Mmmm - might the whole service delivery organization.
I just ordered a single PTF (plus requisites) via SRD for delivery via
INET. Shipped notification came in in no time. Kicked off a batch ftp to
pick it up - timed out.
3 times.
Went and pulled it via http, and (SMP) received it. Just the one
Can anyone suggest a program to use to copy multiple sequential files at
a single point in time? I want to setup a test CA-7 environment and
most of its queues are flat files which may be GENER'ed. For aesthetic
reasons I would like to snap them all simultaneously. I think SyncSort
may offer mul
Twit! Once again answering my own question.
DFSMSdss supports the COPY operand for logical and physical copies.
That'll do, although I would still be interested if anyone has an alternative.
Dave
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signo
John
McKown, John wrote:
Bottom line: Why did the S/A IOCP allow me to create a 2086 IOCDS on a
2096 machine?
I presume you are referring to the SYSTEM keword on the ID statement, It
is probably ignored by SA iocp, as its only purpose is to allow machine
type verification of limit/options,
I lately submitted an RCF on a z/OS product concerning an
apparently incomplete description of its command syntax.
The reply contained the following sentence, apparently
from a developer addressed to a tech writer:
... I probably would not say anything about the
syntax rules that are follo
Has anyone else had their venerable internal reader proc go crazy under 1.7?
Ours gets JCL errors and doesn't pull the job to submit. Must be some more
holes that got close in this release. Here is what we use, which shows an
override error on IEFPROC.IEFRDER.
//*---
Don't forget the "PARALLEL" operand...
Twit! Once again answering my own question.
DFSMSdss supports the COPY operand for logical and physical copies.
That'll do, although I would still be interested if anyone has an
alternative.
It must be you.
It must be you.
Bill
From: "Thompson, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Double Postings
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:42:43 -0400
Is it me [our system], or is anyone else getting two of every posting?
Regards,
St
Probably needs to be something like:
//SYSUT1 DD DDNAME=IEFRDER
//IEFRDER DD DSN=&FILE(&MEM),DISP=SHR
On 6/5/07, Daniel McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone else had their venerable internal reader proc go crazy under 1.7?
Ours gets JCL errors and doesn't pull the job to submit. Mus
Paul
Try to find out which development lab is responsible for the product - if
you don't already know - and write a letter to the lab director - as if I
needed to tell you - indicating how ridiculous this response was.
I once got a response from a manager responsible for documentation having
We had a similar problem. If I remember correctly, JES2 for z/OS 1.7 has
changed its internal reader processing, in that when a data set contains ASA
control characters in column 1, JES2 no longer skips over these characters
when receiving the records in an internal reader, but treats them as p
Hey Gadi, I have been working with ESP since 1994. I have also worked for
the vendor (Cybermation) for 3 years and worked very closely with the
conversion teams. They do an exceptional job in identify all the necessary
pieces in making the conversion as seamless as possible. As always there
are
Daniel
Please also post the job log so we can see the error messages.
It takes me back many years but I'm sure your procedure is what I used to
do.
In any case, this worked for you in releases before 1.7 didn't it?
Chris Mason
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel McLaughlin" <[EMAIL
Here we go again ...
>If "USS" was "official" you would expect a massive number of hits.
Wayne (nor anyone else who has ever weighed in on this topic) never
claimed it was "official". Read his post... the word official was never used.
>Of course I have no doubt that the developers among thems
In a message dated 6/5/2007 2:15:15 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ordered it again just to make sure I had punched all the right radio
buttons.
All round, a pretty poor experience compared to the past.
>>
My suspicion is that they failed to address the tn3270 qu
Thank you...I guess that should have been obvious..I'll give it a try.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at h
Hello all, I have a question. Can a jcl job stream be submitted via an
FTP session? If yes, how? And are there any gotcha's?
Thanks in advance.
==
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity
t
Use this format after you issue the FTP command:
SITE FILETYPE=JES
PUT 'JCL.Dataset'
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ward, Mike S
Sent: Tuesday, Ju
Rich
This is still taking me back many years but I'm happy to say I appear -
according to the "MVS System Commands" manual - to have remembered
correctly.
The purpose of IEFRDER is to identify the, possibly and typically one of
many, DD-statement to which any relevant parameters specified on
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ward, Mike S
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 8:31 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Job Stream via FTP
>
>
>
>
> Hello all, I have a question. Can a jcl job stream be submitted via
All,
I reported a day or two ago about getting various S80A-10 abends in
batch on a newly upgraded 1.8 production system. IBM has identified the
offender as UA26500 which was applied/accepted as part of our base
serverpack. Evidently it freemains x'10' bytes less than it getmained
all below the
Chris,
You missed my point on this. 1 - As Mark Z. stated, I am not claiming
that USS is an "official" designation for z/OS UNIX, I am stating rather
that it should be usable in those places where it's meaning is clear. 2
- Mr. Metz, has repeatedly harped on how USS is NOT z/OS UNIX, and never
You were right Mark, the original OP never did post back.
From: Mark Zelden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 6/4/2007 2:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSTERM to DSN
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:41:27 -0400, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
<[EMAIL PROT
And, at the risk of once more violating O'Brien's Law, I suspect I was right
that it was the asynchronous responses from the HSM address space that was
the real problem.
From: "O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.E
Binyamin Dissen:
:>>There was/is also something called TSSO
:>last time I used TSSO, TPUT output went to the console
TPUT went to the console? I would be surprised.
Perhaps you meant PUTLINE?
About twenty years ago, there was also something called ConsoleMaster, but I
don't see it arou
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:31:04 -0500, Ward, Mike S wrote:
>
>Hello all, I have a question. Can a jcl job stream be submitted via an
>FTP session? If yes, how? And are there any gotcha's?
>
Code pages are frequently a "gotcha". I make it work best
with:
quote site sbdataconn=(IBM-1047,ISO8859-1)
Mark
Indeed, "here we go again". The last outbreak - as I remember - was about 6
months ago.
Indeed the word "official" wasn't used - but it was strongly implied.[1]
I would ask you to do me the honour of taking the trouble to read ***my***
post. I specifically said that I had no objection t
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:02:06 +0200, Chris Mason wrote:
>
>Try to find out which development lab is responsible for the product - if
>you don't already know - and write a letter to the lab director - as if I
>needed to tell you - indicating how ridiculous this response was.
>
Well, I chose to defer t
Mike
Some lecture notes - about a decade or more old now:
When the transfer mode is set to JES using the following subcommand
SITE FILETYPE=JES
jobs may be submitted.
While the "file type" is set to JES, the PUT subcommand causes the data set
to be interpreted as a job by the JES subsys
Thank you very much. I will do so in the future.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chris Mason
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 9:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Job Stream via FTP
Mike
Some lecture notes - about a decad
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:50:48 -0400 J R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>Binyamin Dissen:
:>>:>>There was/is also something called TSSO
:>>:>last time I used TSSO, TPUT output went to the console
:>>TPUT went to the console? I would be surprised.
:>>Perhaps you meant PUTLINE?
:>About twenty years a
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:15:18 +0200, Chris Mason wrote:
>
>SITE FILETYPE=JES
>
This appears to work from a Solaris client. However, from
Windows XP:
ftp> site filetype=jes
Invalid command.
And, ironically, from a z/OS client:
EZA1701I >>> SITE filetype=jes
502 SITE command not imp
That isn't TSSO.
I know.
Did it allow all TSO commands to run
Yes. It supported all SVC93/SVC94 functionality, so it did not matter what
commands the user was running.
From: Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: R
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J R
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 9:34 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Friday musings on the future of 3270 applications
>
>
> >That isn't TSSO.
>
> I know.
>
> >Did it all
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 19:26:53 -0500, Ed Gould wrote:
>
>Err IBM used to have a FDP product that did just that. I am not sure
>if they still market it or not. It was not designed specifically for
>this it was an hmmm designed to take almost any format file and
>create an 80 byte image enveloped inside
On Jun 5, 2007, at 8:48 AM, Jousma, David wrote:
All,
I reported a day or two ago about getting various S80A-10 abends in
batch on a newly upgraded 1.8 production system. IBM has
identified the
offender as UA26500 which was applied/accepted as part of our base
serverpack. Evidently it free
I believe it is Base Access Method Services
Dave Jousma
Principal Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Tues
Oh, man. Any chance of getting this to run as a UNIX command so that I
could use TSO ISPF from a UNIX shell instead of TSO?
I doubt it. It ran in a TSO address space.
In any case, it doesn't seem to exist any more.
From: "McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J R
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 9:58 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Friday musings on the future of 3270 applications
>
>
> >Oh, man. Any chance of getting this to run as
Has anyone noticed "strange results" when seaching the IBM PSP website? I
routinely check the site specifying a type of "Z/OS", catagory of "MVS
operating system", my level of Z/OS, and selecting "extract files only". In
the
last week or so I have been getting results that do not fit into my
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 07:29:25 +0200, Barbara Nitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-snip-
>I beg to differ with regard to the INTIDS and UNKNIDS attribute, though. Given
>that there is no way in hell to define it on a 1.6 system that runs mixed
with a
>1.8 system, it is wrong of console initialization cod
Paul
This is a specific instance of the general rule that, if an FTP client
doesn't understand the command you wish to send to the FTP server, you
should "quote" it, as it were.
From "IP User's Guide and Commands":
QUOte subcommand—Send an uninterpreted string of data
Purpose
Use the Q
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:58:07 -0400, J R wrote:
>>Oh, man. Any chance of getting this to run as a UNIX command so that I
>>could use TSO ISPF from a UNIX shell instead of TSO?
>
>I doubt it. It ran in a TSO address space.
>
>In any case, it doesn't seem to exist any more.
If you're talking about C
Chris Mason wrote:
[snip]
But then I read further and, because FTPPM didn't/doesn't allow the
JES output to be retrieved, that had to be done with the basic FTP
command. However, there's no mention of needing to use "quote" in
order to use the "site filetype=jes" command. Why, I wonder, has the
If you're talking about Console-Master from Xenos (www.xenos.com), it ran
as
a started task.
Yes, that was the "recovery mode" where JES was not available.
In non-recovery mode, you walked up to a console, entered "LOGON" and got a
genuine TSO address space.
From: Tom Marchant <[EMAIL PRO
If I restore UA26500 back to the base of HDZ1180, do you think that I will
be ok? I'm due to roll my first 1.8 into production on June 17th and I've
already restored 2 ptfs on my test system, and frankly, I'm thinking about
postponing my upgrade because of all the information that I've received o
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Darren Evans-Young
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 3:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Double Postings
That may be my fault. I've been trying to update the Listserv mailer and
the Windows se
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Thompson, Steve wrote:
>
>Any idea when this might end? I'm still getting two of every posting.
>
>Later,
>Steve Thompson
Yikes, you shouldnt still be getting doubles!
Email me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), not the list, a double posting
complete with the headers (Received: tags). I d
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Darren Evans-Young
>
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Thompson, Steve wrote:
>
> >
> >Any idea when this might end? I'm still getting two of every posting.
> >
> >Later,
> >Steve Thompson
>
> Yikes, you shouldnt still be gettin
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:49:23 -0400, Sharon Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If I restore UA26500 back to the base of HDZ1180, do you think that I will
>be ok? I'm due to roll my first 1.8 into production on June 17th and I've
>already restored 2 ptfs on my test system, and frankly, I'm thinking a
On Jun 5, 4:18 am, Captain Paralytic wrote:
> I have a file which contains a timestamp in the format:
> MMDDHHMMSSMM
> starting at position 27.
>
> Is it possible to have DFSORT remove records which are more than a
> month old where a month is defined as 28 days?
>
> If it is possible, can some
ESP is no longer Cybermation. It is now a CA product.
We feel that ESP is a superb product. We also feel that CA is trying
very had to put itself out of business and to divest itself of us as a
customer.
Just my personal opinion.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion Lis
On Tue, 29 May 2007 10:50:23 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>Ouch! Dynamically creating job steps seems utterly contrary to the
>JCL paradigm.
Indeed. One of several cases where the z/OS UNIX implementation has
unnecessarily broken existing paradigms. The surprise factor is often high.
What happe
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:28:42 +0100, Roy Hewitt wrote:
>You dont even need to create the IOCDS, remember the IOCDS is only ever
>used at POR time...so if PORs are hard to come by, then you can defer it
>until you really need to...
>
If you don't create and activate a new IOCDS with the IODF, I beli
This is a bit OT, but will you be running as a uniprocessor on the z9BC ?
On 6/4/07, McKown, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We recently converted our 2086 (z890) to a 2096 (z9BC) via a "suicide
swap".
--
For IBM-MAIN subscri
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen Gasior
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 12:54 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Interesting(?) observation - IOCP on a z9BC
>
>
> This is a bit OT, but will you be running as
On Jun 5, 2007, at 9:40 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
TSO TRANSMIT comes tantalizingly close to doing the central part
of this in that it creates LRECL=80 images of many file formats.
However, those can't be safely enveloped inside JCL because there's
no guarantee that the TRANSMIT output won't ha
Jim Savage wrote:
New to cryptography, I'm using IBM callable services CSNBENC and CSNBDEC
to encrypt/decrypt fields in SMS files. It seems I need to obtain a key
identifier by calling CSNBKGN and also specify an initialization vector to
encrypt. Are these two calling parameters 'keys' for th
Just curious: what policy ?
Why people sometimes provide a link to a presentation at share.org and
everyone can download the presentation.
My guesses:
a) There is no such policy. Presenations are available to public.
b) There is a policy, but people often break it, *and* sahre web service
does
New to cryptography, I'm using IBM callable services CSNBENC and CSNBDEC
to encrypt/decrypt fields in SMS files. It seems I need to obtain a key
identifier by calling CSNBKGN and also specify an initialization vector to
encrypt. Are these two calling parameters 'keys' for the encryption? Are
Sorry for posting here, but the CICS newsgroup keeps revoking me - something
about bouncing.
Anyway, we had a CICS region fail after 64 abends of the following. If anyone
could provide some guidance as to where to being that would be great. The only
SVC Dump is at the end when we cancelled C
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:21:35 -0500, Mark Zelden
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>Exactly... common usage and less keystrokes. So what is the
>problem in using it in a forum like this when everyone knows exactly
>what it means? Are all the net jargon abbreviations"official". Do we
>waste time
Jim Savage wrote:
New to cryptography, I'm using IBM callable services CSNBENC and CSNBDEC
to encrypt/decrypt fields in SMS files. It seems I need to obtain a key
identifier by calling CSNBKGN and also specify an initialization vector to
encrypt. Are these two calling parameters 'keys' for th
L.
A dump would be better than a guess, however DFHLUP is for LU services/
MRO. Perhaps you have a 24bit program trying accessing EDSA.
Do a CEMT I SYD
RESULT - OVERTYPE TO MODIFY
Sydumpcode(SR0001)check the AP0001 also
Sysdumping( Nosysdump )
Dumpscope( Local )
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
>
> Sorry for posting here, but the CICS newsgroup keeps revoking
> me - something about bouncing.
>
> Anyway, we had a CICS region fail after 64 abends of the
> following. If anyone could provide
While you're in an intolerant mood, rail at IBM for including these
checks in Health Checker:
USS_AUTOMOUNT_DELAY
USS_FILESYS_CONFIG
USS_MAXSOCKETS_MAXFILEPROC
Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
>You find our pedantry irritating.
Not usually. But occasionally. :-)I'm sure I've been guilty now and
then of being a little pedantic myself.
> (probably "we", but I can speak only
>for myself) find your misuse of USS irritating. So it's a draw.
>
For the record, I don't use USS for Uni
Lizette,
You have someone stepping on your CICS area (well you already knew
that). what you need is a SVC dump. I know of at least a few places
where a dump can be suppress. 1. with in CICS (CEMT S DU...), Abendaid
FX (or other dump reading product), DAE, or maybe you have a forgotten
SLIP suppres
L.
What he said PLUS check for AMODE/RMODE of any recent changes.
Bill
From: "Clark, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CICS Abends at startup AKEA
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:40:45 -0400
L.
A dump would be better than a gu
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 2:30 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: CICS Abends at startup AKEA
>
>
> Sorry for posting here, but the CICS newsgroup keeps revoking
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 2:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: USS pedantry (was Friday musings on the future of 3270
applications
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:21:35 -0500, Mark Z
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
>
>
>
> And in an ETR I had open with IBM, they [the TCP group] had
> to agree that using USS for Unix System Services was causing
> confusion when we also needed to discuss USS [VTAM] while
> disc
Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:21:35 -0500, Mark Zelden
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
Exactly... common usage and less keystrokes. So what is the
problem in using it in a forum like this when everyone knows exactly
what it means? Are all the net jargon abbreviations"official
Without a dump and IPCS we can all run our crystal balls only.
Most customer raise a PMR and deliver dumps to IBM support.
Well in these days a comon way.
Roland
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Tuesday
I agree with R.S. . After all, we don't want to become like that
political body in France (sorry, don't remember the name) which attempts
to MANDATE how the French speaking world will use words. IIRC, the have
"outlawed" many "words" such as Le Hamburger in favor of some long
involved phrase which
Who's the current "custodian"? I have a small contribution to make.
TIA,
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search th
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:56:45 -0500, Tony Harminc wrote:
>
>>Ouch! Dynamically creating job steps seems utterly contrary to the
>>JCL paradigm.
>
>Indeed. One of several cases where the z/OS UNIX implementation has
>unnecessarily broken existing paradigms. The surprise factor is often high.
>
"unnec
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:50:10 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>like).
>
>What client are you using, and what does it do with "quote stru r"?
>
>On Solaris 10, I readily get:
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:331$ uname -a
>SunOS solaris 5.10 Generic_118855-36 i86pc i386 i86pc
>
What a large p
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 4:02 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: BPXBATCH and DSNAME ENQs
>
>
> "unnecessarily" indeed. I would be overjoyed if exec() re
Kenneth E Tomiak wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:50:10 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
like).
What client are you using, and what does it do with "quote stru r"?
On Solaris 10, I readily get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:331$ uname -a
SunOS solaris 5.10 Generic_118855-36 i86pc i386 i
A peer of mine is caught in a bind.
He entered a command in the COMMAND field of the logon screen. The
command was one he cut and pasted from and email sent to him explaining
what to enter there. Unfortunately, the quotes around the
dataset(member) were MS word type quotes (forward and backword q
Current custodian is Helen Seren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Contact her directly
for submission criteria.
FIR
On 6/5/07, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Who's the current "custodian"? I have a small contribution to make.
TIA,
-jc-
--
A peer of mine is caught in a bind.
He entered a command in the COMMAND field of the logon screen. The
command was one he cut and pasted from and email sent to him explaining
what to enter there. Unfortunately, the quotes around the
dataset(member) were MS word type quotes (forward and backwor
Just because GOOGLE can find it does not mean you can view it without your
SHARE userid. And if you can, something is broken because you should need
to sign in.
It is also under Washington DC #2814. The session sometimes was sponsored
by two projects at the same time and so it has a 28xx and a
If you don't have some form of special, you cannot do it for another
user.
-Original Message-
From: George, William (DHS-ITSD) [mailto:snip]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 2:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: TSO LOGON Issue
Thanks Barry. I just tried it myself but received a RACF
Thanks Barry. I just tried it myself but received a RACF error.
I'll attempt to find someone that can issue this command.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Schwarz, Barry A
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 2:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@
Dave Kopischke wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:28:42 +0100, Roy Hewitt wrote:
You dont even need to create the IOCDS, remember the IOCDS is only ever
used at POR time...so if PORs are hard to come by, then you can defer it
until you really need to...
If you don't create and activate a new IOCDS
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:15:51 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
>
>> "unnecessarily" indeed. I would be overjoyed if exec() retained the
>> DDNAME allocations. It would be immensely useful to be able to do
>> fork(), then in the child a bunch of DYNALLOCs then an exec(), or
>> especially an execmvs().
>
>
>From two recent projects I am involved in, I have sent in close to 50
corrections in for three manuals. I have not received feedback on the 20 or so
emails, but they have been trickling back in. An email does not get the same
priority as a problem report. If you can code the command the way the
Have someone with system special issue
ALU user TSO(NOCOMMAND)
Possibly have the user logon through telnet or other non-3270 method and
issue the command himself. Not sure how much authority a user has over
his own account.
-Original Message-
From: George, William (DHS-ITSD) [ma
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:00:43 -0700, Neubert, Kevin (DIS) wrote:
>Just a guess... Determine the variable in question then remove it via
>ISPEXEC VERASE.
>
>From a batch job?
>From a linemode TSO session?
Catch 22?
>-Original Message-
>Behalf Of George, William (DHS-ITSD)
>Sent: Tuesday,
Kevin
It appears to be a RACF 'variable' of which I or the person in question
do not have auth to change. Looks like it is just a matter of finding
someone with RACF authority to fix this.
Thanks
Bill
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Beh
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/05/2007
at 07:50 AM, Daniel McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
>Has anyone else had their venerable internal reader proc go crazy
>under 1.7? Ours gets JCL errors and doesn't pull the job to submit.
>Must be some more holes that got close in this release. Here
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/04/2007
at 02:44 PM, Howard Brazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>My provider shows bit.listserv.ibm-main which contains a copy of this
>listserve.
IBM-MAIN is gated to bit.listserv.ibm-main, but articles in
bit.listserv.ibm-main are not gated to IBM-MAIN. If you want
Anyone know of any program that I could issue an operator display type command
and receive back the response?
Something like a vtam programmed operator but for system commands.
Harold Zbiegien
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signof
We are in the middle of implementing a virtual tape system. And one of the
goals is to dismantle our current TMM (tape mount management) system which is a
combination of SMS rules and HSM.
We want to recall all of our migrated files and write them to tape. The HSM
RECALL command will recall a
Just a guess... Determine the variable in question then remove it via
ISPEXEC VERASE.
Regards,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George, William (DHS-ITSD)
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 2:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Su
The logon screen is a VTAM display, not ISPF, so VERASE or anything
TSO-wise won't work. I think you need to contact your sysprogs. I
have no idea where that information is stored between logons and I
doubt you or your friend will have authority to mess with it.
At 06:04 PM 6/5/2007, George
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 18:25:13 -0400, Harold Zbiegien wrote:
>
>We want to recall all of our migrated files and write them to tape. The HSM
>RECALL command will recall a file to disk, but not to tape.
>
>Does any one have any tips or suggestions?
>
Where are they now? ML1? If so, wait until ML2 mo
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 18:29:12 -0400, Jim Harrison wrote:
>The logon screen is a VTAM display, not ISPF, so VERASE or anything
>TSO-wise won't work. I think you need to contact your sysprogs. I
>have no idea where that information is stored between logons and I
>doubt you or your friend will have a
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
