On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:43:13 -0500 Knutson, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:If you have BMC Cross-System Image Manager (XIM) you will need to take action
to run it when you set ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO).
:The provided solution seems awkward to me. Don't you think an ISV authorized
tool should be able
Hi List,
Anyone out there can share the Incremental backup restore procedure for
HFS/zFS instead of Full Volume Backup ?
Thanks,
Niran Kamaksorn
THAI Airways INTL
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Blue Cloud?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071115/tc_nm/
ibm_cloud_dc_3;_ylt=AgFJHOwzBc3cj5DdxfAfDF4E1vAI
Watch the wrap.
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - IBM (IBM.N) is staking out a major new
source of business helping clients like banks or retailers manage
data centers on a par with Internet
We use HSM to backup the whole HFS dataset.
Incremental backup files within a HFS dataset, TSM is usable. We havn't
TSM, therefore I wrote a REXX-Script, to do this.
Is this what you want?
Albert
VERLAGSGRUPPE WELTBILD GMBH
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Augsburg
Handelsregister Augsburg HRB 6035
We are attempting (for the first time) to configure our HMC for remote access
and we are hitting connectivity issues. We have identified that the MTU size
being transmitted needs to be reduced but cannot find where we can do this
nor under which user.
Has anybody had a simular problem or aware
: IBM in big push to build data centers for clients
Blue Cloud?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071115/tc_nm/
ibm_cloud_dc_3;_ylt=AgFJHOwzBc3cj5DdxfAfDF4E1vAI
Watch the wrap.
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - IBM (IBM.N) is staking out a major new source
of business helping clients like banks or retailers
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:02:13 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
The ACCEPT updates the DLIBs from the SMPWRKx datasets.
The SMPWRKx data sets are temporary data sets.
The HFS is a
TARGET library, and is not needed for ACCEPT.
Correct.
--
Tom Marchant
-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 6:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IBM in big push to build data centers for clients
Blue Cloud?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071115/tc_nm
Hi
Is there anyone implement CICSPLEX in your shop, Any limitation when
implement the CICSPLEX.
Any comment will be appreciated
tommy
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:02:13 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
The ACCEPT updates the DLIBs from the SMPWRKx datasets.
The SMPWRKx data sets are temporary data sets.
Oops; I meant the SMPxTS (and
Hi,
we've finished our migration from 1.7 to 1.8 in our development sysplex and
we've seen a strange behaviour with JES2 checkpoint.
Our configuration is CKPT1 allocated in CF and CKPT2 in DASD and this strange
behaviour has been appeared in both CKPTs when all systems were migrated
to 1.8
Edward Jaffe wrote:
A PPT entry is technically the right way to handle this. It's the only
official mechanism for setting TCBPKF to other than x'80'.
Last millennium, I'm ashamed to admit, I worked for an ISV that
had key 8 hard-coded in some critical software. My boss wouldn't
let me fix
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:05:06 +0800, Tommy Tsui wrote:
Actually, I have problem when I re-uploading the same file to HOST, The
record format is VB and is not one by one after uploaded.
OK. Let's start with the details. What tool(s) did you use
for the download and upload? (I didn't ask; you
Gee. I haven't heard this in a while: My (fill in the blank) doesn't
work, so your mainframe must be broken.
I would not agree that the HMC need be modified. I would suggest that
your network folks do some reading on 'path discovery' and 'black hole
routers'.
There is an added bonus: such a
That was clever! (Didn't saw Your previous post.)
Will try and check if we could use this solution.
(There will be minimal problems with the owner if we
can guarantee that this will not cause them any problems.
Which it looks like.)
Thanks!!
Thomas
Hi All,
We are currently running z/OS 1.7 service level 0705 on 11 production
Lpars for different clients - not in a sysplex.
We just received the latest recommended and critical ptfs from Shop
zSeries - 0710.
The PTF's are a staggering 7524 in total. Our current fix strategy is to
just smp
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Gee. I haven't heard this in a while: My (fill in the blank)
doesn't work, so your mainframe must be broken.
My didjeridu doesn't work and our mainframe is up, so -your- mainframe
must be broken. :-)
Also, be sure that the site default is RDW or issue QUOTE SITE RDW so
the HOST side preserves the RDW.
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:05:06 +0800, Tommy Tsui wrote:
Actually, I have problem when I re-uploading the same file to HOST, The
record format is VB and is not one by
Meganen Naidoo - BCX - RO JHB wrote:
Hi All,
We are currently running z/OS 1.7 service level 0705 on 11 production
Lpars for different clients - not in a sysplex.
We just received the latest recommended and critical ptfs from Shop
zSeries - 0710.
The PTF's are a staggering 7524 in total.
On Nov 15, 2007, at 6:30 AM, Veilleux, Jon L wrote:
I hope they use IBMLINK as an example of their expertise!
Jon,
Do you really mean you hope they don't or am I missing something?
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:11:36 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:02:13 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
The ACCEPT updates the DLIBs from the SMPWRKx datasets.
The SMPWRKx data sets are
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:35:42 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:11:36 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:02:13 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
The ACCEPT updates the DLIBs
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:11:36 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:02:13 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
The ACCEPT updates the DLIBs from the SMPWRKx datasets.
The SMPWRKx data sets are
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:11:36 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:02:13 -0600, Chase, John
Are you maybe referring to that ISV we both worked at?
Gerhard Postpischil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/15/2007 9:03:39 AM
Last millennium, I'm ashamed to admit, I worked for an ISV that
had key 8 hard-coded in some critical software. My boss wouldn't
let me fix it, under the rule not to change
-Original Message-
From: Tommy Tsui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 1:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: REFM=VB Binary upload problem
Actually, I have problem when I re-uploading the same file to HOST, The
record format is VB and is not one by
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gerhard Postpischil
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 8:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: BMC Cross-System Image Manager (XIM) and user key CSA
Edward Jaffe wrote:
A PPT
Thomas,
Not that I like it but here's what works for me:
COPY DASACOMM
REPLACING DASACOMM-CBV1-ADDRBY ALOG-DASACOMM-CBV1-ADDR
DASACOMM-ACTION-CODE BY ALOG-DASACOMM-ACTION-CODE
DASACOMM-RETURN-CODE BY
Meganen,
I just applied maintenance to take us from z/OS 1.8 at RSU0704 to
RSU0710 + HIPER. It came to just about 900 PTFs. I wonder if you
received all the PUT maintenance available instead of just the recommend
RSU levels.
John
Confidentiality notice: The information included in this
Ed, don't you recognize Jon's sarcasm?
--
Russ Hardgrove / RACF Lvl2
IBM - z/OS Software Service
Dept. R8LA Bldg. 707 - 2/F19
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 845-435-3279
or 295-3279 (T/L)
On 14 Nov 2007 14:20:38 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Klein)
wrote:
If you have a current copymember called ABC with the following code:
01 Group1.
05 WS-Field1 Pic X.
05 WS-Field2 Pic 9.
You want programs that use COPY ABC. to continue to work as is but you
want to be
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:30:34 +0200, Meganen Naidoo - BCX - RO JHB
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We would like to know what strategy's other companies use to install
these system fixes. How often do you receive/apply system fixes...etc
100 companies, 100 different answers. Search the archives as
Howard,
Why do you think if everything starts with WS- that you wouldn't have a
problem. The whole issue is that the '85 Standard (and IBM Enterprise
COBOL) don't support partial word replacement.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On 14 Nov 2007 14:20:38 -0800,
On 15 Nov 2007 08:15:43 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Klein)
wrote:
Howard,
Why do you think if everything starts with WS- that you wouldn't have a
problem. The whole issue is that the '85 Standard (and IBM Enterprise
COBOL) don't support partial word replacement.
Sorry - got my compilers
If you download a VB dataset with:
bin
quote site rdw
then you will get binary data with IBM RDWs inlined.
then to upload:
bin
quote site rdw
quote site recfm=vb
On Nov 15, 2007 9:10 AM, Farley, Peter x23353 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tommy Tsui
Hi,
Anybody know a quick way to get the free REXX Alternate Library (RAL)
v1.4.0 in an SMP/E installable package? ShopzSeries lists only the
priced REXX Library (which includes the Alternate Library FMID).
Our currently-installed REXX Alternate Library v1.3.0 (FMID HWJ9133)
apparently was
On 15 Nov 2007 08:46:54 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kirk Wolf) wrote:
If you download a VB dataset with:
bin
quote site rdw
then you will get binary data with IBM RDWs inlined.
then to upload:
bin
quote site rdw
quote site recfm=vb
I just tried your suggestion, but my results weren't quite
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Chevalier
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 11:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: REFM=VB Binary upload problem
On 15 Nov 2007 08:46:54 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kirk
Have you tried rebooting your didjeridu? :-))
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 8:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Remote HMC Access setup
-Original Message-
So we just got the z/OS 1.8 Online Library collection on CD with our
software distribution. My engineer wants to store all the PDF out on a
documentation share we have, but I was telling him they should all be
online at the IBM Book Server library and why keep another copy. He was
thinking
McKown, John wrote:
FSVO works. Can something be said to be working if it contains the
possibility of a security breach or system outage? Just asking.
IOW - if I write code with no input validation, is that working code?
Is it working if the code abends or give incorrect results if
presented
Tommy,
you better post this in the CICS listserver
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe
http://www.listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=cics-lA=1
Roland
Hi
Is there anyone implement CICSPLEX in your shop, Any limitation when
implement the CICSPLEX.
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 14:21 -0600, Jeffrey Deaver wrote:
He was thinking that certain of the documents were
only available as license holders of certain product
features and therefore would not be on the book server.
At the Tampa SHARE, Gwen Dente mentioned that IBM had gotten rid of the
LY
On Nov 15, 2007, at 9:33 AM, Russell D Hardgrove wrote:
Ed, don't you recognize Jon's sarcasm?
---SNIP-
No. But I would have expected some emoticon to indicate it. If that
is what was meant, then I agree.
Ed
Jeffrey Deaver wrote:
So we just got the z/OS 1.8 Online Library collection on CD with our
software distribution. My engineer wants to store all the PDF out on a
documentation share we have, but I was telling him they should all be
online at the IBM Book Server library and why keep another
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:37:14 -0600
Chase, John wrote:
Anybody know a quick way to get the free REXX Alternate Library (RAL)
v1.4.0 in an SMP/E installable package?
Install (z/OS) 1.9 ???.
Marna said she had managed to include it in the ServerPac to save users (us
what do the installing)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shane
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:37:14 -0600
Chase, John wrote:
Anybody know a quick way to get the free REXX Alternate
Library (RAL)
v1.4.0 in an SMP/E installable package?
Install (z/OS) 1.9 ???.
Marna
During SMP/E mantenance a system fils CSF.SCSFMOD0 had a d37. I removed
the file from the PLEX and wanted to increase it's size. It appears the
LLA and XCFAS on the on the other LPAR's in the system have enque on the
name. How can I remove the enqueue so I can increase and copy the file.
Hal Merritt wrote:
Why should we convert? Why shouldn't we convert?
HFS is stabilized. All new enhancements appear in zFS only. It runs a
7734 of a lot faster too!
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
very good, we are running all zFS filesystems, have been running with zFS
filesystems since z/OS 1.6, converted all filesystems except for root under
1.6, and now at 1.8, we made the root a zFS too.
no more hfs in our shop.
give me zFS anyday
- Original Message -
From: Hal Merritt
I still waiting to hear/experience a positive thing about zFS files...
I find the coding of the options confusing and VERY error prone.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
What's the groups' feel for ZFS?
Why should we convert? Why shouldn't we convert?
Any gotcha's?
z/os.e 1.7.
Thanks!!
The very best of the season to you, yours, and theirs.
NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are
intended
our zfs filesystems are sms managed, and our cloning procedure had to change
very little when switching to zFS
- Original Message -
From: Lucymarie Ruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 6:48 PM
Subject:
Why shouldn't we convert?
No good reason not to, but IBM is making us take a step backward by
making zFS'es VSAM. That means we have to go back to having
SMS-managed, non-esoterically cataloged filesystems. Not good for those
folks who like to clone their filesystems just like any other
Huh?
My root filesystem is a zFS and it is *not* SMS managed.
Brian
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:48:08 -0700, Lucymarie Ruth wrote:
Why shouldn't we convert?
No good reason not to, but IBM is making us take a step backward by
making zFS'es VSAM. That means we have to go back to having
Gee. I haven't heard this in a while: My (fill in the blank)
doesn't work, so your mainframe must be broken.
My didjeridu doesn't work and our mainframe is up, so -your- mainframe
must be broken. :-)
My boomerang won't come back either.
IBM invests $5 million in ISU information technology program
By Michele Steinbacher
November 15, 2007
NORMAL — Illinois State University senior Joe Ksiazek is among those who
say IBM’s estimated $5 million investment in the campus’s information
technology program could open doors to more 21st
Timothy Sipples wrote:
IBM invests $5 million in ISU information technology program
By Michele Steinbacher
November 15, 2007
NORMAL — Illinois State University senior Joe Ksiazek is among those who
say IBM’s estimated $5 million investment in the campus’s information
technology program could
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 11/14/2007
at 10:49 PM, Jim Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The real issue here is that maintaining program properties in a
separate file (IEFSDPPT in Parmlib)
SCHEDxx, Shirley. And even if they're still zpping IEFSDPPT, it's not in
PARMLIB.
--
Shmuel
Hi:
I working with an account, where, believe it or not, they are currently
running z/OS V1.R4 in a basic sysplex. The first order of business is to
get them migrated to a supported level of z/OS, which is minimally V1R7.
Since V1R7 goes off support in September of next year (and they
Does anyone out there know of a reasonable way of successfully bypassing V1R7
and migrating to V1R8, when coming from V1R4?
There isn't one, unfortunately.
IBM only promises compatibility for N, N+1, N+2, N+3.
Where N is 1.4 and N+3 is 1.7.
There are control blocks, catalogues and other things
I've been trying really, really, really hard to
not insert my comments into this discussion, but
I'm not having any success. So, let me first
record the following disclaimer: all of what
follows is my opinion and my opinion only. I no
longer work at NIU, although I did teach Computer
I have to remote JES2 printers defined that I would like to delete is there a
way to delete the remote printers without doing a cold start on JES?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Hello to all.
I have a Problem with a Device on a CVC CHP.
I defined for that Device a new CHP so this device will the only one on this
CHP.
On the old CHP it goes online an works. After changing to the new CHP (only
switching the ESCON cable to the new 9034 it comes out with a HW failure.
I
64 matches
Mail list logo
