Chris Craddock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exceptions? Yes, there was a version of NT
> (3.something) that ran on the DEC ALPHA, but
> that was done by Microsoft themselves and it's
> long gone anyway.
There was also a PowerPC version that died
soon after Steve Jobs' return to Apple,
who ended t
Linux running in an LPAR (without z/VM) is perfectly viable and entirely
appropriate if you have relatively stable, predictable workloads that fit,
at least over the short to medium term, within "about 6 or fewer" Linux
instances.
However, if you think you need to install Linux in an LPAR without
To the original poster, what are these Windows servers running (what
middleware, applications, and/or services)? The answer to that question
will largely determine how well you can rationalize your now full data
center.
One major problem with Microsoft Windows is that it locks you into a
particul
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computer as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick O'Keefe) writes:
> At times like this I sorely miss my long lost APPN "Formats and Protocols"
> bible. I believe official sources claim t
On Jun 6, 2007, at 8:23 PM, Craddock, Chris wrote:
Ed G said
A reliable *RUMOR* several years ago said IBM (IIRC or was it AMDAHL)
had done it.
UTTER GARBAGE! AS IN NOT-FREAKIN-POSSIBLE.
CC
Chris:
I respect you but I got this from a excellent source (IBM type person
who has been a fri
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 06/06/2007
01:37:05 PM:
> How big is this processor trace table? From reading the PoOps, I deduce
> that it must be 4K, since a trace table exception interrupt is created
if the
> next available trace table entry address would be in the next higher 4K
o
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 06/06/2007
11:47:39 AM:
> When I change the size of the System Trace Table (i.e. TRACE ST,512K),
> where is the storage taken from?
The storage for trace buffers is mapped in virtual in 31-bit
storage in the TRACE address space. The real storage is 31-b
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 22:58:29 +0200, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>[1] Official sources will claim that the CP is a NAU separate from the LU.
>On examination, this can be seen to be an unnecessary complication.
>A CP is an LU which happens to use certain specific mode names such
>as
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:41:00 -0500, Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>To get around that, here is the version of BPXMTEXT that I use:
>
>/* REXX */
>Arg CODE
>"ALTLIB ACTIVATE APPL(EXEC) DA('SYS1.SBPXEXEC')"
>"%BPXMTEXT" CODE
>"ALTLIB DEACTIVATE APPL(EXEC)"
>...
I got it to work via
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:43:04 -0400, John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote:
>Craddock, Chris wrote:
>>
>> UTTER GARBAGE! AS IN NOT-FREAKIN-POSSIBLE.
>
>What is not possible, that it was IBM or Amdahl did it?
>
>Or that somebody ran Exchange under Wine under Linux on a zSeries mainframe?
Or that someone could
> What is not possible, that it was IBM or Amdahl did it?
Sorry, my rant was not clear. Operating systems in particular have
pretty significant dependencies on the instruction set architecture. It
is just impossible to run a Microsoft Windows operating system (binary)
on anything that isn't a fait
Craddock, Chris wrote:
Ed G said
A reliable *RUMOR* several years ago said IBM (IIRC or was it AMDAHL)
had done it.
UTTER GARBAGE! AS IN NOT-FREAKIN-POSSIBLE.
CC
What is not possible, that it was IBM or Amdahl did it?
Or that somebody ran Exchange under Wine under Linux on a zSeries
- Original Message -
From: "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: EZtrieve query
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/04/2007
at 09:18 AM, Howard Brazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
On 1 Jun 2007
I don't think that any single Intel based box out there today could
scale up to a few hundred virtual Windows boxes. I don;t know how many
virtual servers that VirtualPC can support. VMWare's ESX can now
support up to 128. So I don't think you you can get them all in a
single box.
You MIGH
Will try quote stru r tomorrow, along with combinations of quote rdw and
quote site recfm=vs to see if any work.
>On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:20:02 -0700, Jim Phoenix
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>STRU is not a valid SITE sub-command. Rather it is a command in it's
>own right. Use quote stru r, no
Not on my Windows/XP system. I get invalid parameters and invalid command.
What PC platform are you using? The FTp client that came with windows or
something else? How does using RECMF=U put a RECFM=VS file that IEBCOPY
can use again help? I tried those and IEBCOPY still complained the first rec
Ed G said
>
> A reliable *RUMOR* several years ago said IBM (IIRC or was it AMDAHL)
> had done it.
>
UTTER GARBAGE! AS IN NOT-FREAKIN-POSSIBLE.
CC
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
There are a multitude of vendor products that provide SOX compliant security
without using RACF, ACF2, TopSecret or other product. In those instances,
transaction security has been disabled because the product uses its own
internal security features and double authenticating serves no purpose. T
The answer is already stated below.
>On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 12:14:51 -0600, Howard Brazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On 5 Jun 2007 14:35:42 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>
>>Just because GOOGLE can find it does not mean you can view it without
your
>>SHARE userid. And if you can, some
On Jun 6, 2007, at 6:47 PM, John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote:
---SNIP-
zSeries mainframes can NOT run Windows. That I am aware of, IBM is
not even trying. They can run Linux and a LOT of server functions
that you would use Windows for you can also use Linux.
SNIP--
Dave Kopischke wrote:
I was reading a few weeks (or months) ago that someone actually did boot a
windows server under LINUX. I don't recall the article stating it was on a
zServer, but it might be possible. I doubt it would be reasonable from a
performance standpoint though.
Yes, it was d
We recently installed MQ v6 along with z/OS v1.7. After this
installation we started to see CPU usage creep in the MQ master of about
2% CPU per day on a 2096-107. The system started out using less than 1%
of the processor on May 20 and by May 31 it was
-
Why is this important?
I just lost my job for the second time in three years!
To me, you can call it what you want!
Arguing about the meaning of USS just shows you don't have the weight of the
world on your shoulders!
This forum is meant for much bet
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 19:47:25 -0400, John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote:
>zSeries mainframes can NOT run Windows. That I am aware of, IBM is not
>even trying. They can run Linux and a LOT of server functions that you
>would use Windows for you can also use Linux.
>
I was reading a few weeks (or months)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I realize that this has probably been asked before, but google didn't
give me an answer. Before I asked my question let me state that I
know that windows server 2003 and longhorn won't run on an IBM
mainframe. There is the endian issue and the ascii vs ebcidic
i
I'm hoping someone can help me out with a TSSO problem. I'm testing z/OS 1.8
and downloaded the latest TSSO source from Mar 07 that supports z/OS 1.8.
It's been reassembled and moved into my TSSO loadlib. Now whenever I enter
"TSO OSCMD any command", I receive
"OSCMD TERMINATING --> NO LINES WERE
- Original Message -
From: "Kopischke, David G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 12:50 PM
Subject: MAINFRAME CUSTOMER BASE SEEMS TO SHRINK
Here's an interesting SearchDataCenter interview of our friend and past
IBM-MAIN poster V
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chicklon, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 2:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: USS pedantry (was Friday musings on the future of 3270
applic ations
Ted, sorry to hear about the job los
On Jun 6, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Brian Peterson wrote:
-SNIP___
From this, I conclude the following Just like many areas of my IT
organization, problems which are not reported simply do not exist.
I'd be very
surprised if "noise" from IBM-MAIN had anything
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:56:16 -0500, Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>It sounds like what I was looking for the other day, but the link I had
>saved in my "favorites" was broken and didn't forward. This is what
>I used prior to converting over to ShopZseries for everything and
>then to SMP
Howard
If you are or were ever acquainted with SNA architecture, you will have
heard of the NAU, the generic term for the SSCP, the PU and the LU in
subarea architecture and solely the LU[1] in Low Entry Networking (LEN) and
APPN architecture.
In subarea architecture, NAU stands for "network
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:31:08 -0500, Staller, Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Try
>
>http://www.ibm.com/support/us/
>
>Rarely more the 15 minutes or so for up to 25 or 30 fixes.
>File is placed for browser or FTP retrieval.
>
>The Search panel supports keyword searches similar to IBM link.
>The o
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 16:31:19 -0400, Bob Rutledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>And it was a long time before it meandered into my thick skull that bpxmtext
>would work other than in the shell.
>
It depends. If you use LIBDEF to get to hlq.SBPXEXEC for ISHELL instead of
including it in your logon
Mark,
Try
http://www.ibm.com/support/us/
Rarely more the 15 minutes or so for up to 25 or 30 fixes.
File is placed for browser or FTP retrieval.
The Search panel supports keyword searches similar to IBM link.
The onlyt drawback I have found is that this service is 1 or 2 days
behind IBM link.
Mark Zelden wrote:
The rest of the answer is in the z/OS Unix Messages and Codes and comes
from R2 and R3 as also documented in the MVS codes for EC6.
R2=RC and R3=RSN.
Thanks for that--I missed it completely. (Note to self: Read *all* the words!)
The FM tells you what those mean, but
Steve
I find this argument compelling. USS for UNIX System Services is fine for
text discussion among humans when the context is clear but I can well
imagine it can flummox poor computers who like a simple life where a word
doesn't mean what the speaker chooses it to mean[1] but something more
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 14:10:23 -0500, Brian Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This is an excellent point. I've not heard any written or verbal statement
>regarding the service objective for RECEIVE ORDER processing. Personally, I
>feel the 120 minute timeout is reasonable.
>
>Brian
>
For "norma
Bruce,
In this case, I think he meant by "authority" that the userid was not in
a special userid filter list and that that filter list value is part of
a compound test when testing for the presence of an explicit storclas
specification. (wow, I typed a mouthful...LOL)
Bob Richards
-Origin
Bob,
We did check with IBM and found APAR PK40826 and PTF UK23542. The
specific "fix" specified didn't work for us so our MQ folks are still
talking with IBM support.
Yes, I have definitely used the LCS software and the SETMSUS process to
analyze and then remove the time periods where we're runn
You may not have authority to specify the StorClass.
I believe that a RACF violation on the Storclas name would result in an
allocation failure.
I believe that the only explanation is that his storclas ACS routine is
checking for an input storclas (one specified by the caller as he did)
and
In my shop I've coded...
- an SMS StorClass of 'NONSMS' to specifically NOT SMS manage a dataset
(if so desired).
- that only a known list of UserID's can alter the StorClass. In my
case, these are SMS admins.
- a dataset node position #3 of 'NONSMS' will cause the dataset to be
non-SMS managed.
Tom,
We put up MQ V6 late last year. I seem to remember this same problem
occurring, so you should get a hit on their PMR database.
Oh, and use LCS' WHATIF (SETMSUS) capability to remove the offending
time periods and specify customer MSUs on your SCRT reporting for MQ.
Bob Richards
-Ori
This is an excellent point. I've not heard any written or verbal statement
regarding the service objective for RECEIVE ORDER processing. Personally, I
feel the 120 minute timeout is reasonable.
Brian
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 13:40:29 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>But you (nor anyone else, particularl
I would speculate that CA's customer base is shrinking. They are loosing
the shops that are really aggressive about controlling costs and are
willing to drop a product if the vendor won't play ball on pricing.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Ted, sorry to hear about the job loss (this coming from another former
IBMer...).
And I couldn't agree with the rest of your response more. This topic is NOT
important!
In the grand scheme of things, who really cares? If this is our biggest
problem of the day and we have nothing better to do than
This entry from Dictionary.com would tend to suggest that they are all
initialism's:
in·i·tial·ism /ɪˈnɪʃəˌlɪzəm/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled
Pronunciation[i-nish-uh-liz-uhm] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. a name or term formed from the initial letters of a group
The fact that you code an "SMS" parameter, such as STORCLAS and DATACLAS
in this instance, does not mean that those values are used. The ACS
routines are still invoked. Depending on the code in each routine, the
specified value can honored or changed.
Determining why a set of input resulted in a
Since this thread started after I stopped working yesterday, I just read
all of the posts today from the sidelines. I have to say I am quite surprised
by all of the different (erroneous) responses / guesses as to what could
be done.
I am not surprised that there were at least 3 different subje
On 6 Jun 2007 11:10:52 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>* An initialism is a type of abbreviation pronounced one letter
>at a time. For instance, PGA, AARP, IOU, etc.
>
>* An acronym is a type of abbreviation that is pronounced as a
>word. For instance, SCUBA, LASER, PUS
Brian,
I do plan on opening problems in the future based on the information you
gave before. But my job I submitted late yesterday afternoon for
CONTENT(ALL) actually completed in about 90 minutes. This was a
surprise since yesterday was a "new RSU/PUT levels are now available"
email day -
If I using the following JCL to create a SMS dataset (explicitly but
not ACS
control) , the dataset allocated to non-sms volume.
IEBDGEXEC PGM=IEBDG
SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
OUT DD DSN=SSMD.TESTXX,DISP=(,CATLG),
UNIT=(SYSDA,2),STORCLAS=SC4G,DATACLAS=DC4G,
SPACE=(CYL,(2,10),RLSE),
Chris,
It may not be "official" and it might not be in the manuals often, but
"USS" can be found frequently in the texts of APARs and PTFs.
Here's a quote from OA18832, for example:
"Any further hints regarding predicting and interpreting
the BPXBATCH return codes should be added to this DOC
We recently installed MQ v6 along with z/OS v1.7. After this
installation we started to see CPU usage creep in the MQ master of about
2% CPU per day on a 2096-107. The system started out using less than 1%
of the processor on May 20 and by May 31 it was using 13% of the
processor. We are current
Since the initial command is in the RACF database and not the profile dataset,
this won't help much.
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Noal [mailto:snip]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 4:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:
If the user's TSO logon proc will allocate a new profile data
OK, just to put in my two cents worth. I've seen where there are
actually three types of abbreviations as follows.
* A basic abbreviation is pronounced like the full word it
represents. So 'St.' is pronounced 'Street' (or 'Saint'), 'Ct.' is
pronounced 'Court', and 'Mr.' is pronounced '
On 5 Jun 2007 14:35:42 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>Just because GOOGLE can find it does not mean you can view it without your
>SHARE userid. And if you can, something is broken because you should need
>to sign in.
How did Google view it without a SHARE ID?
-
Why is this important?
I just lost my job for the second time in three years!
To me, you can call it what you want!
Arguing about the meaning of USS just shows you don't have the weight of the
world on your shoulders!
This forum is meant for much better!
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
On 5 Jun 2007 17:49:48 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>If your cow had wheels she'd be a milk truck. The point is that not
>everybody knows what you means, because there are contexts in which
>you need to refer to both Unix System Services *and* to Unformatted
>System Services; what yo
Radoslaw
Oh no, again!
Please, look at www.acronymfinder.com and find what USS can mean. *25
results*. Not two, 25. It is possible for acronym to have multiple
meanings. So, it is not pedantry, it is wrong conviction, there the only
one proper meaning.
-
What nonsense! This exchange is ta
I opened a problem this morning regarding my RECEIVE ORDER timeout from
last night (against component 566894901) for the following failure:
GIM69147WSMP/E WAITED 120 MINUTES BUT ORDER ORD9 IS NOT
READY FOR DOWNLOAD FROM THE SERVER AT
ht
From Webster:
abbreviation: a shortened form of a written word or phrase used in place of
the whole
acronym: a word (as NATO, radar, or laser) formed from the initial letter or
letters of each of the successive parts or major parts of a compound term;
also : an abbreviation (as FBI) formed
In a message dated 6/6/2007 11:41:09 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>Schramm, Rob wrote:
>> When I change the size of the System Trace Table (i.e. TRACE ST,512K),
>> where is the storage taken from?
>Common Name: Master Trace Table Mapping Macro
Alas, the Ma
On 6 Jun 2007 10:15:27 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>
>I also agree with "S.Metz" that USS is an abreviation, not an acronym.
>:-)
I wonder - I guess for some of us, CICS is an abbreviation, for others
an acronym.(I never say "kicks").
--
According to IBM the storage is from the private area of the TRACE
address space.
I checked it after issuing the command and it is being taken from above
the 16 meg line private area.
-Rob Schramm
This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be
privileged. It
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
Master trace is distinct from system trace.
It can pretty much be mapped anywhere, as a CR points to the real address. One
hopes IBM was smart enough to map it to a subpool in some system address space
(rather than common).
--
Binyami
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:17:09 +0200, R.S.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...>What is *primary* meaning of USS acronym ? Well, it depends.
>For you and S.Metz it is always Unformatted System Services. ...
>
I also agree with "S.Metz" that USS is an abreviation, not an acronym.
:-)
Ok. I'll craw
>Should a user hit this rare problem, the most likely sequence of events is
>that the user will contact Technical Support for problem diagnosis and
>resolution, at which point involving a RACF SPECIAL user to perform the actual
>fix should at most be a minor additional delay.
GROUP SPECIAL sh
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 18:55:46 -0500, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
The default RACF behavior allows only a RACF SPECIAL user to issue the
ALU command to update a user profile. It is possible for ane
installation to explicitly grant users the authority to update specific
fields in th
borrowed snip from mr. fochtman.
We have an issue in one our project. The project is deveopled to see who
are using the system using the shared mainframe id.
scenario.
1. There are some users who logon to the mainframe using the sharedid
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:47:27 +0200, R.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Just curious: what policy ?
>
>Why people sometimes provide a link to a presentation at share.org and
>everyone can download the presentation.
>My guesses:
>a) There is no such policy. Presentations are available to public.
>b) Th
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 12:39:55 -0400 Mark Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
:>Schramm, Rob wrote:
:>> When I change the size of the System Trace Table (i.e. TRACE ST,512K),
:>> where is the storage taken from?
:> Common Name: Master Trace Table Mapping Macro
:> Macro ID:
Here's an interesting SearchDataCenter interview of our friend and past
IBM-MAIN poster Vincent Re of CA:
=
MAINFRAME GURU LOOKS ON AS CUSTOMER BASE SEEMS TO SHRINK
Mark Fontecchio, News Writer
In this Q&A, a CA software arc
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 10:14 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: mainframe acces using shared id
>
>
Schramm, Rob wrote:
When I change the size of the System Trace Table (i.e. TRACE ST,512K),
where is the storage taken from?
-Rob Schramm
Common Name: Master Trace Table Mapping Macro
Macro ID: IEEZB806
DSECT Name:
We have an issue in one our project. The project is deveopled to see who
are using the system using the shared mainframe id.
scenario.
1. There are some users who logon to the mainframe using the sharedid
and common password and do some
>
> We have discussed with this with the client, but client wants to use
the
> shared id's and need a workable solution to handle this.
>
Well, just make the 2nd login a "new" RACF (or pick your SAF) session.
In essence, this is every CICS login anyway. When the CESN screen
appears, you are run
Raj,
Since I am sure you aware that Best Practices say "Eliminate Share IDs",
however it seems that you still authenticate the users first, then log
them into the systems with this Shared Userid.
To fix you issue maybe one of these may work.
1. Have pool of shared ID and assign the SHARED ID
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 19:51:34 -0400, Lizette Koehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Okay, I hate UNIX abend codes. They just do not seem to parse easily. So
>would some kind soul help me understand this problem?
>
>+CEE0374C CONDITION=CEE3250C TOKEN=00040CB2 61C3C5C5 527
> WHILE RU
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rajeev Vasudevan
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 10:29 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: mainframe acces using shared id
>
>
> We have discussed with this with the client, but
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:29:16 -0700, Rajeev Vasudevan wrote:
>We have discussed with this with the client, but client wants to use the
>shared id's and need a workable solution to handle this.
So they have to log on with the shared password and then authenticate
themselves with their own logon ID a
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:29:16 -0700, Rajeev Vasudevan wrote:
>We have discussed with this with the client, but client wants to use the
>shared id's and need a workable solution to handle this.
>
Sometimes an ethical supplier needs simply to say, "No."
-- gil
--
When I change the size of the System Trace Table (i.e. TRACE ST,512K),
where is the storage taken from?
-Rob Schramm
This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be
privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you
receive this e-mail in er
We have discussed with this with the client, but client wants to use the shared
id's and need a workable solution to handle this.
Thanks,
Raj
"Rugen, Len" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All the problems here show why shared id's just shouldn't be allowed.
If the task can be done with indivi
Assembler - EMCS. Documented in Chapter 7 of MVS Programming:
Authorized Assembler Services Guide SA22-7608-09.
REXX - Check the SHARE Proceedings from Long Beach. There was a session
detailing the REXX instructions.
--
For IB
All the problems here show why shared id's just shouldn't be allowed.
If the task can be done with individual id's, create those and disable
the shared id.
The people you don't know about that used the shared id will call.
-
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:43:50 -0500, David Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Overall I've had real good luck with the process including performance.
>Then the last week or two I along with a couple of my peers have had
>RECEIVE jobs time out more than once. Anyone heard of any changes
>or problems o
>From horrid experience, I can recognize the 0F01C008 as a dubbing failure,
>most likely a security problem, such as the lack of an OMVS segment (the 44 in
>R1 supports this). As for finding the error codes, good luck. They are
>harder to find than facts in a political speech.
Jon
-Or
McKown, John wrote:
QUOTE STRU R
also works with RECFM=U. At least it does for me. But it is still
impossible to transfer load modules / program objects except from z/OS
to z/OS using the non standard z/OS ftp parameters.
The only thing missing is the directory info. If you relink the
transf
You might want to also check the code levels on the hardware in question.
"(IBM Mainframe Discussion List)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
06/06/2007 10:06 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: 3390B DASD IFCC
Hello,
We have an issue in one our project. The project is deveopled to see who are
using the system using the shared mainframe id.
scenario.
1. There are some users who logon to the mainframe using the sharedid and
common password and do some inquiry going to the cics region.
(Forgot subject in original entry.)
Hey Listers,
I am fairly new to Omegamon and its ZLPAR screen. Does anyone know how
to modify the auto-refresh rate for this screen? I have searched many
manuals, the net, etc. etc. What I do find either doesn't work or I am
using it incorrectly. Th
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
a couple recent items:
The death of single threaded development
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=519
Google Acquires Multicore Programming Startup PeakStream --
Multit
Hey Listers,
I am fairly new to Omegamon and its ZLPAR screen. Does anyone know how
to modify the auto-refresh rate for this screen? I have searched many
manuals, the net, etc. etc. What I do find either doesn't work or I am
using it incorrectly. That is the commond AUTO 15 SECONDS. Can
In a message dated 6/5/2007 10:55:00 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>I have not been able to find command descriptions for the CCW commands 4B,
A5, A6, or E7 when accessing DASD.
4B is Locate Record Extended. It is documented in the 3990 and 2105 Control
Unit R
Overall I've had real good luck with the process including performance.
Then the last week or two I along with a couple of my peers have had
RECEIVE jobs time out more than once. Anyone heard of any changes
or problems on IBM's end of things?
---
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 5:51 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: IEBCOPY Unloaded dataset to PC and back again...not
>
>
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Hi Folks,
There's something on the CBT Tape that may help you guys with the
problem of accurately sending files from one place to another. Check
out www.cbttape.org , CBT File 365. Here's the beginning of the blurb.
FILE 365 IS FROM RON MACRAE OF AMDAHL, UK. THIS FILE CONTAINS
A
SDSF REXX interface.
/* REXX */
"CONSOLE ACTIVATE"
"CONSPROF SOLDISPLAY(NO) SOLNUM(100)"
ADDRESS CONSOLE
"d a,l"
DISPMSG = ''
I forgot to add that if you use the OPER Command you may have to hit enter a
second time for TSO to bring the response back to your TSO session.
Lizette
> Well, you might try the TSO OPER command. Depending on your authority you
> can probably do quite a bit.
>
> When I get into OPER and issue
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Harold Zbiegien
>
> Anyone know of any program that I could issue an operator
> display type command and receive back the response?
>
> Something like a vtam programmed operator but for system commands.
SDSF?
-j
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
