You could also fetch the history of the object with Ctrl-h, then click
through on the changeset and leave a changeset comment.
Jo
2016-04-24 22:24 GMT+02:00 Michael Heißmeier :
> Hi,
>
> today I've been validating a lot on project 1836 and found the quality of
>
john whelan [mailto:jwhelan0...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2016 2:05 PM
To: Blake Girardot
Cc: hot@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [HOT] Mapping in Ecuador - validation
Yes but then you need a fair bit of knowledge of JOSM to know that and its a
lot easier just to put a @ sign with the comment
gt;>
>> From: nama.budhathoki [mailto:namabudhath...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2016 10:06 AM
>> To: Russell Deffner; 'Blake Girardot HOT/OSM'; 'John Whelan'; Megha
>> Shrestha
>>
>>
>> Cc: hot@openstreetmap.org
>> Subject: Re: [HOT] Ma
”
>>
>>
>>
>> Also, we’ve been at it over a week now; make sure to take breaks and if
>> you need ‘back-up’, let us know.
>>
>> =Russ
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* hyan...@gmail.com [mailto:hyan...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Sunday, April 24, 2016 11:
: Humberto Yances; john whelan; HOT
Subject: Re: [HOT] Mapping in Ecuador - validation
Greets Everyone on HOTOSM !
Am not a trained professional in this field.
Am just marking all the damage on Tomnod .
My heart is really saddened at all the damages buildings etc.
I do appreciate and respect
een at it over a week now; make sure to take breaks and if
> you need ‘back-up’, let us know.
>
> =Russ
>
>
>
> *From:* hyan...@gmail.com [mailto:hyan...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Sunday, April 24, 2016 11:57 AM
> *To:* john whelan
> *Cc:* HOT
>
> *Subject:* Re: [HOT]
Sunday, April 24, 2016 11:57 AM
To: john whelan
Cc: HOT
Subject: Re: [HOT] Mapping in Ecuador - validation
John,
I feel you are right with your point to coaching mappers, a way to do this is
through comments in the task. For lucky or common practice, must of Mapathons
has been carry out with st
ilto:namabudhath...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2016 10:06 AM
>> To: Russell Deffner; 'Blake Girardot HOT/OSM'; 'John Whelan'; Megha
>> Shrestha
>>
>>
>> Cc: hot@openstreetmap.org
>> Subject: Re: [HOT] Mapping in Ecuador - validation
>>
gt; *Cc:* hot@openstreetmap.org
> *Subject:* Re: [HOT] Mapping in Ecuador - validation
>
>
>
> Hi Russell,
>
>
>
> Megha and couple of others from KLL are already in Trello. They will be
> happy to contribute on validation.
>
>
>
> Nama
>
>
>
>
Thanks Nama, just trying to herd :)
=Russ
From: nama.budhathoki [mailto:namabudhath...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2016 10:06 AM
To: Russell Deffner; 'Blake Girardot HOT/OSM'; 'John Whelan'; Megha Shrestha
Cc: hot@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [HOT] Mapping in Ecuador - validation
'Blake Girardot HOT/OSM' <blake.girar...@hotosm.org>, 'John Whelan'
<jwhelan0...@gmail.com>
Cc: hot@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [HOT] Mapping in Ecuador - validation
Hi Blake and John,
I'll add to Humberto, we'll have a few staff in the HOT Indonesia office
(tonight/their morni
John, on this note,
For road networks and rivers its actually a lot better as some mappers only map
to the edge of the tile and the next mapper doesn't realise its important.
We actually added a feature to the TM to create ‘tiles’ with ‘complex
geometries’ for projects that don’t ‘fit in a
I've used the mass validation technique before and you can pick up a fair
chunk of stuff doing it plus it's faster than going through the tiles to
validate. For road networks and rivers its actually a lot better as some
mappers only map to the edge of the tile and the next mapper doesn't
realise
the validation problems that I have seen are with changes between versions
of imagery. It might be good against bing but not against the last images
post event. No automated process will pick that up.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Blake Girardot HOT/OSM <
blake.girar...@hotosm.org> wrote:
>
I am busy invalidating the tiles. the new imagery shows many changes to
bing. http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/1832#task/21 the offsets are off.
buildings are missing.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 1:51 PM, John Whelan wrote:
>
> I'm seeing projects archived fairly quickly
Hi Mike,
Really helpful insight on what is contributing to the issues, the
imagery change, we need to look at how to minimize that through better
instructions as well as validation folks need to be aware they should
be using all the available imagery when working.
Mass validation outside of the
? Then once we've identified who, we can
assign whats...
=Russ
-Original Message-
From: Blake Girardot HOT/OSM [mailto:blake.girar...@hotosm.org]
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2016 8:46 AM
To: John Whelan
Cc: hot@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [HOT] Mapping in Ecuador - validation
Hi John,
Given
Hi Humberto and John,
I really encourage you to look at ways of doing large scale validations.
One way I have done it in the past is to download the tasking manager
either project area, or even the individual task square outlines and
load them up in JOSM, then just do large scale validation of
Hi John,
Given that we are spending a lot of times on roads, getting road
networks correct is pretty vital.
Has anyone looked at using existing OSM tools, outside of the Tasking
Manager to do large scale road network validation?
The one that comes to mind is GeoFabrik's OSM Inspector:
Hello John,
2016-04-24 8:51 GMT-05:00 John Whelan :
>
> I'm seeing projects archived fairly quickly without validation.
>
>
A team of validators will start with this ones from tomorrow, with the
objective to review and validate all this squares.
> Of the validation I
I'm seeing projects archived fairly quickly without validation.
Of the validation I have done I've seen crossing ways and highways
almost meeting on a project that was supposed to be Highways only for
experienced JOSM users.
JOSM validation should have highlighted these errors before
21 matches
Mail list logo