Have you tried Panini-viewer? It does reprojections of single frames.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/pvqt/files/
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin
Side-note: renderable image size with Panini Viewer is limited to something
like the max. texture size of your GPU.
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hug
On Monday, 6 June 2016 03:48:30 UTC-5, Groogle wrote:
>
> On Monday, 6 June 2016 at 1:33:48 -0700, dex Otaku wrote:
> > On Sunday, 5 June 2016 02:22:23 UTC-5, Groogle wrote:
> >>
> >> I used to use SaladoPlayer for preparing and viewing 360° navigable
>
For what platform?
On Windows, tksharpless' Panini Viewer
[https://sourceforge.net/projects/pvqt/] still functions [tested on Win7,
8.x and 10].
On Sunday, 5 June 2016 02:22:23 UTC-5, Groogle wrote:
>
> I used to use SaladoPlayer for preparing and viewing 360° navigable
> panoramas, but after
Good advice:
On Tuesday, 6 October 2015 12:37:22 UTC-5, Cartola wrote:
>
> In a next time try also to fix camera settings manually and don't change
> them between shots, including WB. Maybe a simple philopod would give you
> less parallax.
>
>
It may be too late to apply to these shots, but sp
Thank you, Harry. These builds are very much appreciated. =)
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 11:49:25 UTC-5, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
>
> *Windows binaries* for the Hugin 2015.0.0 RC1 version are now available.
>
>
> These are 64bit Windows versions only.
> The python versions require a pre-installe
Note that I'm assuming you're using enblend. :)
On Sunday, 14 June 2015 03:29:15 UTC-5, dex Otaku wrote:
>
> Hi Christopher,
> You might improve this by using the --wrap option of enblend. Add --wrap
> to the enblend parameters on the stitch page in the main hugin window
Hi Christopher,
You might improve this by using the --wrap option of enblend. Add --wrap
to the enblend parameters on the stitch page in the main hugin window.
See also: panini-renderer; search for 'panini' on sourceforge. That tool
might let you rotate and rerender more easily*.
* can't re
Thank you [both]
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
Also: thank you very, very much.
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop r
On Sunday, 14 December 2014 17:23:46 UTC-6, Matthew Petroff wrote:
>
> If someone steps up to take over, I'd be happy to give him or her pointers.
>
>>
>>
Hi Matthew,
If you can come up with build instructions that are clearer than the
current wiki, I'd give making builds a try.
That's assuming
hi mac user,
my workflow is this: (noting i don't usually shoot hdr)
..do basic exposure editing to raw in lightroom
..export all frames into a subfolder as 16-bit tiff (colour profiles get passed
by the hugin chain) intermediates since hugin doesn't natively support raw
..do the work in hugin wit
Harry,
There isn't a x64 build there.
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
On Wednesday, 11 December 2013 08:30:14 UTC-6, ritt...@yahoo.de wrote:
>
> Trying to load tiff files for a project I get following note:
>
> *F:..._NIK5433.tif:wrong data type 7 for "RichTIFFIPTC*: tag ignored*
>
> Clicking o.k. takes me directly to the same box, so clicking again and
> again and
I get similar results with TIFFs generated by Lightroom sometimes. It
never seems to either slow things down or cause any actual problems for me,
though.
I assumed it was just nona or enblend complaining about extended metadata
that any part of the processing chain can't understand, like
Phot
Further info in case it may be of use:
I'm shooting raw with a Sony alpha 55 and a sigma 10-20mm @10mm for panos.
The camera is set to use the AdobeRGB profile. I usually use Lightroom
[4.x] to make 16-bit TIFFs of the images with some basic exposure
processing. Sometimes I use RawTherapee
On Monday, 7 October 2013 06:07:39 UTC-5, dkloi wrote:
>
> I've been trying to track down a problem with enblended images suffering a
> lack of contrast with respect to the remapped images. It seems that I am
> not the only one experiencing this problem and it is due to the CIECAM
> blending def
Try adding --no-ciecam to the options for enblend.
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from t
On Monday, 23 September 2013 04:12:40 UTC-5, dex Otaku wrote:
>
> I'm a bit surprised there are more people wondering about this
>
AREN'T. Heh. Surprised there *aren't* more people wondering about this.
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
h
On Saturday, 21 September 2013 16:58:20 UTC-5, Ronald Waterbury wrote:
>
> I’ve just installed Hugin and am trying my first stitch job. I went
> through the routine to stitch two jpeg photos but the final panoramic
> output has weird colors, almost as if it were shot at night with infrared,
> w
Thanks, Bruno. Happy to stand corrected - perhaps we can look forward to
these additions in the future.
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other
On Saturday, 22 June 2013 11:25:00 UTC-5, Hans Bull wrote:
>
> Another more or less related question: I'm getting the message on some
> images "Nona-GPU does not support the translation parameters. Switch to CPU
> calculation.". Is there any active development on this? It would be
> fantastic!
>
On Friday, 21 June 2013 10:54:54 UTC-5, zarl wrote:
>
> Newsgroups and mailing lists work that way. It's a mailing list, i.e.
> the browser interface is just one different way to read and write
> messages. So once you hit the Send button your message is out there...
Haha.. Yeah, I'm just no
EGAD - 32 becomes 36 [36 is the real number] .. I am having serious number
trouble today. I hope at least something in the above was clear enough
without my math-crippledness ruining it. :P
Am I the only one who finds it annoying that one can't edit posts here?
--
A list of frequently asked
Self-correction #2 now that I've had more coffee: 10k*5k*64-bit / 8
[for bytes] = 400MB .. 3.2GB is totally out to lunch [that's bits, not
bytes]. Sheesh.
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because yo
Self-correction: when I said 18*16Mp panos up there, I actually meant
32*16Mp [as in, a pano made up of 36 16Mp images, that's 3 rows of 12
images for a full 360*180 degrees] with at least 12k*6k output.
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hug
Monkey has a point in suggesting multiblend [at the sacrifice of some
accuracy] but the most positive performance improvement you can make is
additional RAM.
Over the past several years I've gone from using Hugin on a single-core
32-bit system [running XP] with 2GB to a quad-core AMD64 system [
On Monday, 29 April 2013 17:57:51 UTC-5, Robert Alatalo wrote:
>
> I wanted to try out the latest version ( 2013.0.beta1 ) but after it sets
> everything up, it crashes when I try to build the panoramic image.
> I uninstalled and installed latest 2012 windows 64 version and that
> worked, uninst
On Tuesday, 5 February 2013 02:58:07 UTC-6, MaTa wrote:
>
> Please I need you help. I always export my photos from Lighthoom as TIFF
> 16bits, LZW compressed at full resolution/size. It's the best way?
>
> I hope to keep these image quality (resolution/size and 16bits) at the
> entire process.
>
On Tuesday, 15 January 2013 14:04:59 UTC-6, Erik Krause wrote:
>
> Am 15.01.2013 10:21, schrieb paul womack:
> > For the vast majority of purposes, it's better, even on a CHDK equipped
> > P&S, to stay with JPEG.
>
> This might be true, especially since raw takes far longer to process.
> Howeve
Salut alouest,
On Thursday, 8 November 2012 14:01:32 UTC-6, alouest wrote:
>
> 'm using a sotware which can export RGB tiff and 32 bit tiff. I can
> produce panoramic with hugin of the RGB but not of the 32 bit tiff.
> If I extract both RGB and 32 bit tiff, then I create my panorama from the
> R
>
> This means that it only works with 8bit per channel RGB images with or
> without an alpha channel. So you can't use HDR or 16bit or greyscale images.
>
Autopano-sift-c works fine with 16bpc images [or at least, it has here, on
windows, for the past 4+ years]. The error is almost definitely
Hey all,
Just a suggestion for a pano viewer -
If all you need is a simple client for equirectangular or QTVR photos,
Panini viewer is a good option. VASTLY superior to any part of Quicktime
on Windows [I'm one of those people who uses the QTLite installer because I
have software that require
Thanks, Tom.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To
Update:
Thom has been in touch and I shall be posting a new Windows binary in the
next few weeks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.pa
[Quasi-cross-posted from the PVQT/Panini sourceforge project pages]
Hi there... hopefully tksharpless is still around somewhere and may be able
to reply.
I've used panini in the past but since getting a newer computer with newer
video card & drivers [ati/amd claim opengl 4 support] the
curren
I do this all the time - reorder images to force a particular area as
dominant while stitching - with Hugin on Windows.
The current version [2011.4, used last week in exactly this fashion] and
previous versions going back as far as whatever was current in 2004-5 [I
have done this with every v
Would Smartblend [which can deal with parallax reasonably well] not be
useful in this application?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.pano
On Sep 3, 9:28 pm, Yuval Levy wrote:
> Good luck and good bye
> Yuv
Yuv,
I've been following the Hugin list here for several years to watch
developments.
I'd just like to add my own sincere thanks for the work you've
contributed to Hugin. Your presence is sure to be missed.
Best of luck in you
On Jun 1, 10:04 pm, AKS-Gmail-IMAP wrote:
> It is "optimizer" not "optimiser". I know the tab had it this way for
> quite some time. I confess that I would say the word with an
> exaggerated Hollywood german accent when seeing the tab "Optimiser".
Hahaha! You do realise, though, that "optim
On Aug 16, 9:48 pm, "Pete Holzmann" wrote:
> I've just shifted to Win7Pro x64 and would love to test my 64 bit wings. Does
> anyone have a mostly-working build? :)
>
See
http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/browse_thread/thread/187584cdc65b202c/353e130666984f40
in this group
--
You receive
On Jun 29, 6:53 am, "Pete Holzmann" wrote:
>
> What I find:
> - In addition to the file re-read issue (hits every time preview runs)
> - There's another MAJOR slowness factor related to the control point
> "database"
>
> The 50 image pano is sluggish. The 150 image pano is painful:
>
> - File Sav
also,
* turning off/on [Comodo] antivirus et al has no effect
* moving hugin to another location has no effect
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http
On May 23, 5:17 am, Tom Glastonbury wrote:
> On 22/05/2010 11:11 PM, dex Otaku wrote:> Had no problems with your first
> posted binaries until the current,
> > Hugin-2010.1.0.645a8acc3d37-PreRelease-Win-x64-20100517, which has
> > this issue [here].
>
> Can you confir
On May 24, 4:00 pm, sneike wrote:
> so, here i am again..
> today i tried with the 64 bit version, using the same high res images
> as before..
> this time my Mac didn't completely freeze, but after one hour and half
> it was still running the enblend process loading the image 16 (of 36),
> and it
On May 22, 5:08 pm, James Legg wrote:
> If the only difference is the number of pixels in the frame, then more
> megapixels input should give more megapixels optimal size for output. It
> is supposed to scale to the pixel density of the centre of the output.
>
> Since you are using different camer
On May 22, 4:25 pm, Tom Glastonbury wrote:
> Which build exactly are you referring to? Are you saying that it didn't
> happen in one of my previous 64-bit builds? If so, which build did not
> have the problem?
Had no problems with your first posted binaries until the current,
Hugin-2010.1.0.645a
"Downscale final pano" is set to 100% in both cases, by the way.
Altering the setting has no effect whatsoever on the optimal size that
gets calculated.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequen
I work on a variety of panos made with different cameras, from 5Mp to
12Mp per frame.
My main work recently have been produced with one 8Mp camera and
another 10Mp camera.
I can load one of my panos and hit "Calculate Optimum Size" on the
stitcher tab, but the behavior is not consistent / as expe
On May 22, 12:44 pm, dex Otaku wrote:
> On May 22, 12:27 pm, dex Otaku wrote:
>
> > Suddenly experiencing totally bizarre behaviour since updating to
> > Tom's newest build -
>
> Argh. DISREGARD - combination of image cache setting [increasing it
> to ~256
On May 22, 12:27 pm, dex Otaku wrote:
> Suddenly experiencing totally bizarre behaviour since updating to
> Tom's newest build -
Argh. DISREGARD - combination of image cache setting [increasing it
to ~256MB helps] and antivirus software strangling things.
--
You received this mess
Suddenly experiencing totally bizarre behaviour since updating to
Tom's newest build -
For some reason everything within the Hugin interface is now taking
significantly longer to do.
* between basically all actions within the main interface, there are
delays from 10-25 seconds during which (Not Re
On May 18, 6:20 am, Tom Glastonbury wrote:
> Note that enblend/enfuse version 4.0 is what you'll get from my Windows
> 64-bit hugin builds. As you rightly say, it's not the 64-bit version -
> I'll work on that. As for your question - from reading some comments
> elsewhere, it looks like enblend/en
Hey all,
This may seem like a naïve non-developer question, but how much
utility is gained with Hugin being 64-bit when enblend/enfuse isn't?
The only problems I run into with Hugin currently are caused by
enblend running out of memory when trying to use --fine-mask [because
without it, banding o
On May 14, 6:25 am, Tom Glastonbury wrote:
> A number of people have asked to try out this build, so here it is:
Thanks, Tom. Trying it out here [on an Athlon II x4 w/4GB & Windows 7
x64] and everything appears to be good so far.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G
On May 12, 10:35 am, Tom Glastonbury wrote:
> I'm sure this would be of use to others, so I'd like to make it
> available. What should I do?
Hi Tom,
I can't advise anything in terms of putting the files up for download,
but I'd like to test your build if you don't mind. I'm also using
Hugin on
Captain Chaos wrote:
> My question is, is there a way to influence the stacking order of the
> photos? I want photo 2 to be behind *all* the other photos, so that as
> small a portion of the panorama as possible is out of focus. How can I
> do that? Are there other ways I can achieve the same effe
Thank you.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To u
I second the interest if not the programming skills.
I'm approximating a fairly uniform spherical shot-pattern manually
[usually ~48 shots] with a panosaurus head, and have been trying out
different P&S cameras.
The majority of my time making these is spent manually CP tuning to
compensate for a
> That should be this bug (more or less a problem inside of the mac-
> branch of
> wxwidgets):https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=550441&aid=2125481&;...
Thanks, jzander. Perhaps I should brave building it on my own.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You recei
Correction: same issue under Ubuntu 8.04 having compiled one of the
0.8.0 RCs a while back.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked q
> Strange, because it works for me - and I would imagine for other linux
> users as well, and I'm pretty sure for OS/X users too.
>
> Can you give more information about:
> * your linux distribution
Ubuntu 7.10, 8.04, 8.10, 9.04
> * your window manager
Both gnome and KDE
> * your international s
> Which shortcuts are you missing in Linux? I have several, so I would
> be glad to know which additional ones there are.
>
> F to finetune a control point pair
> A to add the pair
> G to generate "fixed" control points
> Del to delete a control point
> Ctrl T to optimize
> Ctrl S to save
>
I hav
I use Hugin frequently under Windows, OS/X and in linux.
I noticed the lack of keyboard shortcuts that exist in the Windows
version [all except the ones listed in the menus] some time ago with
0.7.0. Now I'm using 0.8.0 on the Mac at work and it still lacks the
shortcuts.
Am I missing something
Just a note -
dl'd and am running on XP SP3 with no issues thus far. Rendering
seems a lot faster than 0.7.0.
D
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A lis
Self-correction:
In the linux version, "D" is underlined on the Delete button, so alt+D
does work for delete, but no key [alt or not] is assigned to the fine
tune button.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
This may be a non-issue to many, but I switch back and forth between
Kubuntu [Hardy] and Windows XP on a regular basis, and pick up from
where I left off in Hugin regardless of which I had booted before.
This applies esp. to the control points screen in Hugin:
In Windows, 'f' is fine-tune, 'dele
Thanks Seb, reverting to 3.1 fixed the segfault. The advice was
appreciated, as I'm new to cvs.
On Sep 18, 4:16 am, "Seb Perez-D" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:10, dex Otaku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Exactly the sam
Exactly the same here, cvs from last night [2008-09-16 actually] on
Kubuntu Hardy. Compiled using a script modelled after most of
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_Compiling_Ubuntu 's steps.
On Sep 17, 11:50 am, Bob Bright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Same problem here (Ubuntu Hardy). Enblend ver
69 matches
Mail list logo
