deacon)
> 7 new msgs in hlds_linux. > All from Britt. All pretty much worthless. We have a new Deacon. Hey, fuck you :P -- Eric (the Deacon remix) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftw

RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-02 Thread David Touitou
> With this latest release like it is, do you really think HL2 will be any > better? It will be worse if anything so you folks who host gameservers as > a mainstay had best come up with a plan to sell those high dollar gigs. Just a thought here... Take a (very) badly optimised dedicated server f

RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-02 Thread Eric (Deacon)
> > 20-30% increase in server CPU time shows they're trying > > to make the program stronger and faster - if you see less > > - then it'll be weaker... It takes power to show power and > > vice versa - thats what it has to do with it. Seriously, less CPU hogging means "the program will be weaker"?

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-02 Thread Oscar N aka Dreadful
woohoo(not), eric is awake ;) To bad you missed all the fun stuff, 3 or 4 has allready responded to the fun reading. On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 00:03:00 -0500 "Eric \(Deacon\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 20-30% increase in server CPU time shows they're trying > > to make the program stronger and fast

RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-02 Thread Eric (Deacon)
> 20-30% increase in server CPU time shows they're trying > to make the program stronger and faster - if you see less > - then it'll be weaker... It takes power to show power and > vice versa - thats what it has to do with it. Ok...what? My brain is having trouble wrapping itself around your asse

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-02 Thread Oscar N aka Dreadful
It would be nice to have the 3.1.1.0 + the flashbang bugfix, valve, please! ;) On Sun, 01 Jun 2003 23:56:14 -0500 Rick Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -- > Where have you guys been? It was immediately established that the first > 3.1.1.1 was a resource hog after it was released and none of

RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-02 Thread Rick Thompson
-- Where have you guys been? It was immediately established that the first 3.1.1.1 was a resource hog after it was released and none of the patches have done anything significant about it.Post after post after post on this list have been about people fighting the upgrade and then complaining about

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-02 Thread m0gely
Britt wrote: In the end - it all makes the difference. CPU / routing - all of it must work together... 20-30% increase in server CPU time shows they're trying to make the program stronger and faster - if you see less - then it'll be weaker... It takes power to show power and vice versa - thats w

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-02 Thread Jared Eischen
al Message - From: "Michael Ressen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 7:49 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c > WHAT? Are you on glue? Explain to me how micro$oft, let alone, > windoze has ANYTHING to do with this???

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-02 Thread Michael Ressen
or a listesrv, especially when you don't know what you're talking about. Ok, back to my little cave. Michael Ressen, Michigan Burbs Network Administrator www.michiganburbs.com > From: "Britt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re:

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-02 Thread Oscar N aka Dreadful
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 19:14:57 -0700 (PDT) "Mad Scientist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to the great words of Britt: > > In the end - it all makes the difference. CPU / routing - all of it > > must work together... 20-30% increase in server CPU time shows they're > > trying to make the p

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-02 Thread agenthh
Mad Scientist wrote: According to the great words of Britt: Be glad its free and ligthen up a little - alright? Free!! Interesting perspective. The servers are the infrastructure upon which the game is played. Without the servers, valve wouldn't sell the game. What is free is what we are doing fo

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-02 Thread SavannahLion
re working on it or doing something about it or something. Anything. A simple "Working on the problem" will do wonders. > Message: 7 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 14:56:41 EDT > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c > Reply-To: [EMAIL

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-02 Thread Mad Scientist
According to the great words of Britt: > In the end - it all makes the difference. CPU / routing - all of it > must work together... 20-30% increase in server CPU time shows they're > trying to make the program stronger and faster - if you see less - then > it'll be weaker... It takes power to s

Re: RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-02 Thread Mad Scientist
According to the great words of Britt: > Be glad its free and ligthen up a little - alright? Free!! Interesting perspective. The servers are the infrastructure upon which the game is played. Without the servers, valve wouldn't sell the game. What is free is what we are doing for valve. We are th

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-02 Thread Britt
hat it has to do with it. - Original Message - From: "Oscar N aka Dreadful" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:05 AM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c What does routing or network traffic has to do with what the first guy sai

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-02 Thread Oscar N aka Dreadful
company thats doing > this for free (lifetime) and people bitch and moan - while we profit off > their development by providing server space and bandwidth... consider us > lucky. > > Have a nice day. Beer is on the ice! > > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMA

Re: RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-02 Thread Britt
ff their development by providing server space and bandwidth... consider us lucky. Have a nice day. Beer is on the ice! - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 8:32 PM Subject: Re: RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c > I CAN&#x

Re: RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-02 Thread admin
id get a bit overworked when full, but it wasn't >bad. Now, I'd wonder if it could even handle 14 players. > >So at this time I can see no advantage to moving to 3.1.1.1 (or 4.1.1.1 >for win32) until such time that a benefit is revealed. > >Michael Ressen, >Michiga

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-01 Thread Nathan Dodd
ay 31, 2003 2:44 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c > > hmm, it seems more like a statement rather than a license :) > > The guy's retardedness drives me to drink :\ > > -- > Eric (the Deacon remix) > > ___ >

RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-01 Thread Eric (Deacon)
> hmm, it seems more like a statement rather than a license :) The guy's retardedness drives me to drink :\ -- Eric (the Deacon remix) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.co

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-01 Thread Oscar N aka Dreadful
Networks > www.VUGaming.com > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Eric (Deacon)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 11:44 AM > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c > > > > > Another mirror

RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-01 Thread Eric (Deacon)
> > > Another mirror link: > > > http://www.vugaming.com/pafiledb/pafiledb.php?action=license&id= > > > 1&file=18 > > > Nathan Dodd > > > VUGaming Networks > > > > What the... It says "You must agree to this license agreement to > > download HLDS Linux v3.1.1.1c", which is already very strange in

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-01 Thread Nathan Dodd
Do you not see the license? It is about 1 sentence right above the accept button. Nathan Dodd VUGaming Networks www.VUGaming.com - Original Message - From: "Eric (Deacon)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 11:44 AM Subject:

RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-06-01 Thread Eric (Deacon)
> Another mirror link: > http://www.vugaming.com/pafiledb/pafiledb.php?action=license&id= > 1&file=18 > > Nathan Dodd > VUGaming Networks > www.VUGaming.com What the... It says "You must agree to this license agreement to download HLDS Linux v3.1.1.1c", which is already very strange in and of its

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-05-31 Thread Nathan Dodd
y 31, 2003 2:06 AM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c > Thanks for getting onto this bug so quickly; fortunately it seems that not > many people found out about this one in our community (based on the fact > that most crashes due to the %n bug seemed to be accidental :) Just did a > q

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-05-31 Thread Marcelo Bezerra
Another one: http://cs.webcabo.com.br/~mosca/cs/ > Mirror link for the files: http://www.ausgamers.com/files/details/html/6576 > > -- david ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftwar

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-05-31 Thread David Harrison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Half-Life Dedicated Server Applications Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 3:14 PM Subject: [hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c > Beta binaries for 3111c have been posted to our ftp server: > ftp://hlserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ &

[hlds_linux] HLDS 3111c

2003-05-31 Thread Alfred Reynolds
Beta binaries for 3111c have been posted to our ftp server: ftp://hlserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ server: ftp.valvesoftware.com user: hlserver password: hlserver This is a LINUX only release at the moment. You can apply this patch over a 3.1.1.1, 3.1.1.1a or 3.1.1.1b server. The changes for this ver