Hi,
On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 13:55 -0800, JohnG wrote:
> Does Enblend use Control Points to help it place "Seams" ?
No.
Control points only affect geometric optimisation.
-James
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Hugin and other free panoramic software
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 13:37 -0300, Luís Henrique Camargo Quiroz wrote:
> Hi,
> I just started some translations, for brazilian Portuguese, and
> this
> forced me to (1) verify some things in the program and (2) try to
> figure
> out the best version/translation for some sentences.
>
>
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 23:39 -0500, Yuval Levy wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On December 11, 2010 11:48:22 am James Legg wrote:
> > This isn't working on my system. It would be a more user friendly not
> > working with the attached patch.
>
> you have access to the
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 10:12 -0500, Yuval Levy wrote:
> Enblend (properly compiled) has had GPU blending for longer than Hugin has
> had
> GPU remapping.
>
> enblend --gpu
This isn't working on my system. It would be a more user friendly not
working with the attached patch.
If both nona and enb
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 14:54 -0700, Jan Martin wrote:
> I have a .pto file and need to stitch it.
You can generate a makefile from a pto with pto2mk, then run make on
that to generate the same output as Hugin's "Stitch Now!" button. For
example:
pto2mk -o project.pto.mk -p project project.
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 19:01 -0400, Robert Krawitz wrote:
> With the current (or least past few days) Mercurial, if I open a
> project (or create a new one, open the control point table, and click
> on a control point, I get the following crash:
>
> ContractViolation:
> Precondition violation!
> B
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 03:32 -0700, T. Modes wrote:
> I know that this is a long wished feature. But we have Darkos overview
> branch which some massive changes to the fast preview window waiting
> to integrate. So it would be a better way to integrate the feature
> into this branch and not into def
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 15:58 -0700, Tduell wrote:
> Hullo All,
> I have just been testing the recent changes in the default branch (rev
> b6554a90d55), and am seeing slow display of images in both the fast
> preview window and the control points tab.
The images now show as a temporary place holder
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:07 +, Bruno Postle wrote:
> On Mon 01-Nov-2010 at 12:46 -0700, Thomas Modes wrote:
> >
> > I would like to keep the controls on the sticher tab. This allows
> > me to change some aspects without opening the preview window. If I
> > want only change a simple aspect, I
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 15:31 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
> the current Stitcher tab displays well on high resolution displays (e.g.
> 1920x1080) but a major drawback on the average notebook display (1366x768):
> it
> must be scrolled (although well designed, with the buttons fix).
I find I don't of
On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 19:15 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Judging from a similar issue
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=246675 it looks like the image
> triggers a common programming error. Mirroring
> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdegraphics/libs/libkexiv2/libkexiv2/kexiv2exif.cpp?r1=1
On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 10:02 +0100, Ognjen Bezanov wrote:
> On 23/10/10 03:17, James Legg wrote:
> > The attached bash script should stitch scan images.
> >
> Um, perhaps I'm blind, but I don't see any bash script attached
>
> Could have been stripped by a
On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 00:09 +0100, Ognjen Bezanov wrote:
> #>> pano_modify --center --fov=AUTO --canvas=AUTO --crop=AUTO
> --projection=0 -o project.pto ./project.pto
>
> Setting projection to Rectilinear
> Center panorama
> Fit panorama field of view to best size
> Setting field of view to 179 x
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 22:00 +0100, Ognjen Bezanov wrote:
> Never mind, I found out that I had to update hugin to 2010.2.0 in order
> to get it. Now I have a new issue.
>
> after setting projection to rectilinear, nona fails with "caught
> exception: std::bad_alloc"
>
> This seems to happen with o
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 08:12 -0400, Robert Krawitz wrote:
> 1) While fine tuning works well between the different exposures in
>each set, it works very poorly if at all between the images from
>different positions, probably because in some places the images are
>rotated almost 90 degrees
Hi,
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 00:09 +0100, Ognjen Bezanov wrote:
> I am trying to stitch together a poster that was scanned in sections.
>
> I was able to come up with the following
> commands to auto-stitch:
>
> autopano-sift-c --projection 0,10 project.pto ./*.tiff
> celeste_standalone -i proj
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 10:19 -0700, Mateusz wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Thanks for the fix, but I still don't understand:
> How 3x 4288x2488 pixel images end up with 960 giga pixels which is 960
> 000 000 000 pixels image.
>
> For me making a square from those 3 images: 3x width and 3x height =
> 12864
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 00:51 -0700, Mateusz wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> I haven't seen change yet, but can the warning (or maybe it already
> does) contain predicted output size and information what to do if this
> is not intentional ?
The warning is of this form:
Are you sure you want to stitc
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 14:18 -0700, Mateusz wrote:
> I think, that it should not use entire memory 12Gb at once.
> The algorithm should be aware that there are machine limitations and
> should not allocate all possible memory even if the size of canvas is
> absurdity.
> For me the correct behaviour
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 19:45 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> a question to the coding experts (meaning: everybody who knows what I don't
> know) out there.
>
> why are there two (different) definitions of rotate in the same namespace
> Panorama.h (around line 145 and 158)?
It is a functi
On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 23:33 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
> Almost a year ago I proposed a small change to how Hugin handles the caching
> of images [0]. It's a simple and dumb workaround and indeed in the ensuing
> discussion improvements such as the using of wxThreads were discussed.
> Even if it
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 19:10 +0200, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I pulled and upgraded my 2010.2 branch (in folder hugin-2010.2). Did a
> change and pushed it with "hg push ssh:///hgroot/hugin/hugin -b
> 2010.2" to specifiy the branch. So far so good (it seemed).
> I get a mail mentioning in
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 14:00 -0700, Alan wrote:
> Nick, thanks for the response...
>
> Yes, under the Images tab, each image shows a different shutter speed.
> And under the Exposure tab, each image has a different EV value.I've
> selected "Fused and blended panorama" (only) in the stitcher.
>
> I
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 18:09 -0700, sani...@ymail.com wrote:
> I am currently trying to put together a 360 degree pano for a virtual
> tour of a house. I am running into some troubles with strange and
> excessive distortions.
>
> I am using hugin, and I can seem to get my photos to line up in a
> s
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 05:53 -0600, Pete Holzmann wrote:
> The 50 image pano is sluggish. The 150 image pano is painful:
>
> - File Save or Save-As is horribly slow. Takes minutes of CPU; *NO DISK
> ACCESS.*
I tried saving a 33 image, 613 control point panorama with Valgrind's
callgrind. The mai
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 19:04 +0200, Jan Martin wrote:
> It can be done (with some difficulty). There is a small gap in
> the image I produced though, since neither image covers that
> area.
>
> Care to post the resulting image?
I've uploaded it to the google groups page:
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 16:59 +0200, Jan Martin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need your help with stitching these frames extracted from a YouTube
> video.
> There is nearly no overlapping.
>
> http://bit.ly/aEYOZD
>
> Can this be done at all?
It can be done (with some difficulty). There is a small gap i
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 16:34 +0200, Oskar Sander wrote:
> I've played with the layout mode (thanks to ZZ's builds), and must say
> that it is quickly progressing.
> a) It would be good if the connections also was hidden when the
> corresponding images are hidden.
Good suggestion. I didn't thin
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 23:36 -0700, tetsu yatsu wrote:
> In Hugin, I would use the Align... button first, before running the
> nona commands. Is there a step here that does alignment that I'm
> missing?
Yes. Autopano only generates control points. Use autooptimiser to set
the image positions.
Betw
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 14:45 -0700, sneike wrote:
> problem solved.. i had created an image which wasn't enough tall, so
> practically didn't cover the whole 180° vertical POV..
> i stitched it again more carefully, and now it's fine!
> one last question to james:
>
On Sun, 2010-05-23 at 12:30 -0700, sneike wrote:
> i can look for control points and align easily the photos, but the
> final process is really too heavy fom my Mac..
> can it help to give as inputs smaller images? now they are 36 jpeg
> images of 12Mpixels..
I'm in a similar situation: 12MP cam
On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 14:06 -0700, dex Otaku wrote:
> I can load one of my panos and hit "Calculate Optimum Size" on the
> stitcher tab, but the behavior is not consistent / as expected:
> * With the pano assembled of 8Mp images, it selects a size ~21,000
> pixels wide
> * With the pano assembled o
On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 18:55 +0200, GaaB wrote:
> I finally found out that the Vista Drivers of Ati were working under
> Windows 7 even if ATI is claiming that it is not supported by them.
>
> Updating gave my ATI X300 an OpenGL level of 2.1 - and the OpenGL
> Extension Viewer test runed fine (pr
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 13:36 +0200, Tomasz Nycz wrote:
> Windows crash report is here:
> http://www.ratownictwo.org.pl/docs/hugin_crash.zip
I get this error when trying to open it:
> Archive: /home/james/Desktop/hugin_crash.zip
> [/home/james/Desktop/hugin_crash.zip]
> End-of-central-directory
ions might not be supported.
The recent masking feature uses the Multitexture extension, so you need
a system which supports OpenGL 1.3, or the GL_ARB_multitexture
extension. This might not be available on older windows systems, but I
don't know for certain.
>
> I hope James Legg &qu
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 10:35 -0700, Hesham wrote:
> After optimizing a window, "Optimisation result" opens and reports the
> average control point distance. I wanted to see how this is computed,
> though I see how the mean is computed for all the control points in
> calcCtrlPntsErrorStats(), I could
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 15:37 -0700, Dezen wrote:
> I think it is not yet possible, some kind of a mask editor is under
> development right now.
Actually, you can use the mask editor right now if you can get (or make)
a recent trunk build of Hugin. On the mask tab you can make an include
region mask
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 16:55 +0100, Darko Makreshanski wrote:
> Darko Makreshanski wrote:
> > James Legg wrote:
> >>
> >> Have you thought about how the z-order of the images would work in the
> >> outside sphere view?
> >>
> >> The overlapp
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 13:24 +0100, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 26 March 2010 13:01, ToonSuperLove wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > My name is Sruit Angkavanitsuk, Thailand. I am in last semester on
> > MSc.Computer Science at Christ University, Bangalore, India. I have
> > read through
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 08:23 -0700, TcS wrote:
> I am T.Chandra Sekhar presently pursuing third year Information
> systems in BITS-Pilani goa campus.
Hello!
> I am interested in working on the
> project 'Threading for Hugin". I would like to implement threads for
> Image loading and also separate
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 00:57 +0100, Darko Makreshanski wrote:
> Yes, the equirectangular would be most suitable to convert to a 3D mesh.
> Basically I was thinking of projecting all of the images separately,
> each with its center as the center of projection. Then to convert each
> projection in
On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 22:44 +0100, Darko Makreshanski wrote:
> The 3D panosphere mode would have very little in common with the current
> projection mode. So it will not use the current projection techniques to
> display the result (rectilinear for inside and orthographic for outside
> look) but
On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 17:15 +0100, Darko Makreshanski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some ideas which I would like to present and get feedback of you
> for a project. It basically includes the "Zooming for Fast Preview" and
> other improvements to "Fast Preview"
>
> My ideas are mostly concerned for u
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 00:44 +0100, Darko Makreshanski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In short:
>
> I am a graduating bachelor CS student, I love photography, I have been
> using hugin for years, I want to join the hugin project, I want to apply
> for gsoc for the hugin project, you'll hear more from me
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 20:30 +, andy baxter wrote:
> andy baxter wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've just found a neat way to use enblend to make seamless tiles.
> >
> > All you need to do is:
> > - take an image you want to make seamless.
> > - crop it to a shape with an even number of pixels in bo
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 23:26 +, Bruno Postle wrote:
> I can admin this year, actually this suits me rather than doing the
> 'mentor' thing. I'll need help with wiki pages and the applications
> process which was overwhelming last year.
>
> --
> Bruno
I've started the SoC 2010 ideas wiki pa
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 22:10 -0800, icysubdweller wrote:
> My process currently looks like this: I set CPs, optimize alignment,
> twiddle CPs, optimize alignment, repeat, until errors are nice and
> low. Then I move on to the Exposure tab and optimize. Then I move on
> to the Stitcher tab... calc
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 13:02 -0800, T. Modes wrote:
> @Seb
> > One issue I found: if I include two times the same image, there is one
> > single mask for these two images.
>
> Only the fast preview is affected by this bug. The normal preview and
> the output should be ok. Until it is fixed use the
Sourceforge is blocking users from some countries from downloading
files[0]. Recently they added the an option for project admins to remove
the block on a project-by-project basis if it doesn't do encryption[1].
I don't think Hugin, Panorama tools, Enblend, Luminance HDR, etc do
encryption, so cou
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 01:01 -0800, bruno.postle wrote:
> On Feb 4, 12:25 am, Yuv wrote:
> > On Feb 1, 6:09 am, prokoudine wrote:
> >
> > > With all the current commitments I won't be able to do full
> > > administration this year (I can help with wiki stuff and with writing
> > > proposal text th
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 18:24 +0100, my_daily_...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> No, unfortunately, new build did not help. It still can not pass through
> the "Positions, View and Barrel (y,p,r,v,b)" optimization step.
> The strange thing is that it is only this particular panorama.
> I expected some develop
On Sat, 2010-01-02 at 23:16 +0100, Oskar Sander wrote:
> I have a need to zoom in in the preview window, especially when using
> the new layout view, but also sometimes when previewing a classical
> panorama with many images.
>
> Is this something already there that I have missed?
There is curren
On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 14:24 +, Doug wrote:
> On 30/12/09 14:54, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch 30 Dezember 2009 schrieb Doug:
> >> /home/dougb/downloads/hugin-2009.4.0/src/hugin1/hugin/GLPreviewFrame.cpp:18
> >> 1: error: ‘WX_GL_RGBA’ was not declared in this scope
> >>
> >
> > Here (
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 10:46 -0800, Steeve wrote:
> (1) Boost seems to have been increased to version 1.41.0, but the old
> version seems to work 1.39.0?
> I can't find a pre-compiled version of boost 1.41.0 for Windows, tried
> (http://www.boostpro.com/download)
I'm using boost 1.38, I don't think
On Sat, 2009-12-26 at 20:20 +0100, J. Schneider wrote:
> Could somebody point me out what exactly is meant by "excess" in
> "Calculate crop borders such that the final images has the largest area
> without excess"? Is it white space?
The "excess" is any area in the output not covered by an input
I have merged the gsoc2009_layout branch with trunk.
Please report any new bugs you find here:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=77506&atid=550441
A few are already known:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=77506&atid=550441&keyword=[layout]
The main new features are:
* Image
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 15:41 -0800, Yuv wrote:
> On Dec 18, 1:46 am, cspiel wrote:
> > The web pages at
> >http://enblend.sourceforge.net/
> > have not been updated yet. They are undergoing
> > a major overhaul regarding their appearance as
> > well as the content management behind them.
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 20:25 +, Bruno Postle wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who helped get 2009.4.0 out.
>
> The next steps I think are to branch the current trunk for the next
> 2010.0.0 release. These are the things that I can remember that
> need doing for this release, please add everything
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 13:47 +0100, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've troubles trying to buil svn 4789
>
>
> 1st, this warning:
> /usr/local/src/hugin/hugin-2009.5.0/src/hugin1/hugin/MainFrame.cpp: In
> member function ‘void MainFrame::LoadProjectFile(const wxString&)’:
> /usr/local
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 17:39 -0800, kevin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I normally do stitches of a large number of images (current one I'm
> working on has over 250+). One nice feature is that on the Assistant
> tab hugin will tell me what groups of images aren't connected
> together. However, it displays th
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 16:46 +, James Legg wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 01:17 -0800, bruno.postle wrote:
> > 1. The autocrop tool is currently launched by a button on the Stitcher
> > tab, this needs to move to the Fast Preview window button bar (there
> > is already an a
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 01:17 -0800, bruno.postle wrote:
> One other thing is that we have another branch with a very nice and
> functional 'autocrop' tool that should also go into the next stable
> release, but before we can merge this 'autocrop' branch needs a couple
> of minor things doing and I d
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 20:16 -0500, Brian Sullivan wrote:
> I am using Hugin Version 2009.2.0.4461 on Vista to process shots taken
> with a Peleng fisheye on a Nikon D50 using Nodal Ninja 2 jig.
>
> I am getting pretty good results using standard settings and auto
> alignment with Auto-SIFT-C. Some
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 20:28 -0700, Tom Sharpless wrote:
> Hi Lukas,
>
> On Oct 16, 9:19 am, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > 2009/10/16 Nicolas Pelletier :
> >
> > > "I think "a new Hugin" should provide only two direct stitching
> > > targets: cube faces and equirectangular, and let you co
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 20:23 +0200, Oskar Sander wrote:
> I have now tested with a bit bigger project, and get a very strange
> result, I need some help to see If I am doing something wrong, or it's
> a bug.
>
> Iseems like there are "phantom" CP's in optimization that stuffs up
> the result. The
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 19:02 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> 2009/10/11 James Legg :
> >
> > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:43 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> >> [hugin/src/hugin1/hugin/PreviewTool.h:36]: (error) Class PreviewTool
> >> which is inhe
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 16:43 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> [hugin/src/hugin1/hugin/PreviewTool.h:36]: (error) Class PreviewTool
> which is inherited by class PreviewIdentifyTool does not have a
> virtual destructor
>
> This one is not problem now since there doesn't seem to be any need
> for des
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 09:13 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
> On Fri 09-Oct-2009 at 02:49 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
> >
> >does this mean that it is unlikely that the accuracy of the Fast Preview
> >will be improved?
>
> I think it is very dependent on the graphics hardware.
There are a few constants
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 16:43 +0100, James Legg wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 23:57 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > One thing that bothers me about Hugin is how slow it is in opening the
> > fast (pun intended) preview. Start Hugin. Load a project. Click on
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 23:57 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> One thing that bothers me about Hugin is how slow it is in opening the
> fast (pun intended) preview. Start Hugin. Load a project. Click on the
> fast preview icon and wait. Wait. Starr at the status bar with the (not
> yet loc
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 18:14 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
> On Wed 30-Sep-2009 at 16:43 +0100, James Legg wrote:
> > There is a couple of bugs to fix before the layout
> > branch gets integrated with the trunk, which I should add the tracker:
I've added thes
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 16:25 +0200, Oskar Sander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I though I might test this one trough a bit more. (note one bug
> report in the tracker so far) a couple of Q.
>
> * Who are active developers in this track?
That should be me. There is a couple of bugs to fix before the layout
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 20:21 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Hugin-PTX has this great feeling about it. It is a unique mix of
> developers and users. In a single place we get creative artist's ideas
> and discussion; user support requests; and developers communication down
> to very tech
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 18:59 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
> Yuval Levy wrote:
> > yes, libpano12 is unmaintained legacy.
>
> I've cleaned up a lot of cruft. the patch is at
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/download.php?group_id=77506&atid=550441&file_id=342125&aid=2853853
>
> needs to be tested. al
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 14:53 -0300, Dalai Felinto wrote:
> @James:
> >You can specify the angle of each face on the images tab without control
> >points. Use the camera and lens tab to make sure the field of view of
> >your images is exactly 90 degrees, and all distortion parameters are 0.
>
> Won
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 16:43 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
> James Legg wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 09:54 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
> >> What is still missing for your branch to be ready for integration?
> >
> > The optimiser misbehaves with stacked images where the
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 09:54 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
> thanks, James.
>
> James Legg wrote:
> > You can do what you like to the assistant tab, the stitcher tab, and the
> > previews though.
>
> What is still missing for your branch to be ready for integration?
>
&
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 19:36 -0700, Dalai Felinto wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I've been using Blender for creating fisheye images and videos [1]
> [2]. My current method is to render 4 square images with a FOV of 90º
> and to use Blender nodes to stitch them [3]. Blender however is not
> accurate fo
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 19:56 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
> >> The big question is: aren't changes to this area of the code going to
> >> affect James' integration of the new panorama model? should we wait with
> >> the implementation until after he has integrated his work?
> >
> > I haven't touche
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 20:40 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I wanted to check out James' new addition. Am I the only one who get
> build errors?
>
> [ 83%] Building CXX object
> src/hugin1/hugin/CMakeFiles/hugin.dir/PreviewControlPointTool.cpp.o
> /home/yuv/src/hugin/src/hugin1/hugin/Pre
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 15:37 -0700, Steeve wrote:
> James Legg
>
> I've just built SVN4280 which includes this patch.. This is a really
> useful feature, and one I've wanted for sometime.
>
> However, the dots are so small (one pixel) I can barely see them, even
> w
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 00:51 +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote:
> Hey James,
>
> James Legg schreef:
> >> - Show the keypoints in the example window - 25 euro
> > I created a patch that might do what you want:
> > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 11:41 -0700, Essi wrote:
> Yesterday I built hugin 0.8.0 from source on Ubuntu 9.04 according to
> the instructions on panotools wiki. Every thing works as expected
> apart from the Fast Preview Window. The gui seems to have some sort of
> a bug that makes it to lose either t
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 12:15 -0700, Stefan de Konink wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know this e-mail has been send to you all way too late, I kind of
> refuse not to send it. I'm in a project that has a money grant till 28
> August. I would like to place some bounties for talks that must be
> finished before
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:02 -0700, Tduell wrote:
> Linking CXX executable celeste_standalone
> ../hugin_base/libhuginbase.so.0.0: undefined reference to `gluOrtho2D'
> ../hugin_base/libhuginbase.so.0.0: undefined reference to
> `gluErrorString'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
These function
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 00:48 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
> * if you're not interested in Hugin's development, you can stop reading now*
>
> Hello Hugin developers,
>
> I've been looking at our source code and I find that it can use some
> consistency / clean up. The current status is historically g
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 20:19 +0200, Cristian Marchi wrote:
> In the last week, in an attempt to learn to use inkscape, I've redone in
> svg format the hugin logo that is present in the splash screen. While
> doing that, I came up with an idea to remake the hugin icons; I've
> attached the result
2009/7/14 Klaus Foehl :
> On 13 July, 22:11, Bruno Postle wrote:
>> On Mon 13-Jul-2009 at 01:49 -0700, Klaus Foehl wrote:
>> >a) Drag works differently with rectilinear and cylindrical
>> >projections. With rectilinear I only get rotations, no shifting.
>>
>> That is a difference between the two
On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 17:08 -0700, Tom Sharpless wrote:
> Hi
>
> Ubuntu systems won't run OpenGL right until you install the necessary
> nVidia or ATI video drivers.
Yes they will.
I used to use Ubuntu on a machine with ATI graphics, and never installed
the binary drivers, since they were not
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 21:35 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
> On Fri 24-Apr-2009 at 13:30 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
> >
> >Random thought: how about a 'layout' mode in the fast preview window
> >that rearranges the photos to show the structure of the project.
>
> Following through with this idea,
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 22:16 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
> I think that in the case where the photographer has to fiddle with
> settings on their camera between shots, then they probably need to
> fiddle with their stitching software too - i.e you can't auto-detect
> this stuff.
Fair enough.
>
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 19:20 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
> Hi James, some thoughts on using EXIF data to structure panorama
> projects based on touching this stuff with panostart/match-n-shift:
>
> Identifying panoramas from timestamps. This isn't relevant to your
> project, but it is actually q
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 15:50 +0100, Peter Gawthrop wrote:
> -- Found Glew:
> OpenGL was not found, hugin disabled
> Any hints appreciated.
Can you check that the libglew-dev package is installed?
If you built wxWidgets yourself, instead of using the packages in the
universe repository, did you
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 02:13 +0100, James Legg wrote:
> Also with large projects, it is very unlikely that you can't see all the
> identified images' buttons highlighted. Before they would be mostly
> hidden, as the buttons had a scrollable box where only a few were
> visib
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 08:39 +0200, Guido Kohlmeyer wrote:
> Furthermore the identify feature in OpenGL preview won't work properly on
> Windows. The images are surrounded with a colored line but the buttons to
> enable the images are not colored accordingly. So far as I know this is a
> limitation
On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 15:26 +0200, J. Schneider wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I believe I remember when 0.7 was being worked on it was supposed to be
> a features release and 0.8 was supposed to be a UI release. Therefore
> some ideas were postponed that were UI improvements.
> During the discussion som
On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 15:43 -0500, Gerry Patterson wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Gerry Patterson
> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:05 PM, James Legg
> wrote:
>
>
>
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 11:33 -0500, Gerry Patterson wrote:
> Would it make sense to be allow control of the blending and fusing
> order for the output. When I was looking at this earlier, there were
> two areas that needed to know about the model you are discussing:
> optimization, and then later
Hello,
I'm going to be working on bringing a layout model to Hugin for GSoC
2009, mentored by Bruno Postle. When I'm finished, Hugin should be aware
of rows and stacks of images, and have a few new features which use this
knowledge.
I am writing to the list to get some ideas about what Hugin's u
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 09:27 -0700, r.e.wolff wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 20, 6:22 pm, "Bart.van.Andel" wrote:
> > My first thought about images rendered black was that somehow you are
> > (well, Hugin is) using a wrong value for the EV. Normally you can
> > tweak the EV value (in the preview window, fo
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
